The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) was developed to measure the presence, severity and episodic nature of disability experienced among persons with chronic conditions. Our aim was to assess the sensibility, utility and implementation considerations of the EDQ among older adults with complex health needs.

Cross-sectional measurement study involving quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection.

We recruited community-dwelling older adults (65 years of age or older) living with complex health needs receiving care from a primary healthcare team in Toronto, Canada.

We administered the EDQ, sensibility questionnaire (assessing face and content validity, and ease of usage, with each item scored from 0 to 7 with greater scores indicating greater sensibility) and demographic questionnaire, followed by a semi-structured interview in the home or clinical setting. Using an interview guide, we asked participants about their perspectives on utility, format and implementation of the EDQ in clinical practice. We considered the EDQ sensible if the median score on the sensibility questionnaire was ≥5/7 for ≥80% of items and if none of the items had a median score of ≤3/7. We conducted a team-based directed content analysis of the interview transcripts.

The median age of the 11 participants in this study was 83 years of age. All participants reported living with two or more chronic health conditions, with osteoarthritis (n=5) and diabetes (n=4) most frequently reported. The EDQ met the criterion for sensibility as measured by the sensibility questionnaire. Interview data from participants (n=10) indicated that the EDQ represents the health-related challenges among this sample of older adults with complex health needs, captures the episodic nature of disability and was easy to use. Utility of the EDQ included providing clinicians with a holistic understanding of health challenges older adults face, aiding in intervention planning and measuring changes in disability over time. Six of the participants also expressed uncertainty as to how the EDQ specifically could be used by clinicians in their care. Considerations for implementation included mode of administration (paper or electronic) and the importance of communicating EDQ scores with older adults based on individual preferences.

The EDQ possesses sensibility and utility for use among this sample of older adults living with complex health needs in home or clinical care settings.

Our aim is to develop a Framework of Measurement for people living with Long COVID and their caregivers for use in Long COVID research and clinical practice. Specifically, we will characterise evidence pertaining to outcome measurement and identify implementation considerations for use of outcome measures among adults and children living with Long COVID and their caregivers.

We will conduct a scoping study involving: (1) an evidence review and (2) a two-phased consultation, using methodological steps outlined by the Arksey and O’Malley Framework and Joanna Briggs Institute. We will answer the following question: What is known about outcome measures used to describe, evaluate or predict health outcomes among adults and children living with Long COVID and their caregivers? Evidence review: we will review peer review published and grey literature to identify existing outcome measures and their reported measurement properties with people living with Long COVID and their caregivers. We will search databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus for articles published since 2020. Two authors will independently review titles and abstracts, followed by full text to select articles that discuss or use outcome measures for Long COVID health outcomes, pertain to adults or children living with Long COVID and/or their caregivers and are based in research or clinical settings. We will extract data including article characteristics, terminology and definition of Long COVID, health outcomes assessed, characteristics of outcome measures, measurement properties and implementation considerations. We will collate and summarise data to establish a preliminary Framework of Measurement. Consultation phase 1: we will conduct an environmental scan involving a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire among individuals with experience using or completing outcome measures for Long COVID, to identify outcome measures not found in the evidence review and explore implementation considerations for outcome measurement in the context of Long COVID. Consultation phase 2: we will conduct focus groups to review the preliminary Framework of Measurement and to highlight implementation considerations for outcome measurement in Long COVID. We will analyse questionnaire and focus group data using descriptive and content analytical approaches. We will refine the Framework of Measurement based on the focus group consultation using community-engaged approaches with the research team.

Protocol approved by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (protocol #46503) for the consultation phases of the study. Outcomes will include a Framework of Measurement, to enhance measurement of health outcomes in Long COVID research and clinical practice. Knowledge translation will also occur in the form of publications and presentations.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic condition of impaired membrane electrolyte transport and is characterised by defects in the production and function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. Ground-breaking CFTR modulator therapy has resulted in a notable shift in the clinical presentation and progressive nature of CF, across both pulmonary and extrapulmonary systems. Access to CFTR modulator therapies in people with CF is occurring in a staged, descending age process, with clinical trials focusing primarily on safety and efficacy. There is a lack of robust, real-world longitudinal data on CFTR modulator therapy in infants and young children where extrapulmonary outcomes such as growth, micronutrient status and pancreatic function are the key focus.

Pancreatic, nutritional and clinical outcomes in children 0–5 years with CF during the first 2 years of CFTR modulator therapy (PaNC) is a prospective cohort study involving all eight tertiary paediatric CF centres in Australia. Infants and children 4 months to 5 years of age who are eligible for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) or ivacaftor (IVA) meet the inclusion criteria for PaNC, with a total eligible cohort of 303 children at the commencement of recruitment. The primary outcomes are change in weight-for-length/body mass index z score and change in serum micronutrient status, at 6–12 monthly intervals, during the first 2 years of treatment with ETI or IVA. Secondary outcomes include change in exocrine pancreatic function, measured by faecal elastase-1, change in the use and dose of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, nutritional and gastrointestinal therapies and change in sweat chloride levels. Linear mixed modelling will be used to analyse primary and secondary endpoints. This protocol is reported in accordance with ‘The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement’ reporting guidelines.

Overarching governance and ethics approval has been granted by Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee, in addition to all eight sites receiving site-specific authorisation approvals prior to the commencement of recruitment. Opportunities for CF consumers to be involved in targeted dissemination plans will be initiated via CF Australia at the completion of the study period. Additionally, a summary of non-identifiable results will be provided to CF consumers and CF healthcare providers via scientific and lay conferences and via peer-reviewed journals.

ACTRN12624001185550; Pre-results.

While group, task-oriented, community-based exercise programs (CBEPs) delivered in-person can increase exercise and social participation in people with mobility limitations, challenges with transportation, cost and human resources, threaten sustainability. A virtual delivery model may help overcome challenges with accessing and delivering in-person CBEPs. The study objective is to estimate the short-term effect of an 8-week, virtual, group, task-oriented CBEP called TIME™ (Together in Movement and Exercise) at Home compared with a waitlist control on improving everyday function in community-dwelling adults with mobility limitations.

A randomised controlled trial incorporating a type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid design is being conducted in four Canadian metropolitan centres. We aim to stratify 200 adults with self-reported mobility limitations by site, participation alone or with a partner, and functional mobility level, and randomise them using REDCap software to either TIME™ at Home or a waitlist control group. During TIME™ at Home classes (2 classes/week, 1.5 hours/class), two trained facilitators stream a 1-hour exercise video and facilitate social interaction prevideo and postvideo using Zoom. A registered healthcare professional at each site completes three e-visits to monitor and support implementation. Masked evaluators with physical therapy training evaluate participants and their caregivers at 0, 2 and 5 months using Zoom. The primary outcome is the change in everyday function from 0 to 2 months, measured using the physical scale of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome. The study is powered to detect an effect size of 0.4, given α=0.05, power=80% and a 15% attrition rate. Secondary outcomes are mobility, well-being, reliance on walking aids, caregiver assistance, caregiver mood, caregiver confidence in care-recipient balance and cost-effectiveness. A multimethod process evaluation is proposed to increase understanding of implementation fidelity, mechanisms of effect and contextual factors influencing the complex intervention. Qualitative data collection immediately postintervention involves interviewing approximately 16 participants and 4 caregivers from the experimental group, and 8 participants and 4 caregivers from the waitlist control group, and all healthcare professionals, and conducting focus groups with all facilitators to explore experiences during the intervention period. A directed content analysis will be undertaken to help explain the quantitative results.

TIME™ at Home has received ethics approval at all sites. Participants provide verbal informed consent. A data safety monitoring board is monitoring adverse events. We will disseminate findings through lay summaries, conference presentations, reports and journal articles.

NCT06245135.

Raltegravir is a potent HIV-integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI). Despite its strong activity against HIV-1 strains resistant to other antiretroviral drug classes, it is usually used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs due to the empirical requirement for anti-HIV drug combinations to ensure effective anti-retroviral therapy (ART). As an early-arriving INSTI, raltegravir is clinically familiar for its safety, tolerability and treatment effectiveness. High-dose calcium carbonate formulated as an antacid (as opposed to a supplement formulation) taken orally together with raltegravir is known to reduce systemic raltegravir exposure due to chelation and reduced absorption. This study aims to assess the effect of daily calcium carbonate antacid as TUMS Ultra Strength (US) administration in lower doses, as currently used for oral calcium supplementation, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PKs) of once-daily oral raltegravir.

This is an open-label, three-treatment series in three periods in a single group, fixed-sequence PK study in 12 healthy adult volunteers with HIV on ART. Subjects will take 1200 mg of raltegravir single QD oral dose alone for 7 days (period one), then raltegravir 1200 mg with calcium carbonate 500 mg from day 8 to day 14 (period two) and raltegravir 1200 mg with calcium carbonate 1000 mg from day 15 to day 22 (period three). We will conduct serial PK sampling from observed dosing on days 7, 14 and 21, with 24-hour PK sampling scheduled for days 8, 15 and 22. Follow-up will continue until day 51.

This study will adhere to the ICH GCP Guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board under study ID 20190750–01 hour. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. This protocol will be published in a peer-reviewed journal prior to the study’s completion and closure. Results generated from this activity will also be reported in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT04258475.

Social accountability is a key value and aspirational goal of many medical institutions. While much has been studied on social accountability in the context of medical education and institutions, less research has examined how social accountability influences research. In light of this absence, the objective of our scoping review is to research the following questions: (1) What characterises socially accountable research (SAR), and how is it expressed and experienced? (2) How do language, positionality, and worldview influence SAR?, and (3) What structures and considerations are necessary to support successful SAR in local and global contexts?

To answer the above research questions, the Arksey and O’Malley, Levac et al, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines will be followed. The search strategy was adapted and applied to MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and CINAHL databases. A total of n=5289 eligible articles were identified. Articles were excluded if they were published before 1995, were in a language other than English, or were duplicates, leaving n=2840 articles for title/abstract screening.

Ethical approval is not required to complete this study. We will take an integrated knowledge translation approach. Throughout the project, results will be disseminated to knowledge users (ie, consultations, following Arksey and O’Malley). Our findings will be presented to the larger academic community, policymakers, and healthcare practitioners through presentations, reports, newsletters, and an online repository.

Open Science Framework 16 July 2024. osf.io/mvhnu.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with changes in brain structure, cognition, mental health, and functional outcomes. While these changes have been linked to dysregulated glycaemic control, findings are inconsistent, and their long-term impact remains unclear. Most evidence comes from cross-sectional or short-term longitudinal studies, limiting insights into causal associations. To address this, we aim to study individuals with T1D approximately 30 years after onset to assess how early dysglycaemic insults during neurodevelopment influence cognitive and functional outcomes in mid-adulthood.

This protocol paper outlines an observational, case/control, cross-sectional/longitudinal and descriptive study that follows up the original Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) Diabetes Cohort Study. The initial study recruited children in Australia diagnosed with T1D between 1990 and 1992, conducting five waves of data collection. We now introduce the Cognition and Longitudinal Assessments of Risk Factors over 30 Years (CLARiFY) Diabetes Complications Study to assess brain, cognition and functional outcomes in mid-adulthood, approximately 30 years post-T1D onset. Both T1D participants from the original cohort and healthy controls will participate in semistructured interviews, neuroimaging and cognitive testing. T1D participants will also undergo complications screening. Data from this study and previous waves will be used to (Aim 1) explore cross-sectional and longitudinal impacts of T1D on brain health over 30 years. Linear regression will analyse cross-sectional outcomes, and multivariate analysis will assess cognitive variables jointly. Longitudinal outcomes will be examined using linear mixed-effects regression for IQ patterns, with secondary outcomes analysed via generalised linear models. Additionally, linear mixed-effects regression (Aim 2) will identify T1D-related metabolic factors affecting brain outcomes, with covariate selection informed by the construction of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs).

The study was approved by the Royal Children’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 35 240F and 2019.065). The research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and print and social media. Participants will receive a summary of the study findings on its completion.

Over one billion adults attend emergency departments (EDs) internationally every year, including 6.6 million in Australia. Up to half of these patients have a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) inserted. Although healthcare workers believe that placing a cannula is helpful (‘just in case’), PIVCs often remain idle. PIVC insertion is painful for patients, takes clinicians’ attention away from other care, has adverse outcomes and causes major economic and environmental burden. Our aim is to codesign an implementation toolkit to reduce unnecessary PIVC insertions and improve other national quality indicators using an implementation science framework.

A stepped-wedge cluster-controlled trial will be conducted in nine ED sites (clusters) across Australia. The interventions will be codesigned with and adapted to sites based on local context. The interventions are evidence-based multimodal intervention (MMI) and aligned to the 2021 Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care National PIVC Clinical Care Standard. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Learning Health System will be used to guide implementation. Interventions will be phased across three steps (three sites per step), and each site will collect control and postintervention data using mainly routinely collected clinical data. Each site will be allocated to receive the intervention at one of three study steps. Implementation strategies will tailor broad clinician and consumer engagement, policy changes, education, audit and feedback and clinical champions, along with environment and equipment changes, to each site. The primary objective is to reduce the proportion of adult patients who have a PIVC inserted by 10%. We will evaluate the clinical, implementation and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

Study findings will be used to conduct a health economic analysis, develop an implementation toolkit and inform a sustainable roadmap for national roll-out. This will meet the needs of a diverse range of EDs nationally and internationally.

The protocol was approved by the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC Reference Number: HREC/100808/MonH-2023-390692(v3)). The outcomes of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and communication with study partners and stakeholders including professional colleges and the Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care.

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12623001248651. Date of registration: 1 December 2023. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386256&showOriginal=true&isReview=true