FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

The impact of working conditions on breast cancer outcomes: a study protocol for a population-based cohort study using UK Biobank data

Por: van der Linden · B. W. A. · Carmeli · C. · Duijts · S. F. A. · Guseva Canu · I. · Rohrmann · S. · Chiolero · A. — Septiembre 30th 2025 at 09:49
Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. While the impact of lifestyle factors like smoking and obesity on breast cancer risk and survival is well documented, the effect of working conditions is not fully understood. Moreover, breast cancer can reduce employability, making it crucial to identify factors that facilitate return to work and improve life satisfaction. Since breast cancer is affected by sleep and lifestyle, which are related to working conditions, understanding how they affect breast cancer outcomes is key. This study aims to explore the relationship between working conditions and breast cancer outcomes, including incidence, mortality and survival within a causal framework. Our specific aims are to understand the relationship between (1) working conditions and occupational groups and breast cancer outcomes, including the extent to which sleep, lifestyle and breast cancer screening uptake explain these relationships and (2) prediagnosis working conditions, sleep and lifestyle and their effect on return to work and life satisfaction among breast cancer survivors.

Methods and analysis

We will use data from the UK Biobank, a large-scale cohort study with data on 273 825 women between 40 and 69 years old at baseline, followed from 2006 to 2022. The data has been linked with death and cancer registries and includes 8309 incident breast cancer cases. To quantify the effect of working conditions on breast cancer outcomes (aim 1) and their effect on return to work and life satisfaction (aim 2), we will implement g-methods to estimate the average causal effect and employ counterfactual-based mediation analysis to quantify how much mediating factors, such as sleep and lifestyle, explain this effect.

Ethics and dissemination

UK Biobank received ethical approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee. No further ethical approval was required for the proposed research project. In line with the two aims, four original research manuscripts will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals to disseminate the findings. In addition, findings will be disseminated at international conferences and scientific meetings.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcomes in psychotherapy for depression: study protocol of a randomised controlled multi

Por: Gumz · A. · Kästner · D. · Reuter · L. · Martinez Moura · C. · Ehlers · K. · Daubmann · A. · Eubanks · C. F. · Muran · J. C. · Anderson · T. · Stöckl · R. · Schwanitz · G. · Stegemann · L. · Rohr · L. · Willutzki · U. · Jacobi · F. · Zapf · A. — Julio 16th 2025 at 09:42
Introduction

Alliance ruptures constitute a high risk of premature treatment termination and poor psychotherapy outcome. The Alliance-Focused Training (AFT) is a promising transtheoretical approach to enhance therapists’ skills in dealing with alliance ruptures.

Methods and analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of Modified AFT with doubling (MAFT-D), a randomised, patient and evaluator-blinded, multicentre trial was designed comparing MAFT-D (delivered to trainee therapists and supervisors) and psychotherapy training/treatment as usual (TAU) for therapists (n=120) and their patients with depressive disorders (n=240). A total of 17 cooperating centres, each offering either cognitive-behavioural or psychodynamic psychotherapy training, will contribute to recruitment. Stratification by centre (both for therapists and patients) and hence therapeutic approach (cognitive-behavioural vs psychodynamic psychotherapies), and by comorbid personality disorder (yes vs no, for patients) will be carried out. The two hierarchically ordered primary hypotheses are: In MAFT-D compared with TAU, a stronger reduction of depressive symptoms and a lower rate of patient dropout is expected from baseline to 20 weeks after baseline. Follow-up assessments are planned at 35 weeks, 20 months and 36 months postbaseline to evaluate the persistence of effects. Secondary patient-related and therapist-related outcomes as well as predictors, moderators and mediators of change will be investigated. Mixed models with repeated measures will be used for the primary analyses.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approvals were obtained by the institutional ethics review board of the main study centre as well as by review boards in each federal state where one or more cooperating centres are located (secondary votes). Following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials, results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.

Trial registration number

DRKS00014842; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00014842.

❌