FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Cohort profile: characterisation, determinants, mechanisms and consequences of the long-term effects of COVID-19 - providing the evidence base for health care services (CONVALESCENCE) in the UK

Por: Jamieson · A. · Saikhan · L. A. · Raman · B. · Alghamdi · L. · Cheetham · N. J. · Conde · P. · Dobson · R. · Fernandez-Sanles · A. · Folarin · A. · Goudswaard · L. J. · Hamill Howes · L. · Jones · S. · Neubauer · S. · Orini · M. · Pierce · I. · Ranjan · Y. · Rapala · A. · Smith · S. M. · S — Junio 5th 2025 at 09:00
Purpose

The pathogenesis of the long-lasting symptoms which can follow an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (‘long covid’) is not fully understood. The ‘COroNaVirus post-Acute Long-term EffectS: Constructing an evidENCE base’ (CONVALESCENCE) study was established as part of the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing COVID-19 UK National Core Study. We performed a deep phenotyping case-control study nested within two cohorts (the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children and TwinsUK) as part of CONVALESCENCE.

Participants

From September 2021 to May 2023, 349 participants attended the CONVALESCENCE deep phenotyping clinic at University College London. Four categories of participants were recruited: cases of long covid (long covid(+)/SARS-CoV-2(+)), alongside three control groups: those with neither long covid symptoms nor evidence of prior COVID-19 (long covid(-)/SARS-CoV-2(-); control group 1), those who self-reported COVID-19 and had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but did not report long covid (long covid(-)/SARS-CoV-2(+); control group 2) and those who self-reported persistent symptoms attributable to COVID-19 but no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (long covid(+)/SARS-CoV-2(-); control group 3). Remote wearable measurements were performed up until February 2024.

Findings to date

This cohort profile describes the baseline characteristics of the CONVALESCENCE cohort. Of the 349 participants, 141 (53±15 years old; 21 (15%) men) were cases, 89 (55±16 years old; 11 (12%) men) were in control group 1, 75 (49±15 years old; 25 (33%) men) were in control group 2 and 44 (55±16 years old; 9 (21%) men) were in control group 3.

Future plans

The study aims to use a multiorgan score calculated as the cumulative total for each of nine domains (ie, lung, vascular, heart, kidney, brain, autonomic function, muscle strength, exercise capacity and physical performance). The availability of data preceding acute COVID-19 infection in cohorts may help identify the consequences of infection independent of pre-existing subclinical disease and also provide evidence of determinants that influence the development of long covid.

☐ ☆ ✇ International Wound Journal

Impact of Polyhexanide Care Bundle on Surgical Site Infections in Paediatric and Neonatal Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity Score‐Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) care bundle on the occurrence rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) in paediatric and neonatal cardiac surgery, addressing a critical gap in paediatric-specific infection prevention protocols. A retrospective cohort study included patients under 18 years old who underwent cardiac surgery at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato. Cohort A (n = 117) received the PHMB care bundle from April to December 2023, while Cohort B (n = 801) received conventional care from September 2020 to March 2023. The 1:1 propensity score matching was used to balance covariates between cohorts, resulting in two comparable cohorts (Cohort A = 114 patients and Cohort B = 112). The study found a significant reduction in SSIs among patients receiving the PHMB care bundle compared with those receiving conventional care (1.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.048). The comprehensive nature of the PHMB care bundle, including educational programs, preoperative and postoperative antimicrobial treatments, and consistent application of best practices, was instrumental in achieving these outcomes. Implementing antimicrobial care bundles could significantly reduce SSIs in paediatric cardiac surgery. Future research is needed to refine the tested bundle with prospective approaches.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Impact of comprehensive genomic profiling and molecular tumour board on costs and access to tailored therapies: real-world observational study

Por: De Micheli · V. · Agnelli · L. · Conca · E. · Rabsiun Aramburu · V. L. · Baggi · A. · Vingiani · A. · Duca · M. · Perrone · F. · Tamborini · E. · Piccolo · A. · Lorenzini · D. · Busico · A. · Capone · I. · Niger · M. · Proto · C. · Vernieri · C. · Manoukian · S. · Gancitano · G. · Ferrario — Mayo 16th 2025 at 14:45
Objective

There is limited evidence on the economic implications of assessing patients’ access to personalised treatments through Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) and Molecular Tumour Board (MTB), prompting the need to analyse their impact on the cost of the cancer diagnostic journey (from hospital admission to MTB evaluation) and accessibility to personalised therapies.

Design

Retrospective observational cohort.

Setting

Patients discussed from April 2020 to September 2021 by the institutional MTB operating at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, an Italian centre of excellence in oncology pertaining to the national health system.

Participants

676 patients focused on: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), pancreatic carcinoma (PC) and gastro-oesophageal carcinoma (GEC). We defined two different scenarios: (1) patients tested with small Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels (≤60 biomarkers) vs (2) patients tested with comprehensive panels (>60 biomarkers).

Main outcomes and measures

We measured (1) patients’ eligibility to personalised therapies based on genomic data obtained using targeted somatic NGS panels, (2) MTB cost and the overall diagnostic journey cost and (3) the cost to find a patient eligible to access personalised treatments.

Results

Tumour profiling with comprehensive NGS panels improved patients’ eligibility to personalised therapies compared with small panels (NSCLC: 39% comprehensive panel vs 37% small panel; CCA: 43% vs 17%; PC: 35% vs 3%; GEC: 40% vs 0%). The overall diagnostic journey cost per patient was between 3.2K and 7.4K (NSCLC: 7.4K comprehensive panel vs 6.4K small panel; CCA: 4.9K vs 3.7K; PC: 5.8K vs 4.5K; GEC: 4.2K vs 3.2K). MTB discussion accounted for only 2–3% of the diagnostic journey cost per patient (around 113/patient). The cost to find patient eligible for personalised treatments varied significantly according to panel size and tumour setting (NSCLC: 5K comprehensive panel vs 2.8K small panel; CCA: 4.4K vs 4.4K; PC: 5.5K vs 27K; GEC: 5.2K vs not measurable since none of the patients analysed with small NGS panels were eligible).

Conclusions and relevance

MTB discussion of genomic data obtained with NGS comprehensive panels significantly increases patient eligibility to targeted therapies and optimise the cost to find a patient eligible to personalised treatments, mainly for CCA, PC and GEC patients.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Exploring health locus of control among vaccine-hesitant parents: a scoping review

Por: Magi · C. E. · Buccione · E. · Bambi · S. · Iovino · P. · Zanobini · P. · Cecchi · F. · De Blasi · F. M. · De Marchis · L. · Peduto · C. · Sinisi · D. · Vanella · A. M. · Bonacaro · A. · Lorini · C. · Bonaccorsi · G. · Rasero · L. · El Aoufy · K. · Longobucco · Y. — Mayo 15th 2025 at 06:40
Objectives

This scoping review aimed to explore the relationship between health locus of control (HLOC) and vaccine hesitancy among parents of children aged 0–18 years, focusing on the tools and methods used to assess these constructs.

Design

The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and adhered to established methodologies for scoping reviews, including systematic searches across four electronic databases.

Data sources

PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant studies on 24 September 2024.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Studies were included if they examined HLOC and vaccine hesitancy in parents, measured these constructs with validated tools and focused on childhood vaccination.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data were extracted into a structured table capturing study characteristics, HLOC and vaccine hesitancy measurements, and key findings. Results were synthesised narratively to highlight associations and patterns.

Results

Five studies involving a total of 11 758 parents and caregivers of children aged 0–18 years met inclusion criteria. Higher internal HLOC was consistently associated with lower vaccine hesitancy and higher compliance, while lower chance HLOC correlated with greater hesitancy. Powerful others HLOC (ie, trust in healthcare professionals) emerged as a key predictor of better vaccine adherence.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that internal HLOC and trust in healthcare providers are predictors of vaccine acceptance among parents. However, standardised tools and longitudinal studies are needed to further elucidate these relationships and inform targeted interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Prospective study of continuous rhythm monitoring in patients with early post-infarction systolic dysfunction: clinical impact of arrhythmias detected by an implantable cardiac monitoring device with real-time transmission--the TeVeO study protocol

Por: Hernandez-Hernandez · J. · Cruz-Galban · A. · Duran-Bobin · O. · Garcia-Seara · J. · Gonzalez-Ferrero · T. · Morinigo · J. · Gonzalez-Juanatey · C. · Sanchez-Garcia · M. · Fernandez-Palacios · G. · Seijas-Amigo · J. · Elices · J. · Portales-Fernandez · J. · Martin-Herrero · F. — Mayo 2nd 2025 at 12:04
Introduction

Updated primary prevention strategies are needed for post-infarction sudden cardiac death (SCD) based on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Current recommendations, based on left ventricular systolic function and functional class, may be obsolete because they are derived from ancient studies that do not incorporate the potential benefit of either current comprehensive treatment of ischaemic heart disease or modern device programming. Among patients with post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction, modern implantable cardiac monitoring devices (ICM) allow a unique opportunity to determine in real-time the burden of non-sustained ventricular tachycardias and their relationship to the subsequent occurrence of sustained or symptomatic events.

Methods and analysis

Approximately 200 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) equal to or less than 40% after acute myocardial infarction will be included in the study. They will be implanted with a Confirm RX, an ICM with real-time remote connection via a smartphone. At 6 months, LVEF and functional status will be re-evaluated and cardiac morpho-functional characterisation will be performed by MRI. At this time, and following current European guidelines, patients with an indication will receive an ICD; the others will continue to be monitored using an ICM for a minimum of 2 years. Patients are expected to be followed up for 4 years after the index event. More than 20 000 remote transmissions are expected to be analysed. The study will focus on the relationship between the detection of non-sustained ventricular tachycardias by ICMs (defined as at least 8 R-R intervals at 160 beats per minute) and the subsequent occurrence of symptomatic arrhythmic events. An advanced statistical analysis will be performed using machine and deep learning techniques to determine the clinical variables, those that are derived from monitoring and imaging tests and related to mid-term prognosis.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital of Salamanca (protocol number PI 2019 03 246) on 30 April 2020. Each patient will be informed about the study in both oral and written form by a physician and will be included in the study after written consent is obtained.

For the first time, a study will provide real-time information on the arrhythmic burden of patients with post-infarction ventricular dysfunction and its prognostic implications in the medium term. Several publications in scientific journals are planned.

Trial registration number

NCT04765943.

☐ ☆ ✇ PLOS ONE Medicine&Health

Self-blaming as a barrier to lung cancer screening and smoking cessation programs in Italy. A qualitative study

by Luca Ghirotto, Eugenio Paci, Claudia Bricci, Silvia Marini, Valentina Bessi, Matías Eduardo Díaz Crescitelli, Ermanno Rondini, Francesco Pistelli, Giuseppe Gorini, Sandra Bosi, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, the Working Group

Background

Lung cancer screening (LCS) combined with smoking cessation programs is a critical strategy for reducing lung cancer mortality. Understanding the perspectives of cigarette users and former ones on these interventions is essential for enhancing their acceptability and effectiveness. This study aimed to explore, in Italy, the perceptions and experiences of individuals eligible for LCS within the context of a smoking cessation program.

Methods and findings

This multicenter qualitative study was conducted in two Italian regions as part of a larger project the Italian League against Cancer promoted. Using purposive sampling, we included (a) cigarette users and former ones who participated in an Italian trial, ITALUNG study, and (b) cigarette users who had been offered individual or group smoking cessation interventions and were theoretically eligible for screening in the following years (aged 50–70, ≥15 pack-years). Data were collected through open-ended semi-structured interviews and focus group meetings and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The data analysis yielded six themes covering participants’ views on the interactions between the two types of interventions (screening and smoking cessation program). Across their data, we generated the following themes: (i) depreciation and fatalism toward the risk of smoking, (ii) self-blaming and ethicality, (iii) ambivalent impact of the screening on smoking, (iv) LCS-related information and concerns, (v) teachable and motivating moments, and (vi) non-stigmatizing communication and testimony by professionals.

Conclusions

Our study underscores the importance of avoiding stigma and respecting the dignity of cigarette users in implementing LCS and smoking cessation programs. Clear communication and supportive interactions with healthcare providers are crucial for enhancing the acceptability and effectiveness of these interventions. Future research should focus on quantifying these findings and exploring additional factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of combined LCS and smoking cessation programs.

❌