FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Optimising Paediatric Transition to Intensive Care for Adults (OPTICAL): study protocol for a mixed method study

Por: Huang · Q. · Kohn · C. · Abraham · S. B. · Malbon · K. · Mallick · A. · Mouncey · P. R. · Oulton · K. · Pagel · C. · Rose · L. · Seaton · S. E. · Taylor · J. · Thomas · R. · Windsor · C. · Wray · J. · Ramnarayan · P. · Crowe · S. — Julio 16th 2025 at 09:42
Introduction

An increasing number of teenagers and young adults (TYA) with chronic conditions and complex needs are transitioning from paediatric to adult services, including admission to intensive care units (ICUs). As these services are often ill-equipped to care for TYA, there is a risk of compromised care. Despite recent guidelines from the UK Paediatric Critical Care and Intensive Care Societies highlighting the importance and urgency of improving ICU transition, current recommendations are not evidence-based and established pathways for ICU transition remain limited.

Methods and analysis

This mixed-methods research study aims to generate evidence to underpin national policy on transition from paediatric to adult ICUs that will improve clinical care and patient experience. To do this, we will: (1) link and analyse UK national data (years 2017–2024) on paediatric and adult ICU admissions, hospital inpatient, outpatient and emergency care visits and survival status, to determine the clinical characteristics and healthcare resource utilisation from teenage years to early adulthood of people admitted to an ICU as a young person (admission aged 14 and 15), and how these relate to ICU admissions after age 16; (2) conduct semistructured interviews, online forums and surveys with TYA patients, carers and health professionals to understand their experience of transition in ICU services; and (3) synthesise these strands of evidence and use a structured process of stakeholder engagement to propose potential targeted improvements as appropriate.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee on 1 August 2024 (research ethics committee number 24/EE/0108), and the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) on 7 October 2024 (CAG number 24/CAG/0068). Study results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and accessible lay texts and graphic summaries for the use of charities and patients including those with learning disabilities and neurodevelopmental disorders.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

National survey evaluating the introduction of new and alternative staffing models in intensive care (SEISMIC-R) in the UK

Por: Hadley · R. · Dogan · B. · Wood · N. · Bohnacker · N. · Mouncey · P. R. · Pattison · N. · SEISMIC-R investigator group · Griffiths · Endacott · Leon-Villapalos · Saville · Monks · Dearling · Gordon · Wythe · Handley · Whiting · DallOra · Pearce · Bench — Abril 11th 2025 at 03:59
Objective

To report on the findings from a national survey of UK intensive care units (ICUs) exploring nurse staffing models currently in use and changes since COVID-19.

Design

A survey was designed and distributed using a web-based platform to senior unit leads via Intensive care national audit & research centre contacts.

Participants

Senior nurses representing the 331 National Health Service adult ICUs across the UK (across 231 hospitals/155 trusts), including the Channel Islands and Isle of Man.

Outcome measures

A 15-item survey.

Results

A total of 196 survey responses representing 300 units, majority general and single units, resulting in a 90.6% unit-level response rate. ICU unit characteristics included the average number of total, level 3 and level 2 critical care beds of 26.36 (SD=21.48), 15.67 (SD=15.33) and 10.96 (SD=8.86), respectively. Most units reported nurse to patient ratios compliant with national guidelines and service specifications. Post-COVID-19 changes to ICU nurse staffing establishments were reported by 44% respondents, including increases in non-registered staff. However, limited data were provided regarding decision-making around and changes to bedside allocation of nurses since COVID-19.

Conclusions

Increased numbers and use of non-registered staff within the ICU is indicative of an alternative staffing model to address nursing shortages. However, more research is needed to understand how this staffing group is being used compared with, and alongside, registered nurses.

Trial registration number

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05917574.

❌