Glucocorticoid therapy is prescribed for a variety of inflammatory conditions and is associated with severe adverse effects. A glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) may occur after prolonged glucocorticoid treatment—with or without biochemical glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (GIAI). Previously, GWS was not considered an entity, probably due to the overlap between symptoms of GWS and GIAI. The Addison’s disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (AddiQoL-30) is a validated tool for quantifying symptoms of adrenal insufficiency resembling GWS. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that patients with a low AddiQoL-30 score and/or low cortisol response to a short Synacthen test (SST), after cessation of prednisolone treatment, may benefit from low-dose hydrocortisone therapy without increasing the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease during prolonged cortisol exposure.

REPLACE is a multi-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis after cessation of prednisolone treatment. Criteria for randomisation are an AddiQoL-30 score ≤85 and/or plasma cortisol response to SST, 30-min p-cortisol >100 and 85; and (2) patients with a SST-stimulated cortisol ≤100 nmol/L.

The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, registered at the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS: 2024-513822-53-00) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05193396), and publications will be in accordance with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The trial is monitored by local independent Good Clinical Practice units and overseen by the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal no. 21/27119), the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (project ID: S-20210076), the Danish Patient Safety Authority and the Danish Medicines Agency.

NCT05193396.

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia (HH) repair is associated with a high recurrence rate. Repair reinforced with mesh lowers short-term recurrence but can cause dysphagia and visceral erosion. Results of the PRIME trial, in which non-absorbable mesh reinforcement of the posterior crural repair was investigated, showed equal recurrence compared with primary suture repair after 6 months. This study investigates the use of circular absorbable mesh reinforcement in primary HH repair.

Prospective double-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial comparing two laparoscopic procedures for HH repair (110 vs 110). Adult patients with proven HH Skinner types II–IV (defined by preoperative CT scan) are included. Patients are randomised to undergo a laparoscopic primary crural repair with sutures alone or suture repair augmented with biosynthetic absorbable, circular mesh at the hiatus. Radiologic integrity of the hiatal repair 1 year after surgery is the main endpoint. Secondary objectives are clinical recurrence of the hernia, development of postoperative reflux disease, postoperative side effects and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Outcome assessors are blinded to allocation. Data are collected at baseline, and follow-up includes interviews and digital questionnaires at 3, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, as well as CT scan at 12 and 60 months. All patients randomised will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Ethics approval has been obtained by the local ethics committee at Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands (Medical Ethics Review Committee (METc) Isala, study number: 190516). METc Isala is no longer active; all duties have been taken over by METc of the University Medical Center Groningen. The trial’s results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal as well as (inter)national conferences.

Registered in the Dutch national trial registry: OMON (NL-OMON48062).

Racial disparities in critical illness outcomes are well-described, with social determinants of health as likely contributors. We sought to identify inequalities in readmissions and mortality between black and white patients among survivors of critical illness with sepsis and assess whether these disparities were explained by neighbourhood characteristics, health insurance and hospital quality.

Retrospective cohort study examining 90-day and 9-month readmissions and survival as coprimary outcomes. Models included age, sex, race and area deprivation index (ADI), Medicaid status or hospital Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Star rating. Accelerated failure time and Cox proportional hazards models with subgroup analyses by age and surgical status were employed.

14 community and tertiary hospitals in Western Pennsylvania.

48 027 survivors of sepsis with critical illness; 20 952 (50.4%) male; 6489 (13.5%) identified as black.

Black patients were younger (mean age 59.0 years vs 65.8 years), more likely to have higher ADI, Medicaid insurance and receive care at lower-quality hospitals. Black patients had higher readmission risk: (90-day subdistribution HR (SDHR) 1.13 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.23); p=0.003); 9-month SDHR: 1.11 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.20); p=0.005). Adjusting for age and sex, we found no difference in 90-day and 9-month mortality (90-day acceleration factor (AF): 1.04 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.19); p=0.556; 9-month: 1.08 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.22); p=0.196), which remained consistent when including ADI, Medicaid status or hospital quality. Mortality among black patients was increased relative to white patients among patients ≥60 years (9-month AF 1.23 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.42; p=0.004)) and among surgical patients (90-day AF: 1.23 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.50; p=0.04); 9-month AF: 1.28 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.53; p=0.006)). Medicaid status, but not ADI or hospital quality, attenuated racial differences in subgroup mortality.

In a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors with sepsis, black patients had higher readmission rates but comparable mortality to white patients, except among older and surgical subgroups. Medicaid status influenced racial inequalities in mortality, highlighting a need for targeted post-ICU interventions.

Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are conditions for which the provision of timely and skilled primary care can reduce risks of hospitalisation when preventing, treating or controlling a disease. For this reason, hospitalisations for ACSC have been commonly employed by health systems as an indicator of effectiveness for the primary level of care. This study aims to evaluate whether the provision of primary care services by physicians with residency training in family medicine is associated with rates of general hospitalisations for ACSCs in the Brazilian Unified Health System network in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Longitudinal ecological study using a Generalised Linear Model for Gamma-distributed variables.

Primary healthcare centres in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from January 2017 to December 2021, aggregated at the primary healthcare centres level.

Data aggregated at the primary healthcare centre level, encompassing socioeconomic, professional and health-related variables.

Incidence rates of hospitalisations for ACSCs, adjusted for age and sex.

After adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic variables using the Health Vulnerability Index, a higher concentration of family physicians was significantly associated with a lower incidence of hospitalisations for ACSCs. If all physicians in the primary care network were family physicians, compared with a scenario in which none were, an estimated 11.89% reduction in hospitalisations would be expected (95% CI 7.3% to 16.3%, p

The findings suggest that specialisation in family medicine positively impacts health outcomes by reducing hospitalisations for ACSCs. These results can inform the development of evidence-based public policies to enhance primary care effectiveness.

Physical activity improves physical and psychosocial outcomes in healthy children and in children with a range of chronic health conditions. Unfortunately, children with chronic health conditions have lower levels of physical activity compared to their healthy peers due to multiple restrictions in physical activities and therefore tend to have lower levels of physical activity compared with their peers. This paper describes the protocol for Move to Improve, a pragmatic trial of an individualised physical activity intervention for children with chronic health conditions.

Using the RE-AIM framework, this study aims to test the feasibility of Move to Improve, an 8-week hospital-based individualised physical activity intervention. We will recruit 100 children aged 5–17 years who are diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, cancer, postburn injuries and cerebral palsy to a single-arm, pragmatic feasibility trial. The primary outcomes (objective moderate to vigorous physical activity, quality of life and goal attainment) and secondary outcomes (including aerobic capacity, body composition, motor function, grip strength and psychosocial outcomes) will be assessed at baseline, post intervention and at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. We will conduct semistructured interviews with participants and their primary caregiver at a 2-month follow-up to capture aspects of feasibility. Quantitative data will be reported descriptively, and qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. Data gathered from this study will inform service decision-making and future trials.

The study has received ethics approval from the Government of Western Australia Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (RGS6677). Findings of this research will be communicated to the public through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, reports, infographics and information sheets. Modifications to the protocol will be outlined in the trial registry and journal publications. Authorship will be in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number: ACTRN12624000836538.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative and progressive joint condition causing pain and disability. Physical exercise is recognised as the most effective intervention since individuals with this condition often experience muscle weakness, balance deficits and chronic pain. Additionally, knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is associated with central sensitisation, contributing to chronic pain conditions. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has been employed to induce changes in pain perception by altering cortical excitability, potentially reducing chronic pain.

This is a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Participants will be allocated to two groups: G1 (active tDCS combined with exercise) and G2 (sham tDCS combined with exercise). The intervention protocol will last for 5 weeks, with two sessions per week on non-consecutive days. Pain intensity will be assessed as the primary outcome using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The sample size was calculated based on a minimum clinically important difference of 3 points on the NRS between groups, with a statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 5%. Secondary outcomes will include physical function and global perceived change.

This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Trairi School of Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (Approval Number: 6.801.827), and it is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki for human research. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific events. This trial is registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry.

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-5pb2g33).