Conectar
To explore oncology nursing advance care planning practices and understand how to better support nurses in conducting advance care planning with patients and their families.
Qualitative interpretive descriptive methodology.
Semi-structured, individual telephone or Zoom interviews with 19 oncology nurses in a Western province of Canada between May and August 2022. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and analysed using inductive, thematic, and constant comparative techniques.
Oncology nurses highlighted several factors affecting their ability to engage in advance care planning, including (1) uncertainties related to the nursing role in advance care planning, such as how and when a nurse ought to engage; (2) the educational, experiential, and training environment; and (3) structural barriers, such as a lack of time, space, and privacy; models of care that inhibit nurses from developing longitudinal relationships with their patients; and team dynamics that affect advance care planning interdisciplinary collaboration.
To create environments that support oncology nurses to conduct advance care planning, the findings suggest uncertainties be addressed through a clear and cohesive organisational approach to advance care planning and ongoing, integrated educational opportunities. Further, service delivery models may need to be restructured such that nurses have dedicated time and space for nurse-led advance care planning and opportunities to develop trusting relationships with both patients and their interdisciplinary colleagues.
Oncology nurses recognised the value of advance care planning in supporting patient-centred care and shared decision making, yet they reported limited engagement in advance care planning in their practice. To support oncology nurses in conducting advance care planning, healthcare leaders may address (1) advance care planning-related uncertainties and (2) structural barriers that prevent nurses from engaging in advance care planning with patients and their families. Findings may guide modifications to care models, enhancing support for oncology nurses in conducting advance care planning.
We selected and adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) as the most applicable guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
Emergency Departments face increasing pressure due to rising patient demand, complex presentations, and resource constraints, resulting in long waits and extended stays. Nurse-initiated protocols enable nurses to commence investigations and treatments based on clinical guidelines, improving care and efficiency. Despite evidence supporting their effectiveness, few nurse-initiated protocol implementation strategies are grounded in behaviour change theory. This gap may contribute to limited uptake, as many initiatives fail to address the complex factors influencing clinician behaviour.
To develop a behaviour change theory-informed implementation strategy to enhance the uptake of nurse-initiated protocols in the emergency department.
A framework-based intervention design was used.
The Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the implementation strategy. Barriers and enablers identified through prior research in 2023 using surveys and focus groups were mapped to relevant intervention functions. Behaviour change techniques were selected based on their potential to address barriers or strengthen enablers. The APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side effects, and Equity) were applied to optimise feasibility.
Nine barriers and ten enablers to nurse-initiated protocols use were identified and categorised using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) framework and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eight intervention functions were selected and mapped to 24 behaviour change techniques and 23 delivery modes. The key implementation strategies are education, clinical champions, documentation changes, audit and feedback, and leadership engagement. Stakeholders confirmed the feasibility of the selected strategies.
Theory-informed, context-specific strategies are essential for implementing nurse-initiated protocols in emergency departments. This approach enables the design of targeted, feasible interventions that directly respond to identified barriers and enablers. Future research should test context-specific implementation strategies, assess their long-term impact on healthcare outcomes, and evaluate their scalability across diverse healthcare settings.
By targeting the behavioural determinants of clinician practice, this study fills a critical gap in implementation science within emergency nursing. This study identified 24 behaviour change techniques across eight intervention functions to support nurse-initiated protocol uptake. Strategies such as education, clinical champions, and audit provide a practical, replicable framework to overcome barriers, enhance autonomy, and reduce care delays. Findings support sustainable implementation in emergency settings, with future research needed on long-term impact and scalability.
There is no EQUATOR guideline available for this study.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Transition of care from hospital is a period when the risks of medication errors and adverse events are high, with 50% of adults discharged having at least one medication-related problem. Pharmacist-led medication reviews can reduce medication errors and unplanned readmission when completed promptly post-discharge; however, they are underutilised. A Transition of Care Stewardship pharmacist has been proposed to facilitate and coordinate a patient’s discharge process and facilitate a timely post-discharge medication review. Access to pharmacist medication review in rural and regional areas can be limited. This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether a virtual Transition of Care Stewardship pharmacist reduces medication-related harm in rural and regional Australia.
Multicentre RCT involving patients at high risk of medication-related harm discharged from regional and rural hospitals to a domiciliary residence. Eligible patients must be aged≥18 years, admitted under a medical specialty, be discharged to a domiciliary setting, have a regular general practitioner (GP) or be willing to visit a GP or an Aboriginal Medical Service after discharge for medical follow-up, have a Medicare card and be at high risk of readmission. High risk of readmission is defined as either a previous admission to the hospital or Emergency Department (ED) presentation in the past 6 months AND≥three regular medications OR on at least ONE high-risk medication. A total of 922 participants will be recruited into the study. Enrolled participants will be randomised to the intervention or control (usual care). The intervention will include a virtual Transition Of Care Stewardship pharmacist to ensure that patients receive discharge medication reconciliation, medication counselling, medication list and communicate directly with primary care providers to facilitate a timely post-discharge medication review. Usual care will include informing the patient’s clinical inpatient treating team that the patient is at high risk of medication misadventure and may benefit from a post-discharge Home Medicines Review (a GP-referred pharmacist medication review funded by the Australian Government).
Data analysis will be performed on a modified intent-to-treat basis. The primary outcome assessed is a composite of a first unplanned medication-related hospitalisation or ED presentation within 30 days of hospital discharge. Comparisons between the intervention and usual care groups for the primary outcome will be made using a mixed-effects logistic regression model, adjusting for site-level clustering as a random effect.
This study is approved to be conducted at the Western New South Wales Local Health District via the Research Ethics and Governance Information System (approval number: 2023/ETH00978). To ensure the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients are appropriately addressed, ethics for this study were submitted and approved by the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (approval number: 2148/23). Manuscripts resulting from this trial will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. Results may also be disseminated at scientific conferences and meetings with key stakeholders.
ACTRN12623000727640.
To identify the barriers and enablers to implementing nurse-initiated protocols in an emergency department.
Nurse-initiated protocols empower emergency nurses to autonomously initiate interventions, investigations and treatments based on predefined clinical guidelines. These protocols reduce waiting times and enhance staff and patient satisfaction. However, their uptake remains inconsistent, and the reasons for this variability are not well understood.
Focus groups were conducted with emergency nurses using an interview guide informed by the theoretical domains framework to explore perceived barriers and enablers to protocol implementation. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis.
Six focus groups with 34 participants identified seven categories influencing protocol implementation. Barriers were: (i) nurses' workload and psychological stress, (ii) lack of competence, confidence and experience, and (iii) documentation burden and limited access to resources. Enablers were: (i) education and clinical support, (ii) improved clinical practice, and (iii) positive healthcare outcomes. The nurses and doctor relationship was identified as both a barrier and an enabler.
Effective implementation of nurse-initiated protocols requires systemic changes that empower nurses within a well-supported, adequately resourced environment. Addressing structural and professional development challenges is crucial to ensuring these protocols are consistently integrated into emergency departments.
Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and hospital admission worldwide. However, the management of most viral infection-associated diseases remains primarily supportive. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the urgent need for a deeper understanding of RVIs to improve patient outcomes and develop effective treatment strategies. The Understanding Infection, Viral Exacerbation and Respiratory Symptoms at Admission-Longitudinal Study is an observational study which addresses this need by investigating the heterogeneity of RVIs in hospitalised adults, aiming to identify clinical and biological predictors of adverse outcomes. This study aims to bridge critical knowledge gaps in the clinical course and the economic impact of RVIs by characterising the phenotypic diversity of these infections and their recovery patterns following hospital admission and thus assisting with the optimal design of future interventional studies.
This prospective longitudinal observational study (V.6, 20 September 2023) will be conducted across multiple UK secondary care sites from August 2022 onwards, with an aim to enrol 1000 participants testing positive for RVI. Adults admitted with respiratory symptoms who test positive for RVIs via the BioFire® FilmArray® System or other validated diagnostic PCR tests will be enrolled. The data collected include patient demographics, clinical history, comorbidities and symptoms experienced prior to, during and after hospitalisation with follow-up after discharge at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 26. In addition, biological samples are collected at multiple time points during the hospital stay. The primary endpoints are to study the impact of different RVIs and identify predictors of disease progression and length of stay. Secondary endpoints include time to recovery and healthcare cost. Exploratory endpoints focus on biomarker profiles associated with virus type and clinical outcomes.
The study protocol received ethical approval from the relevant committees (English Ethics Reference Number: 22/WM/0119; Scottish Ethics Reference Number: 22-SS-0101, 20/09/2023). For patients who lack the capacity to consent, the study complies with the Mental Capacity Act 2005, using a consultee process where a family member, carer or an independent clinician may provide assent on behalf of the patient. Data from all the study centres will be analysed together and disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and workshops. The study group will ensure that participants and their families are informed of the study findings promptly and in an accessible format.
FreshRSS