Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, queer/questioning and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBTIQ+) face systemic barriers and discrimination in healthcare settings, leading to significant health disparities. These challenges persist in palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC), where older LGBTIQ+ people often lack family support and experience social isolation. Despite the increasing ageing of the LGBTIQ+ population in Switzerland, there is limited evidence on their specific PEOLC needs. Additionally, healthcare providers’ knowledge and practices regarding LGBTIQ+ inclusivity in these settings remain understudied. This study aims to address these gaps by co-creating knowledge and developing best practice recommendations for inclusive PEOLC in Switzerland.

This study employs a mixed-methods participatory action research approach across three work packages (WPs). WP0 ensures participatory engagement through advisory boards, workshops and co-design processes across Switzerland’s four linguistic regions. WP1 investigates the palliative and PEOLC needs of LGBTIQ+ people and their (chosen) families through qualitative interviews (n30) and a quantitative survey embedded in the Swiss LGBTIQ+ Panel. WP2 explores healthcare providers’ perceptions and practices regarding LGBTIQ+ patients through qualitative interviews (n30) and a nationwide quantitative survey among palliative and PEOLC professionals. Data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis for qualitative data and multivariate regression models for quantitative data. Findings will be synthesised through a specific data integration framework, integrating community and healthcare perspectives.

This study has received ethical approval from the relevant Swiss Ethics Committees. The participatory approach promotes inclusivity, empowering LGBTIQ+ people and healthcare providers in shaping recommendations. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, stakeholder workshops and the co-created Rainbow Book, a best-practice guide for LGBTIQ+ inclusive palliative and PEOLC in Switzerland.

Prehospital care, though critical to injury survival, is largely unavailable in many low and middle-income countries, including Cameroon. Lay first responder (LFR) programmes train persons with high injury exposure in first-aid and emergency transport, but stakeholder buy-in from trainees and healthcare workers (HCWs) is essential. To design a context-appropriate prehospital care system, we evaluated barriers and facilitators of implementing a driver-based LFR programme in Cameroon.

In April 2023, we performed a mixed-methods evaluation targeting commercial mototaxi drivers and HCW in Limbe, Cameroon. Drivers were recruited for focus groups through union leaders. Trauma HCW at Limbe Regional Hospital completed Likert surveys and a subgroup completed semistructured interviews. Data collection focused on perceptions, barriers and facilitators of LFR programme implementation. Survey data were summarised using median and IQR. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, translated and analysed with open and axial coding using reflexive thematic analysis.

Overall, 92 mototaxi drivers and 34 HCWs participated in the LFR programme assessment. Among the HCW surveyed, 93% felt mototaxi drivers were capable of training as LFR but only 44% felt that drivers would be able to provide care safely. Interviews identified negative HCW perceptions of drivers, including drivers being uneducated and financially motivated, as key barriers, whereas driver exposure to injury was identified as a facilitator to LFR programme implementation. Driver groups demonstrated a positive perception of LFR training but identified unpaid time spent transporting injured persons as a significant barrier. Both groups described a need for hospital involvement in trainings and bidirectional standardised communication with HCW.

In Cameroon, driver-based LFR may facilitate increased prehospital care but further exploration of possible systems of collaboration that promote long-term success of the programme is required. Specifically, sustainable implementation will need to include clear bidirectional communication guidelines and provide driver incentive commensurate to effort.