Decisions about nurse staffing models are a concern for health systems globally due to workforce retention and well-being challenges. Nurse staffing models range from all Registered Nurse workforce to a mix of differentially educated nurses and aides (regulated and unregulated), such as Licensed Practical or Vocational Nurses and Health Care Aides. Systematic reviews have examined relationships between specific nurse staffing models and client, staff and health system outcomes (eg, mortality, adverse events, retention, healthcare costs), with inconclusive or contradictory results. No evidence has been synthesised and consolidated on how, why and under what contexts certain staffing models produce different outcomes. We aim to describe how we will (1) conduct a realist review to determine how nurse staffing models produce different client, staff and health system outcomes, in which contexts and through what mechanisms and (2) coproduce recommendations with decision-makers to guide future research and implementation of nurse staffing models.

Using an integrated knowledge translation approach with researchers and decision-makers as partners, we are conducting a three-phase realist review. In this protocol, we report on the final two phases of this realist review. We will use Citation tracking, tracing Lead authors, identifying Unpublished materials, Google Scholar searching, Theory tracking, ancestry searching for Early examples, and follow-up of Related projects (CLUSTER) searching, specifically designed for realist searches as the review progresses. We will search empirical evidence to test identified programme theories and engage stakeholders to contextualise findings, finalise programme theories document our search processes as per established realist review methods.

Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Alberta (Study ID Pro00100425). We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, national and international conference presentations, regional briefing sessions, webinars and lay summary.

Children with sickle cell disease show a significant decrease in bone mineral density, an increase in resting energy expenditure of more than 15%, a decrease in fat and lean mass as well as a significant increase in protein turnover, particularly in bone tissue. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an increase in food intake on bone mineral density and the clinical and biological complications of paediatric sickle cell disease.

The study is designed as an open-label randomised controlled clinical trial conducted in the Paediatrics Unit of the Orléans University Hospital Centre. Participants aged 3–16 years will be randomly divided into two groups: the intervention group will receive oral nutritional supplements (pharmacological nutritional hypercaloric products) while the control group will receive age-appropriate and gender-appropriate nutritional intake during 12 months. Total body less head bone mineral density will be measured at the beginning and the end of the trial. A rigorous nutritional follow-up by weekly 24 hours recall dietary assessment and planned contacts every 6 weeks will be carried out throughout the study. A school absenteeism questionnaire, intended to reflect the patient’s school productivity, will be completed by participants and parents every 3 months. Blood samples of each patient of both groups will be stocked at the beginning and at the end of the trial, for future biological trial. Clinical and biological complications will be regularly monitored.

The protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer 2, Toulouse; approval no: 2-20-092 id9534). Children and their parents will give informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals or international academic conferences.

NCT04754711.