Conectar
by Shunmei Chen, Cihan Ruan, Yutong Guo, Jia Chang, Haohao Yan, Liang Chen, Yongzhong Duan, Guangyou Duan, Jinlong Bei, Xin Li, Shan Gao
Since the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), its genetic and geographical origins remain unclear, resulting in suspicions about its natural origin. In one of our previous studies, we reported the presence of a furin cleavage site RRAR in the junction region between S1 and S2 subunits of the spike protein, which was discovered as the first crucial clue for the origin tracing of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, we conducted an integrative analysis of new genome data from bat Sarbecovirus strains reported after the COVID-19 outbreak. The primary results included the identification of BANAL-20-52, Rp22DB159, and S18CXBatR24 as three close relatives of SARS-CoV-2 and the successful detection of seven out of nine key genomic features (designated as RC0-7 and ORF8) observed in wild types of SARS-CoV-2 in the three close relatives from Laos, Vietnam, and Yunnan province of China, respectively. The most significant contribution of the present study lies in the detection of RC1 in wild genotype in a bat Sarbecovirus population BANAL-20-52 belonging to. Encoding a segment of the NSP3 protein, RC1 was discovered as the second crucial clue for the origin tracing of SARS-CoV-2. Although RC0, encoding the junction furin cleavage site, remains undetected outside of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, Feuang of Laos is the sole place where eight of the nine wild-type features (RC1-7 and ORF8) have been detected.The management of chronic wounds has presented a significant dilemma, which is evident not only in clinical treatment but also in the substantial burden it places on medical resources. The global COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 is likely to further exacerbate this trend. Therefore, it is imperative to delve deeper into the impact of chronic wound on disease burden across different regions and populations. In this study, we focused on decubitus ulcers (DU) as representative chronic wounds and utilized data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 database (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool) pertaining to age, gender, region, year and socio-demographic index (SDI) group. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and mortality were utilized as indicators to assess the burden of DU. The analysis and visualization were performed using R software (version 4.2.3). A decrease in the global ASRs of DALYs and mortality for DU was observed across most regions between 1990 and 2019. The reduction in burden was particularly significant in regions characterized by a high SDI, while regions with a high-middle SDI experienced an increase. The burden of DU increased with age for both males and females, with males generally experiencing a higher burden compared to females. Strengthening population-based data on the prevalence of DU and implementing dynamic monitoring at the public health level will enable policymakers to develop evidence-based strategies for efficient allocation of healthcare resources.
A meta-analysis research was implemented to appraise the perineal wound complications (PWCs) after vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap and mesh closure (MC) following abdominoperineal surgery (AS) and pelvic exenteration (PE) of anal and rectal cancers. Inclusive literature research till April 2023 was done and 2008 interconnected researches were revised. Of the 20 picked researches, enclosed 2972 AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons were in the utilized researchers' starting point, 1216 of them were utilizing VRAM flap, and 1756 were primary closure (PC). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to appraise the consequence of VRAM flap in treating AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers by the dichotomous approach and a fixed or random model. VRAM flap had significantly lower PWCs (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42–0.98, p < 0.001), and major PWCs (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32–0.80, p = 0.004) compared to PC in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons. However, VRAM flap and PC had no significant difference in minor PWCs (OR, 1; 95% CI, 0.54–1.85, p = 1.00) in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancer persons. VRAM flap had significantly lower PWCs, and major PWCs, however, no significant difference was found in minor PWCs compared to PC in AS and PE of anal and rectal cancers persons. However, caution needs to be taken when interacting with its values since there was a low sample size of most of the chosen research found for the comparisons in the meta-analysis.
FreshRSS 