Conectar
by Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Rumesa Batul, Niher Tabassum Siddiqua Snigdha, Matheel AL-Rawas, Tahir Yusuf Noorani
IntroductionRoot canal sealing materials play a crucial role in an endodontic procedure by forming a bond between the dentinal walls and the gutta-percha. The current study aims to analyse the dentinal tubule penetration and adhesive pattern, including the push-out bond strength of six commercially available root canal sealers.
MethodologyEighty-four mandibular first premolars were split into seven groups (and n = 12), Group 1: Dia-Root, Group 2: One-Fil, Group 3: BioRoot RCS, Group 4: AH Plus, Group 5: CeraSeal, Group 6: iRoot SP, Group 7: GP without sealer (control). Two groups were made, one for dentinal tubule penetration and the other for push-out bond strength; the total sample size was one hundred sixty-eight. Root canal treatment was performed using a method called the crown down technique, and for obturation, the single cone technique was used. A confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Microsystem Heidel GmbH, Version 2.00 build 0585, Germany) was used to evaluate dentinal tubule penetration, and Universal Testing Machine was utilised to measure the push-out bond strength (Shimadzu, Japan) using a plunger size of 0.4 mm and speed of 1mm/min. Finally, the adhesive pattern of the sealers was analysed by HIROX digital microscope (KH-7700). Statistical analysis was carried out by a one-way Anova test, Dunnet’s T3 test, and Chi-square test.
ResultsHighest dentinal tubule penetration was noticed with One-Fil (p Conclusion
The highest dentinal tubule penetration was shown by One-Fil compared to other groups. Meanwhile, BioRoot RCS had greater push-out bond strength and more adhesive pattern than other tested materials.
Topical keloid therapy is performed with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) intralesional injection. However, the recurrence rate is high with various side effects. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have high proliferative abilities and reduce the activity and proliferation of fibroblast cells in keloids. To overcome the costs and limitations, conditioned medium (CM) is used. This study aims to evaluate feasibility of intralesional injection of umbilical cord MSC (UC-MSC) and conditioned medium (UC-CM) compared to TA for keloid therapy. Twenty-four patients with keloids who met the inclusion criteria were included, randomized into three treatment groups and then got assessed for the sociodemographic data, keloid volume, histopathology (type 1:3 collagen ratio), interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score during visits. Largest volume regression occurred in the UC-MSC group, followed by UC-CM and then the TA group (UC-MSC: 45.32% ± 2.61%; UC-CM: 43.61% ± 3.67%; TA: 28.34% ± 3.81%; p = 0.003). Similar pattern was also observed in increase in IL-10 levels, the decrease in POSAS scores and the reduction of type 1:3 collagen ratio. Hence, UC-MSC and UC-CM are promisingly more effective than TA for keloid therapy, showcasing their superiority in reducing keloid volume, symptoms and type 1:3 collagen ratio, as well as increasing the levels of IL-10.
Childhood abuse could potentially cause negative health consequences later in life, where they influence individuals' physiological, psychological, and behavioral health. Screening for ACEs is not widely incorporated during routine primary healthcare. The information about past childhood abuse screening among adult patients is elusive. The aim of the study was to investigate healthcare providers (HCPs) practices, skills, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to past childhood abuse screening among adult patients in Saudi Arabia.
Cross-sectional study.
Data were collected from healthcare facilities in the Riyadh and Madinah regions of Saudi Arabia using a self-reported questionnaire.
A total of 126 HCPs completed the survey. Less than one-third of the HCPs reported routinely (usually or always) screening for childhood abuse. HCPs were more concerned that they would offend their patients by examining history of adversities. HCP practice location, the extent to which they think it is part of their responsibilities to screen for history of adversities, and their self-reported of adverse childhood experiences were significantly associated with screening practices for childhood abuse. Four perceived barriers were significantly associated with HCP screening.
Screening for past adversities is vital for identifying childhood trauma among the public; therefore, we might participate in reducing childhood trauma and further controlling consequences in the future. Developing a screening form for childhood abuse or adversities and providing this form in healthcare settings are appropriate at this stage.
Early screening for ACEs is recommended, which prioritizes health promotion and disease prevention. It is highly needed to increase HCP awareness toward childhood abuse, screening for it, and reflection on it.
FreshRSS