FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Efficacy of YOga in people with chronic non-specific low BACK pain and poor PROgnosis (YOBACK-PRO): protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Por: Nunes · S. M. · Rizzo · R. R. · Franco · M. R. · Ferreira · F. R. · Barros · L. J. G. · Maciel · I. T. · Santos · R. L. · Nascimento · R. R. · Couto · A. J. · Quaresma · L. S. · Fontes · R. M. · Ferreira · E. M. R. · Maher · C. G. · McAuley · J. H. · Pinto · R. Z. — Enero 28th 2026 at 14:51
Introduction

Yoga has been shown to improve pain and function compared with no exercise in people with chronic low back pain (LBP), but treatment effects are small. Given that yoga is a mind–body intervention that addresses physical as well as psychological factors, it may be more effective for patients with chronic LBP who are at high risk of poor prognosis. The study aims to investigate the efficacy of a 12-week yoga programme combined with education in reducing pain and disability for individuals with chronic LBP at high risk of poor prognosis at short (12 weeks) and intermediate (24 weeks) terms, compared with a control group receiving education only.

Methods and analysis

A randomised controlled trial will include 110 adults with chronic non-specific LBP reporting an average pain intensity of 3 points or more on a 0–10 scale over the past week and classified as high risk of poor prognosis (ie, scoring 50 points or above) on the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire short-form. Participants in the control group will receive an educational booklet and attend three face-to-face lectures over a 3-month period. In the intervention group, in addition to the booklet and lectures, participants will attend group yoga sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, totalling 24 yoga sessions. The primary outcome is disability assessed at 12 weeks, measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Protocol number CAAE: 57028022.0.0000.5149). Findings will be disseminated to trial participants, clinicians and the broader public and scientific community.

Trial registration number

NCT05953155.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Outcomes following a behaviour change intervention within hospitals to improve birth registrations and hospital utilisation for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander infants: a quasi-experimental and cohort study

Por: McAuley · K. · Strobel · N. A. · Christensen · D. · Edmond · K. M. · Jacoby · P. · McAullay · D. — Octubre 21st 2025 at 08:30
Objectives

The primary objective was to determine whether a behaviour change intervention delivered to hospital staff would (1) improve the proportion of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) babies being registered and (2) reduce hospital admissions and emergency presentations for babies

Design

Quasi-experimental design and cohort study.

Setting

Five tertiary birthing hospitals in WA.

Participants

The intervention was delivered to health service providers who were in the five tertiary birthing hospitals. Outcome data were collected on Aboriginal babies born between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2018 who were delivered within these hospitals. Babies in the control group (n=226) were born 6 months before the intervention and intervention babies (n=232) were born 6 months following the intervention. For the secondary objective, there were 4573 babies included in the analysis.

Interventions

A behaviour change intervention delivered to hospital staff in five hospitals.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcomes were the proportion of babies who were registered and whether a baby had been admitted to hospital or an emergency department by 3 and 6 months old. The secondary outcome was to determine factors that might influence the proportion of registered Aboriginal births in WA (cohort study).

Results

There was evidence of a 38% reduction in emergency presentations within 6 months for babies born to hospitals 6 months following the staff training (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.91), and little evidence of improvements in birth registrations, hospital admissions within 3 or 6 months of birth or emergency department presentations within 3 months of birth. Of the 4573 babies included in the cohort study, 3769 (82.4%) babies had their births registered and 804 (17.6%) babies did not. Factors that were associated with not having a birth registered included low birth weight babies with a 34% decrease in odds of having a registered birth compared with those with a normal birth weight (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.86). Timing of first antenatal visit was associated with reduced odds of having a birth registered if this occurred in the second (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.93) or third trimester (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77) compared with the first trimester.

Conclusions

Our study identifies the complexities surrounding birth registrations and improved hospital utilisation for Aboriginal babies, the importance of targeted interventions and ongoing efforts needed to address this issue comprehensively.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12615000976583.

❌