Since the 1970s, telemedicine has transformed significantly, becoming a critical component of modern healthcare delivery. Over time, technological innovation has increasingly emphasised the integration of the human body with digital systems to develop non-invasive methods for monitoring physiological parameters. Among these technologies, wearable sensors demonstrate substantial potential for continuous patient monitoring. These devices can facilitate real-time data collection, enable more rapid clinical decision-making and promote active patient participation in health management. Such capabilities are particularly valuable in emergency contexts, including prehospital care provided by ambulance services and telephone triage systems. Despite the growing interest in wearable health technologies, their integration into emergency medical services (EMS) remains insufficiently explored and warrants further investigation. We aim to map current research, explore the use of wearables in EMS settings and identify gaps in knowledge regarding their use in EMS.

This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute’s (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ProQuest and Web of Science) will be conducted, from inception to March 2026. All types of study designs, including quantitative and qualitative studies, will be considered in this scoping review. The inclusion is limited to studies published in English. Two independent reviewers (RA and AA) will conduct a thorough screening of titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion criteria. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be reviewed in full text. Quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the JBI’s critical appraisal tools for the relevant study types. The findings will be presented using diagrams or tables, supplemented by narrative summaries following the JBI guidelines.

Ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/MUEFX).

To use best practices in pharmacoepidemiology to assess the association between new use of brain-penetrant calcium channel blockers (BP-CCBs) compared with use of non-brain-penetrant CCBs (NP-CCBs) and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes.

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

Secondary data from nine claims and electronic health record databases from across the globe were used.

First use of a CCB was the index date. There were 1.2 million BP-CCB patients and 9.3 million NP-CCB patients identified across all databases, with 881 758 matched in each group.

Patients were categorised as either initiating BP-CCBs or NP-CCBs. On-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. Large-scale propensity models were used to match cohorts and control for observed confounding. Cox models were used to analyse the time to incident neuropsychiatric disorders. Negative control outcomes were used to calibrate estimates, CIs and p values to account for residual confounding. Diagnostics were used to assess the validity of the analysis.

The time to first diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder was assessed independently. HRs compared the BP-CCB group to the NP-CCB group.

For the outcome of incident MDD in the intention-to-treat design, the meta-analytic HR (95% CI) was 1.02 (0.97, 1.08). Meta-analytic HRs for bipolar disorder (1.04 (0.96, 1.13)), schizophrenia (1.05 (0.94, 1.18)) and schizoaffective disorder (1.04 (0.87, 1.23)) showed similar null effects. The on-treatment analysis was largely consistent: MDD (1.01 (0.96, 1.06)), bipolar (1.05 (0.86, 1.27)), schizophrenia (1.09 (0.87, 1.38)) and schizoaffective (1.00 (0.71, 1.40)).

There was no evidence of an association with any of the neuropsychiatric conditions of interest between use of BP-CCB and NP-CCB. This does not rule out the potential beneficial effect of CCB formulations and doses targeted specifically for the brain rather than the cardiovascular system.

Urgent and emergency care (UEC) systems in England face unprecedented pressures, with record accident and emergency attendances, persistent breaches of ambulance response targets and poorer outcomes for time-sensitive conditions. National UEC recovery plans have introduced multiple innovations—such as same-day emergency care, virtual wards and specialty hubs—to manage these pressures and improve patient flow. Rural coastal areas are particularly vulnerable to excessive demand due to higher levels of deprivation, older populations with complex health needs, seasonal surges that generate unpredictable demand and challenges in attracting and retaining staff. Following the Chief Medical Officer’s 2021 Annual Report, funding research and developing bespoke solutions to manage UEC demand and address geographical disparities has been recognised as a national priority. The Elevate study responds to this priority by identifying and evaluating innovative models of UEC in rural coastal communities in England.

The Elevate study is a 30-month, mixed-methods evaluation that comprises three interlinked work packages: (1) National service mapping—outlining provision of innovative models of UEC in rural coastal areas of England. This will be developed through document review and interviews with regional and national service leaders. (2) Quantitative analysis—quasiexperimental and longitudinal approaches will use National Health Service (NHS) England’s Emergency Care Data Set and linked routine NHS datasets to evaluate the impact of UEC models on health and process outcomes. Standard and bespoke metrics will be developed and used to assess performance. (3) Qualitative case studies—up to 12 case studies of UEC models in rural coastal communities. Interviews with patients and staff and non-participant observation will explore how and why different UEC models influence patient experience, clinical outcomes, resource use and the workforce. Findings will be integrated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify components of UEC models that are effective, scalable and sensitive to local context,

Ethical approval for qualitative components was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (25/NS/0099). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, creative media and community engagement activities to ensure findings are communicated inclusively and effectively to policymakers, health and social care practitioners and the public.

Research Registry (researchregistry11126).

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Current management relies on umbilical artery Doppler patterns in the smaller twin. These patterns are, however, inconsistent and do not represent a reliable severity scale, complicating clinical decision-making and parental counselling. This study aims to improve risk stratification by identifying predictors of adverse outcomes, while also evaluating the pathophysiology and multi-organ impact of sFGR in early childhood.

This is a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study conducted in six tertiary fetal medicine centres with expertise in complicated twin pregnancies. Recruitment began in March 2023 and will continue until December 2026, targeting 274 MCDA twin pairs with complete follow-up to develop a prediction model for adverse perinatal outcomes in sFGR at the time of diagnosis. Standardised data collection includes serial ultrasound examinations, advanced fetal imaging (cardiac, cerebral and 3D volumetric), fetal brain MRI and detailed placental phenotyping. Maternal and parental well-being are assessed during pregnancy and after birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome is evaluated up to 2 years after birth using validated tools. The statistical analysis plan includes predictive modelling with internal validation.

The study has been approved by the ethical review boards of all participating centres. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and engagement with clinical guideline committees.

NCT05952583.

To determine the prevalence and factors associated with pain-related disabilities among First Nations people living off-reserve in Canada in 2017.

Secondary analysis of the 2017 Aboriginal Peoples Survey, a cross-sectional survey of individuals living in private dwellings throughout Canada.

First Nations people living off-reserve aged 15 years and older (n=9115; weighted n=482 066).

Pain-related disabilities, defined as pain-related activity limitations lasting ≥6 months.

Overall, 22.1% (95% CI 20.9% to 23.4%) of First Nations people living off-reserve reported pain-related disabilities. Prevalence was higher among females (26.1%; 95% CI (24.3% to 28.0%)), increased with age (34.3%; 95% CI (30.3% to 38.5%) among those 45 to 54 years) and was similar across geographic areas (ranging from 21.0%; 95% CI (18.3% to 23.9%) to 22.5%; 95% CI (20.8% to 24.2%)). Pain-related disabilities increased with the number of coexisting disabilities (96.2%; 95% CI (94.3% to 97.5%) among those with >3 disabilities) and was highest among those reporting physical disabilities (ranging from 88.2%; 95% CI (85.6% to 90.4%) for those with mobility disabilities to 91.0%; 95% CI (88.6% to 92.9%) for those with disability related to flexibility). Regression models suggested that individuals with unmet basic needs, housing dissatisfaction, unmet healthcare needs, a history of mental health consultations, part-time or no employment, chronic conditions, residential school attendance or a low sense of belonging were more likely to report pain-related disabilities.

Pain-related disabilities are common among First Nations people living off-reserve, and their aetiology may be multifactorial. Continued collaboration with Indigenous partners is required to contextualise findings and to inform culturally responsive clinical and rehabilitation strategies.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a high recurrence rate after curative surgery, with no standard neoadjuvant therapy. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown efficacy in locally advanced ICC, while immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents have demonstrated promising response rates. The NEO-ERA-01 study evaluates the feasibility of neoadjuvant HAIC-GEMOX plus lenvatinib and Adebrelimab in high-risk resectable ICC.

NEO-ERA-01 is a prospective, multicentre, phase II trial using Simon’s two-stage design. Thirty patients with histologically confirmed resectable ICC and high-risk recurrence factors will be enrolled in China. Neoadjuvant therapy consists of HAIC-GEMOX (gemcitabine 800 mg/m², oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (8 mg/day from Day 5) and Adebrelimab (1200 mg on Day 3, every 3 weeks) for 2–4 cycles. Surgery eligibility will be assessed post-treatment. Resected patients will receive adjuvant capecitabine (1250 mg/m² two times per day on Days 1–14, every 3 weeks) and Adebrelimab (1200 mg on Day 1, every 3 weeks) for 6 months.

The primary endpoint is the completion rate of study treatment. Secondary endpoints include safety, R0 resection rate, response rate, event-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include immune microenvironment and biomarker analysis.

The study is approved by the ethics committee of all sites and follows the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

NCT06208462.

To explore the current context in which maternal influenza vaccination (MIV) is delivered in Kuwait and to identify determinants influencing its provision and uptake from the perspectives of preventive medicine professionals (PMPs), including policymakers.

Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with purposely selected PMPs including policymakers. Interview questions were obtained from the Tailoring Immunization Programme for improving MIV in Europe.

PMPs from six governmental regions of Kuwait, including hospitals and associated polyclinics. Data collection was conducted between March and June 2022.

A total of 10 participants reflected diverse professional and population contexts, including Kuwaiti and non-Kuwaiti professionals working in rural and urban settings. Cell sampling was used to ensure representation across key roles involved in MIV delivery, including policymakers, vaccination campaign managers and campaign implementers.

Thematic analysis identified four overarching themes: barriers, facilitators, influences on MIV uptake and suggested interventions. Key barriers included limited knowledge among pregnant women and healthcare providers (HCPs), lack of prioritisation of pregnant women within vaccination programmes, shortage of vaccine supply and the COVID-19 pandemic. Facilitators and influential factors included the presence of vaccination champions, targeted health promotion activities and the availability of a Ministry of Health (MoH) hotline for addressing concerns and system-level accessibility and digital facilitation of MIV uptake. Suggested interventions emphasised strengthening HCP education through continuous training aligned with clear national policies and guidelines.

This study highlights the need for clear national policies and clinical guidelines to support consistent MIV provision, alongside ongoing education for HCPs in Kuwait to strengthen MIV recommendation. Future research should include obstetricians, given their central role in antenatal care, to ensure MIV strategies are clinically grounded and integrated into routine maternity services.

This study investigated perinatal depressive symptoms among pregnant and postpartum Filipino women.

Cross-sectional survey.

The Philippines.

Participants were recruited online and face-to-face from maternal care facilities.

Perinatal depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score, with prevalence calculated based on ≥13 cut-off, indicating clinically significant symptoms of depression. Patterns of depressive symptoms were examined by demographics, perinatal time period and other obstetric information using adjusted regression coefficients (ab) and risk ratios (aRR).

A total of 856 women participated in the study, comprising 356 pregnant and 500 postpartum women. EPDS scores were, on average, similar between pregnant (14.4) and postpartum women (14.1). Using the locally validated cut-off of ≥13 revealed that 69.1% of pregnant and 62.0% of postpartum women reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. Consistent EPDS scores and prevalence were observed across pregnancy trimesters and within 12 months postpartum and beyond. Women who received adequate prenatal care were less likely to experience antenatal (ab=–1.59, 95% CI –3.13 to –0.05) and postpartum (ab=–1.30, 95% CI –2.48 to –0.12) depressive symptoms. Postpartum EPDS scores and depressive symptom prevalence (EPDS score ≥13) were higher among 18–24-year olds (ab=1.96, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.61; aRR=1.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.47) and single mothers (ab=3.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 6.71; aRR=1.42, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.90), compared with older and married mothers, respectively.

At least 60% Filipino mothers experienced clinically significant perinatal depressive symptoms, which exceeds the established global average of 25%. Younger and single postpartum women were at greater risk, while pregnant and postpartum women who attended adequate prenatal visits were less likely to report depressive symptoms. Our study underscores the need for further research to uncover the true burden of poor perinatal mental health and calls for targeted early interventions and integrative public health strategies to support at-risk mothers, particularly those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds.

The second phase of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health (C-MACH) was initiated to investigate how environmental exposures from the fetal period to early childhood influence maternal and child health outcomes. The sub-cohort focuses specifically on detailed assessments of indoor environmental factors and neighbourhood-built and social environments. By integrating environmental metrics with biological, behavioural and sociodemographic data, the study aims to elucidate their role in the development of allergies, neurodevelopmental disorders and other non-communicable diseases in early life.

Between June 2021 and April 2023, 505 pregnant women were enrolled in the second phase of the C-MACH main study. Of these, 298 participants consented to join the sub-cohort study, including 258 in the sleep and physical activity monitoring option (Option 1) and 148 in the indoor allergen exposure sub-study (Option 2). The study includes biological sampling, environmental monitoring and repeated questionnaire surveys. At baseline, 253 live births were recorded from 251 pregnancies.

Of the 298 women, 272 completed early pregnancy questionnaires. The mean maternal age was 33.1 years (SD 4.6); 97.8% were married. University-level education was reported by 51.0% of mothers and 53.7% of fathers. Most households had an annual income of 6 to

Longitudinal follow-up will continue until the children reach age 15. Future analyses will examine associations between environmental exposures and allergic, developmental, endocrine/metabolic and obesity-related outcomes.

We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting patients to examine the effect of near vision glasses in young infants at risk of cerebral visual impairment.

A three-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomised feasibility trial.

Tertiary neonatal intensive care in London, UK.

We included babies born before 29 weeks of gestation or at full term with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Babies who needed ongoing inpatient care, with established eye anomalies or with very high refractive errors at baseline (±8.00D) were not included. Infants with retinopathy of prematurity were not excluded.

At 8 weeks corrected age, we allocated 18 infants to wear glasses (+3.00D over full cycloplegic refraction) immediately (intervention 1), 18 to wear the same glasses at 16 weeks (intervention 2) and 19 infants were allocated to standard treatment (no glasses).

Recruitment and retention of study participants (primary), compliance wearing glasses, preferential-looking visual acuity (with glasses) and visual function as determined using A Test Battery of Child Development for Examining Functional Vision at 3-month and 6-month age post-term.

Of 70 eligible families, 55 consented and 34 attended baseline assessments, and 28 completed the study. Non-attendance was due mainly to prolonged inpatient stay, infant health and scheduling conflicts. Glasses were worn for similar periods in each group (Intervention 1: median 2 hours/day (95% CI 1 hour to 4 hours); Intervention 2: median 2 hours/day (95% CI 1.5 hours to 3 hours)). Visual acuity improved from baseline to 6 months. Mean (SE) LogMAR (Minimum Angle of Resolution) improvements were standard care: 0.47 (0.45); intervention 1: 0.66 (0.44); intervention 2: 0.37 (0.36). Among the 29 very preterm infants, there were similar findings: standard care: 0.35 (0.35); Intervention 1: 0.67 (0.47); Intervention 2: 0.34 (0.40). As a functional measure, object permanence was present at the following rates by randomised arm: standard care: 29%; whereas intervention 1: 56%; and intervention 2: 44% (OR intervention 1 vs standard care: 3.13 (95% CI 0.38 to 25.57), ie, not statistically significant).

We demonstrate feasibility for a definitive RCT (randomized controlled trial) with good recruitment and retention and observed potential benefits for vision and development following the dispensing of glasses at 8 weeks post-term age compared with untreated controls. We identified methodological modifications to further improve recruitment processes for a future larger study.

ISRCTN14646770; NCT05048550.

Transgender and gender-diverse individuals often face significant barriers to accessing gender-affirming care, such as hormones and/or surgery, leading to poorer mental health, lower quality of life, and higher rates of substance use and suicidal ideation. Vaginoplasty, the most commonly sought genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), is desired by over half of all trans women but has been performed in only a minority. This is due largely to limited surgeon availability and long wait times. Peer support has been shown to improve health outcomes and reduce stigma in marginalised populations, including trans communities, but has never been studied for efficacy during the perioperative period of GGAS. Building on priorities identified by multi-stakeholder engagement from the Transgender & Non-Binary Surgery Allied Research Collective, the Support for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Vaginoplasty (STRIVE) study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a centralised peer support and education intervention for patients seeking vaginoplasty, addressing a critical gap in perioperative care.

The STRIVE Study is a pragmatic, multi-site randomised controlled trial enrolling trans adults seeking full depth vaginoplasty. Participants are randomised to one of two arms; enhanced usual care, or a facilitated group intervention. The primary outcome is coping self-efficacy at 6 months, with a secondary outcome of surgical readiness. Primary analysis uses an intention-to-treat approach with linear mixed effects modelling, adjusting for selected baseline values and site. The feasibility evaluation data collected via qualitative interviews will be analysed thematically.

Approvals were granted by the primary site’s Institutional Review Board on 10 May 2024 (STUDY00026957). The trial was registered on 24 May 2024. Results will be published in open access journals and made available to community members in plain language formats.

NCT06436560.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) are chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases characterised by pain, fatigue, mood disturbances, sleep problems and reduced quality of life. These symptoms are highly variable both between individuals and within individuals across days, reflecting the fluctuating nature of disease activity and daily functioning. Although physical activity is known to alleviate many of these symptoms, individuals with RA and SpA often encounter barriers that limit regular engagement. Capturing the dynamic interplay between symptoms and physical activity therefore requires methods that account for day-to-day and moment-to-moment variability. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), especially when combined with actigraphy, enables real-time, context-sensitive monitoring of symptoms and physical activity in daily life. However, little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of such protocols in individuals with RA and SpA, for whom participant burden and adherence may represent significant challenges. This pilot study therefore aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a 14-day EMA protocol and to explore factors associated with objectively measured physical activity in individuals with RA and SpA.

50 adults diagnosed with RA or SpA will be recruited through rheumatology clinics or via advertisement. Eligible participants must be smartphone users without cognitive or physical impairments affecting participation. After providing consent, participants will complete baseline questionnaires regarding disease activity, quality of life, sleep, pain, fatigue, affective states and will attend a remote session with a member of the research team to learn how to use the mobile app. They will then complete a 14-day EMA protocol, during which data on patient-related outcomes (PROs), including pain, fatigue, sleep quality and affective states (i.e. positive and negative affects) will be assessed four times daily: upon awakening, 11:00, 15:00 and 20:30. Physical activity and sleep will be continuously monitored using both a wrist-worn and a thigh-worn device. Feasibility will be evaluated based on adherence to EMA prompts and actigraphy wear time. Acceptability will be assessed via a study-specific questionnaire and qualitative interviews conducted at the end of the protocol. Exploratory analyses will examine real-time, temporal and lagged relationships between PROs (pain, fatigue affective states), sleep and physical activity levels.

This study was approved by the French national ethics committee [Comité de protection des personnes Nord Ouest I, 2025-A01349-40] on 24/07/2025. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences.

NCT07167784.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-shortening genetic disorder traditionally mischaracterised as affecting only populations of European descent. This framing has contributed to under-recognition of CF in African populations, despite emerging evidence of both common and region-specific cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutations across the continent. Diagnostic barriers, structural inequities and lack of surveillance further exacerbate disparities in care and visibility.

This scoping review aims to characterise CF in African populations by synthesising evidence on clinical presentation, diagnostic practices, genotypic diversity, prevalence and structural barriers to care. We will include case reports, cohort studies, registry analyses and other primary data sources involving individuals of African descent with suspected or confirmed CF. Key outcomes include clinical phenotype, age at diagnosis, mutation profile, diagnostic testing access and mortality. Data sources include Ovid Medline, Embase, Ebsco Global Health, CAB Abstracts and Web of Science Core Collection. Multiple-reviewer screening and extraction will be conducted. We will use narrative synthesis, thematic analysis and meta-analysis for prevalence where feasible.

No ethical approval is required as the review uses published data. Results will be shared with clinicians, researchers and CF networks in Africa and globally to inform diagnostic strategies and policy.