Conectar
To provide a contemporary, postpandemic description of UK occupational therapy and physiotherapy practice to rehabilitate the upper limb after stroke.
A national online survey, first undertaken in 2018 (prepandemic), was readministered to describe postpandemic practice.
The survey was distributed to UK-based occupational therapists and physiotherapists working with people after stroke, via professional and social networks.
Shaped by the Template for Intervention Description and Replication Checklist, the survey collected and subsequently analysed the content, frequency and duration of upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
A total of 122 occupational therapists (n=42) and physiotherapists (n=80) currently working clinically, across in-patient, out-patient and community settings, in the UK completed the survey. Respondents reported treating the upper limb a median of three times a week (IQR 2–4; range 0–6) for a median of 25 min (IQR: 20–35; range 3–60; n=119). Repetitive, functionally-based activities were the most commonly reported interventions for mild (n=93; 81%) and moderate (n=72; 64%) impairment. Stretching (n=73; 66%) and positioning (n=49; 45%) were most frequently reported for severe impairment. In each of the three impairment categories, a larger number of interventions were reported than in the 2018 survey.
While the pandemic promoted the use of virtual interventions, most therapists had returned to face-to-face interventions. The findings highlight that the current reported provision of upper limb therapy continues to be markedly less than the dose shown to be effective. The study provides important data which can be used to judge the success of attempts to align practice with new guidelines and inform ‘usual therapy’ for the upper limb after stroke in comparative studies.
Most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for assessing and managing people’s chronic pain focus on specific pain conditions, body sites or life course stages. This creates complexity for clinicians making care choices in the absence of a diagnosis and/or where a person experiences more than one pain condition. Specific to this context is the ICD-11 classification of chronic primary pain where an experience of pain cannot be better accounted for by another condition. CPGs for chronic primary pain, agnostic to condition or body part, may support clinicians towards best pain care since many of the principles of person-centred chronic pain care are transdiagnostic. The two aims of this systematic review are to (1) identify and appraise CPGs for chronic primary pain, relevant across the life course and (2) map the CPG content against a pain care priority framework to evaluate the extent to which the CPG content aligns with the priorities of people with lived chronic pain experience.
We will systematically search nine scholarly databases, the Epistemonikos database and international and national guidelines clearinghouses. CPGs published within 2015–2025, in any language, that offer recommendations about assessment and/or management of chronic primary pain for people of any age, excluding hospitalised inpatients or institutionalised populations, will be included. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen citations for eligibility and appraise CPG quality and implementation potential using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE)-II and the AGREE-Recommendations Excellence tools, respectively. Data extraction will include the citation and scope characteristics of each CPG, methods used to develop recommendations, verbatim recommendations, guiding principles or practice information and narrative excerpts related to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) considerations (or equivalent). We will use the PROGRESS-PLUS framework as a checklist to identify whether determinants of health equity were considered by guideline developers. CPG recommendations will be organised according to common topics and categorised in a matrix according to strength and direction. Qualitative content analysis will be used to synthesise excerpts relating to GRADE EtD considerations (or equivalent), and we will map extracted data against an established chronic pain care priority framework to determine the extent to which the CPGs align with values and preferences of people with lived experience. Interpretation will be informed by an interdisciplinary Advisory Group, including lived experience partners.
Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Results will be disseminated through publication in an open-access peer-reviewed journal, through professional societies, and integrated into education curricula and public-facing resources. Reporting will be consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.
CRD420251000482.
Despite the increasing number of doctorally prepared midwives in Europe, particularly after the Bologna Declaration 1999, little is known about the context and experiences of their doctoral education.
To explore European initially qualified midwives' experiences with doctoral education; and the context of their education through their professional associations.
An exploratory descriptive observational survey.
An ethically approved web-based survey was used to collect data from midwifery associations and midwives in 33 European countries between October and December 2024. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the responses.
Twenty-two midwifery associations from 19 European countries and 207 midwives from 23 European countries participated. Over the last two decades, there has been an increase in the number of doctorally prepared midwives. Common reasons to gain doctoral qualifications included an interest in research, career progression, in particular in education, and improving healthcare. Midwives reported growing availability of European-wide opportunities for doctoral programmes, alongside an increase in the number of doctoral midwifery programmes and supervisors with midwifery expertise. Although many barriers were reported, effectively combining study with their personal life and support from family, friends and colleagues was highlighted as crucial factors in completing their doctoral studies.
This is the first study exploring the experiences of European midwives pursuing a doctoral degree. The findings highlight a need for universities to improve the collaboration with midwives' supportive networks as well as for the profession to reduce intraprofessional hostilities to enhance doctoral midwifery students' well-being.
Implications for the profession: Acknowledging challenges faced by these midwives is necessary to improve professional and institutional support in academia and midwifery.
Findings of this study inform strategies to improve doctoral education for midwives and, in this way, strengthen the contributions of midwives to maternal evidenced-based care development and healthcare innovations.
The Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) was used to guide reporting.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and white matter injury (WMI) are major neurological complications in preterm infants, leading to long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. Despite advances in neonatal care, effective treatments are lacking. Umbilical cord blood cell (UCBC) therapy shows neuroprotective potential, with autologous sources ideal but often not feasible due to the unpredictability of preterm births. Allogeneic UCBCs offer an alternative, although immunogenicity and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility present challenges with knowledge gaps in their relevance in neonatal populations. This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of partially HLA-matched allogeneic UCBC therapy in preterm infants with severe brain injury.
The ALLO trial is an open-label, phase I, single-arm feasibility and safety study conducted at Monash Children’s Hospital, Victoria, Australia. Preterm infants born before 28 weeks (ALLO-1) or between 28 weeks and 36+6 weeks (ALLO-2) gestational age with severe brain injury identified on neuroimaging will be enrolled. Severe brain injury is defined as grade 3 or 4 IVH or significant WMI. Exclusion criteria include major congenital anomalies or redirection to comfort care. Eligible infants will receive a single intravenous infusion of unrelated, allogeneic, partially HLA-matched (4/6 or 5/6 HLA match) UCBCs sourced from a public cord blood bank. The target dose is 50 million total nucleated cells per kilogram body weight. Infusion will occur within 2–3 weeks of confirmation of eligibility, contingent on clinical stability and absence of active sepsis. Primary outcome includes: (1) feasibility, defined as having more than 60% of enrolled infants with an eligible allogeneic partially matched cord blood unit available and (2) safety, defined as absence of severe adverse events within 48 hours of infusion or graft-versus-host disease within 3 months of infusion. Secondary outcomes include survival, neonatal morbidities, neurodevelopmental assessments and serum cytokine analysis.
Monash HREC has granted full ethics approval (RES-23-0000-297A) for the study, including the research use of allogeneic cord blood from compassionate donations by healthy donors, facilitated through the Bone Marrow Donor Institute Cord Blood Bank within the AusCord network. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, contributing to the development of novel neuroreparative therapies for preterm brain injury.
ACTRN12623001352695 (The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).
Globally, the demand for community palliative care, delivered within the home setting, is rising. Hospice support workers, also referred to as healthcare assistants, play a crucial role in providing this care, but evidence indicates they face challenges relating to inadequate training, isolation and emotional labour. This realist review aims to understand how peer support interventions can support healthcare assistants in delivering hospice care at home.
The realist review will follow a five-step process to explore the research question: (1) locating existing initial programme theories, (2) searching for evidence, (3) selecting and appraising evidence, (4) extracting and organising data and (5) synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions. Comprehensive searches of academic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED, Scopus) and grey literature sources will be conducted between November and December 2024, with no restrictions on publication date applied. Search strategies will be iteratively refined, with evidence selected based on relevance and rigour. Data will be extracted and coded using a realist logic model of analysis. The review will develop an explanatory programme theory for peer-to-peer interventions which would identify what, how, for whom, why and in what circumstances peer-to-peer interventions may support delivery of hospice care at home. It will explore the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of these interventions using context-mechanism-outcome configurations.
Ethical approval is not required as the review involves no primary data collection. This review aims to clarify research gaps, inform next stages of a wider study, policy and practice. Reporting of the findings will adhere to RAMESES publication standards for realist syntheses, ensuring transparency and rigour in reporting. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and other strategies identified by the stakeholder group.
CRD42024606133.
Understand the relational influences on help-seeking for mental health and substance use problems among people experiencing social marginalisation, with a focus on research applying social capital theory and social network analysis methods.
Scoping review.
EMBASE, Web of Science, Criminal Justice Abstracts and SocINDEX were searched up to June 2023, and Web of Science email alerts were used to capture any further publications up to June 2024.
English-language, peer-reviewed publications that (1) focused on/discussed help-seeking for mental health or substance use problems; (2) included adults experiencing social marginalisation beyond sociodemographic factors; and (3) applied social capital theory or social network analysis methods.
We extracted and charted data pertinent to review objectives and narratively synthesised results.
Twenty-seven papers were included. Most (n=19) focused on the experiences of people who used drugs. Five specifically focused on help-seeking, four of which applied quantitative social network analysis, one was framed by network theories of social capital and one referred to social capital in interpreting findings. The remaining 22 papers discussed help-seeking while focused on different phenomena. Seven of these framed their approach with social capital, but none explicitly applied social capital to help-seeking. Eight papers used social network analysis, with four focused on help-seeking and seven using personal networks. Social/relational influences identified included: fear of losing social capital, the risks of high bonding capital, service providers as social capital, selective help-seeking, trust and network culture. Social capital, interconnected with the tight-knit bonds within marginalised groups, could deter help-seeking. Knowledge and attitudes towards help and help-seeking, shaped by past experiences and network cultures, influenced help-seeking and contributed to a cautious and selective approach.
Theoretical elaboration and empirical research are required to better appreciate the relational influences on help-seeking for mental health and substance use problems among people experiencing social marginalisation. Social capital may provide a useful theoretical approach. While social network analysis methods have been applied, they are under-utilised.
by Rhonda M. Merwin, Patrick J. Smith, J.A. Riley, Jordan Infield, Christine O’Connell, Dorothy Mayo, Ashley A. Moskovich, Lauren Hill, Hilary Winthrop, Amy Bush, Ernaya Johnson, Francesca Scheiber, Anthony D. Sung
Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) has the potential to cure patients with hematologic malignancies, but treatment-related morbidity and mortality is high. Transplant outcomes are optimized by patients maintaining physical activity. The aim of the current study was to examine whether a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention is acceptable to HCT patients and caregivers and helps patients engage in healthy behavior despite physical and emotional discomfort. Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years of age who were undergoing allogenic HCT for any cancer or non-cancer illness and their caregivers were invited to complete six ACT sessions between transplant day − 30 and day + 90. Multiple small cohorts of n = 3 dyads were enrolled, and the protocol content was iterated after each cohort to reflect the experiences and breadth of concerns of individuals undergoing HCT. Acceptability was indexed by session completion rates and acceptability surveys. Pre-post 6-minute walk distance was collected as an index of physical function as part of standard care. Results: Sixteen HCT dyads enrolled in the study; 12 continued to treatment. Most participants completed all assigned sessions. Participants perceived ACT to be helpful and 70% (5 of 7) of the patients with pre-post 6-minute walk test data showed improvement. Conclusion: ACT is an acceptable and potentially useful intervention for individuals undergoing HCT. Additional controlled studies are warranted.
To synthesise evidence from studies that explored the impact of electronic and self-rostering systems to schedule staff on healthcare organisations and healthcare workers.
Mixed-method systematic review.
Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using standardised data extraction tables. The quality of studies was assessed, and parallel-results convergent synthesis was conducted.
Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PsycARTICLES were searched on January 3, 2023.
Eighteen studies were included (10 quantitative descriptive studies, seven non-randomised studies and one qualitative study). Studies examined two rostering interventions including self-rostering (n = 12) and electronic rostering (n = 6). It was found that the implementation of electronic and self-rostering systems for staff scheduling impacted positively on both, healthcare workers and healthcare organisations. Benefits included enhanced roster efficiency, staff satisfaction, greater control and empowerment, improved work-life balance, higher staff retention and reduced turnover, decreased absence rates and enhanced healthcare efficiency. However, self-rostering was found to be less equitable than fixed rostering, was associated with increased overtime, and correlated with a higher frequency of staff requests for shift changes.
The impact of electronic and self-rostering systems to schedule staff on healthcare organisations and healthcare workers’ outcomes was predominantly positive. Further randomised controlled trials and longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term impact of various rostering systems, including electronic and self-rostering systems.
Rostering is a multifaceted responsibility for healthcare administrators, impacting patient care quality, workforce planning and healthcare expenditure.
Given that healthcare staffing costs constitute a substantial portion of global healthcare expenditure, efficient and strategic resource management, inclusive of healthcare staff rostering, is imperative.
The 27-item Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Background
Public health nurse home visiting is a promising approach for addressing the complex needs of families at risk of child maltreatment. The Colorado Nurse Support Program advances service provision by using evidence-based practices to provide tailored assessment and intervention to low-income, primiparous, and multiparous families with children under 18 years of age identified as high risk by county human service systems.
Objectives
This study aimed to test the effects of the Nurse Support Program on child protective services case characteristics between Nurse Support Program families and a demographically comparable reference group of families and evaluate changes in parenting outcomes from pre- to postprogram involvement for Nurse Support Program families.
Methods
We used a matched comparison group quasi-experimental design in which families in the Nurse Support Program (n = 48) were compared to families (n = 150) who were identified using administrative data from Colorado’s Comprehensive Child Welfare Information System. Outcomes were child protective case characteristics (child protection referrals, open assessments, founded assessments, open cases, and children’s placement in out-of-home care) and parenting outcomes.
Results
Nurse Support Program families were less likely to have a child protection case opened or have their child placed in out-of-home care. There were no significant between-group differences in child protection referrals, open assessments, or founded assessments. Families in the Nurse Support Program showed improvements in parenting outcomes over time.
Discussion
Findings suggest that the Nurse Support Program is a successful public health nurse home-visiting approach to promote positive parenting and family preservation among families with complex needs. Implementing tailored public health nurse home-visiting programs, such as the Nurse Support Program, should continue to be evaluated and supported to mitigate the public health risk of child maltreatment. 
FreshRSS