FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Implementation strategies by leaders and health professionals to improve the safety climate in the operating room: a scoping review

Por: Alves Ferreira · R. · Santos · E. J. F. · Ribeiro · O. M. P. L. · Henrique · D. M. · Camerini · F. G. · Bueno · A. A. B. · de Abreu Pereira · S. C. · Schutz · V. · Rosa Lima · M. V. · Fassarella · C. S. — Enero 7th 2026 at 04:50
Objectives

This scoping review aims to map evidence or literature on improvement strategies used by health leaders and professionals to strengthen the safety climate in the operating room.

Design

A scoping review was performed on the basis of the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and applied to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension.

Data sources

16 academic and grey literature data sources were searched using search terms on 17 January 2025, namely, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via Pubmed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences via the Virtual Health Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, WorldCat, Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Brazilian Association of Surgical Center Nurses, Center for Material and Sterilization and Anesthetic Recovery, Association of Portuguese Operating Room Nurses, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, WHO and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Eligibility

Study selection, data extraction and synthesis were based on the following eligibility criteria based on the acronym PCC (participants, concept, context): participants (health leaders and professionals), concept (strategies to improve the safety climate) and context (operating room). This scoping review considered studies published from 2009 onwards.

Data extraction

Information on the objective, method and findings addressing improvement strategies employed to strengthen the safety climate in the surgical centre was retrieved. The findings are presented in tables and in a qualitative thematic summary.

Results

A total of 26 studies were analysed, published between 2009 and 2024, with the USA as the country of origin of the publications with the highest number (11 studies). As for the methodological approach, intervention and quasi-experimental studies stand out. When the studies in this review were mapped, strategies that strengthened the safety climate in the operating room were identified and grouped into two main axes that are interrelated: communication tools and training programmes.

Conclusion

It is evident that the implementation of tools that promote communication and training programmes enhances safe surgical care, as they contribute substantially to the domains of the safety culture. The use of communication protocols in the operating room is recommended as a perioperative safety tool.

Trial registration number

This scoping review adhered to a protocol previously published in this journal and that is registered on the Open Science Framework website (https://osf.io/zg8nu/).

☐ ☆ ✇ Evidentia

Enfermería y seguridad en la programación de la prescripción de medicamentos

Objetivos: Analizar los aplazamientos y la gravedad de las potenciales interacciones medicamentosas en las enfermerías de clínica; correlacionar con los riesgos para la seguridad del paciente. Metodología: Se caracteriza como investigación documental, descriptiva, com abordaje cuantitativo, a partir del análisis documental. Los datos fueron analizados por el programa Micromedex®, a fin de verificar las posibles interacciones medicamentosas ocurridas de acuerdo com el aplazamiento. Resultados: Se analizaron 52 prescripciones, generando 664 dosis de medicamentos. Se identificaron 37 potenciales interacciones que fueron clasificadas de acuerdo com la gravedad y riesgos a la seguridad del paciente. Conclusión: Las interacciones medicamentosas encontradas fueron significativas y necesitan ser evaluadas como factores de riesgo para la seguridad del paciente.

❌