FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Understanding barriers and enablers for vaccination against COVID-19 and influenza among healthcare workers: a mixed-methods study nested within the UK SIREN cohort

Por: Sparkes · D. · Munro · K. · Kamal · A. · Haywood · J. · Howells · A. · Foulkes · S. · Russell · S. · Platt · N. · Broad · J. · Brown · C. S. · Hopkins · S. · Islam · J. · Hall · V. · SIREN Study Team — Diciembre 17th 2025 at 11:54
Objectives

To investigate vaccination coverage for influenza and COVID-19 in the SARS-CoV-2 immunity and reinfection evaluation (SIREN) study cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) between 2020 and 2023 and explore vaccination enablers and barriers.

Design

A mixed-methods study nested within SIREN, a multicentre prospective cohort study of HCWs across the UK. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used sequentially, using an expansion/explanation function, enabling emergent themes observed from the quantitative stage to be explored in the qualitative stage.

Setting

SIREN sites include secondary care centres and community mental health trusts in the UK.

Participants

Quantitative analysis was conducted on data from 6048 participants. Participants were representative of the HCW workforce, with the majority being women (83%) and of white ethnicity (88%). Nurses made up the largest occupational group (33%). Qualitative analysis of data from 24 participants including five focus groups (n=21) and three semistructured interviews (n=3); 82% women, 26% minority ethnic, all working age from across the UK.

Primary outcome measures

Quantitative: vaccine coverage for COVID-19 and influenza vaccines by demographic with multivariable logistical regression used to assess differences. Qualitative: thematic analysis to explore reasons behind the results seen in the quantitative stage.

Results

COVID-19 vaccination was initially high; 97% received two doses and 94% a first booster. However, coverage was reduced to 77%, for the second booster. Influenza vaccination coverage was lowest in 2020–2021 (46%), increasing to 73% in 2021–2022 and to 79% in 2022–2023. In 2022–2023, vaccination coverage was higher for influenza than for COVID-19. High vaccine coverage for both COVID-19 and influenza was observed in doctors, pharmacists and therapists. Porters, healthcare assistants and staff from minority ethnic groups had lower vaccine coverage for both COVID-19 and influenza. Four themes were identified: (1) attitudes towards vaccination changed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) HCWs used data to inform vaccination decisions; (3) poor communication in healthcare settings contributed to a reduction in vaccination; (4) there were both positive and negative impacts of the COVID-19 vaccine on influenza vaccine uptake and other vaccination programmes.

Conclusions

Between 2020 and 2023 in our cohort, COVID-19 vaccination coverage decreased, whereas influenza increased. Our study found attitudes to both vaccines have shifted, becoming more favourable to influenza and less to COVID-19 boosters. Barriers to COVID-19 boosters, including concerns about side effects and vaccine effectiveness, need to be addressed with improved communication on the benefits and adverse events. Future vaccination strategies should address the differences we have identified in vaccine coverage across demographics and occupational groups, including continued efforts to improve vaccine equity.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN11041050.

☐ ☆ ✇ Journal of Advanced Nursing

Emergency clinicians' use of adult and paediatric sepsis pathways: An implementation redesign using the behaviour change wheel

Abstract

Aims

To identify facilitators and barriers and tailor implementation strategies to optimize emergency clinician's use of adult and paediatric sepsis pathways.

Design

A qualitative descriptive study using focus group methodology.

Methods

Twenty-two emergency nurses and ten emergency medical officers from four Australian EDs participated in eight virtual focus groups. Participants were asked about their experiences using the New South Wales Clinical Excellence Commission adult and paediatric sepsis pathways using a semi-structured interview template. Facilitators and barriers to use of the sepsis pathways were categorized using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Tailored interventions were selected to address facilitators and barriers, and a re-implementation plan was devised guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel.

Results

Thirty-two facilitators and 58 barriers were identified corresponding to 11 Theoretical Domains Framework domains. Tailored strategies were selected to optimize emergency clinicians' use of the sepsis pathways including refinement of existing education and training programmes, modifications to the electronic medical record system, introduction of an audit and feedback system, staffing strategies and additional resources.

Conclusion

The implementation of sepsis pathways in the Emergency Department setting is complex, impacted by a multitude of factors requiring tailored strategies to address facilitators and barriers and optimize uptake.

Implications for Patient Care

This study presents a theory-informed systematic approach to successfully implement and embed adult and paediatric sepsis pathways into clinical practice in the Emergency Department.

Impact

Optimizing uptake of sepsis pathways has the potential to improve sepsis recognition and management, subsequently improving the outcome of patients with sepsis.

Reporting Method

The Consolidated Criteria for REporting Qualitative research guided the preparation of this report.

Patient or Public Contribution

Nil.

❌