Gastric outlet obstruction syndrome (GOOS) is a clinically significant condition often associated with advanced malignancies, particularly gastric and pancreatic cancers. Management strategies focus on symptom relief, nutritional improvement and quality of life enhancement. Surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ), especially laparoscopic GJ, is commonly recommended for patients with good functional status and life expectancy exceeding 2 months. The modified Devine partial stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PSPG) was introduced to address functional limitations of conventional GJ, including duodenogastric reflux and afferent loop syndrome. However, PSPG has not been widely adopted, and its role in malignant GOOS remains unclear.

This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the application, functional outcomes and oncological implications of the modified Devine technique in malignant GOOS.

This review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The PICO framework was employed to define eligibility criteria, focusing on studies examining PSPG for malignant GOOS as palliative surgery or a bridge to resection. Literature searches were conducted across Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature sources using a prospectively registered search strategy, between August and October 2025, following protocol submission. Two independent reviewers will screen articles, extract data and assess quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale where applicable. Data will be synthesised narratively.

As this study is a systematic review of published literature, formal ethical approval was not strictly required. In accordance with institutional policy, the protocol was submitted to the Institutional Review Board of Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, which confirmed that the study met criteria for ethical exemption. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.

This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024593540). Search strategy is registered in searchRxiv https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838.

PROSPERO CRD42024593540

https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838.

Integrated digital diagnostics can support complex surgeries in many anatomic sites, and brain tumour surgery represents one of the most complex cases. Neurosurgeons face several challenges during brain tumour surgeries, such as differentiating critical tissue from brain tumour margins. To overcome these challenges, the STRATUM project will develop a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics based on multimodal data processing, including hyperspectral imaging, integrated as a point-of-care computing tool in neurosurgical workflows. This paper reports the protocol for the development and technical validation of the STRATUM tool.

This international multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study, STRATUM-OS (study: 28 months, pre-recruitment: 2 months, recruitment: 20 months, follow-up: 6 months), with no control group, will collect data from 320 patients undergoing standard neurosurgical procedures to: (1) develop and technically validate the STRATUM tool and (2) collect the outcome measures for comparing the standard procedure versus the standard procedure plus the use of the STRATUM tool during surgery in a subsequent historically controlled non-randomised clinical trial.

The protocol was approved by the participant ethics committees. Results will be disseminated in scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

NCT07036783.

Tibial plateau fractures present a complex orthopaedic challenge and usually require surgical intervention to restore joint alignment and stability as well as to prevent complications. In practice, determining the most appropriate surgical approach, implant selection and positioning remains a challenge and depends on the surgeon’s experience and patient-specific factors. Therefore, this scoping review aims to map the current evidence on surgical fixation methods for proximal tibia fractures in adults. In particular, we seek to first assess study types and their distribution across levels of evidence and second to identify knowledge gaps to support evidence-based surgical planning.

The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Information for this study will be gathered from Medline, Cochrane and Embase. Data analysis will involve categorising the studies by their level of evidence and extracting predefined parameters, including fracture characteristics, surgical approach, implant type and key findings relevant to the review question. The study focuses on surgically stabilised intra-articular proximal tibia fractures in adults. Only English- and German-language studies that are available in full text and published after 1995 will be included.

No ethical approval is required. The findings of the proposed review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Open Science Framework, osf.io/g9zfu.

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication after cardiac surgery, particularly in elderly patients, and is associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes. Effective preventive strategies remain limited. Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated potential neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory and metabolic benefits, which may reduce the incidence of POD.

This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive liraglutide or placebo from the day before surgery until postoperative day 3. A total of 260 patients are planned to be enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint is the incidence of POD within 7 days, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or CAM-intensive care unit. Secondary outcomes include delirium severity, neurocognitive and psychological function, cardiac function, clinical outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year and perioperative biomarker changes. Exploratory outcomes include functional MRI in selected subgroups and additional biomarker analyses.

The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.

ChiCTR2500106943.

Surgery and its resulting hospitalisation are associated with subsequent cognitive and functional decline. Interventions to reduce this decline have exhibited limited success. Prehabilitation is the process of enhancing capacity and reserve before an acute stressor to improve tolerance of the acute physiologic insult. Older adults requiring major surgery are an ideal population for prehabilitation. Prehabilitation exercise studies have mostly focused on physical training to improve physical outcomes after specific surgery types, and data on cognitive outcomes and in broader surgical populations are needed. Computerised cognitive training (CCT) has been shown to enhance memory, processing speed, attention and multitasking. Combining CCT with a physical exercise may be most effective in reducing cognitive and functional decline in older patients undergoing major surgery, but has yet to be evaluated.

The COgnitive and Physical Exercise to improve Outcomes after Surgery (COPE-iOS) study is a randomised, controlled, participant and assessor blinded clinical trial testing the hypothesis that a pragmatic programme combining CCT and physical exercise throughout the perioperative (ie, preoperative and postoperative) period will improve long-term cognitive and disability outcomes in older surgical patients at high risk for decline. The trial aims to randomise 250 patients who undergo major surgery for a treatment period of approximately 1 month prior to surgery and 3 months after surgery, with a follow-up period of 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome is global cognition at 3 months after surgery. Key secondary outcomes include global cognition at 12 months after surgery and disability in activities of daily living and depression at 3 and 12 months after surgery.

Trial protocol has been approved by Vanderbilt Human Research Protections Programme (#202496) and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board. Results will be presented at scientific conferences and submitted for publication.

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry NCT04889417.

To provide a nationwide epidemiological assessment of upper limb amputations (ULAs) in Germany, including incidence trends, underlying aetiologies, amputation levels and revision patterns, with a comparative analysis between 2019 and 2023.

Nationwide retrospective cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected inpatient hospital data.

All acute-care hospitals in Germany reporting to the national Diagnosis-Related Groups and Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS) from 2019 to 2023.

All patients undergoing ULA procedures (OPS 5-862 and 5-863) or revision procedures (OPS 5-866) within the study period. No exclusion criteria were applied.

Primary measures were annual incidence of ULAs, the distribution of amputation levels and underlying medical aetiologies. Secondary measures included the incidence of revision procedures and revision aetiologies stratified by anatomical level.

A total of 5427 ULAs were performed in 2023, representing a 7.3% decrease compared with 2019 (5,852). Distal amputations remained most frequent, though proximal amputations increased proportionally over time. Above-wrist amputations were predominantly associated with malignancy (40.3%) and vascular disease (23.7%), whereas distal amputations were mainly trauma-related (43.6%). Infection-related distal amputations increased from 23.4% in 2019 to 30.4% in 2023. Revision procedures occurred in 32.4% of proximal amputations and 6.1% of distal amputations in 2023. Infection was the most common indication for distal revisions (53.3%), while infection and neuroma formation each accounted for 29.4% of proximal revisions.

This nationwide analysis provides a comprehensive epidemiological overview of ULAs in Germany, demonstrating stable overall incidence but clear level-specific differences in underlying aetiologies. Proximal amputations were mainly associated with malignant and vascular disease, whereas trauma predominated at distal levels. High rates of infection-related and neuroma-related revisions, particularly after proximal amputations, highlight the complexity of surgical management and the need for level-specific perioperative and follow-up strategies.

Increased risks and concerns regarding patient safety in early-phase studies exist because knowledge about the new intervention is still accumulating. This means that narrow eligibility criteria are needed. However, if early-phase studies are narrow in their inclusion, for example, by not including diverse populations, there is a potential risk that new therapies have insufficient relevant efficacy and safety data. Existing research has explored equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) factors in early-phase pharmaceutical studies, but it has not been possible to find studies that have systematically examined whether EDI factors have been considered in surgical studies reporting innovative procedures. We aim to examine how EDI factors are considered in early-phase surgical studies and surgical innovation reports to explore how this may impact on later-phase evaluation and inclusive intervention implementation.

A scoping review following the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) and Arksey and O’Malley’s five-step process is being conducted. We will search Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for surgical early-phase studies. A two-step screening process for eligibility is being used. Independent double screening will take place for 20% of the papers. Eligible articles will report early evaluation of an innovative surgical/invasive procedure. Excluded will be comparative and later-phase studies and early evaluations of pharmaceutical products even in a surgical setting. Data on article details, patient eligibility and whether protected characteristics are reported and considered will be extracted. Information about EDI considerations reported in the introduction or discussion of the papers will also be extracted. Findings will be discussed with a patient advisory group. A content synthesis approach will be undertaken and descriptive summaries presented.

This study does not require ethical approval being a secondary analysis. The findings will be disseminated through academic journal publications and oral presentations.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a technically demanding procedure where surgical skill directly influences outcomes. Traditional evaluation relies on expert subjective judgement, which is resource-intensive and lacks scalability. The emergence of computer vision and deep learning offers potential for objective, automated skill assessment. Prior research has explored phase recognition and gesture classification in surgery; however, few studies have applied AI-driven evaluation in high-stakes cardiac procedures. Therefore, the objective of this study is to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based framework for the automated assessment of surgical technical skills in CABG using real-world surgical videos, benchmarked against expert ratings.

This study is a prospective, single-centre observational study conducted in a high-volume surgical hospital. Eligible participants are adult patients undergoing elective CABG with complete intraoperative video data. Videos are analysed using a hybrid AI pipeline to generate scores based on visual impression and tool trajectory accuracy. The primary outcome is the feasibility of AI annotation, that is, the intraclass correlation coefficient value of AI predicted score and human rating data. Secondary outcomes include the consistency between AI and expert skill assessments, analysis of surgical instrument trajectories and the correlation of AI-derived skill scores with intraoperative graft flow and resistance. Exploratory outcomes aim to correlate surgical skill with graft patency at 1 year and major adverse cardiovascular events within 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.

The Ethics Committee in Fuwai hospital approved this study (2024-2563). The results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06739005.

Persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) affects up to 15% of patients after major surgery, impairing physical function, quality of life and increasing risk for long-term opioid use. Current PPSP prediction models rely on static or retrospective data and fail to incorporate dynamic perioperative factors. The Personalised Prediction of Persistent Postsurgical Pain (P5) study aims to develop individualised, multimodal prediction models by integrating preoperative behavioural, psychophysical and neurocognitive assessments and high-frequency symptom monitoring.

P5 is a prospective, single-centre cohort study enrolling 2500 adults aged 18–75 undergoing major surgery at a tertiary academic hospital. Participants complete baseline surveys, cognitive testing and quantitative sensory testing preoperatively. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) are collected via smartphone three times per day through 30 days postoperatively, capturing pain, mood, catastrophising and medication use. Participants are assessed on postoperative day 1 and complete online surveys at 3 and 6 months, evaluating pain persistence, interference, neuropathic symptoms and related outcomes. Clinical and perioperative data are extracted from the electronic health record. The primary outcome is PPSP at 3 months. Predictive models will be developed using supervised machine learning and dynamic structural equation modelling to extract latent features from EMA data. Model performance will be assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the precision-recall curve and SHapley Additive exPlanations for interpretability.

This study has received ethics approval from the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board #202101123. Informed consent is required. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at research conferences.

NCT04864275.

Concha-type microtia, classified as a milder form of microtia under Nagata’s classification, is characterised by the presence of more normal ear subunits compared with other types. The non-expanded auricular reconstruction using autologous rib cartilage is a standard procedure treating conchal microtia, and this operation typically comprises two stages. To maximise the utilisation of native auricular cartilage, the lower half of a patient’s ear is preserved as residual ear, which should be connected to the rib cartilage scaffold in this operation. However, it remains unclear whether this connection should be performed in the first-stage or second-stage surgery. Current literature lacks sufficient evidence to determine the safer and more effective approach. Thus, we plan to conduct this randomised controlled trial to formally compare the safety and efficacy of first-stage versus second-stage connection, hypothesising that second-stage connection may be a better choice since it may reduce skin cutting, operative risk and improve recovery.

This is a single-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing two surgical treatments. Based on sample size calculations, a total of 78 eligible patients will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation. The control group will be treated with connecting the residual ear with the framework in stage 1, while the experimental group will be treated with connecting the residual ear with the framework in stage 2.

The safety of the surgery will be evaluated based on the grade-A healing rate and the incidence of complications (infection, haematoma, flap or skin necrosis and cartilage scaffold exposure). Efficacy of the surgery will be assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scores. Patients will be scheduled for follow-up 3–6 months after each surgery. Descriptive analyses will be performed to summarise baseline demographics. The incidence of grade-A healing and complications will be analysed using the ² test. GBI and POSAS scores of the two groups will be analysed using independent-samples t test. A p value

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital (no. 2025-256-1) on 9 April 2025, and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. At the time of manuscript submission, patient recruitment began in April 2025 and is expected to continue until January 2027. Surgical procedures and follow-up will continue until February 2028. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will be disseminated to the media and the public.

NCT06763991.

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia (HH) repair is associated with a high recurrence rate. Repair reinforced with mesh lowers short-term recurrence but can cause dysphagia and visceral erosion. Results of the PRIME trial, in which non-absorbable mesh reinforcement of the posterior crural repair was investigated, showed equal recurrence compared with primary suture repair after 6 months. This study investigates the use of circular absorbable mesh reinforcement in primary HH repair.

Prospective double-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial comparing two laparoscopic procedures for HH repair (110 vs 110). Adult patients with proven HH Skinner types II–IV (defined by preoperative CT scan) are included. Patients are randomised to undergo a laparoscopic primary crural repair with sutures alone or suture repair augmented with biosynthetic absorbable, circular mesh at the hiatus. Radiologic integrity of the hiatal repair 1 year after surgery is the main endpoint. Secondary objectives are clinical recurrence of the hernia, development of postoperative reflux disease, postoperative side effects and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Outcome assessors are blinded to allocation. Data are collected at baseline, and follow-up includes interviews and digital questionnaires at 3, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, as well as CT scan at 12 and 60 months. All patients randomised will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Ethics approval has been obtained by the local ethics committee at Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands (Medical Ethics Review Committee (METc) Isala, study number: 190516). METc Isala is no longer active; all duties have been taken over by METc of the University Medical Center Groningen. The trial’s results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal as well as (inter)national conferences.

Registered in the Dutch national trial registry: OMON (NL-OMON48062).

Timely publication of preregistered study outcomes is not self-evident. Discrepancies can lead to significant research waste.

To assess timely (within 7 years) and consistent publication of preregistered primary outcomes and associated factors of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) studies registered between 2000 and 2017 over time.

An observational study.

ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar.

Registered TKA trials at ClinicalTrials.Gov between 2000 and 2017.

ClinicalTrials.Gov’s required and optional data elements for registering a study and the preregistered and published primary outcome, defined as the outcome stated in the primary outcome field on ClinicalTrials.Gov. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses.

1352 registered TKA (1072 interventional; 280 observational) studies were included, with 967 (811 interventional; 156 observational) unique references. Regarding the publication of preregistered primary outcomes within 7 years, the results for interventional trials were 0% (2000), which increased to 59.6% (2017). Observational studies were timely published in 0% (2000) and 37.5% (2017). Interventional trials and observational studies not funded by industry were more likely to have timely and consistent publication of their primary outcomes. Drug intervention trials were more likely to be timely and consistently published than procedure-focused trials. Phase 3 interventional trials were more likely, while phase 1 trials were less likely to be consistently published on time.

Despite ongoing efforts to improve publication rates, over a third of interventional trials remain unpublished within 7 years. For observational studies, the rate is even lower, with only two-fifths published on time, contributing to significant research waste.

CRD42021246599.

This review identified and mapped the current evidence on emergency presentation of colorectal cancer in Africa.

Scoping review based on methodology by Arksey and O’Malley.

Medline (via PubMed), Embase and African Journals Online were searched between 29 January 2025 and 6 March 2025.

Studies published in English and describing the burden, risk factors and management options for emergency presentation of colorectal cancer in Africa were included. Full-text articles of all epidemiological study designs were considered with no publication date limit. Grey literature such as conference abstracts and letters to the editor were considered if sufficient study detail was provided to map data to the research questions.

Two independent reviewers extracted data from the included studies onto a standardised electronic form. Data were narratively synthesised using predefined themes.

Twenty-seven studies are included in this review. There was wide variability in reported emergency presentation colorectal cancer rates (8.3% to 64.9%). There were few data on early mortality, and none on long-term outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer. Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer was characterised clinically by bowel obstruction, bowel perforation and peritonitis. Only one study reported on risk factors for emergency presentation of colorectal cancer. Use of diagnostic modalities was variable and depended on resource availability. Surgery was the mainstay of treatment. Endoscopic stenting was only available as a treatment option in South Africa.

Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is a significant clinical, oncological and health system metric, yet there is a dearth of evidence on the subject in the African context. Available evidence demonstrates the need for more studies on emergency presentation of colorectal cancer, focused on risk factors, prevalence, treatment options and short-term and long-term outcomes.

Outcome reporting in studies on sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is highly heterogeneous, which limits comparability across studies and thus hampers the development of international treatment guidelines.

Variation in treatment and access to facilities contributes to differences in outcome reporting between centres and countries. Establishing a Core Outcome Set (COS) can improve consistency in outcome reporting and facilitate global collaboration and data comparison. We therefore aim to develop a Core Outcome Set for SCT (COS-SCT) using the Delphi method to achieve consensus on key outcomes. This will enhance the standardisation of outcome reporting and improve the quality of research and clinical care for SCT patients globally.

The development of the COS-SCT will consist of three phases. First, a systematic review will be performed to identify outcomes reported in studies on the surgical treatment of SCT in children. Second, an international Delphi survey will be conducted among key stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers and patient representatives, to establish consensus on outcome prioritisation. Finally, a consensus meeting with representatives from all stakeholder groups will be held to ratify the final Core Outcome Set. The study will follow methodological guidance from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and will be developed and reported in accordance with the Core Outcome Set Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Core Outcome Set Standards for Reporting (COS-STAR).

The medical research ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC) confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study, and therefore a full review by the ethics committee is not required. This study is registered in the COMET initiative database. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: COMET registration number 3485

Shared decision-making is widely advocated in policy and practice, but how it is to be applied in a high-stakes clinical decision such as major lower limb amputation due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or diabetic foot is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation.

A qualitative study (done as part of a broader mixed-methods study) using semi-structured interviews. Interview transcriptions were analysed using thematic analysis.

Vascular centres in three large National Health Service hospitals in Wales and England, UK, between 1 October 2020 and 30 September 2022.

A purposive sample of 18 patients for whom major lower limb amputation was considered as a treatment option/carried out, with interviews conducted before or within 4 months of amputation and 4–6 months after amputation. A further purposive sample of 20 healthcare professionals (including eight surgeons) involved in supporting or conducting major lower limb amputation decision-making.

Five major categories were identified that highlighted the challenges of ensuring shared decision-making associated with major lower limb amputation: (i) patients’ limited understanding, (ii) variable patient attitudes to decision-making, (iii) healthcare professionals’ perceived challenges to sharing decision-making, (iv) surgeons’ paternalism and (v) patients’ and healthcare professionals’ decisional regret/possible consequences of challenges.

Amputation is a life-changing decision for both patients and healthcare professionals, with huge consequences. Despite being considered the gold standard, our findings highlight several challenges to effective shared decision-making for major lower limb amputation. Shared decision-making training for healthcare professionals is paramount if these limitations are to be addressed and patients are to feel confident in being adequately informed about the treatment decisions that they make.

NCT04903756.

To determine the time intervals between injury and orthopaedic admission, admission and surgery, and postsurgery length of stay and to elucidate factors contributing to delays in accessing orthopaedic services.

Prospective cohort study.

A tertiary hospital in the rural Eastern Cape province of South Africa.

413 adult patients admitted with femur fractures between January 2024 and July 2024.

The primary outcome was the time interval from injury to surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes included time from admission to surgery, length of hospital stay and reasons for delays.

Of 413 patients, only 22% (n=91) received surgical intervention within 48 hours of admission. The median time from injury to admission was 4 days (IQR 0–12), and injury to surgery was 13 days (IQR 0–713). Systemic factors, including limited theatre capacity and bed shortages, were the main reasons for delays. In the multivariate analysis, cardiac disease (adjusted OR, AOR=9.62), diabetes mellitus (AOR=4.36) and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of

Significant delays in femoral fracture fixation were observed, with fewer than 10% receiving surgery within 48 hours of injury. Addressing surgical capacity and referral pathways is essential to improving timely access to care.

This study aimed to investigate the burden and characteristics of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in China.

A national retrospective study was conducted based on the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) in China. Patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2013 and 2018 were included. Revision burden was calculated as the ratio of revision procedures to the total number of THA procedures. Demographic and hospital characteristics, hospitalisation charges, clinical indications and patient migration patterns related to revision THA were analysed.

Tertiary hospitals across China.

A total of 13 029 revision THA cases from HQMS.

Revision burden, indications for revision, hospitalisation charges, hospital level, patient migration and their trend.

During the study period, 13 029 revision THA cases were identified. The revision burden showed an increasing trend from 2013 to 2018 (4.5% to 5.4%; p for trend=0.002). The hospitalisation charges continued to increase between 2013 and 2016 and decreased over the next 2 years. The leading indications for revision THA were prosthesis loosening (44.0%), prosthesis dysfunction (13.7%) and fracture (10.7%). More than 60% of patients were hospitalised in provincial hospitals, but this proportion gradually decreased over time. 14.8% of patients were hospitalised in a hospital outside the province of their residence. Shanghai and Beijing were the most preferred migration destinations, with 63.5% and 52.0% of patients from outside provinces, respectively.

This study provided epidemiological data on revision THA in China based on a national database. During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the revision burden, and hospitalisation costs shifted from an annual increase to a decrease. China exhibits distinct characteristics regarding indications for revision THA. Additionally, significant regional disparities in revision THA were evident, leading to a considerable phenomenon of migration.

Although timely surgery is essential for improving general health and psychosocial outcomes, delays in cleft surgery remain common in low- and middle-income countries, including Rwanda, where little is known about the underlying causes. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing delays in cleft surgery in Rwanda using the four-delay framework.

A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between April and July 2024. We conducted 29 in-depth interviews with 15 caregivers of children with orofacial clefts and 14 healthcare providers involved in cleft care. Transcripts were analysed thematically using an inductive–deductive hybrid approach in MAXQDA (V.24), guided by the four-delay framework while allowing themes to emerge from the data.

This qualitative study was conducted across six Operation Smile-supported hospitals in Rwanda. Operation Smile is a non-governmental organisation providing cleft care in several low- and middle-income countries, including Rwanda. Among these facilities, one is a tertiary-level hospital located in Kigali city, while the others are secondary-level hospitals distributed across all provinces of the country.

Participants were purposively selected and comprised caregivers of children who underwent cleft surgery at Operation Smile-supported hospitals between 2023 and 2024, as well as healthcare providers with a minimum of 6 months’ experience delivering cleft care at these facilities.

Six major themes and 15 subthemes emerged. Limited caregiver awareness, cultural beliefs and inconsistent knowledge of clefts among healthcare providers influenced delays in seeking care. Reaching care was impeded by long distances, poor road infrastructure and inadequate transportation options. Receiving care was delayed by patient-related factors such as poor nutritional status of children and systemic issues, including shortages of specialised cleft care workforce (such as plastic surgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, anaesthesiologists, etc) and surgical infrastructure. Remaining in care was affected by the absence of multidisciplinary follow-up services. Despite these barriers, caregivers appreciated the support services provided by Operation Smile, including nutrition, transportation and coverage of surgery costs.

Cleft surgery delays in Rwanda are driven by multifactorial barriers across all stages of care. Strengthening early identification, public awareness, health provider training and post-operative support systems is essential to reducing delays and improving outcomes. Findings support the need for integrated cleft care within national surgical plans and broader health system strengthening efforts, and encourage the social and psychological support to affected children and caregivers.

Complex breast surgery, including immediate breast reconstruction and oncoplastic procedures, is increasingly performed to optimise oncologic and aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative wound healing complications remain a major concern, particularly in high-risk patients. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve wound healing in various surgical fields. However, its effectiveness in oncologic breast surgery remains insufficiently studied. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT in reducing wound healing complications in complex breast cancer surgery.

The TPN-SEIN study is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase III clinical trial. A total of 254 patients undergoing complex breast cancer surgery will be randomised either to arm 1 (NPWT immediately postoperatively for 7 days) or arm 2 (standard wound care). The primary endpoint is the rate of wound healing complications at day 30, defined as at least one of the following: deep postoperative infection of the prosthetic pocket, wound dehiscence or incomplete healing. Secondary endpoints include surgical site infection at day 90, reoperation rate, hospital readmission rate, time to complete healing, time to adjuvant treatment initiation, quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire and breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30)), patient satisfaction and medico-economic outcomes.

The study was approved by the French national ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est II, 5 December 2024, reference 24.04416.000295) and the institutional review board (IRB–COMERE, reference ICM-RCM 2024/11). The French National Agency for the Safety of Health Products has been notified. The study results will be presented at both national and international conferences and will also be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06265558.

To compare elective surgeries rates and waiting times between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients in Queensland.

Aggregated annual data analysis from July 2013 to December 2022 on elective surgeries and waiting times.

Public hospitals across Queensland.

All patients who had elective surgery in Queensland public hospitals between 2013 and 2022.

Rates and clinically recommended timeframes for elective surgeries.

Between 2013 and 2022, the overall estimated average rate of elective surgeries for Indigenous patients was 286 per 100 000 population, compared with 221 per 100 000 for non-Indigenous patients. Indigenous patients had higher rates of most elective surgeries except plastic and urological surgeries, where non-Indigenous patients had higher rates. Across all urgency categories, the percentages of elective surgery performed within clinically recommended timeframes were similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients.

Our findings may point to the efficacy of specific policy and service delivery innovations undertaken in Queensland. Due to the limitations of our aggregated data, this inference warrants careful interpretation. More studies with disaggregated data are needed.