Conectar
Palliative care supports the physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs of people with serious life-limiting illness. Future research must align with the priorities of people approaching the end of their lives, and those close to them.
To undertake a refresh of the James Lind Alliance Palliative and End of Life Care Priority Setting Partnership, to identify and prioritise areas for future research.
The James Lind Alliance process was applied, between May 2023 and February 2025. An initial online survey collected areas for future research from participants. These were synthesised into a long list of questions and shortlisted through a second online survey. Final ranking of priorities was achieved using an adapted Nominal Group Technique within a prioritisation workshop.
People living with serious life-limiting illnesses, carers, friends and family members supporting them, bereaved people, health and social care professionals, volunteers working in palliative and end-of-life care and members of the public.
1032 and 626 responses were received to survey 1 and 2, respectively. 20 people with lived and professional experience attended the prioritisation workshop. An updated list of 24 priorities for palliative and end-of-life care research was produced.
The priorities reflect the range of issues shaping end-of-life experiences and serve as a call to action for researchers and funders.
To explore community nurses' experiences of changes to their roles in palliative and end-of-life care.
An e-survey was followed by focus groups.
Fifty-one community nurses with recent experience of delivering end-of-life care in the United Kingdom completed a survey about changes to their roles. A purposive sample of 35 respondents participated in focus groups exploring these changes in more depth; thematic analysis was used with constant comparison.
As well as two new roles—prescribing and verifying death—many participants talked about a broader expansion of their role, increasing their leadership in making complex end-of-life care decisions with patients and families. Most nurses expressed pride in their new knowledge and skills, and satisfaction with the care they were providing. Yet many also expressed distress that heavy workloads impaired their capacity both to provide good clinical care and to train junior colleagues. The importance of General Practitioner support with complex cases was often highlighted, but accessing such support was sometimes difficult.
While welcoming the opportunity to extend their palliative care roles, many participants indicated experiencing moral distress.
Excessive workloads and patchy medical support threaten the retention of the experienced nurses upon whom community palliative care depends.
Our findings suggest that new and extended palliative care roles are viewed positively by nurses. To be sustainable, these changes require better workload management and consistent medical back-up.
We adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, using the SRQR checklist.
Our Public and Clinician Advisory Group helped shape questions and commented on findings.
To provide a synthesis of the published research evidence on Muslims’ perspectives and preferences regarding end-of-life symptom management to inform future practice and research priorities aimed at providing sensitive end-of-life care.
Systematic review and narrative synthesis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA, The Cochrane Library and Global Health were searched from 1 January 1994 to 10 July 2024, alongside reference searches of included papers and hand searches of two journals.
The included papers presented primary research on end-of-life care among Muslims in the British Isles.
Data were collected on publication details, study aims, participants, methods and results. Studies were appraised using Gough’s weight of evidence framework. An inductive narrative synthesis consisting of three steps was conducted. This involved conducting a preliminary synthesis of findings, exploring relationships between studies and assessing the robustness of the synthesis.
18 papers were included in the synthesis. Patients prioritised conformity between religion, culture and end-of-life symptom management. Symptom management preferences were also influenced by patients’ desire to maintain a sense of control at the end of life. Family-based care is culturally accepted, and indeed expected, to achieve a peaceful death. Healthcare professionals experienced challenges in providing sensitive symptom management given their unfamiliarity with the religious needs of Muslims.
Co-design research methods are essential to better understand care priorities within diverse Muslim communities. Meaningful collaboration among patients, families and healthcare professionals is necessary to identify mutually acceptable and beneficial approaches to promote culturally and religiously sensitive end-of-life symptom management.
In 2023, 21% of deaths occurred in residential aged care facilities (RACFs), a setting expected to play an increasing role in palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC). General practitioners (GPs) oversee and deliver PEoLC in residential and nursing homes, yet little is known about their practice. We conducted a systematic review of the published evidence concerning how GPs provide this care: what they do and the quality, challenges and facilitators of that care.
Systematic review and narrative synthesis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus and NHS Evidence and grey literature via Google Scholar were searched through 9 October 2024.
We included studies presenting new empirical data from qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods, were published in the English language and conducted in the UK, the European Union, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. We excluded studies with no new empirical data, discussion papers, conference abstracts, opinion pieces, study participants under 18 years old and in care settings other than RACF.
One independent reviewer used standardised methods to search and screen study titles for inclusion. This reviewer assessed all abstracts of the included papers, and a second independent reviewer screened 60% of the abstracts to validate inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using Gough’s Weight of Evidence assessment. Thematic analysis was used to describe the contents of the included papers; a narrative synthesis approach was taken to report the findings at a more conceptual level.
The search identified 5936 titles: 35 papers were eligible and included in the synthesis. This is a nascent evidence base, lacking robust research designs and characterised by small sample sizes; the results describe the factors observed to be important in the delivery of care. Care provision is extremely variable; no models of optimal care have been put forward or tested. Challenges to care provision occur at every level of the care system. At macro level, service-level agreements and policies vary: at meso level, team-working, communication technology solutions and equipment availability vary: at micro level, GPs’ interests in providing PEoLC vary as does their training. No study addresses residents’ and relatives’ experiences and expectations of GPs' involvement in PEoLC in RACFs.
The limited evidence base highlights that GP care at end of life for RACF residents varies greatly, with enablers and challenges at all levels in the existing care systems. Little research has examined GP PEoLC for RACF residents in its own right; insight is derived from studies that report on this issue as an adjunct to the main focus. With national policies focused on moving more PEoLC into community settings, these knowledge deficits require urgent attention.
FreshRSS