Intensive care units (ICUs) manage patients with or likely to have one or more life-threatening acute organ failures that might require the use of invasive supportive therapies. The use of physical restraint is frequent, with rates up to 50%, and usually initiated to maintain patient safety especially if the patient is agitated. Physical restraints have been associated with delirium, post-traumatic stress disorder and physical injuries while restricting patients’ individual freedom. Moreover, the incidence of invasive therapeutic devices’ self-removal by patients might not be decreased by physical restraint use. No recommendation is available concerning ICU patients and physical restraint management, despite being a daily practice. The main objective is to evaluate whether a strategy aimed at decreasing physical restraint use in ICU patients with that of a strategy based on routine and subjective caregivers’ decision is safe and efficient.
ARBORea is a multicentre randomised, stepped-wedge trial testing an innovative, dedicated web-based, multiprofessionally developed, experts validated, nursing management strategy in comparison with standard care. The primary outcome is physical restraint use rate (effectiveness) measured at least every 8 hours and incidents’ rate (tolerance) defined as the rate of incidents attributable to non-compliance, corresponding to the deterioration or self-removal of critical devices, a fall or self-aggressive or heteroaggressive behaviours. Planned enrolment is 4000 ICU adult participants at 20 French academic and non-academic centres. Safety and long-term outcomes will be evaluated.
Trial results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 guidelines. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international meetings and conferences to publicise and explain the research to clinicians, commissioners and service users. The trial is funded by the French Ministry of Health and has been approved by the French local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer 2, Toulouse, France with registration number: 2020-A02904-35).
(ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04957238 on 12 July 2021 before first inclusion in study.
This randomised controlled clinical trial compared the efficacy of a standardised autologous platelet gel (RegenWound gel) (n = 48) with a standard care treatment (hydrocellular or hydrocolloid dressing) (n = 48) for the treatment of hard-to-heal foot ulcers in type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus patients > 18 years old. The primary outcomes were the percentage of ulcers healed 6 weeks after treatment commenced. The secondary outcomes were the average healing time, the time course of the healing process, the local tolerance, and the acceptability of the treatment by the patient compared to the standard treatment. At the 6 weeks end-of-treatment visit (ETV), 56.5% of the patients in the RegenWound gel group and 20.0% of the patients in the control group had completely healed. Healing continued to evolve after the ETV and reached 77.3% at end-of-study visit 2 (12 weeks) in the RegenWound gel group, compared to 35.1% for the control group. The treatment was well tolerated and safe. RegenWound gel could be an effective treatment for diabetic foot ulcers, with most patients being healed within 6 weeks of treatment, and on average 1 to 2 treatments being needed.
Trial Registration: ISRCTN10032417