Conectar
To measure patients' views of nurses' communication and interpersonal skills during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.
From January to June 2024, a convenience sampling approach was used to recruit patients hospitalised in acute care wards across two healthcare organisations in regional Victoria, Australia. A self-report survey, the Communication Assessment Tool for Nurses, included 15 items that measured patients' opinions about the quality of nurses' communication using a 5-point scale. Data were analysed by descriptive and univariate statistics and logistic regression.
The sample included 204 participants. Higher ratings were found for respectful care: ‘Treated me with respect’ and ‘Showed care and concern’. Lower ratings largely related to shared decision-making: ‘Encouraged me to ask questions’, ‘Informed me about my plan of care’, ‘Involved me in decisions as much as I wanted’ and ‘Showed interest in my ideas about my health’. Logistic regression revealed lower ratings for the quality of nurses' communication based on longer hospital stay for items related to greetings and shared decision-making.
Whilst this study found that patients perceive a high quality of respectful nursing care, the findings underscore the need for communication skills training to enhance shared decision-making by nurses. Consideration is needed regarding how nurses are prepared to engage in shared decision-making with patients during acute hospitalisation, particularly for longer hospital stays.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding patients' perceptions about the quality of nurses' communication during acute hospitalisation in the Australian context. Whilst they perceive that nurses communicate in a respectful and caring manner, opportunities for shared decision-making may not be capitalised on. Hospital managers and nurse academics should develop interventions to address essential communication skills.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To establish, through patient and public involvement (PPI) events, the exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences of people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Qualitative ‘best fit’ framework analysis was used to analyse field notes and transcripts collected during three patient and public involvement meetings and three workshops. The best fit framework was based on the COM-B model of behaviour change, which has identified that Capability, Opportunity and Motivation components are essential for Behaviour change. The Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research checklist was used to structure the report.
Setting and participants: Community dwelling older adults with HFpEF.
24 people with HFpEF (n=16 female, 66%), 2 spouses and 2 people with chronic conditions participated in the PPI meetings and workshops. Multiple exercise-related capability (negative symptoms, functional ability, resilience and self-efficacy and knowledge and skill); opportunity (appealing components, optimal conditions, adequate support); and motivation factors (well-being, physical gains, goal achievement, sense of enjoyment) were identified as essential to facilitating change in exercise behaviours in people with HFpEF.
This study provides insight into capability, opportunity and motivation conditions that people with HFpEF feel are necessary to enable them to engage in exercise-related behaviour change. This work extends previous post hoc work by moving beyond identification of broad influencers that may enable or impede exercise intervention engagement, to identify intervention conditions necessary to affect change.
Public involvement in mental health research enhances research quality. The use of citizen science methods in mental health research has been described as a conclusion of a movement towards increased public involvement; however, this field is in its early stages of development. Our objective was to create a theory of change (ToC) for how citizen science can be used to enhance mental health research quality.
Iterative consultation with the stakeholders of an existing citizen mental health science study, that is, change for citizen science to achieve co-production at scale (C-STACS: https://www.researchintorecovery.com/research/c-stacs/)
We co-developed a ToC through an iterative consultation with C-STACS stakeholders who were (a) representatives of mental health community organisations (n=10), individuals with public involvement experience (n=2) and researchers (n=5). In keeping with established ToC practice, entities were identified, including long-term impacts, outcomes needed to create an impact, stakeholder assumptions and indicators for tracking progress.
A desired primary long-term impact of greater co-production of research was identified between researchers and members of the public, which would create a secondary impact of enhancing public capacity to engage in citizen mental health science. We proposed long-term outcomes needed to enable this impact: (1) greater co-production of research objectives and pathways between researcher and the public, (2) greater embedment of citizen mental health science into funder processes (eg, the creation of specific funding calls for citizen mental health science proposals, (3) greater clarity on the boundaries between citizen science and other participatory approaches (eg, so that there is not loss of impact due to conceptual confusion between these, (4) increased knowledge around effective frameworks to enable mass public participation and (5) greater availability of technology platforms, enabling safe and accessible engagement with citizen mental health science projects.
The proposed ToC is grounded in the C-STACS project, but intended to be broadly applicable. It allows the continued formation of a community of practice around citizen mental health science and should be reviewed, as greater knowledge is developed on how citizen mental health science creates change.
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern and is the fourth most prevalent cancer among women. In South Africa, it is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women aged 15–44 years. The disease is typically preceded by persistent high-risk HPV infection, leading to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and eventually cancer. Currently, in South Africa, management primarily involves excision, particularly through large loop excision of the transformation zone, which has associated risks and limitations. Thermal ablation is an alternative cost-effective treatment method, providing a straightforward approach to treatment, particularly advantageous in environments characterised by limited resources. The study aims to assess the efficacy, safety and patient experience of thermal ablation, providing valuable data for potential integration into South Africa’s cervical cancer prevention policies.
Randomised controlled trial in which 420 women living with HIV aged 30–60 years will be recruited from the Colposcopy Clinic at Tygerberg Hospital and will be followed up for a period of two years. The primary study endpoint is a test of cure that will be assessed by HPV genotyping, cervical cytology and histology at six month intervals. Other endpoints include the occurrence of adverse events.
The study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ethics Reference No: M20/11/035) and by the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness via the National Health Research Database (WC_202109_016). All study procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, South African Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Medical Research Council’s ethical guidelines. Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conference presentations and professional associations. A lay summary will be shared with the Community Advisory Board to guide community-level dissemination.
Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202504820339039.
FreshRSS