Conectar
Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are among the leading non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide. However, diagnosing CRDs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains challenging due to limited access to spirometry and trained professionals. Aggravating the burden, CRDs often coexist with other NCDs, increasing healthcare costs, reducing quality of life and elevating mortality. These challenges highlight the need for simple case-finding approaches for CRDs, such as the COPD in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries Assessment (COLA-6) questionnaire, to support prompt identification and appropriate care within NCD services in LMICs.
To evaluate the discriminative accuracy, feasibility and implementation of the COLA-6 questionnaire in identifying and managing CRDs in Brazilian Primary Healthcare (PHC) services for NCDs.
The Multimorbidity Approach for REspiratory Solutions (MARES) study consists of three work packages to be conducted in PHC services in São Carlos/SP and São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
MARES-1: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 859 individuals with at least one NCD receiving care in PHC. The COLA-6 questionnaire will be administered by the research team and compared with quality-assured spirometry. The Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will also be assessed. The diagnostic performance of COLA-6 for identifying CRDs—including COPD, asthma, preserved ratio impaired spirometry, restriction and overlaps—will be assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curves and 95% CIs.
MARES-2: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 20 healthcare professionals (physicians, physiotherapists, community health agents and nurses) from five PHC services. These professionals will apply the COLA-6 during routine NCD care to a total sample of 1000 patients. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of COLA-6, using deductive thematic analysis.
MARES-3: A longitudinal, prospective observational study in which patients from MARES-1 and MARES-2 will be reassessed at 6-month follow-up. A total sample of 473 participants with abnormal spirometry, a diagnosis of CRD or high risk for CRDs is expected. Participants will undergo spirometry, and a subset will be interviewed to explore their healthcare experiences through qualitative thematic analysis. Access to diagnostic and treatment services in Brazil will be assessed. Changes in spirometry values, FeNO, CAAT and ACQ-7 scores from baseline to 6 months in patients from MARES-1 will be analysed.
This study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of Federal University of São Carlos and University of Santo Amaro (UNISA). Ethical approval was also granted by the University College London. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at international conferences. Results will improve identification of CRDs, addressing a significant gap in current PHC settings.
To analyse the comfort needs of patients following renal transplantation, guided by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort.
A qualitative design was employed.
This study was conducted at a Brazilian university hospital's renal transplant outpatient clinic. Forty-six post-transplant patients were purposively sampled by age, transplant time and clinic attendance. Face-to-face interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and conducted using a semi-structured script. Data were analysed through thematic content analysis, guided by Kolcaba's Comfort Theory and relevant literature.
Participant narratives were categorised according to the contexts outlined by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort: Physical, Environmental, Sociocultural and Psychospiritual. In the physical context, pain was identified as a major factor diminishing comfort after renal transplantation. In the environmental context, elements such as light, odour, sound, temperature and uncomfortable furnishings contributed to discomfort. In the sociocultural context, family support was highlighted as essential. In the psychospiritual context, religiosity played a key role in enhancing the comfort of transplant recipients.
Spirituality, strengthened social support networks and non-pharmacological comfort measures are essential for promoting comfort among patients following renal transplantation. These findings underscore the importance of integrated care approaches that address physical, emotional and social aspects to improve quality of life for this population.
Conceptual models in nursing provide a critical perspective for care and support the delivery of effective, evidence-based interventions. By identifying the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients, this study informs the development of targeted, holistic strategies for nursing and multidisciplinary practice in outpatient settings.
This study examined the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients and found that comfort is shaped by physical, environmental, sociocultural and psychospiritual factors. The results may guide global nursing and multidisciplinary outpatient care by informing integrated approaches that enhance the quality of life of transplant recipients.
This study was reported according to the COREQ framework.
No patient or public contribution.
Telerehabilitation (TR) programmes are increasingly recognised for their feasibility and potential benefits, such as eliminating travel time, reducing costs and providing a more comfortable rehabilitation experience at home. However, the comparative efficacy of remote physiotherapy compared with traditional in-person sessions for individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of TR compared with in-person physiotherapy in individuals with PD, focusing on both motor and non-motor outcomes.
This is a randomised, single-blind clinical trial with a mixed-methods approach. A total of 22 individuals diagnosed with PD will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will receive TR, consisting of remote physiotherapy sessions conducted once a week for 1 hour over a 4-month period. The control group will receive the same interventions in person. Interventions will include global muscle strengthening exercises, balance training, gait and motor coordination exercises, and cognitive training. The primary outcome will be motor function, measured using part III of the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes will include cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), gait (Functional Gait Assessment), mobility (Timed Up and Go Test) and quality of life (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire). Data will be analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance to compare outcomes between groups across four assessment points (baseline, midpoint, postintervention and 2 months follow-up). Additionally, a qualitative phase will explore participants’ perceptions and experiences regarding TR and in-person interventions, with assessments carried out 2 months after the completion of the 24-week interventions, through semistructured interviews that will be analysed using Bardin’s Content Analysis technique.
This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (approval number: 5.553.701). All participants will provide written informed consent before inclusion. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and communication with participants and healthcare professionals.
RBR-6h5knrj.
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are conditions for which the provision of timely and skilled primary care can reduce risks of hospitalisation when preventing, treating or controlling a disease. For this reason, hospitalisations for ACSC have been commonly employed by health systems as an indicator of effectiveness for the primary level of care. This study aims to evaluate whether the provision of primary care services by physicians with residency training in family medicine is associated with rates of general hospitalisations for ACSCs in the Brazilian Unified Health System network in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Longitudinal ecological study using a Generalised Linear Model for Gamma-distributed variables.
Primary healthcare centres in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from January 2017 to December 2021, aggregated at the primary healthcare centres level.
Data aggregated at the primary healthcare centre level, encompassing socioeconomic, professional and health-related variables.
Incidence rates of hospitalisations for ACSCs, adjusted for age and sex.
After adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic variables using the Health Vulnerability Index, a higher concentration of family physicians was significantly associated with a lower incidence of hospitalisations for ACSCs. If all physicians in the primary care network were family physicians, compared with a scenario in which none were, an estimated 11.89% reduction in hospitalisations would be expected (95% CI 7.3% to 16.3%, p
The findings suggest that specialisation in family medicine positively impacts health outcomes by reducing hospitalisations for ACSCs. These results can inform the development of evidence-based public policies to enhance primary care effectiveness.
The development of effective vaccines targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) has significantly contributed to disease prevention, highly relevant in immunosuppressed patients who have higher incidence of HPV-related cancers than their non-immunosuppressed counterparts. However, the acceptance and uptake of the HPV vaccine among immunosuppressed individuals pose unique challenges. Immunocompromised patients’ acceptance of the HPV vaccine is influenced by multifaceted factors, including concerns about safety and effectiveness, interactions with immunosuppressive medications and uncertainties due to their compromised immunity. This systematic review aims to identify the main factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance among immunosuppressed patients.
A comprehensive search strategy will be executed across databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Cochrane Database. The review will encompass the three WHO-endorsed HPV vaccines (quadrivalent, bivalent and nonavalent) and will consider studies related to HPV vaccines and their administration. The scope includes study focusing on immunosuppressed patients who received organ transplants, cancer treatments or are HIV-positive. No temporal restrictions will be applied, and searches will be conducted until December 2025. Observational studies, including retrospective/prospective cohorts, case–control and cross-sectional studies, reporting factors influencing HPV vaccination in immunosuppressed populations will be included. Studies with overlapping patient populations will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, demographics, vaccine type, risk/protective factors, outcomes and medical history. Validation and cross-verification will ensure data accuracy. Risk of bias will be assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions), and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) will rate evidence certainty. Meta-analysis, guided by Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, will employ fixed/random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity using I² statistics.
This research will analyse previously published data, so ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
CRD42023452537.
by Juliana Rodrigues Tovar Garbin, Franciéle Marabotti Costa Leite, Ana Paula Brioschi dos Santos, Larissa Soares Dell’Antonio, Cristiano Soares da Silva Dell’Antonio, Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior
A comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the epidemiological dynamics of COVID-19 across the pandemic waves—particularly in terms of disease severity and mortality—is critical for optimizing healthcare services and prioritizing high-risk populations. Here we aim to analyze the factors associated with short-term and prolonged hospitalization for COVID-19 during the first three pandemic waves. We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from individuals reported in the e-SUS-VS system who were hospitalized for COVID-19 in a state in a southeast state of Brazil. Hospitalization duration was classified as short or prolonged based on a 7-day cutoff, corresponding to the median length of hospital stay during the second pandemic wave. Bivariate analyses were performed using the chi-square test for heterogeneity. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with statistical significance set at 5%. When analyzing hospitalization duration across the three waves, we found that 51.1% (95%CI: 49.3–53) of hospitalizations in the first wave were prolonged. In contrast, short-duration hospitalizations predominated in the second (54.7%; 95% CI: 52.4–57.0) and third (51.7%; 95% CI: 50.2–53.2) waves. Factors associated with prolonged hospitalization varied by wave. During the first wave, older adults (≥60 years) (OR=1.67; 95%CI: 1.35–2.06), individuals with ≥10 symptoms (OR=2.03; 95%CI: 1.04–3.94), obese individuals (OR=2.0; 95%CI: 1.53–2.74), and those with ≥2 comorbidities (OR=2.22; 95%CI: 1.71–2.89) were more likely to experience prolonged hospitalization. In the second wave, he likelihood of extended hospital stays was higher among individuals aged ≥60 years (OR=2.04; 95%CI: 1.58–2.62) and those with ≥2 comorbidities (OR=1.77; 95%CI: 1.29–2.41). In the third wave, prolonged hospitalization was more frequent among older adults (OR=1.89; 95%CI: 1.65–2.17,), individuals with 5–9 symptoms (OR=1.52; 95%CI: 1.20–1.92), obese individuals (OR=2.2; 95%CI: 1.78–2.73), and those with comorbidities (OR=1.45; 95%CI: 1.22–1.72 and OR=2.0; 95%CI: 1.69–2.45). In conclusion, we identified variations in hospitalization patterns across the pandemic waves, although the differences were relatively subtle. These variations likely reflect gradual shifts in the risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stays. Our findings highlight t the importance of implementing targeted public health interventions, particularly those designed to reduce disease severity and improve clinical outcomes among vulnerable populations at greater risk of extended hospitalization.
Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an important modifiable risk factor of major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke but with established risk factors and elevated LDL-C may benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT); however, the size and potential healthcare burden of this population globally are not known. The benefits of evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in these patients, are currently being studied in the phase 3 Effect of Evolocumab in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk Without Prior Myocardial Infarction or Stroke (VESALIUS-CV) trial. To characterise the high-risk pre–CV-event (VESALIUS-CV–like) individuals in the real world, an observational study is being conducted across multiple countries.
This retrospective cohort study will use a common protocol and an analytical common data model approach to characterise VESALIUS-CV–like individuals in the real world across different geographical regions and healthcare settings. The study period will be from 2010 to 2022, subject to data availability in study sites. Patients aged 50 years and older at high risk of CV disease but without prior MI or stroke will be included in this study. VESALIUS-CV–like individuals are defined through a combination of the following: (1) one diagnosis of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease or diabetes with microvascular complications or chronic insulin use; (2) an elevated LDL-C measurement and (3) other high-risk factors. The objectives of this study are to estimate the prevalence of VESALIUS-CV–like individuals, describe their characteristics and care pathways and estimate their incidence rates of CV events and healthcare costs. The prevalence of VESALIUS-CV–like individuals will be expressed as annual prevalence; patient characteristics at index date will be presented using summary statistics; care pathways will be summarised as LLT prescription across time; and the incidence of defined CV events will be expressed as events per person-years as well as at certain time periods. Healthcare costs will be presented as CV-related costs in different time periods.
Approvals of the study protocol were obtained from relevant local ethics and regulatory frameworks for each participating database. The results of the study will be submitted to peer-reviewed scientific publications and presented at scientific conferences.
The COVID-19 pandemic’s unprecedented nature has exposed significant vulnerabilities in most public health systems and highlighted the importance of coordinated responses across various levels of government. A global debate emerged on the types of health measures necessary to curb the rapid spread of contagious and/or lethal diseases. However, some of these measures involved restricting individual rights, raising significant ethical, legal and public health questions. The protocol of this systematic review aims to address a critical gap in the literature by analysing how Public Health Surveillance services worldwide implemented compulsory right-restricting measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what impacts these measures had on public health outcomes and individual rights.
This protocol focuses on studies about right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will be unrestrictive as to period (starting in 2019, when the outbreak was identified), language or publication status in a preliminary stage. It will include only peer-reviewed publications, discarding opinion articles, editorials, conference papers and non-peer-reviewed publications. Considering the PICo strategy, the research question of this systematic review can be formulated as follows: Problem—right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services; Interest—implementation modalities and impacts on individual rights and public health outcomes; Context—COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol will use the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Considering the various measures that may have been adopted, the following categories of analysis will be used: (i) Public Health Surveillance as a field, (ii) the various specific areas of Health Surveillance, (iii) law enforcement, (iv) right-restricting measures and consent, (v) interactions between right-restricting measures and routine Public Health Surveillance functions, (vi) differences between countries and (vii) Health Surveillance lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. These categories are not strictly mutually exclusive; however, each study will be assigned to the category most aligned with its primary focus. To ensure the validity and reliability of findings, each study will have its risk of bias assessed at both the study and outcome levels.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this systematic review. The results will be presented in one or more articles to be submitted to scientific journals and may also be presented at scientific conferences and to public policy makers.
This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 November 2024 (registration number CRD42024613039).
The way communication is conducted directly influences the professional–patient relationship, how patients cope with their diagnosis, and their sense of hope throughout treatment. This study aims to map the literature on strategies that healthcare professionals can use to promote hope in communication with pediatric patients and their families in the context of chronic illness. Based on this objective, the study highlights an algorithm to assist healthcare professionals in instilling hope in this population through communication.
Scoping review.
This systematized review was conducted using the databases PubMed, LILACS, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus, employing the PCC framework and the Boolean operators AND and OR. The time frame was limited to the last 20 years (2004–2024). A total of 734 studies were identified across the databases, with an additional four retrieved through manual citation searches, resulting in 19 articles included in the final sample.
The findings highlight three key pillars for promoting hope in communication: (1) careful preparation for information delivery, which involves identifying the diverse needs of families and creating a physically comfortable and emotionally supportive environment; (2) providing information and emphasizing how it is presented—considering content, clarity, honesty, empathy, and adaptation to the recipient's specific needs; and (3) follow-up after information delivery, ensuring emotional support and active, skilled listening.
Interpersonal communication between the healthcare professional, the patient, and the family was mainly focused on the transmission of information about the disease and treatment in a clear and empathetic manner, considering who is receiving the information and how the information is interpreted.
This review provides guidance for healthcare professionals in implementing communication strategies that foster hope in the context of pediatric chronic illness. Additionally, this guide may serve as a model for training students and healthcare professionals. Further research is needed to implement and explore additional effective communication strategies for this population across diverse cultural settings.
To evaluate the impact of implementing a prototype of simulation-based educational technology on raising awareness among ICU nurses, improving communication in nursing handover, and promoting patient safety.
Qualitative study based on the conceptual framework of patient safety. The COREQ tool guided the presentation of the research report.
The research was conducted with 18 nurses from the ICU of a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, who worked directly in nursing handover. The technology implemented was developed based on communication failures identified in a previous stage of the macro research project. This evidence supported the development of a simulated scenario of a nursing handover of a critical patient, which was recorded in audio and video. The video addressed content (absence, incompleteness and lack of ordering of information) and behavioural errors (interruptions, distractions, noise and lack of clarity) during communication between intensive care nurses. The video was implemented with nurses through the use of telesimulation with debriefing. Finally, the nurses were subjected to a semi-structured interview to evaluate the potential of the technology, whose data underwent thematic analysis with an inductive model.
The nurses recognised the communication failures portrayed as part of their daily practice, reflected on their mistakes, and on actions to be adopted to change behaviour during the handover.
The simulation-based technology prototype has the potential to promote self-reflection and raise nurses' awareness of the need to change behaviours during the handover.
The simulation-based technology prototype can be applied as an educational strategy to improve communication safety in nursing handover.
No patient or public contribution.
To test a middle-range theory (MRT) for the nursing diagnosis of ineffective breathing pattern in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) based on analysis of two general propositions.
This cross-sectional study is guided by STROBE. The propositions represent hypotheses about the relationships between the concepts of this MRT to be tested empirically, and thus, log-linear models were used to verify the structure of the proposition related to the stimuli. Diagnostic accuracy measures, univariate logistic regressions and the Mann–Whitney test were used to analyse the structure of the propositions related to behaviours.
The analysis of the propositions related to the stimuli (eight concepts, four of which were classified as focal stimuli and four as contextual stimuli) suggested a reclassification of the stimulus “deformities in the thoracic wall” which became too focal. In the analysis of the propositions related to behaviours (17 concepts, five of which were classified as acute confirmatory, nine as acute clinical deterioration and three classified as chronic), guided changes in the operationalisation of concepts were suggested after comparing clinical findings; thus, acute confirmatory behaviours now have 10 concepts, while acute clinical deterioration behaviours and chronic behaviours continued with nine and three concepts, respectively, but with reclassifications between them.
Changes in the operationalisation of the classification of the elements of the two propositions occurred after comparing the clinical findings with the theoretical model.
By establishing precise causal relationships and describing how IBP manifests itself over time in children with CHD, empirical testing of this MRT helps nurses understand clinical reasoning based on temporal logic and spectral interaction between diagnostic components, which in turn will improve the use and accuracy of nursing diagnoses.
Children and adolescents with CHD were recruited for this study sharing their clinical history and physical lung examination.
This study aimed to describe the process of construction, validation, and usability of the chatbot ESTOMABOT to assist in the self-care of patients with intestinal ostomies. Methodological research was conducted in three phases: construction, validation, and usability. The first stage corresponded to the elaboration of a script through a literature review, and the second stage corresponded to face and content validation through a panel of enterostomal therapy nurses. In the third phase, the usability of ESTOMABOT was assessed with the participation of surgical clinic nurses, patients with intestinal elimination ostomies, and information technology professionals, using the System Usability Scale. The ESTOMABOT content reached excellent criteria of adequacy, with percentages of agreement equal to or greater than 90%, which were considered adequate, relevant, and representative. The evaluation of the content validity of the script using the scale content validity index/average proportion method reached a result above 0.90, and the Fleiss κ was excellent (P
Objetivo: Comprender e identificar, utilizando referencias y producciones científicas, sobre la importancia de la lactancia materna en el contexto de las hospitalizaciones de recién nacidos prematuros en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales, además del trabajo de los profesionales de enfermería en la educación y estímulo a la lactancia materna. Method: Se realizó una revisión integradora realizada en las bases de datos de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS) basada en el cruce de los descriptores, se realizó una encuesta bibliográfica en las siguientes bases de datos: Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS) y Base de Datos de Enfermería (BDENF). Results: Se seleccionaron nueve artículos que abordaron la importancia de la lactancia materna, las condiciones para la promoción y sensibilización de la lactancia materna en Brasil y el papel de los profesionales de enfermería en el contexto de la lactancia materna en Brasil. Conclusions: Este estudio destacó la importancia de la lactancia materna para la salud pública y el desempeño de los profesionales de enfermería en este contexto, actuando como apoyo, promoción, estímulo y orientación para la práctica adecuada de la lactancia materna.
Objetivo principal: Describir las experiencias de las madres que vivieron accidentes domésticos que involucraron a sus hijos, a la luz del Modelo de Adaptación de Roy. Método: Estudio cualitativo. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de entrevistas y sometidos a la técnica de análisis de contenido. Se utilizó como marco teórico el Modelo de Adaptación de Roy. Resultados principales: Participaron 17 madres, cuyos discursos fueron agrupados en tres categorías: enfrentar el desafío de salvar la vida de su hijo; reconocer el momento de (falta de) cuidado de su hijo; y aprender de sus errores. Conclusión principal: Se identificaron madres con dificultades para reconocer sus errores y posibles negligencias, que les atribuyeron la responsabilidad del accidente al hijo. Los enfermeros, cuando basan su práctica clínica en el Modelo de Adaptación de Roy, deben prestarles atención a las necesidades emocionales de los sistemas adaptativos de los involucrados.
Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de un instrumento interdisciplinario, desarrollado y aplicado en una unidad de cuidados intensivos de adultos para reducir las infecciones asociadas a la atención de la salud. Metodología: Estudio transversal, cuantitativo, realizado de enero de 2018 y junio de 2019, en una UCI de un Hospital de Paraná-Brasil. Resultados: Se evaluaron 759 pacientes. Antes de la aplicación del instrumento, las medias eran respectivamente: 1,00 para IRAS CVC; 6.78 ID IPCS; 3,22 VAP; 21,62 DIPAV y 0,88 para IRAS CVD, después con la aplicación del Fast Checklist: 0,11 para IRAS CVC (p = 0,11); 0,86 ID IPCS (p = 0,017); 0,33 VAP (p = 0,001); 2,83 DIPAV (p = 0,003) y 0,00 para IRAS ECV (p = 0,0002). Conclusión principal: El estudio demostró que la implementación y aplicación diaria de la Lista de Verificación Rápida fue efectiva para la reducción de las IRAS en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos.
Objetivo: recopilar evidencia científica sobre la implementación y evaluación del uso de instrumentos para la identificación temprana del deterioro clínico en pacientes no infectados por SARS-COV-2 en unidades de hospitalización de adultos. Método: revisión integradora realizada en las bases de datos Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Web Of Science y SCOPUS, utilizando la siguiente estrategia de búsqueda: (“Early Medical Intervention” OR “Early Warning Systems” O “Puntuación de alerta temprana”) Y (“Deterioro clínico”). Resultados: se seleccionaron ocho artículos que abordaron la implementación de herramientas para la identificación temprana de deterioro clínico en unidades de hospitalización y evaluaron sus resultados a través de indicadores de incidencia de paro cardiorrespiratorio, incidencia de ingreso no planificado en UTI, incidencia de cirugía de emergencia, mortalidad e incidencia de enfermedad renal. lesión. Conclusión: la implementación de herramientas que permiten la identificación temprana del deterioro clínico en las unidades de hospitalización tuvo un impacto positivo en los indicadores institucionales.
Objetivo: Analizar las repercusiones de la pandemia por el nuevo coronavirus en la salud de los profesionales de enfermería. Método: Investigación cuantitativa, descriptiva, realizada en un hospital universitario de Salvador, Bahía, Brasil, entre septiembre y octubre de 2020. La recolección de datos se realizó a través de un cuestionario electrónico estructurado, que fue respondido por 209 profesionales de enfermería de la institución. El proyecto fue aprobado por un Comité de Ética en Investigación (nº CAAE 36841720.0.0000.0049). Resultados: La mayoría de los profesionales relató insomnio o dormir menos de lo necesario (62,67%); mostró aumento del deseo de comer (46,89%) o pérdida del apetito (16,75%); tuvo pérdidas en actividades de ocio (97,6%); relataron una disminución en la práctica de actividad física (91,87%); mostró alteraciones en el estado de ánimo (83,75%); reportó algún grado de ansiedad (89,95%); y tenía diagnóstico de covid-19 (28,23%). Conclusión: Los resultados indican las repercusiones que trajo la pandemia para la salud física y mental de los profesionales de enfermería.
Objetivo principal: Aprehender las experiencias de los profesionales de enfermería en el cuidado de pacientes con covid-19. Metodología: Investigación cualitativa realizada con 17 profesionales de enfermería en un hospital universitario de Salvador, Bahía, Brasil. La información fue recolectada a través de entrevistas semiestructuradas y analizada con el apoyo del software IRAMUTEQ. Resultados principales: La experiencia de las prácticas fue descrita como difícil, aterradora, complicada, causando miedo, aprensión y estrés. Surgió el énfasis en las medidas de autoprotección y como medio para superar el aislamiento, los profesionales utilizaron estrategias para favorecer la aproximación y la comunicación entre los pacientes y el equipo, evidenciando así un cuidado sensible a las necesidades del otro. Conclusión principal: Las reacciones indican que los profesionales desarrollaron estados emocionales negativos; adaptaron el servicio; y el fortalecimiento del autocuidado mediante la exposición al riesgo de contaminación y utilizaron estrategias de atención permeadas por la sensibilidad.
Objetivo: Identificar los cuidados que brindan las enfermeras a los pacientes adultos en cuidados paliativos. Método: Se trata de una revisión integradora, realizada en octubre de 2020. Resultados: se incluyeron 14 artículos. En cuanto a las dimensiones del cuidado, el 33,2% de los estudios abordaron solo una dimensión del cuidado: el 13,3% la dimensión física; El 13,3% aporta la dimensión espiritual y el 6,6% la dimensión emocional. Asociando dos dimensiones, apareció el 33,2%: el 13,3% trajo las dimensiones física y emocional; 6,6% las dimensiones emocional y social; 6,6% dimensiones físicas y sociales; y el 6,6% las dimensiones emocionales y espirituales del cuidado. Asociando tres dimensiones, el 20% aporta las dimensiones física, emocional y social del cuidado y, finalmente, solo el 6,6% aporta la asociación de las cuatro dimensiones. Conclusión: El estudio muestra el predominio de los cuidados brindados por enfermeras a los pacientes en cuidados paliativos en las dimensiones física y emocional.
Objetivo: conocer la producción diaria de atención para mujeres embarazadas que viven con infección por el síndrome de inmunodefi-ciencia humana en una ciudad del estado de Río de Janeiro. Método: esta es una investigación cualitativa, descriptiva. Empleados como herramientas de producción de datos: la guía del usuario y el diario desde la perspectiva del Análisis Institucional. El análisis del material se realizó en función de la identificación de núcleos de significado en el contenido recopilado. Resultados: se construyó un diagrama de flujo, que presenta el recorrido del usuario en la red y los núcleos de significado, caracterizados como: tensión entre la demanda y el tiempo en servicio, yendo y viniendo de la producción burocrática y el vínculo entre la usuaria y los profesionales. Conclusión: un estudio señala la necesidad de reuniones en la construcción de una red de apoyo para mujeres embarazadas con el síndrome de inmunodefi-ciencia humana, que es una posibilidad de reflexión sobre el proceso de atención, centrado en la usuaria.
FreshRSS