To provide a nationwide epidemiological assessment of upper limb amputations (ULAs) in Germany, including incidence trends, underlying aetiologies, amputation levels and revision patterns, with a comparative analysis between 2019 and 2023.

Nationwide retrospective cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected inpatient hospital data.

All acute-care hospitals in Germany reporting to the national Diagnosis-Related Groups and Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS) from 2019 to 2023.

All patients undergoing ULA procedures (OPS 5-862 and 5-863) or revision procedures (OPS 5-866) within the study period. No exclusion criteria were applied.

Primary measures were annual incidence of ULAs, the distribution of amputation levels and underlying medical aetiologies. Secondary measures included the incidence of revision procedures and revision aetiologies stratified by anatomical level.

A total of 5427 ULAs were performed in 2023, representing a 7.3% decrease compared with 2019 (5,852). Distal amputations remained most frequent, though proximal amputations increased proportionally over time. Above-wrist amputations were predominantly associated with malignancy (40.3%) and vascular disease (23.7%), whereas distal amputations were mainly trauma-related (43.6%). Infection-related distal amputations increased from 23.4% in 2019 to 30.4% in 2023. Revision procedures occurred in 32.4% of proximal amputations and 6.1% of distal amputations in 2023. Infection was the most common indication for distal revisions (53.3%), while infection and neuroma formation each accounted for 29.4% of proximal revisions.

This nationwide analysis provides a comprehensive epidemiological overview of ULAs in Germany, demonstrating stable overall incidence but clear level-specific differences in underlying aetiologies. Proximal amputations were mainly associated with malignant and vascular disease, whereas trauma predominated at distal levels. High rates of infection-related and neuroma-related revisions, particularly after proximal amputations, highlight the complexity of surgical management and the need for level-specific perioperative and follow-up strategies.

Child-to-parent violence (CPV) has received limited attention in scientific literature, but due to a recent increase in reported cases, it has become a subject of investigation. The reliability and validity of the Child-to-Parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q), in separate mother and father versions, have not yet been studied in Iran. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian CPV-Q.

This research employed a cross-sectional design to evaluate the Persian CPV-Q’s psychometric properties. The process included translation (using backward-forward method), face validity (via impact score calculation), content validity (using content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI)), construct validity (through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA)) and reliability assessment (via test–retest, coefficient α, coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)).

The study was conducted at the Faculties of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.

A total of 500 qualified students from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences were recruited using cluster random sampling. These participants completed the Persian CPV-Q.

Face validity was confirmed, with impact scores exceeding 1.5 for all items. Content validity was strong, with CVR=0.92 and CVI=0.89. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors related to violence frequency and two factors regarding reasons for violence, consistent with the original questionnaire, covering 19 and 8 items, respectively. Total variance explained was 0.30 and 0.39 for the mother’s version and 0.33 and 0.43 for the father’s version in frequency and reason sections. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test confirmed sample adequacy (

The Persian CPV-Q demonstrates adequate validity and reliability for assessing the prevalence and causes of CPV in Iranian society.

Severe perinatal asphyxia at term or near term remains a critical public health issue, associated with high risks of neonatal death and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Despite improved clinical guidelines, suboptimal care persists in many cases, and previous audits have demonstrated that up to 50% of asphyxia cases could be associated with suboptimal care. OptiNeoCare is a French study which aims to assess the prevalence and determinants of suboptimal obstetric and neonatal care and evaluate its potential impact on neonatal outcomes.

This prospective, population-based observational study will include newborns ≥36 weeks’ gestation with severe perinatal asphyxia across 12 French perinatal networks (213 maternity units). Inclusion criteria comprise neonatal death or moderate/severe HIE with confirmed biochemical markers of asphyxia. Data will be collected prospectively from labour wards, transport teams and neonatal intensive care units using an electronic case report form, and the in-situ team will be invited to complete a morbi-mortality review (MMR). Approximately 336 cases will be included over 12 months, with 25% randomly selected for confidential enquiry by two experts. The quality of care will be assessed based on a structured classification of medical errors (diagnostic, therapeutic, preventive and systemic) by a panel of experts including an obstetrician or midwife and a paediatrician. Root cause analysis will identify determinants of suboptimal care. A concordance analysis will compare findings from MMRs and confidential enquiries. Statistical analysis will include multivariable logistic regression to explore associations between care quality and neonatal outcomes.

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee for Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Informed non-opposition is required from participants. Results will be shared with participating centres, healthcare professionals and through scientific dissemination.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06322732.