FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Surgery versus conservative management for severe pectus excavatum (RESTORE): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority trial

Por: Maier · R. · Dunning · J. · Wason · J. · Chadwick · T. · Bryant · A. · Fernandez-Garcia · C. · Vale · L. · Danjoux · G. R. · Wallace · G. · Levett-Renton · A. · Naidu · B. · Pryor · C. · McCulloch · P. · Thursfield · R. · Wyllie · J. · Chang · L. · Marsay · L. · Akowuah · E. — Diciembre 25th 2025 at 05:45
Introduction

Severe pectus excavatum (PE) may impair cardiopulmonary and physical function. The effectiveness of surgical treatment to correct PE and restore physical function is widely debated due to a lack of high-quality comparative evidence. The RESTORE trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of corrective surgery for severe PE compared with conservative management for the first time in a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods and analysis

RESTORE is a pragmatic, multicentre, RCT with an embedded observational cohort. 200 participants aged ≥12 years with severe PE will be recruited at around 12 National Health Service cardiothoracic surgical centres in England. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either surgery within 3 months of randomisation (intervention arm) or no surgery until after the primary outcome measurement at 1 year (comparator arm). The primary outcome is change in physical functioning from baseline to 1 year as measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical function score. The primary economic outcome is cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is change in % predicted VO2peak at 1 year measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Outcomes will be assessed at 1 year post-randomisation in the comparator arm and 1 year post-surgery in the intervention arm. The primary analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat population using a linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for stratification variables via a binary covariate. Other secondary outcomes will include change from baseline of cardiopulmonary function (CPET and spirometry), health-related quality of life using the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) and SF-36v2 questionnaires, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and disease specific symptoms (Phoenix Comprehensive Assessment for Pectus Excavatum Symptoms and Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire). Adverse events, complications from surgery and operative technical success (Haller and Compression Indices from preoperative and postoperative CT scans) will also be assessed. Health economic analysis will estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year at 1 year.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial was approved by East of Scotland Research and Ethics Service (24/ES/0034). Participants who are ≥16 years of age will be required to provide written informed consent. For participants

Trial registration number

ISRCTN11359779.

☐ ☆ ✇ Evidence-Based Nursing

US public perceives abortion to be much riskier than it actually is

Por: Arkell · R. · McCulloch · H. — Junio 19th 2025 at 10:25

Commentary on: Chaiken, S.R., Darney, B.G., Schenck, M. and Han, L., 2023. Public perceptions of abortion complications. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 229(4), pp.421-e1.

Implications for practice and research

  • Information provision, including clinical messaging and public health campaigns, needs to emphasise the safety of abortion, stressing accurate information on ‘true’ risks associated with respective procedures.

  • Further research should focus on exploring and tackling misinformation for all abortion methods, establishing which perceived risks are associated with which procedure type.

  • Context

    Despite firm evidence on the safety of abortion,1 a large number of myths concerning the risks associated with the treatment remain, particularly in the USA. The current political climate, which has seen increasing legal and regulatory restrictions placed on abortion, has encouraged the spread of misinformation. This has led to the perception that abortion has substantial physical and mental health risks....

    ❌