Conectar
To determine the application rate of the preventive measures, alternate air anti-decubitus mattress and postural changes in patients who develop hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) on the basis of their preventive or reactive temporality.
This is an ambispective observational study that included adult patients without pressure injuries admitted to Mancha Centro Hospital (Spain) who developed at least one HAPI during hospitalisation (August 2022 to March 2023).
The main variables were the implementation of preventive measures and the time of their application. Other variables were comorbidities, sociodemographic and clinical variables, Braden and Barthel scale, variables related to the application of preventive measures and information to characterise HAPI.
180 patients who developed 276 HAPI during their admission were included; 73.9% of the patients received a risk assessment upon admission, and 53.9% were re-evaluated. At some point during admission, an anti-decubitus mattress was placed in 73.3% of the patients, and 76.1% received postural changes.
Among the patients at risk at the time of HAPI onset, 49.4% had received anti-decubitus mattress preventively, 23.9% had received it reactively, and 26.7% did not receive it. Among the patients without contraindication for postural changes, 51.4% received them before the lesions appeared, 33.6% received them after the lesions appeared, and 13.6% did not receive them.
We detected a significant association between the preventive application of anti-decubitus mattress and postural changes with the Braden reassessment; admission to the intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, nasogastric tube; mental state confused; hospital isolation; low Barthel and Braden scores; impaired mobility; inability to perform postural changes; diaper; urinary/faecal incontinence; and sedatives.
Only approximately half of the patients received preventive measures. Although patients with a more unfavourable clinical profile were more likely to receive these measures, increased awareness and training among healthcare professionals are necessary to ensure broader and more consistent implementation of preventive strategies.
This study explores the real-world use of preventive measures in hospitalized patients who develop HAPI. In half of the patients, these measures were applied reactively, highlighting the need to introduce strategies that facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices.
This study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for cross-sectional studies.
In the present study, data from patients have been obtained, but the patients or caregivers have not contributed to the development of the manuscript.
To examine how family caregivers of deceased nursing home residents scored and justified their ratings for each item on the Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care scale and to identify the consistencies and discrepancies between their perceptions and the scores assigned when assessing the residents' end-of-life experience.
A convergent mixed-methods design, comprising a cross-sectional study and a thematic analysis for quantitative and qualitative phases, respectively.
Quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously between May 2018 and February 2019. The two sets of data were analysed separately. For the quantitative component, family caregivers completed the quality of dying in long-term care scale and a single-item question assessing the final month of the residents' life. Descriptive statistics, Mann–Whitney U-tests for comparative analyses and Spearman's correlations were applied to the quantitative data, while deductive thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-nine family caregivers completed the QoD-LTC, and 11 participated in qualitative interviews. The mean overall QoD-LTC score was 39.29 (SD = 7.58). The highest-rated domain was ‘Personhood’ (M = 4.32; SD = 0.68), while the lowest was ‘Preparatory Tasks’ (M = 2.66; SD = 1.26). Interviewed family caregivers reported effective management of pain and other symptoms, satisfaction with the care provided and respectful and appropriate treatment. However, they identified significant shortcomings in communication concerning end-of-life issues, coping with death and advance care planning. Residents with cognitive impairment had significantly lower scores on the ‘closure’ (p < 0.01) and ‘preparatory tasks’ (p = 0.03) domains as well as on the overall QoD-LTC score (p = 0.01).
The findings demonstrate consistency between the quantitative and qualitative data, with high scores reported across most domains of the QoD-LTC scale, with the exception of the ‘Preparatory Tasks’ domain. Cognitive impairment among residents was associated with lower perceived quality of the dying process from the perspective of family members.
Aspects related to closure and preparatory tasks were often overlooked. Strategies to enhance end-of-life communication and advance care planning are needed.
The study adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (MMR-RHS) checklist for mixed-methods studies, the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines for qualitative studies were used for reporting.
No funding was received for the completion of this study.
FreshRSS 