Conectar
Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are among the leading non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide. However, diagnosing CRDs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains challenging due to limited access to spirometry and trained professionals. Aggravating the burden, CRDs often coexist with other NCDs, increasing healthcare costs, reducing quality of life and elevating mortality. These challenges highlight the need for simple case-finding approaches for CRDs, such as the COPD in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries Assessment (COLA-6) questionnaire, to support prompt identification and appropriate care within NCD services in LMICs.
To evaluate the discriminative accuracy, feasibility and implementation of the COLA-6 questionnaire in identifying and managing CRDs in Brazilian Primary Healthcare (PHC) services for NCDs.
The Multimorbidity Approach for REspiratory Solutions (MARES) study consists of three work packages to be conducted in PHC services in São Carlos/SP and São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
MARES-1: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 859 individuals with at least one NCD receiving care in PHC. The COLA-6 questionnaire will be administered by the research team and compared with quality-assured spirometry. The Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will also be assessed. The diagnostic performance of COLA-6 for identifying CRDs—including COPD, asthma, preserved ratio impaired spirometry, restriction and overlaps—will be assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curves and 95% CIs.
MARES-2: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 20 healthcare professionals (physicians, physiotherapists, community health agents and nurses) from five PHC services. These professionals will apply the COLA-6 during routine NCD care to a total sample of 1000 patients. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of COLA-6, using deductive thematic analysis.
MARES-3: A longitudinal, prospective observational study in which patients from MARES-1 and MARES-2 will be reassessed at 6-month follow-up. A total sample of 473 participants with abnormal spirometry, a diagnosis of CRD or high risk for CRDs is expected. Participants will undergo spirometry, and a subset will be interviewed to explore their healthcare experiences through qualitative thematic analysis. Access to diagnostic and treatment services in Brazil will be assessed. Changes in spirometry values, FeNO, CAAT and ACQ-7 scores from baseline to 6 months in patients from MARES-1 will be analysed.
This study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of Federal University of São Carlos and University of Santo Amaro (UNISA). Ethical approval was also granted by the University College London. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at international conferences. Results will improve identification of CRDs, addressing a significant gap in current PHC settings.
by Erica Qureshi, Quynh Doan, Jessica Moe, Steven P. Miller, Garth Meckler, Brett Burstein, Jehannine (J9) Austin
ObjectivesEmergency department (ED) to community (ED2C) programs, which redirect patients from the pediatric ED to community healthcare professionals represent a promising strategy to reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the pediatric ED. Given an ED2C program’s potential impact on various care professionals, we completed a qualitative study to explore key informants’ attitudes and perceptions of pediatric ED2C programs.
MethodsWe conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with key informants in British Columbia, Canada. Participants included: pediatric ED staff – triage nurses and physicians; community professionals – pediatricians and family physicians; and health system leaders responsible for pediatric and emergency care in British Columbia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, de-identified, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis within an interpretive description framework. A visual model was developed to depict key themes in attitudes and perceptions towards pediatric ED2C programs.
ResultsWe interviewed 24 participants: 6 community professionals, 11 pediatric ED professionals, and 7 healthcare leaders. Participants viewed the ED2C program as a valuable solution to address pediatric system strain provided that systemic barriers are addressed, and both emergency and community settings are equipped with adequate training and resources. Participants emphasized the need for clear guidelines on eligibility and operations to build confidence and enhance program effectiveness.
ConclusionsOur findings suggest there is support for ED2C programs as a means to reduce the impact of non-urgent pediatric ED visits and strengthen community-based care. Successful implementation will require coordinated planning, resource investment, and clear operational frameworks.
by Moe Thi Thi Han, Tay Zar Myo Oo, Busayamas Chewaskulyong, Sakorn Pornprasert, Kanyamas Choocheep, Khanittha Punturee, Warunee Kumsaiyai, Yupanun Wuttiin, Sawitree Chiampanichayakul, Ratchada Cressey
Non-smoking-related lung cancer is increasingly associated with environmental factors such as particulate matter (PM) exposure. Using deep small RNA sequencing, we identified distinct miRNA expression patterns in lung cancer patients compared to non-cancer controls, stratified by smoking status. Notably, hsa-miR-125b-5p and hsa-miR-100-5p were significantly downregulated in non-smoking lung cancer patients. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed smoking amplifies pathways related to glycan biosynthesis, signal transduction, and transcriptional regulation, while non-smoking lung cancer is characterized by immune dysfunction and metabolic alterations, including oxidative phosphorylation and natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Validation in a larger cohort using quantitative RT-PCR confirmed the suppression of miR-125b-5p and miR-100-5p in non-smoking lung cancer patients. Additionally, miR-203a and miR-199a-3p were identified as potential biomarkers for lung cancer, independent of smoking status. Chronic PM exposure in primary bronchial/tracheal epithelial cells initially elevated miR-125b-5p and miR-100-5p expression, but prolonged exposure suppressed these miRNAs while increasing their target genes, TXNRD1 and HOXA1, suggesting stress-induced dysregulation. Functional studies using miRNA mimics demonstrated that miR-125b-5p and miR-100-5p suppress PM-induced cancer cell mobility and colony formation, with miR-125b-5p exhibiting broader effects. These findings underscore the critical roles of miR-125b-5p and miR-100-5p in PM-associated lung cancer progression and their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This study highlights distinct mechanisms of lung carcinogenesis in smokers and non-smokers, providing a foundation for targeted interventions in PM-associated lung cancer.
The healthcare landscape in South Africa is challenging with a complex patient population and a stressed healthcare system. Negative pressure therapy-based systems such as negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) and closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) can help manage wounds or incisions. However, guidelines for South Africa-specific use are limited. An in-person meeting was held with 10 experts to develop South Africa-specific therapy use recommendations for NPWTi-d and ciNPT. Panel members recommended NPWTi-d use for wounds in need of cleansing. Normal saline and a 10-min dwell time were recommended with the caveat that the instillation solutions and dwell times can be changed based on the wound bed condition and the features of the instillation solution. A negative pressure cycle of 2–3 h and a negative pressure of −125 mmHg were also recommended for NPWTi-d. In patients, incisions, and surgical procedures at high risk of developing surgical site complications, ciNPT use was recommended. These general recommendations serve as a framework for NPWTi-d and/or ciNPT use in South Africa and should be updated as more region-specific evidence becomes available.
We aimed to explore the patient-related and organisational characteristics associated with late cancellations and non-attendance in diabetes outpatient care and present our findings organised as a risk matrix based on these characteristics.
A cross-sectional study.
Our study was conducted at an endocrinology outpatient clinic based on data extracted between January and December 2019 from electronic medical records.
Adult patients with type 1 diabetes with late cancellations or non-attendance. We compared our sample with national data for comparison and to assess representativeness.
Main outcome was late cancellations or non-attendance, while secondary outcomes included type of cancellations and reason for cancellation.
In total, 541 patients had late cancellations or non-attendance across 5040 diabetes consultations. These patients had a mean age of 43 years, 57.9% were men and half (n=301, 55%) were employed. The mean diabetes duration was 18 years, and the mean HbA1c level was elevated at 72 mmol/L. The outpatient clinic had a higher number of consultations, but the patient characteristics were comparable to the national average. Half of the patients (n=258, 52.3%) had late cancellations ahead of their consultations. Most cancellations occurred during the winter, mainly due to illness being the most frequent reason. Unemployed men with poorly regulated diabetes were more likely not to attend compared with employed females.
Characteristics such as being male, unemployed and having elevated HbA1c levels were significantly associated with non-attendance. Our findings contribute to understanding the reasons for at-risk patients missing consultations.
Insomnia is a common complaint among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) maintained on buprenorphine (BUP). However, people with OUD have historically been excluded from insomnia clinical trials, leaving clinicians without evidence-based treatment options for this patient population. Lemborexant, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia, was recently shown to be safe and tolerable among a sample of patients with insomnia who were maintained on BUP. We hypothesise that pharmacologically antagonising the orexin system with lemborexant may improve insomnia symptoms in individuals with OUD and also enhance BUP treatment benefits by improving performance in neurofunctional domains identified in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Phenotyping Assessment Battery.
Participants with insomnia and OUD who have been stabilised on BUP for at least 4 weeks will be randomly assigned to receive either lemborexant (n=50) or placebo (n=50) for 8 weeks. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, during the 8-week intervention, postintervention and at a 2-week follow-up. Primary outcomes are insomnia severity and impulsivity. Secondary measures include objective sleep metrics (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset) and performance in the neurofunctional domains of negative emotionality and metacognition.
The study was approved by the Virginia Commonwealth University Institutional Review Board in April 2025 (protocol number HM20031777). Data collection began in May 2025 and is expected to be completed by May 2029. The trial is conducted under FDA IND no. 154797 (FGM). The dissemination plan for the trial includes presentations at local and national conferences, submission of primary and secondary outcome manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed journals and circulation of findings to popular media outlets, as available. Results will also be shared with interested participants and clinical collaborators upon completion of the trial.
by Catarina Simões, Diana S. Vasconcelos, Raquel Xavier, Xavier Santos, Catarina Rato, D. James Harris
Fire has long been recognized as an important ecological and evolutionary force in plant communities, but its influence on vertebrate community ecology, particularly regarding predator-prey interactions, remains understudied. This study reveals the impact of wildfires on the diet of Podarcis lusitanicus, a lizard species inhabiting a fire-prone region in the Iberian Peninsula. In order to explore diet variability associated with different local burn histories, we evaluated P. lusitanicus diet across three types of sites in Northern Portugal: those had not burned since 2016, those burned in 2016, and those more recently burned in 2022. Podarcis lusitanicus is a generalist arthropod predator with dietary flexibility. Given the turnover of arthropod species after fire, it is expected to find variations in diet caused by different fire histories, especially between unburned and recently burned sites. From DNA metabarcoding of faecal samples, our study revealed that while prey richness remained unaffected by wildfire regime, significant shifts occurred in diet composition between more recently burned and unburned areas. Specifically, we found that differences in diet composition between these two fire regimes were due to the presence of Tapinoma ants and jumping spiders (Salticus scenicus). These prey were present in the diets of lizards occupying unburned areas, while these were absent in areas burned in 2022. Interestingly, diets in unburned areas and areas burned in 2016 showed no significant differences, highlighting the lizards’ ecological flexibility and the habitat’s resilience over time. The ant species T. topitotum was found in dominance in both burned areas, suggesting that this species may be fire tolerant. In addition, families such as Cicadellidae and Noctuidae were found to be more associated with more recently burned areas. The use of DNA metabarcoding in this study was essential to provide a more detailed and accurate view of predator-prey interactions in ecosystems susceptible to fire, and therefore a better understanding of changes in prey consumption in this fire-adapted ecosystem.
To systematically review the evidence on the association between non-standard working time arrangements (such as night work or shift work) and the occurrence of safety incidents.
Systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using a structured narrative approach and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework to evaluate and summarise findings.
MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and ProQuest Health and Safety Science Abstracts were searched through February 2024.
We included peer-reviewed English-language studies of paid workers (18–70 years) that examined the association between non-standard working time arrangements and safety incidents (accidents, near-accidents, safety incidents or injuries), excluding cross-sectional designs and studies on unpaid workers, athletes or military personnel.
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using standardised forms, extracting study characteristics (author, year, country, sector and population), working time arrangements and exposure assessment, outcomes and their assessment, and reported risk estimates. We conducted a narrative synthesis, classifying studies into three exposure contrasts (shift worker versus non-shift worker, time-of-day and shift intensity), and summarised risk estimates using forest plots without calculating pooled effects.
A total of 13 569 records were screened, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that shift workers generally had an elevated safety incident risk compared with non-shift workers (risk estimates ranged from 1.11 to 5.33). Most of the included studies found an increased risk of safety incidents during or after night shifts. Accumulated exposure to evening or night shifts increased the risk of safety incidents during the following 7 days. However, bias and heterogeneity across studies in design, populations and outcome measures resulted in an overall low to very low certainty of the evidence.
Non-standard working time arrangements, including night and evening shifts, appear to increase the risk of occupational safety incidents. Despite the low certainty of evidence, the findings highlight a potential area for preventive measures in work scheduling. Future longitudinal studies using individual data on daily working hours are needed.
Asthma is a leading cause of morbidity and healthcare use among children. Risk factors of childhood asthma include atopic predisposition and severe wheezing episodes caused by rhinovirus infection in early life. In children with first-time rhinovirus-induced wheezing, we aim to study the response of a short corticosteroid treatment to prevent recurrent wheezing and asthma.
This is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase IV, international multicentre trial involving eight sites in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Two hundred and eighty 3–23 months old steroid-naïve children are randomised 1:1 to receive oral dexamethasone (0.3 mg/kg/day) versus placebo in 3 days for their first wheezing episode and rhinovirus infection. Rhinovirus is diagnosed with multiplex PCR. The two co-primary outcomes are time to next physician-confirmed wheezing episode, and time to asthma, within 24 months from inclusion. Asthma is defined as fulfilment of the 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program—criteria for initiating asthma controller medication in children aged 0–4 years. Primary interaction analyses are age, gender, atopic predisposition, risk genotypes and viral co-detection. The optimal cut-off on the rhinovirus genome load used to define a true rhinovirus infection will be assessed by exploring interactions between rhinovirus genomic loads and study drug on the co-primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are number of wheezing episodes, duration and severity of each wheezing episode, bronchial hyperreactivity, quality of life and safety (height/weight development) at 24 months from inclusion.
Rhinovirus positive children with acute wheezing fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria are enrolled after informed consent from both caregivers. This trial has received ethical approval from all sites. Results will be submitted to Competent Authorities and disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conferences within paediatrics and other relevant fields. If proven effective, findings may be implemented directly into paediatric clinical guidelines.
Dermoscopy has a proved validity in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma, which is one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer. Although some studies have demonstrated a relationship between specific dermoscopic and pathologic melanoma features, there is no solid evidence allowing reliable conclusions. This study will evaluate the evidence regarding this association.
Observational studies eligible for our systematic review will enrol adults with histological cutaneous non-volar melanoma diagnosis and with dermoscopy image analysis. We will search the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. We will not impose any language or date restrictions. Outcomes of interest include the association of at least one of the melanoma dermoscopy features (irregular pigmentation, blue-white veil, atypical network, multicomponent pattern, atypical dots and/or globules, regression, peripheral tan structureless area, negative network, shiny white structures, atypical vessels and streaks/pseudopods), with melanoma Breslow index or other histopathology characteristics (melanoma subtype, mitotic index and presence of ulceration). Two reviewers will independently screen and search results, extract data from eligible studies and assess risk of bias. The evidence derived by this study will elucidate the possible link between melanoma dermoscopy and histopathology. If we could predict melanoma thickness based on dermoscopy, we would be able to anticipate melanoma treatment with impact on survival.
Ethical approval is not required because this is a literature-based study. It will be published in scientific Pubmed indexed open access journals to ensure its accessibility.
CRD42024564919.
Asthma is a major personal and public health problem worldwide, with a significant impact on patients’ quality of life and health systems. The prevalence of asthma in children is 9.1% and in adolescents is 11%. Greater literacy among children is related to better asthma control. There are many validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) related to asthma, but there are only a few, and no gold standard, to measure children and adolescents’ knowledge of asthma. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the most suitable asthma self-knowledge PROMs for the paediatric population with asthma.
The inclusion criteria will be children and adolescents diagnosed with asthma (population), validated PROMs about asthma self-knowledge (intervention), between each PROM (comparison) and measurement properties (outcome) (validity, reliability, interpretability and responsiveness). The search process will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and SCOPUS. The risk of bias evaluation will be done independently by two authors with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist, and the quality of evidence will be evaluated based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since the data that will be collected are secondary data and are already in the public domain. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
CRD42024577500.
FreshRSS