Conectar
Delirium is a common complication following cardiac surgery and significantly affects patient prognosis and quality of life. Recently, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) has gained prominence in predicting and assessing the risk of postoperative delirium, showing considerable potential in clinical settings.
This scoping review summarises existing research on AI-based prediction models for post-cardiac surgery delirium and provides insights and recommendations for clinical practice and future research.
Following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, eight databases were searched: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, Virtual Information Platform, PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were screened, and data were extracted on surgery type, delirium assessment tools, predictive factors, and AI-based prediction models. The search covered database inception through January 12, 2025. Two researchers independently conducted the literature review and data analysis.
Ten studies from China, Canada, and Germany involving 11,702 participants were included. The reported incidence of postoperative delirium ranged from 5.56% to 34%. The most commonly used assessment tools were Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Key predictive factors included age, cardiopulmonary bypass time, cerebrovascular disease, and pain scores. AI-based prediction models were primarily developed using R (6/10, 60%) and Python (4/10, 40%). Model performance, as measured by the area under the curve, ranged from 0.544 to 0.92. Among these models, Random Forest (RF) was the most effective (5/10, 50%), followed by XGBoost (3/10, 30%) and Artificial Neural Networks (2/10, 20%).
AI-based models show promise for predicting postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients. Future studies should prioritise integrating these models into clinical workflows, conducting rigorous multicenter external validation, and incorporating dynamic, time-varying perioperative variables to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.
This review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To characterise and analyse doctoral programmes in nursing in Latin America through an exhaustive review of the official websites of the universities.
Descriptive and multiple correspondence analysis. Existing programmes were mapped out, identifying their geographic distribution and curricular characteristics.
A review of 59 doctoral programmes in nursing was conducted through the official web portals of universities in Latin America that were currently available (as of 2025) and that provided the required information. Thereafter, a matrix was built in Excel to consolidate the data.
The study identified an increase in the number of doctoral programmes in nursing offered in Latin America. Furthermore, these programmes were found to be more strongly concentrated in countries such as Brazil, Peru and Mexico, while other countries, including Guatemala and Uruguay, have recently incorporated such training.
Doctoral education in nursing in Latin America has experienced significant growth in recent years, consolidating itself as a fundamental pillar for the development of the discipline and the generation of knowledge in health. However, structural challenges persist, including limited funding for research, a lack of cooperation between universities, and the absence of programmes focused on Advanced Nursing Practice.
This contribution helps identify trends in the offering of doctoral programmes and inequalities in their geographic distribution, allowing for an understanding of how training varies across countries in the region while also consolidating Nursing as an academic and professional discipline.
To determine common and distinct factors experienced by nurses working in acute care settings during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
An online qualitative descriptive study with eight open-ended questions and a comprehensive demographic profile administered via the Qualtrics XM survey software.
Thirteen countries formed teams and led online data collection in their respective countries through various approaches. The data collection period occurred between January 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022. Descriptive thematic analysis was conducted in English (with translation), Spanish, and Korean to analyse the qualitative data. Descriptive statistics summarised the responses to the demographic profile.
Worldwide, a final sample size of n = 1814 produced 6483 qualitative data points for analysis. The results identified ongoing occupational risk factors for nurses during the pandemic's second year, including mental health issues, yet showed some improvements in access to personal protective equipment and resources. Four themes emerged from the qualitative analysis, highlighting role changes, living states, and insights into the implementation of pandemic response measures.
Despite individual occupational risks nurses described, structural factors associated with healthcare delivery produced common nursing experiences during the pandemic. Additionally, at least two distinct stages of pandemic response implementation were demarcated by treatment availability (e.g., vaccine development).
There is potential for common pandemic response policies for nurses, centered on specific factors, such as the increased provision of mental health support services by healthcare organisations.
This study helped determine the common and distinct work experiences during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurses simultaneously experienced increased workload, role changes, perpetual fear and fatigue, daily hostility, and chaos in the implementation of pandemic responses. The results will impact nurses and those they serve along with future pandemic response policies.
We have adhered to the SRQR reporting guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To evaluate bioecology and environmental influences of patients presenting with alopecia regarding decisions made for hair camouflage.
A descriptive qualitative design was used.
Sixteen adult patients with alopecia were purposefully recruited from two specialised trichology clinics across the Jiangsu Province, China. Surveys and in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2024 and December 2024. Practical thematic analysis of transcribed data was informed through Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory.
Five major facilitators (camouflaged demands drive, camouflaged psychological resilience, habituation and dependence, family resilience and cross-border support, social acceptance) and four major barriers (limited future orientation, perceived coordination barriers, marginalisation of camouflage-related information, runaway costs) to hair camouflage were identified. These themes align with different levels of the ecological systems theory.
This study captures the complex ecological and intersectional nature of choice, experience and decision-making in patients' views on hair camouflage amid alopecia. Nursing professionals must understand these complexities to provide informed support and evidence-based interventions throughout patients' experiences with alopecia.
This study uses patient voices to offer ecological insights for a holistic understanding of their experiences. It provides knowledge relevant to nursing practice and alopecia patient support. Understanding patient-identified barriers and facilitators in alopecia camouflage is essential to inform more patient-centred approaches to choice, decision-making and psychological adaptation. Nurses are pivotal in this process, making enhanced understanding crucial for improving patients' psychological wellbeing and quality of life.
Our research reveals factors that equip nurses and the broader healthcare team to develop targeted counselling strategies, educational programs and resources related to camouflage for patients with alopecia. The hair-camouflage industry can use these insights to create more personalised and accessible products, better addressing patients' concealment needs and preferences.
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
No patient or public contribution.
To describe the level of family decision-making self-efficacy and its associated factors among Chinese family members of ICU patients.
Cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study.
Using convenience sampling, 154 ICU patients and their family members from two tertiary hospitals completed a paper-based questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics of patients and their family members, patients' disclosure of preferences to their family members, and family members' decision-making self-efficacy, anxiety and depression, uncertainty of illness, coping and social support. The data were analysed using independent-samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression.
The average scores of self-efficacy in treatment, comfort promotion and facing death decision-making were 4.3 (SD = 0.6; range = 1–5), 4.2 (SD = 0.6; range = 1–5) and 3.5 (SD = 0.6; range = 1–5), respectively. Active coping was a predictor of self-efficacy in treatment, comfort-promoting and facing death decision-making. Patients' disclosure of preferences regarding mechanical ventilation, family members' anxiety and illness uncertainty were predictors of self-efficacy in treatment decision-making. Patients' disclosure of preferences regarding expensive medications was a predictor of self-efficacy in comfort-promoting decision-making, and patients' age was a predictor of self-efficacy in facing death decision-making.
Chinese family members of ICU patients reported relatively high self-efficacy in treatment and comfort promotion decision-making but lower self-efficacy in facing death decision-making. Active coping plays a critical role in enhancing decision-making self-efficacy across these three types of decisions. The predictors of decision-making self-efficacy varied according to the specific type of decision.
For Chinese family members of ICU patients, targeted strategies to strengthen their active coping skills are key to enhancing their confidence in making decisions with or for patients. Patients' disclosure of preferences to their family members is helpful for improving family members' confidence in making treatment and comfort promotion decisions. Extra support is especially needed for end-of-life decision-making, particularly when the patient is younger.
This research informs future interventions by highlighting active coping and patients' disclosure of preferences to family members as key factors to strengthen decision-making self-efficacy among Chinese family members of ICU patients. However, family members' decision-making self-efficacy appears to be culturally specific, underscoring the need to design family-centered critical care approaches that are tailored to cultural contexts in other settings. Besides, while our research found a positive association between anxiety and self-efficacy in treatment decision-making, the relationship between them requires further investigation.
STROBE guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
During the COVID-19 pandemic health crisis, in some countries such as Spain, nursing students have offered to provide health assistance, but the role they have played, their degree of preparedness to face the situation, and what must be improved in their training to be ready for these situations is unknown.
Describe the experience and perceptions of students of the Nursing university degree during their participation as health support in the COVID-19 health crisis in Spain.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey study.
503 students enrolled in the 4th course of the Nursing degree in Spain during the months of March and April 2020. An online questionnaire was developed, based on a pilot study and distributed through the Nursing Association, students’ unions and students’ associations. Variables were used to describe their participation, degree of preparedness and training needs to determine how to improve training through descriptive statistics, as well as nonparametric tests to analyse the relationship between training and degree of preparedness nursing students. Results are reported according to the STROBE Statement.
73.2% (368) of students offered to participate in healthcare aid, of which 225 were actively involved. 27.8% carried out nursing tasks without supervision, and 47.7% assisted COVID-19 patients as any other nurse. Only 3.4% felt very prepared to work in the field of intensive care, finding that those students who perceived a higher degree of preparedness had received previous training in personal protective equipment and mechanical ventilation (p < 0.005). The highest scores for training activities that may improve their preparedness were simulations to improve levels of anxiety and stress when managing critical patients, simulation in ventilatory support and mandatory practices in services where ventilators are used.
Although three out of four students were willing to provide health assistance, they recognise that they were not specially prepared in the field of intensive care and demand training with simulation to improve anxiety and stress levels in the management of critical patients and simulation in ventilatory support.
Students have been vital resources for our health system and society when they have been needed. It is now up to us, both teachers and health authorities, to share their efforts by implementing the necessary improvements in training and safety measures not only because these affects the health and safety of the patient, but because they will be essential parts in future pandemics.
To systematically compare nurse-led versus traditional rehabilitation in improving clinical outcomes for stroke survivors.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data were extracted from Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (searched up to July 2024). Analyses with standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) as the estimates were performed in Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0. Randomized controlled trials investigating nurse-led stroke rehabilitation with outcomes such as mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of quality of life, self-efficacy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL), Barthel Index (BI), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), and pain were included. Sensitivity analyses and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were performed.
A total of 12 articles were included. The quality assessment indicated that most studies did not have a serious risk of bias. Nurse-led rehabilitation showed significant improvements in SS-QOL (SMD: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.26, 5.40; very low-quality evidence), depressive symptoms (GDS-15, SMD: −2.21; 95% CI: −2.80, −1.63; high-quality evidence), pain (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: −2.14, −1.08; high-quality evidence), and BI (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.48; low-quality evidence). However, there were no significant differences in MCS, PCS, self-efficacy, or NIHSS between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results for SS-QOL and BI were unstable and should be interpreted with caution.
Nurse-led rehabilitation is effective in improving psychological outcomes, particularly depression (GDS-15) and pain, although this high-quality evidence is based on a single study. Functional independence (BI) and SS-QOL are also improved, but the evidence for these outcomes is of low quality and highly unstable in sensitivity analyses. No significant benefits are found for other outcomes. The evidence quality varies, and future high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Incorporating nurse-led rehabilitation into stroke guidelines and implementing standardized depression screening programs and non-pharmacological pain interventions in community rehabilitation could be beneficial for populations with depressive symptoms and chronic pain.
This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for transparent reporting of systematic reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore the possible barriers and facilitators to implementing the Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour (UPSSL) programme in Chinese healthcare settings.
A mixed-method convergent design with the guidance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
An online survey study and semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and May 2023. Healthcare professionals were recruited from four hospitals in Shijiazhuang, China. One hundred and thirty-one participants completed the survey study, and 23 of them were interviewed individually. Descriptive statistics evaluated the possible barriers and facilitators of implementing the UPSSL programme within the CFIR framework quantitatively. Guided by the CFIR framework, qualitative data were analysed using directed content analysis to summarize healthcare professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of the UPSSL programme.
Multiple intersectional barriers and facilitators were identified from the survey and semi-interviews. Healthcare professionals believed that the UPSSL programme has a scientific evidence base, systematic contents, and possible benefits for women. However, various barriers existed at individual, system, and organizational levels. Major barriers included healthcare professionals and women's safety concerns towards the use of upright positions during childbirth, the healthcare professionals' unfamiliarity with assisting an upright position birth, poor adaptability of the programme protocol, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting.
To facilitate the implementation of the UPSSL programme in China, tailored antenatal education on upright positions, especially addressing safety-related issues, should be provided to pregnant women, their families, or peers to enhance their understanding of and familiarity with such positions. Healthcare professionals should also be offered adequate training opportunities and necessary facilities. Furthermore, national-level policy changes might be required to address midwifery workforce shortages. Additionally, further research is warranted to select, adapt, and test effective implementation strategies for programme adoption.
What problem did the study address? The adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour could promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and a positive childbirth experience. However, the adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour is suboptimal in healthcare settings in China. Barriers and facilitators of implementing upright positions during childbirth are unclear. What were the main findings? A range of barriers and facilitators within the CFIR framework to promote upright positions during childbirth from healthcare professionals' perspectives were identified, and the major barriers included safety concerns towards and unfamiliarity with an upright position birth, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study will enable a better understanding of the barriers and facilitators to promoting upright positions in the second stage of labour in China. The smooth and effective implementation of the UPSSL programme could help to promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and improve women's childbirth experiences.
The reporting of this study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) and Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines.
In this study, healthcare professionals were involved in refining the topic guides and survey questions. Additionally, findings from the interviews were returned to them for comments and corrections.
To examine the associations among diabetes-related stress, treatment adherence, perceived social support, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), and to explore the mediating roles of support and adherence in this relationship.
A cross-sectional observational study using self-report standardised measures and mediation analysis.
A total of 772 Spanish adults with DM1 completed validated instruments measuring diabetes-related distress, perceived social support, treatment adherence, and HRQoL. Hierarchical multiple regression and serial mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 6, 10,000 bootstraps) were conducted, controlling for age, sex, and time since diagnosis.
Not applicable (primary data collection, not a review).
Diabetes-related stress was the strongest predictor of lower HRQoL. Perceived social support and treatment adherence also contributed significantly. Mediation analyses indicated that the impact of stress on HRQoL was partially mediated by perceived social support and, in sequence, by treatment adherence. The indirect path through social support alone and the sequential path involving both mediators were significant.
Stress and social support are critical in understanding and improving HRQoL in adults with DM1. Treatment adherence appears to be influenced by perceived support, highlighting an indirect mechanism linking stress to quality of life.
Healthcare professionals should integrate psychosocial assessments and interventions into routine diabetes care. Targeting stress reduction and enhancing social support may improve adherence and overall well-being in adults with DM1.
What problem did the study address? The study addressed the need to understand how psychosocial factors—specifically stress, perceived social support, and treatment adherence—contribute to HRQoL in adults with DM1. While prior research often focused on paediatric or clinical populations and rarely explored mediation models, this study sought to fill those gaps with data from a large community sample of adults.
What were the main findings? The main findings indicate that diabetes-related stress is the most significant predictor of reduced HRQoL. This relationship is partially mediated by perceived social support and, sequentially, by treatment adherence. While stress directly affects HRQoL, its negative impact is also channelled through diminished social support and decreased adherence. The indirect effect through treatment adherence alone was not significant.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research has implications for adults living with DM1, particularly those in community settings outside of clinical supervision. It informs healthcare providers, diabetes educators, and policymakers on the importance of addressing emotional distress and strengthening support networks to improve both treatment adherence and overall quality of life.
This study adhered to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for cross-sectional studies. All methods and results are reported in alignment with EQUATOR Network recommendations for transparent and rigorous research reporting.
The study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Diabetes Federation (FEDE), which supported participant recruitment and dissemination through its affiliated associations. Patient input was incorporated throughout the study. A person with lived experience of type 1 diabetes contributed to the conceptual development of the research questions and the interpretation of findings. Their perspective helped ensure that the study design, choice of measures, and implications were relevant and meaningful to people living with the condition. This involvement supported a patient-centred approach to both the research and the manuscript preparation. Patients' participation as voluntary contributors was essential to the data collection process.
Incarceration significantly impacts inmates health, particularly marginalized groups like transgender persons, due to systemic oppression and inadequate healthcare. This study aims to understand transgender prisoners' health management experiences.
An interpretative phenomenological approach was used. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with eight transgender inmates in Barcelona, Spain, and analyzed using the seven-step Colaizzi method.
Three primary themes emerged: (1) Navigating Vulnerability in Healthcare Dynamics, which highlighted experiences of stigma and inadequate care; (2) The Quest for Wellbeing Amidst Uncertainty, underscoring concerns regarding treatment continuity; and (3) Negotiating a Landscape of Violence, revealing experiences of harassment and discrimination.
This study highlights the need for culturally competent, person-centered healthcare policies in prisons, particularly for transgender individuals. Addressing the specific health needs of transgender inmates is crucial for enhancing their overall well-being. This emphasizes the importance of systemic reforms to improve care provision for transgender prisoners.
Prison nurses must prioritize person-centered approaches, ensure continuity of gender-affirming treatments, and provide empathetic mental health support to enhance trust and improve the overall well-being of transgender inmates.
To (1) examine the attitudes of community-dwelling adults towards death and their ability to cope with death, as well as (2) understand the influence of advance care planning on community-dwelling adults' death attitudes and coping with death.
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted in Singapore.
In Phase I, a case–control study was conducted to examine the differences in death attitudes and coping with death ability between community-dwelling adults who have completed advance care planning and those who have not. A univariate general linear model was used to compute the mean difference in death attitudes and coping with death scores. In Phase II, a descriptive qualitative study was conducted to provide an in-depth understanding of the influence of advance care planning among community-dwelling adults. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. Mixed-methods analysis was conducted to integrate the quantitative and qualitative data.
In Phase I, 80 community-dwelling adults who had completed advance care planning and 81 community-dwelling adults who did not have advance care planning were included. Adults who had completed advance care planning had significantly higher coping with death scores (t = 4.14, p < 0.01). In Phase II, a purposive sample of 24 adults who had completed advance care planning was selected for individual semi-structured interviews. From the thematic analysis, three themes were developed: (1) Advance care planning enables coping with death, (2) overcoming fear of death with advance care planning and (3) confronting death with advance care planning.
Advance care planning may influence death attitudes and coping with death. Further work on longitudinal designs and among individuals from different age groups should be used to gain further in-depth understanding of the impacts of advance care planning.
Strategies to enhance one's coping abilities with death and death attitudes should be developed to stimulate the uptake of advance care planning.
This paper was reported according to the Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study framework.
Community-dwelling adults participated in the survey and interviews.
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the measurement properties of pressure injury risk assessment tools for cancer patients using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology, and to serve as a reference for clinical nurses in their hospital duties when choosing high-quality assessment tools.
A systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.
The English literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and the search period ranged from the inception of the database to September 30, 2024.
Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies.
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Two tools—the PUSO (Pressure Ulcer Scale in Oncology) and the Cuire scale—demonstrated sufficient evidence of content validity and structural validity, meeting the COSMIN quality standards. None of the studies reported the cross-cultural validity, stability, and measurement error of the assessment tool.
Following the COSMIN assessment, the PUSO and the Cuire were developed using rigorous procedures, ensuring sufficient overall quality for content validity, structural validity, and other measurement properties. We recommend their use across various environments, based on the quantity and content of specific items. The PUSO was recommended for clinical screening, whereas the Cuire scale was deemed more suitable for use in outpatient, community, and scientific research settings. However, these measurement properties are not without flaws, and their clinical application requires further validation.
To examine the association between perceived quality of care and the level of coercion experienced by individuals hospitalised in acute mental health units.
National cross-sectional study.
Data were collected from 255 patients admitted to 12 acute mental health units across Spain. Standardised instruments assessed perceived quality of care and levels of coercion, humiliation and fear at discharge. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to explore associations between care quality dimensions and patients' experiences.
Perceived quality of care was significantly associated with lower levels of perceived coercion and humiliation. All dimensions of care quality showed inverse associations, with the “secluded” dimension showing the strongest association. The association between care quality and perceived fear was less consistent. These findings are particularly relevant for mental health nurses, who play a central role in delivering relational care and ensuring patients' emotional safety.
Higher perceived quality of care is associated with lower levels of coercion, humiliation, and fear during hospitalisation in acute mental health settings.
For mental health nursing, these results underscore the critical role of nurses in creating therapeutic environments that reduce coercive experiences. By fostering trust, promoting patient autonomy, and ensuring emotional and physical safety, nurses can significantly influence the quality of care and patient outcomes.
The study addresses the lack of evidence on how perceived quality of care influences experiences of coercion in acute mental health settings. Better perceived care quality is linked to reduced feelings of coercion, humiliation and fear. The research has direct implications for mental health nurses, clinical educators and healthcare managers aiming to improve patient experiences and reduce coercive practices in psychiatric care.
STROBE reporting guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
The effect of prehabilitation on reducing the level of postoperative stress and facilitating recovery has been proven to be controversial in previous studies involving patients with cancer. This review contributes to the improvement of an intervention programme by qualitatively integrating the prehabilitation experiences of patients with cancer.
This review aimed to integrate the individual experiences of patients with cancer who had received prehabilitation interventions to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementation, which can be used to understand patients' adherence behaviours.
This was a qualitative evidence synthesis review.
Articles were systematically searched from inception to February 18, 2025, using four English databases and three Chinese databases. Keywords and Medical Subject Headings were used to identify potential studies written in both Chinese and English. This study was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative systematic review methodology.
Twenty-five articles were included in this review. Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), eight synthesised findings were extracted, focusing on the representation of factors influencing the adherence of patients with cancer to prehabilitation, including the domains of knowledge (two facilitators), reinforcement (two facilitators), beliefs about consequences (two facilitators), beliefs about capabilities (two barriers), environmental context and resources (two barriers, one intervention preference factor), social influence (one facilitator, one intervention preference factor), emotion (one barrier, one facilitator) and behavioural regulation (one facilitators, two intervention preference factors).
Our findings indicate that the adherence to prehabilitation among patients with cancer is shaped by a dynamic interplay of determinants. Structured assessments, self-monitoring, tailored interventions and tele-prehabilitation can improve patients' self-efficacy, perceived benefits and access to resources, which in turn can facilitate their completion of prehabilitation.
This study deepens our understanding of behaviours related to adherence to prehabilitation among patients with cancer and provides valuable guidance for the formulation and optimisation of subsequent prehabilitation intervention programmes.
ENTREQ.
No patient or public contributions.
PROSPERO CRD: 42024553972
To identify whether there are differences in knowledge regarding the management of patients with respiratory stomas among nurses working in hospitals with an advanced practice tracheostomy service compared to those without it.
Descriptive, cross-sectional, comparative, analytical survey study.
The study was conducted from January to March 2023 in four tertiary care hospitals, two of which have an advanced practice tracheostomy service. A self-administered questionnaire was designed, consisting of 16 questions about nurses' specialised training in caring for tracheostomy patients. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (24.0) from IBM.
Nurses in hospitals with a dedicated tracheostomy service obtained a higher mean score (7.1/10) and demonstrated greater anxiety when managing patients with stomas (p < 0.001), as well as an increased willingness to undergo specific training (p = 0.017) to reduce their lack of self-confidence.
A higher level of anxiety in the management of tracheostomised patients and a greater interest in receiving specific training have been observed among nurses in hospitals with advanced practice services (APTS), despite having greater training. Therefore, institutions should commit to incorporating advanced practice nurses and continuing education in the approach to ostomies among their professionals.
Implementing ongoing training programmes and specific tracheostomy services or units in hospitals would enable nurses to provide high-quality care for patients with respiratory stomas.
The study adhered to the STROBE checklist.
Neither patients nor the public were involved in the design or conduct of this research. Nurses participated exclusively in data collection.
To evaluate the prevalence of frailty and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in older Chinese breast cancer (BC) patients, which have not been thoroughly reported in this population.
A prospective multi-centre cross-sectional registry study.
Data were collected from Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking University Third Hospital and Beijing Chaoyang District San Huan Cancer Hospital between October 2021 and July 2023.
BC patients aged over 65 years were enrolled in this study. They completed three assessment scales including the FRAIL scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), to screen for frailty, related factors and QoL. Clinical and pathological data were also collected. Analysis of frailty and prefrailty risk factors was performed via logistic regression. A multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the mean differences in scores for each QoL domain between patients with different frailty statuses.
A total of 946 patients were enrolled from three hospitals in Beijing between October 2021 and July 2023. Their median age was 69 years and 73.6% of them had early-stage breast cancer. Further, 37.2% of these patients had ≥ 1 comorbidity. The prevalence of frailty was 8.8% and frailty was more common in those with aged ≥ 75 years (22.3%), those with advanced tumours (15.6%), those with anxiety (31.3%) and those with depression (29.3%). More than half (57.2%) of the patients were prefrail. Regression analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.12 [95% CI 1.07–1.17], p < 0.001), an advanced tumour (OR 2.27 [1.33–3.89], p = 0.003), anxiety (OR 2.74 [1.37–5.48], p = 0.004) and depression (OR 3.84 [1.97–7.49], p < 0.001) were significantly associated with frailty. After adjusting for other factors, different frailty states were shown to be independent influencing factors for QoL in both the functional and the symptom domains (all p < 0.05).
Our study provides data on the prevalence of frailty and prefrailty in older Chinese patients with BC. Both conditions are closely related to poor QoL. It is helpful for oncologist and clinical care to making intervention and better treatment decisions.
The study adhered to the STROBE checklist.
This study provides detailed data on the prevalence of frailty in older Chinese patients with BC and correlative factors. It suggests that clinical care should fully assess patients' frailty before making treatment decisions and provide early intervention for related factors.
Patients participated in the implementation of the project (including the informed consent and questionnaire process). No other public contribution to this research.
This study provides data on the prevalence of frailty in Chinese older BC patients and correlative factors. It indicates that clinicians should fully assess patients' frailty before making treatment decisions and provide early intervention for related factors.
ChiCTR2200056070
To systematically search, evaluate and synthesise the most robust evidence regarding pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients admitted to general wards.
The present study provides an evidence-based summary of the most robust findings, adhering to the evidence guidelines established by the Center for Evidence-Based Nursing of Fudan University.
According to the “6S” model, a systematic search was conducted for literature on pressure injury prevention among orthopaedic patients in general wards. The types of literature included guidelines, clinical decisions, expert Consensus, evidence summaries, etc. The search period covered the time from the beginning of the database up to December 2023.
The following databases and resources were systematically searched: Up To Date, JBI, NICE, WOCN, NZWCS, etc.
Fifteen literature sources were included, comprising one clinical decision, eight guidelines, one systematic review, and one expert Consensus. In these sources, a comprehensive collection of 34 pieces of best evidence was formed across six key topics: risk assessment, position management, skin care, device used for device-related pressure injury, nutritional assessment, and support, as well as health education and training. Among the evidence gathered, a strong recommendation was made for 18 pieces, while the remaining 16 received a weak recommendation.
This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the most robust evidence on pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients, encompassing 34 pieces of evidence that can serve as valuable references for clinical practice. Before implementing this evidence, it is crucial to evaluate the specific contextual factors within different countries and medical institutions, as well as the facilitators and barriers influencing its application by healthcare professionals and patient's preferences. Furthermore, targeted evidence selection should be conducted through careful screening and subsequent adjustments in implementation, thereby offering a more scientifically grounded basis for clinical nursing practice. Future research endeavours should prioritise investigating strategies for effective evidence utilisation.
The prevention of pressure injuries poses a significant challenge for orthopaedic patients. This study presents a synthesis of 34 pieces of best evidence to provide guidance on preventive measures for pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients. Adhering to and implementing these 34 pieces of evidence can effectively aid in preventing pressure injuries in clinical practice. This evidence encompasses risk assessment, position management, skin care, device usage for device-related pressure injuries, nutritional support and evaluation, and health education and training, establishing a comprehensive and systematic implementation process. Assessing the risk of pressure injuries during interventions serves as an essential prerequisite for developing effective strategies to prevent such injuries among orthopaedic patients. Ultimately, this study will offer valuable guidance to healthcare professionals worldwide regarding preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients.
Upon admission to the hospital, it is essential to conduct a risk assessment and implement evidence-based, individualised prevention measures for pressure ulcers in patients to prevent their occurrence. This study will provide valuable insights into preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients admitted to orthopaedic wards for healthcare workers worldwide.
The PRIMA manifest is utilised during the text preparation process.
Trail Registration: ES20245365
This study aimed to establish a comprehensive set of nursing-sensitive quality indicators (NSQIs) for patients with dysphagia following tracheotomy due to acquired brain injury (ABI), based on the ‘structure-process-outcome’ model.
A Delphi survey.
The research utilised a mixed-methods approach, including systematic literature reviews, qualitative interviews and two rounds of Delphi expert consultations. A diverse team comprising specialists in dysphagia rehabilitation and nursing management conducted the research, which involved defining and refining NSQIs through extensive evaluations and consensus among recruited experts.
The finalised NSQI includes 4 structural indicators, 13 process indicators and 4 outcome indicators, covering key aspects such as resource allocation, patient assessment and clinical outcomes. The expert consensus provides verification. Kendall's harmony coefficients are 0.304 and 0.138 (p < 0.001), respectively, and the mean importance assignments of indicators at all levels are 3.90–5.00. The final care of patients with tracheotomy and dysphagia after brain injury was constructed. The evaluation indicators include a total of 4 first-level indicators, 23 second-level indicators and 52 third-level indicators.
The established NSQIs offer a systematic framework to enhance the quality of nursing care for ABI patients with posttracheotomy dysphagia. This model facilitates precise monitoring and proactive management of nursing practices, promising better patient outcomes and streamlined care processes.
This study develops targeted NSQIs to improve dysphagia management in ABI patients’ posttracheotomy, fostering better patient outcomes and advancing nursing education through essential specialised training.
Expert-driven insights from experienced clinicians informed the NSQIs, ensuring their relevance and effectiveness in enhancing patient-centred care.
FreshRSS 