FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Sex differences in the efficacy, safety and persistence of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of phase III and long-term extension trials

Por: Strand · V. · Schulze-Koops · H. · Al-Emadi · S. · Kinch · C. D. · Gruben · D. · Germino · R. · Connell · C. A. · Mysler · E. — Diciembre 25th 2025 at 05:45
Objectives

Evaluate tofacitinib efficacy, safety and persistence by sex in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Design

Post hoc analyses using data from phase III placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (ORAL Scan, ORAL Sync and ORAL Standard).

Setting

ORAL Scan, ORAL Sync and ORAL Standard were global, multicentre trials conducted across 111, 114 and 115 sites, respectively.

Participants

The trials enrolled adults with active RA and prior inadequate response to methotrexate (ORAL Scan/ORAL Standard) or ≥1 conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (ORAL Sync). Post hoc analyses included 2265 patients (1870 female and 395 male).

Interventions

Patients received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times a day, adalimumab or placebo.

Outcome measures

Efficacy outcomes to month 12 included American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, 50 and 70 responses, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR))-defined low disease activity (LDA) and remission, DAS28 (C reactive protein (CRP)) ≤3.2 and

Results

At baseline, female patients had similar DAS28(CRP and ESR), slightly higher HAQ-DI and lower FACIT-F scores versus male patients (n=395). ORs for active treatments (tofacitinib and adalimumab) versus placebo were generally >1 for ACR20, 50 and 70 responses, DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 and

Conclusions

In post hoc analyses, tofacitinib was efficacious across both sexes, with higher responses in males observed particularly for more stringent composite endpoints and patient-reported outcomes. Findings are generally consistent with studies of other advanced RA therapies. Safety and persistence were similar across sexes. Interpretation is limited by the small proportion of male patients (

Trial registration number

NCT00847613, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT00661661 and NCT00413699.

❌