FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Household determinants of healthcare utilisation in three informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional survey

Por: Sesay · S. · Sesay · I. J. · Tengbe · S. M. · Wurie · H. · Fullah · S. · Vangahun · D. · Gandi · I. · Teixeira de Siqueira Filha · N. · Lakshman · R. W. D. · Conteh · A. · Saidu · S. · Koroma · B. · Mansaray · B. · Elsey · H. · Whittaker · L. · Dean · L. · Wiltgen Georgi · N. · Nganda · M — Marzo 3rd 2026 at 13:40
Objective

Healthcare utilisation (HU) is key to improving the health of residents in urban informal settlements. This study aimed to explore household-level factors influencing HU among informal settlement households in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting

Three informal settlements (Cockle Bay, Dwarzark and Moyiba) in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Participants

Primary data from 4871 households were collected during the Health and Wellbeing survey conducted between April and May 2023, targeting households with adults aged 18 years and older.

Primary outcome measures

The primary outcomes were households HU both within and outside informal settlements. Household-level predisposing and enabling explanatory variables were derived from Andersen’s Behavioural Model of HU.

Results

Disability in households increases HU within settlements (especially in Dwarzark, 13% and Moyiba, 10%) but is less likely outside. Households engaged in income-generating activities are more likely to seek healthcare within settlements, but 12% less likely outside in Cockle Bay and Dwarzark. Food insecurity decreases HU within Dwarzark (9%) and increases HU outside by 174% in Moyiba. Longer water fetching times and water shortages were associated with higher HU (between 6% and 16%) within settlements, especially in Cockle Bay and Dwarzark. Clean water sources (eg, piped dwelling, bowser, surface, bottled) were consistently associated with higher HU both within and outside settlements. Shared sanitation facilities (such as shared toilets) were positively associated with HU both within and outside settlements, particularly in Dwarzark and Moyiba. Households with income from fishing, informal salaried work and bike riding showed higher HU both within and outside settlements, especially in Dwarzark and Moyiba.

Conclusions

We identified strong settlement-specific patterns of household-level factors that influence HU both within and outside Freetown’s informal settlements. These findings provide a foundation for developing targeted policies such as strengthening local services, addressing affordability and accessibility barriers and supporting vulnerable occupation groups.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Development, content and planned evaluation of a behavioural support intervention to reduce ultraprocessed food intake and increase physical activity in UK healthcare workers: UPDATE trial stage 2 study protocol

Por: Heuchan · G. N. · Buck · C. · Conway · R. · Dicken · S. · Brown · A. C. · Jassil · F. C. · Makaronidis · J. · Van Tulleken · C. · Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott · C. A. · Batterham · R. · Fisher · A. — Octubre 29th 2025 at 16:48
Introduction

Diets high in ultraprocessed food (UPF) are associated with poor health outcomes and weight gain. Healthcare workers are particularly at risk of consuming diets high in UPF due to erratic work patterns, high stress and limited access to fresh food at work. Despite this, no interventions to date have specifically targeted a reduction in UPF intake in healthcare workers.

Methods and analysis

This article describes the development and content of a 6-month behavioural support intervention targeting a reduction in UPF intake in UK healthcare workers. The intervention was offered to all participants who took part in the UltraProcessed versus minimally processed Diets following UK dietAry guidance on healTh outcomEs trial—a two-stage study in which Stage 1 was a controlled-feeding crossover randomised controlled trial of provided UPF versus minimally processed food (MPF) diets (published previously) and was completed before the start of Stage 2. Stage 2, reported here, aimed to support participants to reduce their UPF consumption, increase MPF and increase physical activity in real-world settings. The intervention was developed using the behaviour change wheel framework, which systematically links behavioural diagnoses to intervention functions, incorporating the capability, opportunity and motivation model for behaviour change. It included tailored one-to-one and group support sessions, bespoke digital and print resources and a mobile-optimised website. The detailed description is intended to support future replication and adaptation. The acceptability and feasibility of the intervention will be assessed using quantitative and qualitative data in a future paper.

Ethics and dissemination

Sheffield Research Ethics Committee approved the trial (22/YH/0281). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries shared with participants and stakeholders.

Trial registration number

NCT05627570.

❌