Chronic pain affects around 28 million adults in the UK and is associated with impaired work ability, reduced productivity and increased sickness absence. Access to work-focused support within healthcare services is limited, and most employers do not routinely provide structured assistance for employees living with chronic pain. The Pain-at-Work Toolkit is a co-created, web-based intervention designed to improve work ability, self-management, and workplace experiences for employees living with chronic pain. A feasibility trial demonstrated strong acceptability, exceptional recruitment and potential improvements in work ability, providing clear justification for progression to a fully powered evaluation. This paper describes the protocol for a definitive cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit.
This two-arm, open-label cluster-randomised controlled trial will recruit at least 70 organisations (minimum 35 clusters per arm) and at least 685 participants. Organisations will be randomised 1:1 to (a) support-as-usual (SAU) or (b) SAU plus the Pain-at-Work Toolkit, and Pain-at-Work Manager’s Toolkit as an implementation-support component. The primary outcome is work ability at 3 months, measured using the Work Ability Index (three-item version). Secondary outcomes include work self-efficacy, sickness absence, presenteeism, productivity loss, job satisfaction, job stressfulness, turnover intentions, anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life. A mixed-methods process and implementation evaluation will assess fidelity, contextual influences and mechanisms of impact. A health economic evaluation will estimate cost-effectiveness from employer and societal perspectives. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles using multilevel modelling.
Ethical approval was granted by the University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (Ref: FMHS 1200226) and the UK Health Research Authority and Health and Care Wales (IRAS 367449). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder reports and public summaries.
To determine whether the onset of physical health problems/sensory impairments is associated with incident challenging behaviours.
A retrospective, population-based cohort study using longitudinal data from primary care records. HRs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models accounting for recurrent events and time-varying exposures.
UK primary care data sourced from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum and Gold databases, covering over 850 000 person-years between 2009 and 2019.
166 989 individuals with recorded intellectual disabilities were included in the cohort.
Incident identification of challenging behaviours before or after a recorded incident of physical health problems/sensory impairment. Physical health problems/sensory impairments assessed included constipation, epilepsy, pain, visual impairment, hearing impairment, bowel incontinence, urinary incontinence and sleep problems.
21.21% (n=35 415) of the cohort had challenging behaviour recorded at least once in primary care records over the 11-year study period, equating to an incidence rate of 0.10 per person-year. 40.9% of episodes of challenging behaviour were associated with an incident physical health problem/sensory impairment. All eight physical health problems/sensory impairments were significantly associated with higher HRs for challenging behaviours after full adjustment for demographic and mental health covariates. These associations held across multiple sensitivity analyses. The strongest associations were found for bowel incontinence (HR=2.24; 95% CI 2.01 to 2.50), urinary incontinence (HR=1.93; 95% CI 1.77 to 2.11), constipation (HR=1.89; 95% CI 1.74 to 2.05) and sleep problems (HR=1.74; 95% CI 1.58 to 1.90).
This is the first longitudinal study to establish a temporal association between the onset of physical health problems/sensory impairments and challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities. These findings highlight the need for proactive identification and management of physical health problems/sensory impairments as part of assessment processes to prevent or reduce the impact of challenging behaviours.
Despite the increasing number of doctorally prepared midwives in Europe, particularly after the Bologna Declaration 1999, little is known about the context and experiences of their doctoral education.
To explore European initially qualified midwives' experiences with doctoral education; and the context of their education through their professional associations.
An exploratory descriptive observational survey.
An ethically approved web-based survey was used to collect data from midwifery associations and midwives in 33 European countries between October and December 2024. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the responses.
Twenty-two midwifery associations from 19 European countries and 207 midwives from 23 European countries participated. Over the last two decades, there has been an increase in the number of doctorally prepared midwives. Common reasons to gain doctoral qualifications included an interest in research, career progression, in particular in education, and improving healthcare. Midwives reported growing availability of European-wide opportunities for doctoral programmes, alongside an increase in the number of doctoral midwifery programmes and supervisors with midwifery expertise. Although many barriers were reported, effectively combining study with their personal life and support from family, friends and colleagues was highlighted as crucial factors in completing their doctoral studies.
This is the first study exploring the experiences of European midwives pursuing a doctoral degree. The findings highlight a need for universities to improve the collaboration with midwives' supportive networks as well as for the profession to reduce intraprofessional hostilities to enhance doctoral midwifery students' well-being.
Implications for the profession: Acknowledging challenges faced by these midwives is necessary to improve professional and institutional support in academia and midwifery.
Findings of this study inform strategies to improve doctoral education for midwives and, in this way, strengthen the contributions of midwives to maternal evidenced-based care development and healthcare innovations.
The Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) was used to guide reporting.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
by Zvika Orr, Levi Jackson, Evan Avraham Alpert, Mark D. Fleming
The emergency department (ED) often serves as the first point of care for those with mental health conditions. Mental health-related visits to the ED tend to increase during and after public health crises. In Israel, the war that started in 2023 has had substantial adverse effects on the population’s mental health, increasing the need for emergency services for people with mental health conditions. This article examines the perceptions and experiences of Israeli staff providing care to patients with mental health conditions in an ED of a tertiary-care hospital in Jerusalem. Based on an inductive thematic analysis of 24 semi-structured interviews with staff members, this study sheds new light on the staff’s challenges in treating these patients. The study found that providers navigated a high level of stigma towards people with mental illness. Many providers were aware that negative perceptions of these patients were potentially harmful and may lead to diagnostic overshadowing, and in some cases, they tried to mitigate the effects of stigma. Staff often viewed patients with mental illness as inappropriate users of the ED, assuming limited responsibility for these patients. The findings also illuminate the providers’ inadequate training and skills for treating and managing mental health, as well as organizational and structural constraints. The article recommends ways to improve the treatment of mental health in EDs, such as educational workshops, more support of mental health specialists in EDs, providing calm environments, working alongside experts by experience, and conducting person-centered risk assessments. EDs should strengthen collaboration and referral pathways to community-based mental health services. Moreover, the healthcare system must provide patients with alternative sources of care, such as community crisis centers. These steps can mitigate the expected post-war mental health crisis in Israeli EDs and are relevant to many other countries.