This study examined social determinants and structural barriers to lung cancer outcomes in Kern and Fresno counties, California, and co-developed a multilevel intervention strategy informed by community perspectives.
Engaging stakeholders through group model building (GMB) to elicit their knowledge to build a system dynamics (SD) simulation model for intervention strategy design.
We identified and trained four community members from two community-based organisations in Central Valley, California, to help recruit GMB participants. 14 community members representing patient advocacy organisations, cancer survivors, clinicians, caregivers, public health professionals, medical interpreters, housing, agriculture, sanitation, healthcare payer organisations and local policymaking sectors were recruited.
The GMB protocol consisted of two in-person and four virtual workshops from 22 August to 11 November 2024. The SD simulation model was built with iSee System’s Stella Architect SD modelling software (V.4.0).
The 181 variables suggested by the GMB workshop participants were categorised into 3 themes and 13 subthemes, which shaped the system boundary and model structure. 7 of the 16 intervention scenarios tested showed a cumulative reduction in the at-risk population and increases in screening, diagnoses, treatment and cancer-free survival. Participants selected a multilevel strategy focused on expanding public health and insurance education and advocating for air pollution-related screening within existing protocols.
Community engagement is essential for understanding lung cancer disparities and designing practical multilevel interventions. Scenario testing enables informed planning to improve long-term population health outcomes.
This study aimed to assess the psychological outcomes of family members of patients who were resuscitated in the Emergency Department (ED) and analyse factors associated with these outcomes.
This study utilised a cross-sectional design
Data were collected using a self-reported questionnaire sent to family members of patients who had undergone resuscitation in the ED from February 2024 to January 2025. Instruments for data collection included The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the short version of The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale–21 items (DASS-21), the Multicultural Quality of Life Index (MQLI) and questions related to demographic variables and the resuscitation event.
A total of 106 family members completed the questionnaire. Of this, 64.2% (n = 68) reported witnessing the resuscitation attempt, and 35.8% (n = 38) did not witness the event. Family members who witnessed the resuscitation displayed more symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), measured by the IES-R, compared to those who did not witness the event. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between the IES-R and the MQLI scores, indicating that higher PTSD symptoms correlate with lower quality of life (QoL) ratings.
The findings of this study indicated that witnessing the resuscitation of a loved one in the ED is associated with increased PTSD symptoms.
Patients' and family members' cultural and religious needs should be acknowledged by the health care providers. Study findings indicate that family members prefer to be with the patient during the patient's resuscitation. However, without adequate support from hospital staff, this experience may cause adverse psychological effects. Strategies to support family members during and after resuscitation should be developed and integrated into the management of in-hospital resuscitation.
This study followed the STROBE guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.