FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Patient lumbar discectomy journey (DiscJourn) in the UK: a qualitative study

Por: White · L. · Heneghan · N. R. · Furtado · N. · Baraks · K. · Parvez · Z. · Masson · A. · Rushton · A. B. — Julio 25th 2025 at 10:04
Objectives

To gain insight into patients’ views, perceptions, experiences and expectations postlumbar discectomy.

Methods

A qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) purposively recruited patients undergoing lumbar discectomy at one UK spinal centre. Purposive criteria included age, sex, ethnicity, symptom duration, work/sick leave, education level and co-existing psychological issues. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a patient co-constructed topic guide. Interview transcriptions were analysed in accordance with IPA. Strategies enhancing trustworthiness included suspension of judgements and presuppositions, reflexivity, iterative coding process and critique from co-investigators.

Results

Data from 14 participants (eight elective, 6 emergency surgery) informed four themes. The theme ready to move forwards was characterised by high satisfaction with post-operative improvement, positivity and optimism, with readiness to work towards personal goals. The theme post-operative fear and uncertainty was characterised by reflections on pre-operative difficulties fuelling fear about potential recurrence and long-term impacts. The theme of advice and guidance considered important was characterised by the expectation and value of support provided (verbal, written); instances of negative influences from healthcare interactions and access to unregulated patient information sources suggest scope for future improvement. The final theme, heterogeneity in peri-operative needs, was characterised by variation in depth/access to patient information, perceived post-operative support and wide-ranging preoperative activity/fitness.

Conclusions

Surgery offers physical and psychosocial changes which could be better harnessed to positively influence recovery through high quality verbal/written communication. Peri-operative advice and guidance was valued; while this was sufficient for some, personalised rehabilitation should be available owing to the identified heterogeneity.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a personalised guided consultation versus usual physiotherapy care in people presenting with shoulder pain: a protocol for the PANDA-S cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation

Por: Harrisson · S. · Myers · H. · Wynne-Jones · G. · Bajpai · R. · Bratt · C. · Burton · C. · Harrison · R. · Jowett · S. · Lawton · S. A. · Saunders · B. · Beard · D. · Bucknall · M. · Chester · R. · Heneghan · C. · Huckfield · L. · Lewis · M. · Mallen · C. · Pincus · T. · Rees · J. L. · Roddy — Mayo 6th 2025 at 12:26
Introduction

Musculoskeletal shoulder pain is a common reason for people to be treated in physiotherapy services, but diagnosis can be difficult and often does not guide treatment or predict outcome. People with shoulder pain cite a need for clear information, and timely, tailored consultations for their pain. This trial will evaluate the introduction of a personalised guided consultation to help physiotherapists manage care for individuals with shoulder pain.

Methods and analysis

This is a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of introducing a personalised guided consultation compared with usual UK NHS physiotherapy care. Physiotherapy services (n=16) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either intervention (physiotherapy training package and personalised guided consultation incorporating a new prognostic tool) or control (usual care); 832 participants (416 in each arm) identified from participating physiotherapy service waiting lists aged 18 years or over with shoulder pain will be enrolled. Follow-up will occur at 3 time points: 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcome will be the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score over 12 months. Secondary outcomes include global perceived change of the shoulder condition, sleep, work absence and the impact of shoulder pain on work performance, healthcare utilisation and health-related quality of life (using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)). A multimethod process evaluation will investigate views and experiences of participants and physiotherapists, assess uptake, facilitators and barriers to delivery, and changes in factors assumed to explain intervention outcomes. Primary analysis of effectiveness will be by intention-to-treat, and a health economic evaluation will assess cost-utility of introducing the personalised consultation.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial received ethics approval from the Yorkshire & The Humber (South Yorkshire) Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 23/YH/0070). Findings will be shared through journal publications, media outlets and conference presentations. Supported by patient contributors and clinical advisors, we will communicate findings through a designated website, networks, newsletters, leaflets and in the participating physiotherapy services.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN45377604.

❌