FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the emergency department: EFFI-PNO protocol - a multicentre, cluster-controlled, stepped-wedge, randomised interventional study

Por: Kepka · S. · Wilme · V. · Duracinsky · M. · Matau · C. · Nze Ossima · A. · Gil Jardine · C. · Le Borgne · P. · Marjanovic · N. · Marx · T. · Ohana · M. · Peyrony · O. · Philippon · A.-L. · Viglino · D. · Chenou · A. · Clere-Jehl · R. · Bilbault · P. · Durand-Zaleski · I. · Sauleau · E. A. — Diciembre 25th 2025 at 05:45
Introduction

For large primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), drainage or simple aspiration are the two first-line treatment options. Outpatient ambulatory strategies have a success rate of almost 80% with few complications. New French recommendations suggest that an outpatient strategy should be preferred if an appropriate care network is in place. However, establishing this care network remains the main obstacle to the use of this strategy. Thus, outpatient management of PSP remains rare, which is neither optimal for the patient, with a likely impact on quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction with care, nor for the healthcare system, with increased costs. We hypothesise that outpatient treatment of PSP compared with usual inpatient management could improve quality of care and represent a more efficient, generalisable and sustainable strategy.

Methods and analysis

In this multicentre, cluster-controlled, randomised interventional study with stepped wedge implementation, patients aged 18–50 presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a first episode of large PSP will be enrolled in seven university hospitals in France. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on changes in QOL of an ambulatory strategy for the management of large PSP in the ED compared with usual inpatient management. The primary outcome is the difference in QOL as measured by SF-36 score, between drain placement and 6 months. Clinical criteria (pulmonary expansion at 6 days, pain, dyspnoea, complications, recurrence), perceived quality of care (satisfaction, patient preference, anxiety) and ease of implementation of the care pathway will also be assessed. A cost-utility analysis will be carried out to evaluate the incremental cost-utility ratio at 1 year, defined as the difference in costs divided by the difference in utility estimated by the EQ-5D scores.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval has been obtained by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III N° 2024-36. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal. Results will be presented at national and international emergency healthcare meetings, and participating patients notified of the main conclusions.

Trial registration number

This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry NCT06471608. The trial protocol and statistical design are fully described in this study protocol. Additional data can be provided on reasonable request to the sponsor. Protocol version: V2.1 - 21/11/2024.

☐ ☆ ✇ CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing

Best Practices in Supporting Inpatient Communication With Technology During Visitor Restrictions: An Integrative Review

imageBackground Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers around the world have experimented with technologies to facilitate communication and care for patients and their care partners. Methods Our team reviewed the literature to examine best practices in utilizing technology to support communication between nurses, patients, and care partners while visitation is limited. We searched four major databases for recent articles on this topic, conducted a systematic screening and review of 1902 articles, and used the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model & Guidelines to appraise and translate the results of 23 relevant articles. Results Our evaluation yielded three main findings from the current literature: (1) Virtual contact by any technological means, especially video visitation, improves satisfaction, reduces anxiety, and is well-received by the target populations. (2) Structured video rounding provides effective communication among healthcare workers, patients, and offsite care partners. (3) Institutional preparation, such as a standardized checklist and dedicating staff to roles focused on facilitating communication, can help healthcare workers create environments conducive to therapeutic virtual communication. Discussion In situations that require healthcare facilities to limit visitation between patients and their care partners, the benefits of virtual visitation are evident. There is variance in the types of technologies used to facilitate virtual visits, but across all of them, there are consistent themes demonstrating the benefits of virtual visits and virtual rounding. Healthcare institutions can prepare for future limited-visitation scenarios by reviewing the current evidence and integrating virtual visitation into modern healthcare delivery.
❌