Leprosy remains a significant public health challenge in many low and middle-income countries, including India. People affected by leprosy face multifaceted challenges: physical, psychological, social and economic. In response, donors support self-help groups (SHGs) to improve health, social integration and economic circumstances for marginalised people, including those with leprosy. This study aims to assess the sustainability of SHGs in India after the withdrawal of donor support by examining whether they remain functional and exploring the key factors, barriers and facilitators that influence their long-term social and economic viability.

To examine the functionality of SHGs after withdrawal of donor support, and to explore the factors, barriers and facilitators influencing their long-term social and economic sustainability.

Using qualitative methods, we conducted semistructured interviews with 40 key informants associated with five SHGs formed under the Self-Help Community Development Project implemented in an endemic state of India and funded by The Leprosy Mission Trust India.

It was an exploratory qualitative study using interviews with SHG members and key informants, situated within the self-help community-based project.

While some SHGs demonstrated resilience and adaptability, others faced challenges such as internal discord, loss of members to migration and lack of access to government schemes. Thematic analysis revealed key drivers and barriers to sustainability and realising the benefits of SHGs, highlighting variations in leadership, governance, economic performance and social engagement across groups.

SHGs are often sustained after the funding and managerial donor support have been withdrawn. The findings emphasise the importance of strong leadership, community support and external facilitation in sustaining SHGs and enhancing their impact on marginalised populations. This study contributes to understanding the role of SHGs in addressing the socioeconomic challenges faced by individuals affected by leprosy and offers insights for improving their long-term viability.

Investigate interprofessional medication safety risk management from the perspective of physicians in healthcare settings.

Qualitative, semistructured interview study. Data analysed with an inductive content analysis.

Wellbeing Services County in Central Finland.

17 physicians working in different healthcare settings or specialties.

Physicians’ overall perception of interprofessional medication safety risk management was generally positive. They considered their own responsibility for medication safety as both comprehensive, encompassing the safety of the entire unit and limited, focused primarily on prescribing the correct medication. Organisational barriers to participating in medication safety promotion comprised insufficient healthcare resources and unclear distribution of tasks and responsibilities. Personal barriers included prioritisation of clinical work, considering medication safety as an administrative task and experiencing the process to be slow and complex. Strong leadership, increased visibility of medication safety, framing the topic positively, targeted education and fostering physicians’ intrinsic motivation were identified as means to increase physicians’ participation in medication safety risk management.

This study emphasises the importance of integrating physicians into interprofessional, systems-based medication safety risk management as a core element of high-quality care. Despite recognising their broad role, physicians face barriers such as organisational constraints and limited identification with medication safety advocacy. Addressing these challenges requires enhancing their understanding of the medication management and use process and fostering shared responsibility through time allocation and interprofessional leadership structures.

Our study investigated the age-adjusted incidence rates of non-fatal overdoses by HIV status and sex, and examined trends over time.

We used data from the Comparative Outcomes and Service Utilization Trends study, a population-based cohort study that includes clinical and administrative health data on virtually all people with HIV (PWH) and a 10% random sample of people without HIV in the province.

British Columbia, Canada.

Between April 2012 and March 2020, 11 050 PWH (81.8% male) and 473 952 people without HIV (50.3% male) who were 19 years and older contributed 68 035 and 3 285 824 person years (PY) of follow-up, respectively.

The primary outcome was age-adjusted incidence rates of non-fatal overdose events stratified by sex and HIV status. Trends over time were also assessed.

Age-adjusted non-fatal overdose incidence rates among males with and without HIV were 36.4 and 3.12 per 1000 PY, respectively (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 11.7, 95% CI 10.9 to 12.5). For females with and without HIV, the age-adjusted incidence rates were 61.4 and 2.33 per 1000 PY, respectively (IRR=26.3, 95% CI 24.0 to 28.7). Between 2013 and 2019 (calendar years with full-year data), the age-adjusted non-fatal overdose rate increased significantly among males and females without HIV but not among PWH.

We observed a significantly higher non-fatal overdose rate among PWH compared to people without HIV. The rate was highest among females with HIV. These findings underline the need for policies and programmes oriented towards PWH to mitigate overdoses, especially for females.

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) strives to improve the healthcare system by focusing on value of care, that is, patient relevant outcomes relative to the costs for achieving these outcomes. Within VBHC, patient participation is crucial to identify patient relevant outcomes and value improvement potential. However, patient participation in VBHC initiatives remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to improve patient participation within VBHC teams with the ultimate aim to develop a practical guide for patient participation in VBHC.

An action research study.

This study was conducted in seven collaborating Dutch hospitals from March 2023 to November 2024.

Seven VBHC teams were selected to participate in the cyclical action research steps, that is, orientation, planning, implementation, and evaluation, in which patient participation was implemented or improved. These included the following patient groups: prostate cancer, vulnerable elderly, breast cancer, diabetes, maternity care, colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease.

Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data included observations and minutes of meetings with the intervention teams. Quantitative data included responses to the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) by multiple members of the intervention (n=7) and control teams (n=94) at three time points (T1=6 months, T2=12 months, T3=end of study). Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Finally, the data were triangulated to create an overview of lessons learnt in improving patient participation.

Patient participation goals varied across teams, leading to diverse actions, such as establishing a diabetes patient panel and distributing questionnaires to patients with colorectal cancer. PPEET results show that 71% of intervention team members reported that patient participation had an impact on the team’s outcomes compared with 44% in control teams (T3). Furthermore, 80% of the intervention team members initially wanted training in patient participation (T1), which dropped to 29% at T3. Overall, 22 lessons in improving patient participation in multidisciplinary project teams were identified and compiled into a practical guide.

The action research process improved the process and impact of patient participation in the intervention teams. Furthermore, the results indicate that the action research process enhanced the team members’ knowledge and skills on patient participation. The practical guide developed in this study can be used to support implementation of patient participation in VBHC.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. While the impact of lifestyle factors like smoking and obesity on breast cancer risk and survival is well documented, the effect of working conditions is not fully understood. Moreover, breast cancer can reduce employability, making it crucial to identify factors that facilitate return to work and improve life satisfaction. Since breast cancer is affected by sleep and lifestyle, which are related to working conditions, understanding how they affect breast cancer outcomes is key. This study aims to explore the relationship between working conditions and breast cancer outcomes, including incidence, mortality and survival within a causal framework. Our specific aims are to understand the relationship between (1) working conditions and occupational groups and breast cancer outcomes, including the extent to which sleep, lifestyle and breast cancer screening uptake explain these relationships and (2) prediagnosis working conditions, sleep and lifestyle and their effect on return to work and life satisfaction among breast cancer survivors.

We will use data from the UK Biobank, a large-scale cohort study with data on 273 825 women between 40 and 69 years old at baseline, followed from 2006 to 2022. The data has been linked with death and cancer registries and includes 8309 incident breast cancer cases. To quantify the effect of working conditions on breast cancer outcomes (aim 1) and their effect on return to work and life satisfaction (aim 2), we will implement g-methods to estimate the average causal effect and employ counterfactual-based mediation analysis to quantify how much mediating factors, such as sleep and lifestyle, explain this effect.

UK Biobank received ethical approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee. No further ethical approval was required for the proposed research project. In line with the two aims, four original research manuscripts will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals to disseminate the findings. In addition, findings will be disseminated at international conferences and scientific meetings.

To evaluate an innovative approach to recruit 40 hospitals to a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to improve discharge antibiotic prescribing.

This study describes the design, implementation and impact of a theory-informed recruitment approach for hospitals participating in the Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics at Discharge (ROAD) Home trial.

An inperson meeting of a quality improvement collaborative of acute care hospitals in the state of Michigan.

Representatives from acute care hospitals that are part of the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.

Small group recruitment sessions that combined deliberative participation and credible messengers to recruit hospitals to participate in a cluster RCT on a single date (1 November 2023).

The primary outcome was the number of hospitals which agreed to participate in the trial. We also assessed participant feedback, effectiveness of recruitment methods and resources required for implementation of this approach.

We recruited 51 (74%) of 69 eligible hospitals. Survey participants reported: sessions made clear the purpose of the trial (94%, 64/68) and time commitment required (87%, 59/68); agreed deliberative participation was helpful (82%, 56/68) and were ‘very satisfied’ with the session (82%, 56/68). Investigators largely reported credible messengers were a positive influence, though this varied across sessions. Hospital recruitment was time intensive, taking 179.5 total person hours. The recruitment process involved 3 months of preparation for the sessions and 2 months of follow-up prior to closing recruitment.

We demonstrated the feasibility and impact of a novel approach to recruit hospitals from an existing collaborative to a cluster RCT using the principles of deliberative participation and credible messengers. While the approach was time-consuming, we achieved success at over-recruiting hospitals in a relatively short period of time. Strategies presented here may assist future trial organisers in implementing hospital-based cluster RCTs.

The ROAD Home trial is registered on Clinical.Trials.gov (NCT06106204).