Conectar
To explore why and how staff use alarms for falls prevention in hospital and their alignment to person-centred practice.
Qualitative interpretive design.
One hundred focus groups and 25 interviews across 10 health services were completed between October 2022 and September 2024. Participants included nurses (n = 451), allied health (n = 82), and fall prevention managers (n = 18). The Framework Method guided initial data familiarisation and analysis and led to the Person-Centred Practice Framework being identified as a useful framework.
Themes generated: (1) Understaffed, under-resourced, under pressure, (2) Alarm impact on stress and workload, (3) Negotiating patient safety and patient preference, (4) Engaging family as a resource, (5) Sharing responsibility for alarms and falls prevention, and (6) Navigating ambiguity and fearing consequences.
Staff feel compelled to use alarms despite problems associated with their use and challenges to person-centred practice. Drivers of alarm use were feeling under-resourced and fearing liability if patients fell. Staff want clearer organisational guidance in alarm use but also want the freedom to use their own clinical reasoning.
Hospitals worldwide are working to identify effective strategies for preventing falls. However, research has yet to adequately explore the perspectives of frontline nurses and allied health staff regarding the use of mobilisation alarms—a critical gap when evaluating their impact and effectiveness. This study's six key themes provide insights into why alarms are so widely used despite the limited evidence supporting their effectiveness.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000823875.
To review current evidence on the implementation and impact of virtual nursing care in long-term aged care.
An integrative rapid literature review.
Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Ageline and Scopus.
The review included studies involving virtual care interventions provided by nurses (or by a multidisciplinary team including nurses) to older people in residential aged care that reported health outcomes or stakeholder experiences. Consistent with PRISMA guidelines, databases were systematically searched in July and August 2024, focusing on literature published since 2014. Studies were screened in Covidence by three team members, with conflicts resolved by additional reviewers. Studies not involving nurses or not set in aged care were excluded.
The search identified 13 studies, which included quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method approaches, conducted in both Australian and international settings, as well as in rural and metropolitan locations. Nurses were often involved as part of an existing virtual care programme, typically located in a hospital setting. The training and credentials of nurses delivering VN varied in terms of specialisation and advanced practice. The model of care in general was ad hoc, though in some cases there were regular, scheduled VN consultations. The time requirements for onsite staff and nurses were not well articulated in any of the studies, and information on the funding models used was also lacking.
There is some evidence that VN interventions in aged care may improve communication, enhance person-centred care and reduce emergency department presentations and hospitalisations.
Rigorous, ongoing evaluation of VN interventions is required to ensure their appropriate application in residential aged care.
FreshRSS 