Conectar
Adnexal torsion is a gynaecological emergency in which prompt diagnosis and management are critical to preserving ovarian function. However, the clinical presentation is often non-specific, and diagnosis primarily relies on pelvic ultrasound, a modality with limited sensitivity that can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as a promising imaging technique that may enhance diagnostic accuracy by better characterising adnexal vascularisation.
The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of CEUS to standard diagnostic procedures can reduce the rate of unnecessary emergency surgeries. Specifically, we compare two diagnostic strategies in cases of high clinical suspicion of adnexal torsion: the current standard approach versus an experimental strategy incorporating CEUS. The primary outcome is the rate of inappropriate surgical interventions, defined as emergency surgery performed within 6 hours without intraoperative confirmation of torsion.
This is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised (1:1), controlled, superiority trial. A total of 256 women presenting with a high clinical suspicion of adnexal torsion will be enrolled over a period of 36 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the standard diagnostic strategy or an experimental strategy that includes CEUS. The primary endpoint is the proportion of emergency surgical procedures (performed within 6 hours of hospital admission) in which adnexal torsion is not confirmed.
The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee, the CPP (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on 28 October 2024. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant national and international conferences. The ethical approval number from the CPP is 6115.
NCT06677554; 2024-511720-13-00.
Disasters can have a disproportionate impact on highly vulnerable hospitalised patients. Managers preparing hospital networks for disasters play an important role in enhancing networks’ readiness by creating disaster plans and imparting that knowledge through training and simulation exercises. The objective of this research was to uncover how those working in disaster preparedness roles in Australian hospital networks perceived the challenges that they face while ensuring adequate preparation for disasters.
A qualitative study design was employed which involved purposive sampling of Australian hospital network professionals responsible for disaster preparedness. Thematic analysis of data collected through individual online interviews generated prominent challenges of disaster preparedness in Australian hospital networks.
Local hospital networks across Australia
Twenty-six disaster preparedness managers, including hospital executives, disaster managers, emergency management coordinators and business continuity managers from 23 hospital networks located in five Australian states and one territory, participated in semi-structured online interviews. Interview transcripts were coded through an iterative inductive thematic analysis process to synthesise the predominant challenges faced by these participants when preparing their hospital networks for disasters.
Participants reported four challenges: staff’s limited interest in preparedness, budgetary constraints, staffing issues and ambiguous relationships with state and national health departments. They also presented four related solutions: capitalising on interest after disasters, attracting funding with evidence from prior disasters, facilitating staff’s availability for disaster training and specifying network-government relationships for accountability.
Disasters, although infrequent, are known to occur and can be catastrophic, yet those working in hospital network disaster preparedness roles encounter limited availability of wider staff for training and low interest in disaster planning. The sudden onset of a disaster can take a heavy toll on patients if hospitals’ staff are not sufficiently trained in disaster response or are not aware of the disaster plan. By identifying the perceptions of managers to disaster preparedness, this research presents specific challenges that hospital networks can address to improve awareness and preparation.
The second phase of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health (C-MACH) was initiated to investigate how environmental exposures from the fetal period to early childhood influence maternal and child health outcomes. The sub-cohort focuses specifically on detailed assessments of indoor environmental factors and neighbourhood-built and social environments. By integrating environmental metrics with biological, behavioural and sociodemographic data, the study aims to elucidate their role in the development of allergies, neurodevelopmental disorders and other non-communicable diseases in early life.
Between June 2021 and April 2023, 505 pregnant women were enrolled in the second phase of the C-MACH main study. Of these, 298 participants consented to join the sub-cohort study, including 258 in the sleep and physical activity monitoring option (Option 1) and 148 in the indoor allergen exposure sub-study (Option 2). The study includes biological sampling, environmental monitoring and repeated questionnaire surveys. At baseline, 253 live births were recorded from 251 pregnancies.
Of the 298 women, 272 completed early pregnancy questionnaires. The mean maternal age was 33.1 years (SD 4.6); 97.8% were married. University-level education was reported by 51.0% of mothers and 53.7% of fathers. Most households had an annual income of 6 to
Longitudinal follow-up will continue until the children reach age 15. Future analyses will examine associations between environmental exposures and allergic, developmental, endocrine/metabolic and obesity-related outcomes.
by Anas Ismail, Moatasem Salah, Mads Gilbert, Yousef H. Abu Alreesh, Craig Jones
BackgroundGaza has faced numerous military attacks that resulted in mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The ongoing genocide in Gaza has destroyed much of the health system, including killing and injuring of hundreds of health care workers (HCWs). Current thinking on the health system reconstruction lacks empirical data and local HCWs’ perspectives. The study analyses locally driven innovations and lessons learned by HCWs who responded to MCIs between 2018 and 2021 to guide current and future planning of the reconstruction of the health system in Gaza.
MethodsThis was a qualitative study using online and face-to-face interviews with HCWs who responded to the Great March of Return and the 2021 Israeli military attacks. Transcripts and extensive notes from the interviews were recorded and analyzed on NVivo using thematic content analysis. We used the health system building blocks as themes for deductive analysis with a seventh place-based theme (Gaza-specific) to account for the context of Gaza and the MCIs.
ResultsProblems faced by HCWs mostly related to the nature and complexity of traumatic injuries, shortages in HCWs, particularly specialist doctors, poor coordination among actors, duplication of services, and shortages of supplies and equipment. Locally driven innovations and solutions included establishing new services centers, opening and expanding training programs, starting new coordination bodies, and task shifting of staff and facilities. Lessons learned included strengthening training and employment opportunities for staff, enhancing emergency preparedness and capacities, maintaining coordination bodies, enhancing community engagement and strengthening the governance of the Ministry of Health.
ConclusionReconstruction of Gaza’s health system needs to be grounded in its political context and in the experiences of HCWs who have worked in and managed the system. Locally driven solutions and lessons learned can ensure that reconstruction serves as a vehicle for self-determination and sovereignty, rather than entrenching dependency.
There are limited data about how South Asian (SA) patients, their caregivers and their physicians make decisions about treatment, in particular advanced therapies. The study aimed to explore how SA people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their family members and clinicians experience and perceive treatment-related decision-making with the aim of identifying strategies to improve treatment decision-making in Canada.
A descriptive qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews.
Canada.
Adults residing in Canada, who self-identified as SA, had received treatment or cared for someone who received treatment for IBD from a gastroenterologist in Canada, and who spoke and understood English, Hindi and/or Punjabi were eligible to participate in the study. Clinician participants (eg, nurses, gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons) were eligible if they had experience treating SA patients with IBD.
Data from 1:1, semi-structured interviews were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.
The length of time spent in Canada played a central role in patient perspectives on decision-making around IBD treatment. First or second-generation SA people, residency status, family and community involvement, universal factors like stigma, medication costs and preferences for non-pharmacological treatments influenced decision-making. Patient and caregiver participants reported high satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making processes, while clinician participants self-reported lesser satisfaction.
Clinicians and researchers working with SA patients in chronic disease specialties can use these findings to meet the healthcare needs and reduce disparities in optimal treatment for this patient population.
N/A.
To identify and synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence of nurse managers' qualities, practices and styles related to leading nurses' interprofessional collaboration.
Mixed-methods systematic review.
Two authors independently selected studies based on predefined inclusion criteria, assessed quality and extracted data. A thematic synthesis with a convergent qualitative design was used.
CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus were searched from January 1, 2010, to September 7, 2025. Citations of relevant articles were screened.
A total of 32 articles were included. The analysis revealed two leadership core qualities, five core practices, and three core styles of nurse managers that promote nurses' interprofessional collaboration. Core qualities were proficiency and mindset. Core practices comprised empowering, communicating and informing, commitment to interprofessional collaboration, creating possibilities, and establishing an enhancing atmosphere. Core styles included authentic, transformational, and transactional leadership styles.
The results reflect the situational nature of nursing leadership related to interprofessional collaboration. Successful leadership requires managers to adopt primarily a transformational leadership style, yet more traditional leadership is required occasionally. Results indicate that nursing leadership is foremost a process that evolves within its context.
Greater clarity on how leadership influences nurses' interprofessional collaboration supports leaders, organisations, and educational institutions in developing and sustaining effective leadership.
This review demonstrates that the quality of nursing leadership is a central factor for successful interprofessional collaboration.
The PRISMA guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis were used.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To investigate the effects of organisational interventions on the incidence, healing and management of pressure injuries in adult patients in acute hospital settings.
Systematic review.
The review included adult patients at risk of or with pre-existing pressure injuries in acute hospital settings, excluding mental health units, emergency departments or operating theatres. Interventions employed in the included studies were categorised using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL Complete and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from 01 January 2012 to 31 December 2023.
Of 8861 records identified, 7 prevention studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies reported reductions in pressure injury incidence. Included studies employed various combinations of 14 organisational strategies to enhance practices. Educational interventions were utilised in six studies, including educational meetings, materials and outreach visits. Other common strategies included audit and feedback, communities of practice and continuous quality improvement. The interventions targeted patients and clinicians, primarily nurses, with some involving multidisciplinary teams. The focus was on enhancing healthcare practices through systematic approaches and stakeholder engagement.
Organisational strategies targeting both patients and clinicians as part of an intervention bundle may enhance the prevention of pressure injuries in acute hospital settings. Further, high-quality effectiveness–implementation hybrid trials are required to evaluate these strategies.
Organisational factors influence clinicians' ability to implement evidence-based practices. The effectiveness of specific organisational strategies in acute settings is uncertain. Multiple organisational strategies targeting patients and clinicians may improve the implementability of a pressure injury prevention intervention.
This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines.
Neither patients nor the public were directly involved in this study.
Suicide is a leading cause of death among Autistic adults globally. Autistic people are up to six times more likely to die by suicide than people in the general population. Research highlights a lack of appropriate support for Autistic individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviours.
A scoping review will be conducted to map available literature on Suicide Prevention Interventions and Supports used with the Autistic community. This scoping review will use the methodological guidelines set out by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The searches will be conducted in January 2025. The following electronic databases will be searched; PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate, PsycINFO and EMBASE, as well as the reference lists of included articles and grey literature (including conference abstracts, PhD theses, grey literature databases and preprints). The search strategy will be used to identify literature with an aim of preventing suicide in Autistic individuals. Only literature published in English will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen all literature based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction will be piloted by two reviewers and continued by one reviewer. The extracted data will be checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. A narrative summary of findings will be conducted. Results will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review statement.
Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is protocol for a review of published literature and does not involve human participants or private data. Findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.
This protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/bpxnf/overview).
Within the UK there are 33 deaths every day from prostate cancer, second only to lung cancer as the most common cause of cancer death in males in the UK. Of the 55 000 new cases each year, up to 50% of these patients will receive radiotherapy either alone or after prostatectomy. Although there have been significant improvements in the accuracy of radiotherapy delivery leading to better tumour targeting and a reduction in dose to normal tissues, significant permanent genito-urinary or gastrointestinal-related side effects are all too common. With nearly 80% of patients with prostate cancer surviving for 10 years or more, minimising life-limiting radiation damage to normal tissues is vitally important. However, at present, it is not possible to identify which patients will suffer a poorer outcome after radiotherapy. The aim of this study, improving radiotherapy in PROState cancer using EleCtronic population-based healthCAre data (PROSECCA), is to do this by using the existing information in a patient’s digital healthcare record. By linking primary, secondary and tertiary clinical data, including digital image information, with radiotherapy treatment plans and outcome data, the PROSECCA study will identify de novo predictive biomarkers of radiation response and provide clinicians with a tool to individualise a radiotherapy dose and plan to maximise cure and minimise toxicity.
The PROSECCA study is a large multidisciplinary project, the purpose of which is to analyse healthcare records from up to 15 000 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radiotherapy in the treatment of their cancer in Scotland between 2010 and 2022. Through the linkage of data obtained specifically for radiotherapy and data held within each patient’s unique electronic health record (EHR), the factors that indicate why some patients have a poor response to treatment, or an increased risk of side effects from radiation, will be identified. This will be made possible by the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AL/ML), which will help to identify at-risk patients earlier and allow adaptation of their treatment accordingly.
The study is being conducted in accordance with the ethical principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice that respects and protects the rights, and maintains confidentiality, of all trial participants. The study protocol (V.1.0) was reviewed by the South Central Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (REC) on 13 December 2021 and received a favourable opinion subject to each National Health Service (NHS) organisation confirming permission for patients treated within their area. Approval for the use of unconsented healthcare record data for patients included in the study and treated at one of the five Scottish Cancer Centres required an application to the NHS Scotland Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care (HSC-PBPP). Full approval from the HSC-PBPP panel was received on 1 July 2024, which covered the use of pseudoanonymised EHR data for all patients participating in the study. The study is publicly listed on the NHS Health Research Authority site, with IRAS ID 306245 and REC reference 21/SC/0402. Dissemination of the study findings will take place through field-leading cancer, radiation oncology and medical physics journals. All manuscripts will be approved by the main study team and authorship determined by mutual agreement.
To develop and psychometrically test a comprehensive Cancer Nurse Self-Assessment Tool (CaN-SAT).
Modified Delphi to assess content validity and cross-sectional survey to assess reliability and validity.
Phase 1: An expert group developed the tool structure and item content. Phase 2: Through a modified Delphi, cancer nursing experts rated the importance of each element of practice and assessed the relevance and clarity of each item. Content Validation Indexes (CVI) were calculated, and a CVI of ≥ 0.78 was required for items to be included. Phase 3: Cancer nurses participated in a survey to test internal consistency (using Cronbach's alpha coefficients) and known-group validity (through Mann–Whitney U tests). This study was reported using the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) checklist.
The CaN-SAT underwent two rounds of Delphi with 24 then 15 cancer nursing experts. All elements of practice were rated as important. Only three items achieved a CVI < 0.78 after round one; however, based on open-ended comments, 26 items were revised and one new item added. After round two, all items received a CVI above 0.78. The final tool consisted of 93 items across 15 elements of practice. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were between 0.92 and 0.98 indicating good reliability. Mann–Whitney U tests demonstrated significant differences between clinical nurses and advanced practice nurses across 13 out of 15 elements of practice.
The CaN-SAT is a comprehensive, valid and reliable tool that can be used for cancer nurses to self-assess current skill levels, identify their learning needs and inform decisions about educational opportunities to optimise cancer care provision.
The research team included three patient advocates from Cancer Voices NSW, who were actively involved in all aspects of the study and are listed as authors.
This study aimed to explore perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative’s (PIC’s) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) among clinicians, with a focus on awareness, frequency of use, applicability and areas for improvement.
Cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews.
Clinicians working in all Australian states and territories. Recruitment was via non-probability convenience sampling. Invitations to participate in the online survey were posted on national- and state-level paediatric organisations, networks and groups. Survey participants could express interest in taking part in a follow-up online interview.
A total of 466 clinicians, including consultants/specialists (46.1%), specialists in training (residents/registrars: 20.4%), nurses (17.8%), allied health professionals (4.7%) and general practitioners (3.6%) participated in the survey. Findings indicated a high level of usage, with two-thirds of participants (63.9%) using the guidelines weekly. Most participants (91.8%) deemed the CPGs highly applicable to their practice settings, and over half (57.9%) had referred to more than 10 different PIC CPGs in the past month. Patterns of use reflected experience, seniority and scope of practice, with utilisation significantly higher among specialists in training, those working in emergency settings and those with less practising experience. Ten clinicians were interviewed to gain deeper insights, reinforcing that PIC CPGs serve multiple purposes, such as to check practice and for self-learning, for teaching more junior staff, and to reinforce treatment decisions with parents and patients. The guidelines were noted as being useful for all members of the multidisciplinary team in providing consistent language and uniform care. Key areas for improvement included enhancing accessibility in time-pressured environments, such as incorporating human factors-based navigation features and standardised layouts, and integrating additional tools and localised referral information.
PIC CPGs are viewed as a source of credible, evidence-based information that was valued across medical, nursing and allied health professionals.
Digital technology in primary healthcare service delivery can enhance accessibility, service delivery and health outcomes in rural populations. The objective of this systematic review is to review and synthesise the scope and impact of digital health technology innovations within rural primary healthcare settings.
Systematic review.
Articles published on PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE and CINAHL between January 2013 and October 2025 were searched using key search terms.
Patient, intervention, context, outcome model criteria guided article eligibility. Included articles were undertaken in rural populations, used digital health technology for treatment or management, explored the impact of digital health technology on rural primary healthcare and reported on healthcare outcomes. Included articles were in the English language and presented peer-reviewed primary research.
Extraction was performed using a bespoke standardised template by multiple reviewers. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Descriptive analysis and conventional inductive content analysis were applied to quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The review is written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement guidelines.
66 studies were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n=26). Most studies focused on adult patient populations, with limited representation of Indigenous (In=3) and paediatric populations (n=2). Telemedicine/telehealth interventions using audio, video or both were the most common (n=36). Remote patient monitoring or point-of-care testing was integrated into 21 studies. Physical health conditions, particularly diabetes (n=17), cardiovascular diseases (n=11) and general primary healthcare concerns (n=13) were commonly reported. Others reported on areas including mental health, hypertension, obesity and pregnancy care.
Conventional inductive content analysis identified key themes: cost and time effectiveness, quality healthcare provision, consumer acceptance from both patients and practitioners, and healthcare service provider perspectives. Uptake barriers included staff workload and patient non-compliance, while facilitators encompassed process standardisation and practitioner acceptance and endorsement. Consumer acceptance was linked to satisfaction, willingness to engage and improved health outcomes and well-being.
Digital health interventions in rural primary healthcare offer significant potential to improve healthcare delivery, reduce costs and enhance patient access, satisfaction and health outcomes. However, careful consideration of factors such as feasibility, consumer and practitioner acceptance, and recognition of limitations is crucial for successful implementation. The review underscores the importance of flexible policies to support emerging digital healthcare solutions, including the integration of artificial intelligence. Overall, digital health interventions offer a promising avenue to improve healthcare outcomes in rural areas and should be prioritised for government funding and investment.
CRD42023477233.
Burn injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally; however, limited data are available from low- and middle-income countries such as Jordan. This study aimed to describe burn patient presentation, initial management and factors associated with in-hospital mortality. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using records of 493 patients admitted to a national referral centre in Jordan between 2018 and 2022. The sample was predominantly male (61.5%) with a mean age of 19.6 years (SD = 21); children under 18 years comprised 58.4%. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) burned was 18%. Flame (50.1%) and scald (44.6%) injuries were most common. Inhalation injury occurred in 25.8% and 21.3% required mechanical ventilation. The hospital mortality rate was 15.6%, significantly associated with TBSA, age, inhalation injury and low serum total protein. Baux and revised Baux scores showed high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.902 and 0.918). Logistic regression identified TBSA, age, inhalation injury and total protein level as independent predictors of mortality. Burn injuries in Jordan disproportionately affect children and are associated with substantial mortality. Early identification of high-risk patients using validated scores and prompt nutritional and respiratory interventions are essential. Multicentre studies and a national burn registry are recommended to guide future policy and care improvements.
To evaluate the efficacy of melatonin, a neurohormone regulating the sleep–wake cycle, in preventing delirium within 5 days of hospitalisation among older adult patients (≥65 years) admitted to general medical wards.
Single-centre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
General medical wards of a tertiary hospital in Oman.
Patients aged ≥65 years admitted within 24 hours to general medical wards were screened. Key exclusion criteria included prevalent delirium, use of vasopressors, non-invasive ventilation, intensive or high-dependency unit admission and aphasia.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 5 mg or 8 mg of melatonin or a placebo nightly for up to 5 days during hospitalisation or until discharge, whichever occurred first.
The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 5 days, assessed using the 3-Minute Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method. Secondary outcomes included delirium treatment, average sleep duration or sleep maintained, 28-day mortality and 28-day readmission. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, with per-protocol (PP) analyses conducted for robustness.
The study was terminated early due to futility. At termination, a total of 115 participants were recruited, 109 of whom were included in the ITT analyses: 55 in the melatonin group (5 mg or 8 mg) and 54 in the placebo group. The overall incidence of delirium by day 5 was 2.75%, 3.64% in the melatonin group and 1.85% in the placebo group (p=1.000). No statistically significant differences were found in the average sleep duration (p=0.136), 28-day mortality (3.64% vs 1.85%, p=1.000) or 28-day readmission (21.82% vs 20.37%, p=0.853). PP analyses and subgroup sensitivity yielded similar findings.
In this trial, melatonin did not significantly reduce the incidence of delirium. The lower-than-expected numbers of outcome events and resultant early termination for futility limited the study’s power. As a result, the study findings should be interpreted with caution, and further research is necessary before definitive recommendations can be made.
To develop and validate decision trees using conditional probabilities to identify the predictors of mortality and morbidity deterioration in trauma patients.
A quasi-experimental longitudinal study conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center in São Paulo, Brazil.
The study analysed 201 patient records using standardised nursing documentation (NANDA International and Nursing Outcomes Classification). Decision trees were constructed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm and validated through K-fold cross-validation to ensure model reliability.
Decision trees identified key predictors of survival and mobility deterioration. Patients who did not require (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status but required (NOC 0210) Transfer Performance had a 97.4% survival rate. Conversely, those requiring (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status had a 25% risk of worsening mobility, compared to 9% for those who did not. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's predictive accuracy, reinforcing the robustness of the decision tree approach (Value).
Decision trees demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mobility outcomes and mortality risk, offering a structured, data-driven framework for clinical decision-making. These findings underscore the importance of early mobilisation, tailored rehabilitation interventions and assistive devices in improving patient recovery. This study is among the first to apply decision trees in this context, highlighting its novelty and potential to enhance trauma critical care practices.
This study highlights the potential of decision trees, a supervised machine learning method, in nursing practice by providing clear, evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making. By enabling early identification of high-risk patients, decision trees facilitate timely interventions, reduce complications and support personalised rehabilitation strategies that enhance patient safety and recovery.
This research addresses the challenge of improving outcomes for critically ill and trauma patients with impaired mobility by identifying effective strategies for early mobilisation and rehabilitation. The integration of artificial intelligence-driven decision trees strengthens evidence-based nursing practice, enhances patient education and informs scalable interventions that reduce trauma-related complications. These findings have implications for healthcare providers, rehabilitation specialists and policymakers seeking to optimise trauma care and improve long-term patient outcomes.
Patients provided authorisation for the collection of their clinical data from medical records during hospitalisation.
This study explores the lived experiences of critical care nurses who are also mothers, focusing on their challenges with breastfeeding and pumping at work.
Using interpretive phenomenology, grounded in Martin Heidegger's work, semi-structured interviews were conducted with critical care nurses (N = 54) who were also breastfeeding mothers in the United States in 2024. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Patricia Benner's interpretation of the hermeneutic circle in nursing data analysis to identify the essence of lived experiences in breastfeeding as a critical care nurse mother.
Four main themes emerged during the analysis. They are as follows: (1) The Impact of Workplace Environment on Breastfeeding Nurse Mothers and Their Children, (2) The Role of Organisational Support and Resources in Retaining Breastfeeding Nurse Mothers in Critical Care, (3) Team Dynamics and Career Implications of Breastfeeding for Nurse Mothers in Critical Care and (4) Organisational and Systemic Approaches to Supporting Breastfeeding Nurse Mothers in Critical Care.
The findings highlight critical gaps in workplace policies and support systems for breastfeeding nurses. Addressing these inequities through the provision of adequate lactation facilities, flexible pumping schedules and a supportive workplace culture is essential to reducing stress and enabling nurse mothers to continue breastfeeding successfully. This study underscores the need for systemic reforms to support breastfeeding in the nursing profession.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To verify the efficacy of virtual reality compared to tablet games for pain and anxiety management in children undergoing percutaneous bone pin and/or suture removal procedures.
Randomised clinical trial using two parallel groups: (1) virtual reality or (2) tablet game.
Three-center, randomised pragmatic clinical trial, using a parallel design with two groups (experimental group: immersive virtual reality; active comparator: tablet games). Children aged 6–17 requiring percutaneous pins and/or sutures were recruited between 2020 and 2022 from three outpatient orthopaedic clinics in paediatric hospitals. Pain was measured with the Numerical Rating Scale and anxiety with the Child Fear Scale before and immediately after the procedure.
A total of 188 participants were assigned to either the virtual reality group (96 participants) or the tablet group (92 participants). At the first assessment, there was no noticeable difference between the two groups in terms of pain or anxiety levels. However, further analysis revealed that participants aged 13 and older in the virtual reality group experienced significantly lower anxiety.
Virtual reality was not more efficacious than games on a tablet for pain and anxiety of children undergoing removal of bone pins or sutures. However, virtual reality demonstrated a benefit in reducing anxiety for teenagers, particularly those aged 13-older.
Virtual reality games provide an immersive, non-pharmacological alternative of for anxiety management of teenagers during pins and/or sutures removal.
This study showed that a virtual reality game may help reduce anxiety during pins and/or sutures removal procedures in patients aged 13 years and older.
We adhered to the CONSORT checklist for reporting results.
A patient partner reviewed the study design, methods and final manuscript.
NCT03680625
This study examined associations between pregnancy-related fear and stress, occupational exposures, and workplace modifications among pregnant registered nurses in the United States engaged in direct patient care.
A cross-sectional design was used with data collected via an online survey between November 2021 and April 2022. Participants (n = 358) were recruited through social media and listservs. Log-binomial regression models, adjusted for age and parity, estimated prevalence ratios and confidence intervals for associations between occupational exposures and workplace modifications with prevalence of pregnancy-related stress at work and fear of pregnancy or infant complications. Stress, a non-specific physical/psychosocial response to demands, and fear, an emotional response to perceived threat, functioned as distinct constructs.
Emotional and physical environmental hazards were associated with increased prevalence of stress. Emotional and environmental hazards, as well as physical movement, administering antineoplastic medications, infectious disease transmission and scans, were associated with increased prevalence of fear. Each additional occupational exposure increased prevalence of stress by 4% and fear by 12%. Nurses also mitigated risks by implementing workplace modifications. Stress was associated with changing work schedules, while fear was statistically significantly associated with taking extra infection precautions and seeking assistance for CPR.
Findings highlight the need for interventions that address modifiable occupational hazards and improve access to modifications that reduce stress and fear among pregnant nurses.
Strengthening workplace protections could reduce occupational stress, improve nurse retention and enhance patient care quality.
Pregnant nurses face significant occupational hazards, yet limited research has examined their psychosocial effects and mitigation strategies. This study identified key exposures associated with increased stress and fear and showed that workplace modifications varied by stress/fear levels and pregnancy trimester, informing policies to better protect pregnant nurses.
Authors adhered to the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Quality improvement is a well-known and commonly utilized approach to improving care and outcomes that is built on process improvement methods but not practice improvement methods. Because quality care includes both process and practice elements, process improvement alone cannot ensure quality outcomes will be achieved. This calls for a new approach.
To share an innovative, synergistic, and collaborative quality framework: Evidence-based Quality in Practice and Process: The EQUiPP Framework.
The EQUiPP Framework's intent is to provide structure for collaborative efforts to effectively identify best practices/processes, implement and sustain change, and improve outcomes. The framework provides guidance to decrease the frequency of implementing ineffective changes by deriving effective solutions … the first time, every time.
A team of experts used a consensus approach to develop the framework.
A precursor to this framework, the Practice and Process Improvement = Quality (PPQ) Model, was evaluated by individual expert review and a two-day beta test workshop. Feedback was obtained during the workshop when participants applied the model in activities reflecting real-world healthcare scenarios. When used in both DNP student work and real-world health systems, fundamental flaws were identified which resulted in the necessity to develop a different conceptualization. The framework described here is a new approach to improving quality care.
The EQUiPP Framework is a tool that provides the synergistic integration of both practice improvement (EBP) and process improvement methodologies to successfully implement and sustain best practices to achieve and sustain quality outcomes.
The EQUiPP Framework aligns EBP and process improvement, allowing clinicians and students to work collaboratively to identify and effectively, as well as efficiently, implement and sustain best practices to deliver quality outcomes.
FreshRSS