To identify and contextualise evidence-based strategies for implementing deprescribing practices at different levels of healthcare in Brazil, through the development of an evidence brief for policy that includes stakeholder deliberation and considers barriers, facilitators and equity aspects.
This protocol outlines the development of an evidence brief for policy using a mixed-methods design. It involves synthesising evidence for health policies by integrating global research and local evidence through three stages: stakeholder exchange, evidence brief development and external endorsement. The Supporting Policy-Relevant Reviews and Trials tools for evidence-informed health policies will guide both the synthesis of strategies and the facilitation of deliberative dialogues. The synthesis will encompass evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis on deprescribing strategies across healthcare levels, focusing on effectiveness, harms, costs, perceptions, barriers, facilitators and equity. Studies proposing strategies not yet implemented will be excluded. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted independently and in duplicate. The methodological quality of included studies will be assessed using the A Measurement Tool for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 criteria. Synthesised evidence will be used to develop evidence-based strategies, which will then be presented in deliberative dialogues for endorsement by stakeholders and adaptation to the Brazilian context. Endorsement rates will be classified as high, moderate or low based on predefined criteria.
This study was approved by the University of Sorocaba Research Ethics Committee (certificate 82098324.7.0000.5500). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
CRD42024548845.
Breastfeeding is beneficial to the health of both the mother and infant. Despite recommendations to breastfeed by organisations including the WHO and the American Academy of Pediatrics, rates of breastfeeding remain below public health goals. The Mother and Infant Metabolome and Microbiome (MIMM) study is a prospective cohort study of healthy mother-term infant dyads designed to comprehensively assess the perinatal, maternal, neonatal and infant factors that are associated with breastfeeding outcomes and human milk composition.
MIMM participants were recruited from two medical centres in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2019 to 2023 and are followed for 2 years. Dyads were included if the mother delivered a singleton infant at ≥37 weeks’ gestation, was discharged home 2 and infant gestational age was 39.3 weeks. Approximately 43% of infants were born via caesarean delivery, and 45.5% were female.
MIMM study procedures include longitudinal (1) collections of maternal blood, vaginal swab, stool and milk and infant blood and stool samples and (2) assessments of breastfeeding status, child neurodevelopment and growth and maternal health at birth, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Data collection through 18 months is complete. The overall objective of the MIMM study is to identify potential targets to improve breastfeeding outcomes, human milk composition and ultimately, maternal and child health. Preliminary analyses, reported in conference presentations (with ongoing analyses and results manuscripts pending), have found that (1) mothers with higher levels of stress were less likely to be exclusively breastfeeding their infants at 6 weeks; (2) higher breastfeeding intensity was associated with greater postpartum weight loss at 6 weeks; (3) feeding type was a more relevant predictor of feeding frequency and volume compared with feeding mode; (4) infants who received exclusive human milk had higher food enjoyment compared with those who received any formula; and (5) infants of mothers with obesity had higher average feeding volume per feed.
Data collection for the final 24-month visit is expected to be completed by August 2025. We expect that all sample assays will be completed by December 2025. Findings will continue to be submitted for presentation at scientific conferences, and we expect to publish the first findings from this cohort in manuscript format in 2025.
Delirium is commonly observed in older patients who are admitted to the emergency department (ED). Previous systematic reviews have identified poor outcomes associated with delirium in surgical, intensive care and other hospital settings, yet none have specifically considered the ED. This systematic review aims to examine associations between older patients who present or develop delirium in the ED and adverse outcomes within the hospital and after discharge.
Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library. There will be no date or language restrictions. Key terms will include concepts related to delirium, the ED and older adults. Observational studies or non-intervention clinical studies will be included that compare outcomes in older patients (ie, ≥65 years) with and without delirium. Outcomes of interest will include length of hospital stay, non-home discharge (eg, nursing home/residential aged care facility), cognitive impairment, decreased physical function, mortality, readmission to hospital and quality of life measures. Two reviewers will independently screen the studies. Data extraction and quality assessment will be extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer, with any disagreements resolved by discussion or by a third reviewer. Where appropriate, data will be combined in a meta-analysis and a GRADE assessment will be made for each outcome. All methods will be guided by the Cochrane Handbook and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement as well as the recommendations set out by the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group.
As this systematic review will use published data, ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
CRD42024594975.
In Indonesia, antibiotics are often purchased without a prescription at community pharmacies, contrary to current regulations. This practice may increase the risk of out-of-specification (OOS) medicines being dispensed, potentially contributing to treatment failure and antibiotic resistance. To address this concern, we assessed the quality of antibiotics purchased without a prescription at private drug retail outlets (PDROs) in Indonesia.
We conducted a cross-sectional study in Tabalong and Bekasi, Indonesia, using standardised patients (SPs) who purchased antibiotics without a prescription for three clinical scenarios: upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), tuberculosis (TB) and child diarrhoea. The pharmacies and drug stores were randomly selected from each subdistrict based on the probability proportional method. We measured the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) content of the antibiotic samples using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
The quality of 183 antibiotics including amoxicillin tablets (148/183, 80.9%, 95% CI 74.7% to 86.1%), amoxicillin dry syrup (12/183, 6.6%, 95% CI 3.6% to 10.8%), ampicillin tablets (5/183, 2.7%, 95% CI 1.1% to 5.9%) and ciprofloxacin tablets (18/183, 9.8%, 95% CI 6.2% to 14.8%) obtained from 117/166 (70.5%, 95% CI 62.8 to 77.2) PDROs were tested. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the purchased antibiotics, and the API content of each antibiotic was compared against the United States Pharmacopeia 43-National Formulary 38 (USP 43-NF 38) standards in absolute values and percentages.
Almost all samples produced in Indonesia (182/183, 99.5%, 95% CI 97.5% to 99.9%) were unbranded (123/183, 67.2%, 95% CI 60.2% to 73.7%) or branded generic (60/183, 32.8%, 95% CI 26.3% to 39.8%) and packaged in strips (165/183, 90.2%, 95% CI 85.2% to 93.8%). Around 12/183 (6.6%, 95% CI 3.6% to 10.8%) antibiotics were found to be OOS; these were mostly amoxicillin 125 mg dry syrup (6/12, 50%, 95% CI 24.3% to 75.7%) and ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablet (5/18, 27.8%, 95% CI 11.5% to 50.6%). Around 33% (4/12, 95% CI 12.5% to 61.2%) of amoxicillin 125 mg dry syrup samples had an API content above the label claim, the highest being 187%, whereas 16.7% (2/12, 95% CI 3.6% to 43.6%) were below the label claim, the lowest being 64%. About 27.8% (5/18, 95% CI 11.5% to 50.6%) of ciprofloxacin samples tested had an API content above the label claim; the highest was 120%.
While the proportion of OOS antibiotics identified was relatively small, at a population level, it represents a significant proportion of sub-optimally treated infections.
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) reduces adverse events, but is underused. Global barriers to GDMT optimisation include low frequency of visits, clinician inertia and poor patient knowledge, which may be mitigated by digital health interventions (DHI). In Brazil, low digital literacy and reduced access to technology may compromise these potential DHI’s beneficial effects. Our objective is to develop and test the effectiveness of a DHI to optimise GDMT in patients recently hospitalised for HF in the Brazilian public health system (Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS)).
This is a randomised, controlled, multicentre, parallel-group, clinical trial in which 154 patients being discharged from an HF-related hospitalisation will be randomised. Inclusion criteria are ≥18 years of age, reduced ejection fraction HF (EF
This study was approved by the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Recruitment started in November 2023, and patients involved will sign an informed consent form. Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in scientific journals in 2025, and will be disclosed in social media and presented to public health stakeholders.
Universal Trial Number U1111-1295-1864 Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-10vpf9bm).