Poor cardiopulmonary fitness is an important risk factor for postoperative complications, yet a feasible, objective and prognostically accurate method to assess preoperative fitness has not been established. The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is a simple, inexpensive and widely applicable measure that shows promise for predicting postoperative risk. However, robust data are lacking on whether the 6MWT accurately predicts complications, provides incremental prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors or outperforms simpler alternatives such as questionnaires, cardiac biomarkers or grip strength testing. The Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study is designed to address these knowledge gaps by evaluating whether the 6MWT improves prediction of key postoperative outcomes compared with clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.

The FAST Walk study is an international multicentre prospective cohort study of 1672 adults (≥40 years) undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at centres in Canada, Hong Kong, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands. Participants complete a preoperative 6MWT and baseline assessments of comorbidities, self-reported cardiopulmonary fitness (MET: Re-evaluation for Perioperative Cardiac Risk questionnaire), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and grip strength. The primary outcome is 30-day death or major postoperative complication, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher. Secondary outcomes are (1) death or new significant disability at 90 days after surgery and (2) days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery. Disability is measured using the short-form WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 instrument. Multivariable regression models and complementary metrics of prediction performance will be used to determine whether 6MWT distance adds prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.

The FAST Walk study has received research ethics board approval at all participating sites. Recruitment commenced in June 2024, with completion of participant follow-up expected in 2026. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the primary results anticipated in 2027.

NCT06412367.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital in Niger.

Prospective, cross-sectional study.

The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Niger.

All clinical samples received at the bacteriology laboratory during the study period for diagnostic purposes were included.

Out of 548 clinical Gram-negative isolates, 60 strains of NFGNB (10.94%) were isolated. These NFGNB strains were mainly isolated from male patients (62%, n=37) with a mean age of 41.2±27.3 years. NFGNB was more frequent in urine samples (91.7%), followed by pus (6.6%). Among the NFGNB strains isolated, Acinetobacter baumannii was predominant (60%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.3%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (13.33%). 20% (n=12) of NFGNB isolated were multidrug-resistant (MDR), including 13.33% (n=8) carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and 6.67% (n=4) carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. There is no statistically significant association between MDR-NFGNB and age, sex and origin of patients (p>0.05).

Our study revealed a relatively high MDR-NFGNB prevalence rate in a Nigerien tertiary care hospital. These findings emphasise the need for vigilant antibiotic stewardship, with appropriate infection prevention and control practices to curb the emergence and spread of MDR-NFGNB infections in hospital settings.