FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial assessing prehospital whole blood versus component therapy in traumatic haemorrhage: SWiFT Canada (study of whole blood in frontline trauma)

Por: Lin · Y. · Peddle · M. · Callum · J. · Beckett · A. · da Luz · L. T. · Drennan · I. · Pavenski · K. · Mack · J. · McGowan · M. · Ahghari · M. · Smith · J. · Green · L. · Keown-Stoneman · C. D. G. · Nolan · B. · on behalf of the SWiFT Canada Investigators — Diciembre 31st 2025 at 18:10
Introduction

Major haemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in trauma, and prehospital blood transfusion may improve survival and outcomes for patients with prolonged out-of-hospital times. Globally, there is increasing interest in the use of whole blood in the prehospital environment, with randomised controlled trials ongoing. However, the results of these studies may not be generalisable to the longer out-of-hospital times seen in the Canadian trauma environment. The aim of this trial is to determine the feasibility of performing a randomised clinical trial evaluating the use of leukocyte-reduced whole blood transfusion compared with component blood transfusion in the Canadian prehospital environment. The secondary objective is to explore whether whole blood transfusion is better in reducing the proportion of patients who die or require massive transfusion within 24 hours.

Methods and analysis

This is a multi-centre, open-label, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Patients aged 16 years or older will be eligible if they have suffered a major traumatic haemorrhage, are attended by the provincial air ambulance service and require a prehospital blood transfusion. The primary outcome is feasibility as measured by the following metrics: proportion of patients enrolled with full data collection, proportion of patients who received at least one prehospital transfusion prior to arriving at the receiving trauma centre, proportion of patients who completed transfusion of all assigned blood units, number of patients unable to be enrolled due to lack of whole blood availability and number of whole blood units produced for the study that were wasted or expired. The secondary outcome is a composite outcome of death (all-cause mortality) or receipt of massive transfusion (receipt of 10 units of blood or more) within the first 24 hours from randomisation. We plan to recruit 60 patients, with an anticipated post-randomisation exclusion of ~10 patients for traumatic cardiac arrest or who do not meet eligibility criteria.

Ethics and dissemination

Provincial ethics approval was obtained (Clinical Trials Ontario REB ID: CTO-4921). An opt-out consent model will be employed for participants. The SWiFT Canada trial will recruit 60 patients through the provincial air ambulance organisation in Ontario who are transported to one of the six participating lead trauma centres. It will investigate the feasibility of a pre-hospital transfusion clinical trial in Canada to compare the effectiveness of whole blood compared with component blood therapy in a future definitive trial.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06495294 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06495294), Clinical Trials Ontario: CTO-4921.

☐ ☆ ✇ Journal of Advanced Nursing

Exploring Students' Perceptions and Experiences of Raising Concerns During Pre‐Registration Training in England: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the perceptions and experiences of students raising concerns during pre-registration health and/or social care training in England.

Design

Systematic review.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO and Education Research Complete were systematically searched for studies published between September 2015 and August 2024. Grey literature searches were conducted using Google Scholar and ETHOS British Library. Reference lists from included studies were hand searched.

Methods

Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for the conduct of systematic review informed conduct and the convergent integrated approach. Mixed methods appraisal tool was used for quality appraisal.

Findings

Eleven studies were included. Synthesis of findings generated three themes: (1) conflicting needs of self and others, (2) navigating the professional workspace and, (3) ‘choice to voice’.

Conclusion

Speaking up and raising concerns as a pre-registration student is a complex, multi-faceted and non-linear social phenomenon. Experiences and perceptions are impacted by the novice student position alongside individual, interpersonal and organisational factors. Open cultures within teams and organisations, leadership, support and feedback may enable students overcome barriers to raising concerns.

Impact

Raising concerns may reduce avoidable harm. Pre-registration students offer a ‘fresh pair of eyes’; however, they face barriers related to their student position. Synthesis of speaking-up experiences and perceptions of students in English settings can inform the design of learning environments which equip pre-registration students with the knowledge and skills required to cultivate safety behaviours. These skills contribute positively to safety culture and support learning and improvement in complex systems such as health and social care.

Reporting Method

The review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

The conceptualisation of this project was informed by engagement events with higher education staff, students and Freedom to Speak Up Guardians.

❌