FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Students perceptions and experiences of an online well-being programme: a phenomenological study protocol

Por: Escuadra · C. J. · Chiong Maya · A. · Nava · J. B. P. · Vergara · J. A. · Bea · T. C. · Javier · A. M. · Karamihan · F. · Padilla · D. P. · Reyes · A. J. · Samonte · J. · Serrano · S. I. — Marzo 9th 2024 at 02:25
Background

The pandemic has ensued challenges across all sections of the human population such as livelihood and educational changes, which involve the abrupt shift to online learning, immensely affecting the students’ well-being. Negative health consequences of e-learning among students stem from the increased demand for new technological skills, productivity, information overload and restriction of students to spend time with their peers.

Objective

To explore the experiences of the students from the University of Santo Tomas—College of Rehabilitation Sciences (UST-CRS) who participated in the online well-being programme.

Methodology

A phenomenological design will be used to determine the participants’ perceptions and experiences. Purposive sampling will be used to recruit 8–10 undergraduate students from UST-CRS ages 18–22 years, who participated in the well-being programme, and completed the study’s quantitative counterpart. Semistructured, in-depth questions will be used to conduct a focus group discussion. The transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis via the NVivo V.12 software.

Ethics and dissemination

The study protocol is approved by the UST-CRS Ethical Review Committee (Protocol Number: SI-2022–034 (V.4)). It will be implemented in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the National Ethical Guidelines for Health and Health-Related Research, and Data Privacy Act. Findings will be published in accredited journals and presented in related scientific fora.

Registration ID

PHRR230214-005419; Philippine Health Research Registry.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine during surgery under general anaesthesia on patient-centred outcomes: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis protocol

Por: Verret · M. · Le · J. B. P. · Lalu · M. M. · McIsaac · D. I. · Nicholls · S. · Turgeon · A. F. · Hutton · B. · Zivkovic · F. · Graham · M. · Le · M. · Geist · A. · Berube · M. · Gilron · I. · Poulin · P. · Daudt · H. · Martel · G. · McVicar · J. · Moloo · H. · Fergusson · D. A. — Febrero 2nd 2024 at 03:55
Introduction

Dexmedetomidine is a promising pharmaceutical strategy to minimise opioid use during surgery. Despite its growing use, it is uncertain whether dexmedetomidine can improve patient-centred outcomes such as quality of recovery and pain.

Methods and analysis

We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis following the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science and CINAHL approximately in October 2023. We will include randomised controlled trials evaluating the impact of systemic intraoperative dexmedetomidine on patient-centred outcomes. Patient-centred outcome definition will be based on the consensus definition established by the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP-COMPAC). Our primary outcome will be the quality of recovery after surgery. Our secondary outcomes will be patient well-being, function, health-related quality of life, life impact, multidimensional assessment of postoperative acute pain, chronic pain, persistent postoperative opioid use, opioid-related adverse events, hospital length of stay and adverse events. Two reviewers will independently screen and identify trials and extract data. We will evaluate the risk of bias of trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0). We will synthesise data using a random effects Bayesian model framework, estimating the probability of achieving a benefit and its clinical significance. We will assess statistical heterogeneity with the tau-squared and explore sources of heterogeneity with meta-regression. We have involved patient partners, clinicians, methodologists, and key partner organisations in the development of this protocol, and we plan to continue this collaboration throughout all phases of this systematic review.

Ethics and dissemination

Our systematic review does not require research ethics approval. It will help inform current clinical practice guidelines and guide development of future randomised controlled trials. The results will be disseminated in open-access peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and shared among collaborators and networks.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42023439896.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Examining the extent, forms and factors influencing multiple job holding among medical doctors, professional nurses and rehabilitation therapists in two South African provinces: a cross-sectional study

Por: Matiwane · B. P. · Blaauw · D. · Rispel · L. C. — Diciembre 21st 2023 at 06:07
Objective

Multiple job holding (MJH), or working in more than one paid job simultaneously, is a common characteristic of health labour markets. The study examined the extent (prevalence), forms and factors influencing MJH among public sector medical doctors, professional nurses and rehabilitation therapists in two South African provinces.

Design

A cross-sectional, analytical study.

Setting

29 public sector hospitals in the Gauteng and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa.

Participants

Full-time public sector medical doctors, professional nurses and rehabilitation therapists.

Results

We obtained an overall response rate of 84.3%, with 486 medical doctors, 571 professional nurses and 340 rehabilitation therapists completing the survey. The mean age was 39.9±9.7 years for medical doctors, 43.7±10.4 years for professional nurses and 32.3±8.7 years for rehabilitation therapists. In the preceding 12 months, the prevalence of MJH was 33.7% (95% CI 25.8% to 42.6%) among medical doctors, 8.6% (95% CI 6.3% to 11.7%) among professional nurses and 38.7% (95% CI 31.5% to 46.5%) among rehabilitation therapists. Medical doctors worked a median of 20 (10–40) hours per month in their additional jobs, professional nurses worked 24 (12–34) hours per month and rehabilitation therapists worked 16 (8–28) hours per month. Private practice was the most prevalent form of MJH among medical doctors and rehabilitation therapists, compared with nursing agencies for professional nurses. MJH was significantly more likely among medical specialists (OR 4.3, p

Conclusion

The high prevalence of MJH could adversely affect the care of public sector patients. The study findings should inform the review and revision of existing MJH policies.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterisation with a needle guide (ELUSIVE): protocol for a randomised controlled study

Por: Naddi · L. · Borgquist · O. · Adrian · M. · Bark · B. P. · Kander · T. — Diciembre 19th 2023 at 16:46
Introduction

Central venous catheters are indispensable in modern healthcare. Unfortunately, they are accompanied by minor as well as major complications, leading to increased morbidity, mortality and costs. Immediate insertion-related complications (mechanical complications) have decreased due to the implementation of real-time ultrasound guidance, but they still occur and additional efforts to enhance patient safety are warranted. This study aims to investigate whether the use of a needle guide mounted on the ultrasound probe in subclavian catheterisations may decrease the number of catheterisations with >1 skin puncture (primary outcome).

Methods and analysis

This is an investigator-initiated, non-commercial, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study conducted at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Adults (≥18 years) with a clinical indication for a subclavian central venous catheter and the ability to give written informed consent will be eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria include subclavian catheterisation deemed unsuitable based on the preprocedural ultrasound examination. Patients will be randomised to catheterisation by certified operators using a microconvex probe (long-axis, in-plane technique) with (n=150) or without (n=150) a needle guide. The ultrasound imaging from the procedures will be recorded and assessed by two reviewers individually. The assessors will be blinded for group affiliation. Secondary outcomes include the total number of skin punctures, mechanical complications, time to successful venous puncture, number of failed catheterisations and operator satisfaction with the needle guide at the end of the study period.

Recruitment started on 8 November 2022 and will continue until the sample size is achieved.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (#2022-04073-01) and the Swedish Medical Products Agency (#5.1-2022-52130; CIV-21-12-038367). The findings will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number

NCT05513378, clinicaltrials.gov.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

INvestigational Study Into Transplantation of the Uterus (INSITU): a cross-sectional survey among women with uterine factor infertility in the UK assessing background, motivations and suitability

Por: Jones · B. P. · Vali · S. · Kasaven · L. S. · Mantrali · I. · Saso · S. · Bracewell-Milnes · T. · Nicopoullos · J. · Thum · M.-Y. · Diaz-Garcia · C. · Quiroga · I. · Yazbek · J. · Smith · J. R. — Diciembre 9th 2023 at 17:51
Importance

The study summarises the selection prescreen criteria currently used in the UK for a uterus transplant and highlights the number of women who are suitable to proceed.

Objectives

To assess the demographics, motivations, reasons and suitability among women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) to undergo uterine transplantation (UTx).

Design

A cross-sectional survey.

Setting

An electronic questionnaire was sent via email to women with AUFI who had previously been referred to the UTx research team or approached the Womb Transplant UK Charity. The questions assessed suitability to undergo UTx based on demographic information, perceptions to adoption and surrogacy and reasons why UTx was preferable. Responses were assessed against the study selection criteria.

Participants

Women with AUFI.

Results

210 women completed the questionnaire. The most common aetiology of AUFI in our cohort was Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (68%; n=143) whereas 29% (n=62) had previously undergone hysterectomy. 63% (n=132) of the cohort had previously considered adoption, 5% (n=11) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully adopted. The most common reason cited to undergo UTx over adoption was to experience gestation (n=63; 53%), while 37% (n=44) wanted a biologically related child. 76% (n=160) of participants had previously considered surrogacy, 22 (10%) had attempted it and 2 (1%) had successfully become mothers using a surrogate. The most common reason to undergo UTx over surrogacy was to experience gestation (n=77; 54%). 15% (n=21) were concerned about the legal implications, 14% (n=20) identified the financial cost as a barrier and 8% (n=12) could not consider it due to religious reasons. On adhering to the selection criteria, 65 (31%) women were suitable to proceed with the trial.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates that implementing commonly used selection criteria for a UTx led to an attrition rate of more than two-thirds of women who requested to initially undergo the process. As more studies present outcomes following UTx, critical assessment of the selection criteria currently used is warranted to ensure potential recipients are not being unnecessarily excluded.

Trial registration number

NCT02388802.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of therapies for psoriatic arthritis on patient-reported outcomes

Por: Nash · P. · Dutz · J. P. · Peterson · S. · Patel · B. P. · Eaton · K. · Shawi · M. · Zazzetti · F. · Wei · J. C.-C. — Noviembre 8th 2023 at 16:27
Objectives

Head-to-head clinical trials are common in psoriasis, but scarce in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), making treatment comparisons between therapeutic classes difficult. This study describes the relative effectiveness of targeted synthetic (ts) and biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) through network meta-analysis (NMA).

Design

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in January 2020. Bayesian NMAs were conducted to compare treatments on Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey including Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores.

Data sources

Ovid MEDLINE (including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily),Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

Eligibility criteria

Phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients with PsA receiving tsDMARDS, bDMARDs or placebo were included in the SLR; there was no restriction on outcomes.

Data extraction and synthesis

Two independent researchers reviewed all citations. Data for studies meeting all inclusion criteria were extracted into a standardised Excel-based form by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any discrepancies, as necessary. Risk of bias was assessed using the The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical effectiveness quality assessment checklist.

Results

In total, 26 RCTs were included. For HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS scores, intravenous tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors generally ranked higher than most other classes of therapies available to treat patients with PsA. For almost all outcomes, several interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17A, subcutaneous TNF and IL-12/23 agents offered comparable improvement, while cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, phosphodiesterase-4 and Janus kinase inhibitors often had the lowest efficacy.

Conclusions

While intravenous TNFs may provide some improvements in PROs relative to several other tsDMARDs and bDMARDs for the treatment of patients with PsA, differences between classes of therapies across outcomes were small.

❌