Conectar
To explore the key factors influencing nurses' capability, opportunity and motivation to offer the choice for self-collection for cervical screening within rural primary care services, following a national policy change in Australia.
A qualitative study informed by implementation and behavioural change frameworks.
Primary health nurses working in Victoria were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews via video or telephone between December 2022 and March 2023. Eighteen nurses from 18 clinics participated. Interview data were analysed following a Framework analysis approach, and themes were mapped to the COM-B model.
Nurses were highly motivated to offer the choice for self-collection due to perceived advantages for their patients and potential opportunities for reaching people hesitant to screen. There was variation in how nurses offered this choice, and to whom. Some nurses were concerned about lost opportunities to visualise the vulval area or cervix, or to have broader health and wellbeing conversations with patients. Views were mixed about how self-collection would impact nurse roles, and several external factors were impacting their opportunities as cervical screening providers.
Appropriately trained nurses have the capability and motivation to incorporate the choice for self-collection within their screening practice; however, their opportunity to maximise equity and increase participation is impacted by funding models and structures that limit their autonomy.
People living outside major cities experience greater healthcare inequities. Australia introduced access to the choice for self-collection for all eligible individuals in 2022, in part to achieve greater equity in the national screening program. Nurses can play a key role in program delivery. Understanding how they incorporate self-collection into their practice, and the key factors influencing implementation in rural primary care settings, can inform future program implementation and improve outcomes for patients.
We have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To examine the historical origins of ‘advanced’ nursing as a concept.
Historical analysis using primary source documentation.
Historical analysis of articles published in the American Journal of Nursing by the National League of Nursing Education from 1928 to 1950, supplemented by books and articles addressing nursing specialisation history. Articles were analysed chronologically to trace terminology development and strategic decision-making processes during this foundational period.
‘Advanced’ terminology was first introduced in 1933 by Isabel Stewart to distinguish university-based clinical specialisation from exploitative hospital ‘postgraduate courses’. The term served as a strategic tool for legitimacy and professional differentiation. World War II accelerated development through federal funding and increased specialisation demands. Louise McManus provided the first conceptual framework in 1949, defining ‘advanced’ education as ‘planned forward movement’ requiring new learning experiences beyond basic preparation. Master's degree requirements were established in 1952, creating educational structures that persist today.
The strategic introduction of ‘advanced’ terminology in the 1930s established foundational concepts that continue to influence contemporary advanced practice nursing development internationally.
Understanding these historical origins enables more informed policy development for countries implementing advanced nursing roles and helps resolve ongoing definitional confusion in international nursing practice.
This research addresses the gap in historical understanding of advanced practice nursing terminology origins. Main findings reveal the strategic nature of professional language in nursing's professionalisation. The research impacts international nursing education policy and contemporary advanced nursing role development across diverse healthcare systems.
This study adhered to guidelines for historical research methodology.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This study aimed to explore the direct and indirect effects of secondary traumatic stress (STS) on nurses' perceived work ability and the effect of these two variables on job satisfaction, organisational turnover intention and intention to leave the nursing profession.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to November 2023.
Data were collected by sending an online survey to a convenience sample of nurses. Instruments for data collection included a 37-item questionnaire divided into three sections: (i) socio-demographics, job satisfaction, organisational turnover intention, and intention to leave the profession; (ii) perceived work ability assessed through the Work Ability Index (WAI); (iii) STS measured with the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale.
Two hundred seventy-one nurses completed the questionnaire. STS negatively and statistically impacted on WAI, and it was a direct determinant of intention to leave the nursing profession. WAI showed a direct, positive and significant impact on job satisfaction and it was a significant partial mediator in the relationship between STS and job satisfaction. Job satisfaction mediated between WAI, the intention to leave the nursing profession, and the organisational turnover intention.
STS negatively impacted nurses' work ability, influencing their job satisfaction through the mediation of WAI, whereas job satisfaction independently affected nurses' organisational turnover intention. Moreover, STS was a positive and direct determinant of the intention to leave the nursing profession.
Nurses, as helping professionals, are exposed to extreme stressful events resulting from the traumatic experiences of patients. STS in nurses can lead to emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, job dissatisfaction and reduced work ability. The findings from this study offer insights that can help shape organisational health policies aimed at reducing STS, preserving nurses' work ability, enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating turnover intentions within and outside the nursing profession.
This study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To co-produce a prototype intervention to help nurses improve the assessment and care of the sexual health needs of men with inflammatory bowel disease.
Inflammatory bowel disease can have a significant impact on the sexual health and well-being of men, but has largely been neglected in research and clinical guidelines. Men with the disease report that sexual health is not discussed during consultations, while healthcare practitioners describe a lack of confidence to initiate sexual health assessments. At present, no evidence-based tool exists to support nurses in detecting, assessing, and providing care for the sexual health of men with the disease.
A mixed-methods study shaped by phase 1 of the Medical Research Council's framework for the development of complex interventions.
(1) Cross-sectional surveys of (i) men with inflammatory bowel disease, (ii) nurses, and (iii) inflammatory bowel disease services to determine the current state of sexual health provision across the UK National Health Service. (2) Semi-structured interviews with men and the partners of men with IBD and asynchronous focus groups with health professionals to explore appropriate and acceptable ways to provide sexual healthcare. (3) Three consecutive co-production workshops inclusive of men with the disease, healthcare professionals, and stakeholders to formulate a prototype intervention.
This study will create an evidence-based prototype intervention that will provide nurses with the knowledge and skills required to effectively assess the sexual health needs of men with inflammatory bowel disease and provide appropriate, patient-centred care.
The study design was supported by a patient group. The study delivery will be supported by a patient co-investigator and stakeholder group inclusive of men with lived experience of the disease.
This report adheres to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist for standard protocol items for clinical trials.
clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06562751
To provide a structured analysis of the acceptability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation to support clinical conversations, decision making and recovery for older adults with aortic stenosis and their carers.
While transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an effective treatment for heart valve disease, its acceptability to patients and caregivers remains unclear. Understanding the acceptability of clinical procedures is key for influencing patient engagement in self-care and guiding the information and support patients and carers need.
A descriptive, qualitative study used deductive content analysis, guided by Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Participants included 18 aortic stenosis patients (mean age 84.2 ± 4.1 years) and 8 carers from three Australian metropolitan hospitals (2018–2020). Semi-structured interviews were conducted 4–6 months post–TAVI and transcribed verbatim. Analysis used Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability across three temporal zones, with deductive coding examining affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy.
Participants described high prospective, concurrent and retrospective acceptability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Perceived prospective acceptability framed the procedure as lifesaving. Peri-operatively, participants found the procedure simple, low-risk and minimally disruptive, ensuring high concurrent acceptability. Post-procedure, patient participants described a slow but gradual return to normal, growing confidence and a reengagement with their valued pastimes. The absence of structured rehabilitation advice led to self-designed recoveries and uncertainty about safe limits.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was perceived as a highly acceptable intervention that helped this group of mostly older adults achieve their personal goals.
Despite the minimally invasive nature of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, optimising recovery and rehabilitation requires a holistic approach that addresses both clinical needs and patient goals.
None in the conceptualisation or design.
To determine the application rate of the preventive measures, alternate air anti-decubitus mattress and postural changes in patients who develop hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) on the basis of their preventive or reactive temporality.
This is an ambispective observational study that included adult patients without pressure injuries admitted to Mancha Centro Hospital (Spain) who developed at least one HAPI during hospitalisation (August 2022 to March 2023).
The main variables were the implementation of preventive measures and the time of their application. Other variables were comorbidities, sociodemographic and clinical variables, Braden and Barthel scale, variables related to the application of preventive measures and information to characterise HAPI.
180 patients who developed 276 HAPI during their admission were included; 73.9% of the patients received a risk assessment upon admission, and 53.9% were re-evaluated. At some point during admission, an anti-decubitus mattress was placed in 73.3% of the patients, and 76.1% received postural changes.
Among the patients at risk at the time of HAPI onset, 49.4% had received anti-decubitus mattress preventively, 23.9% had received it reactively, and 26.7% did not receive it. Among the patients without contraindication for postural changes, 51.4% received them before the lesions appeared, 33.6% received them after the lesions appeared, and 13.6% did not receive them.
We detected a significant association between the preventive application of anti-decubitus mattress and postural changes with the Braden reassessment; admission to the intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, nasogastric tube; mental state confused; hospital isolation; low Barthel and Braden scores; impaired mobility; inability to perform postural changes; diaper; urinary/faecal incontinence; and sedatives.
Only approximately half of the patients received preventive measures. Although patients with a more unfavourable clinical profile were more likely to receive these measures, increased awareness and training among healthcare professionals are necessary to ensure broader and more consistent implementation of preventive strategies.
This study explores the real-world use of preventive measures in hospitalized patients who develop HAPI. In half of the patients, these measures were applied reactively, highlighting the need to introduce strategies that facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices.
This study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for cross-sectional studies.
In the present study, data from patients have been obtained, but the patients or caregivers have not contributed to the development of the manuscript.
To explore nursing professionals' perceptions of the intersectional positioning of their profession within healthcare and society, examining how axes of oppression shape healthcare responses and resource management.
A qualitative study framed in critical theory paradigm employing constructivist grounded theory, as outlined by Charmaz.
The study was conducted in Catalonia, Spain, between 2022 and 2023. A total of 26 nursing professionals participated, representing a range of professional roles and settings. Theoretical sampling guided participant recruitment and was saturated after 17 in-depth interviews and 2 thematic focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis, informed by Charmaz's approach, was applied to identify key dimensions and themes. Intersectionality theory was used as a critical analysis framework.
A predominant theme emerged from data identified as ‘intersectional disempowerment of nursing profession’. Four categories shape this positioning: (1) symbolic and historical undervaluation of care, rooted in nursing's feminization and patriarchal norms; (2) patriarchal influence on professional leadership, manifested by men disproportionately occupy leadership roles, reinforcing vertical segregation; (3) intra-professional hierarchies and technocratic influence, forcing prestige disparities within nursing and promoting horizontal segregation; and (4) internalised barriers among nurses regarding professional prestige, authority and recognition which combined undermine nursing's visibility, legitimacy and influence within healthcare.
Nursing cannot be understood as a neutral profession. Its societal positioning is deeply shaped by structural inequities, gendered assumptions and entrenched hierarchies, which collectively undermine its potential for autonomy and recognition.
This study highlights the need to challenge intersectional hierarchies in nursing, promoting equitable recognition, policy reforms and leadership opportunities to enhance nurses' authority, visibility and professional empowerment within healthcare systems. Addressing these challenges requires systemic policy reforms and a critical re-evaluation of societal perceptions. What problem did the study address? Nursing's social image is strongly shaped by biomedical, technocratic and social views. The gap between nursing's public image and identity limits professional growth and recognition. Analysing how power relations intersect in nursing's social position is essential. What were the main findings? Nursing's role is shaped by the intersection of gender, prestige, socioeconomic status and social recognition. Nurses' empowerment must be tied to transforming unjust institutions and systemic structures. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study provides a critical analysis of the intersectional positioning of the nursing profession. The findings have implications at multiple levels: micro, by offering nurses a critical perspective on their professional positionality; meso, by providing healthcare managers with insights into the underlying factors contributing to nursing's undervaluation; and macro, by fostering reflection within the broader healthcare community on the power dynamics shaping interprofessional relationships.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
The manuscript is based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
To review the qualitative literature regarding how people with fibromyalgia experience and are impacted by stigma.
A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies was conducted following the Thomas and Harden method.
The electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase and Scopus were queried (September 2023). No publication year limit was set. Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. The findings were reported according to the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement.
Three main themes with 11 sub-themes were identified: manifestations and roots of stigma, avoidance and coping strategies, and consequences of stigma. Stigma arises from disbelief due to the invisibility of symptoms, protracted time to diagnosis and gender stereotyping, especially against women. Various strategies to avoid or cope with prejudice may involve social isolation, hiding the disease, controlling information, getting closer to or further away from other patients, acknowledging and understanding the disease. Stigmatisation can diminish a person's integrity and dignity, undermine trust in health care professionals and worsen suffering.
The metasynthesis findings align with previous research highlighting the pervasive stigma associated with chronic pain conditions. Greater awareness of the impact of disease-related stigma on individuals with fibromyalgia is crucial, not only among health care professionals but also within broader societal and institutional contexts.
Understanding the stigma experienced by individuals with fibromyalgia can guide health care professionals in adopting more empathtic approaches, potentially improving the diagnostic process and the overall management of the condition.
This study highlights the profound impact of stigma on individuals with fibromyalgia, emphasising the need for greater awareness and targeted interventions to address stigma in clinical practice and societal contexts.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 