Conectar
Ample evidence has shown the benefit of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in promoting learning in pre-licensure nursing students, but the evidence for practising registered nurses has not been synthesised.
To evaluate the effects of HFS training on learning outcomes and satisfaction in practising registered nurses.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for studies published in English or Chinese from database inception to 31 May 2023 (updated on 20 April 2025). All randomised controlled trials (RCT) or quasi-experiments that compared HFS training with traditional methods (e.g., lecture) for practising registered nurses and reported learning outcomes and satisfaction were included. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) and non-randomised trials (ROBINS-I). Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We followed the PRISMA 2020 guideline.
Of 1404 records, eight eligible studies (five RCTs and three quasi-experiments) involving 275 practising nurses were identified. Two RCTs had high risk of bias, while others showed some concerns or moderate risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed that HFS could promote knowledge acquisition (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI, [0.35, 0.95], p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), professional skills (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI, [0.41, 1.04], p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and learning satisfaction (SMD = 1.24, 95% CI, [0.35, 2.13], p < 0.01; I2 = 67%), compared with traditional methods. The pooled effect on self-confidence was marginally insignificant (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI, [−0.04, 1.22], p = 0.07; I2 = 67%).
Compared with traditional training methods, HFS is effective in promoting knowledge acquisition, professional skills and learning satisfaction and may enhance self-confidence among practising nurses. To strengthen the evidence base, more rigorous RCTs with larger sample sizes, adequate reporting of HFS design, and standardised outcome measures are warranted.
PROSPERO (CRD42022358717). No Patient or Public Contribution.
To evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions on functional status, quality of life and readmission rates of stroke patients.
Quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.
Studies with interventions to ease the hospital-to-home transition of stroke patients that were delivered by multidisciplinary teams consisting of registered healthcare professionals from at least two disciplines were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for quality appraisal.
Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for randomised controlled trials delivering transitional care interventions to hospitalised stroke patients.
Thirty-one randomised controlled trials were included in the final review. The studies featured multidisciplinary teams of two to nine professionals, most commonly nurses, physicians and physiotherapists. Although multidisciplinary care improved functional status and quality of life scores, the impact on readmission rates was inconclusive. Meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in functional status when care involved physicians, care coordinators (often nurses) or had teams of more than two healthcare professionals. Significant improvement in quality of life was also reported when care involved physicians or in teams with more than two healthcare professionals.
Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions show promise in improving functional status and quality of life after stroke. Their effectiveness depends on team composition and coordination, particularly the inclusion of physicians and care coordinators. Future research should address reporting gaps and evaluate broader strategies to reduce hospital readmissions.
Impact (Addressing)
What problem did the study address? ○
The effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions for stroke patients.
○Evaluated the role of various healthcare professionals within these teams.
What were the main findings? ○
Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions significantly enhance stroke patients' functional status, especially within the first 3 months.
○Teams with care coordinators (often nurses) and supportive physicians improve functional outcomes, with effective communication being crucial despite underreporting of specific practices.
○Teams comprising of more than two health professionals can significantly improve stroke patients' functional status.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○
Healthcare institutions and providers: The findings can guide healthcare institutions in developing and implementing effective transitional care services for stroke patients.
○Stroke patients: Patients receiving multidisciplinary transitional care are likely to experience enhanced functional recovery and improved ability to perform daily activities.
○Policymakers and researchers: The study highlights the need for more detailed reporting and research on communication practices within multidisciplinary teams and the importance of evaluating underreported outcomes like readmission rates.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Virtual reality-reminiscence therapy (VR-RT) has increasingly been applied to older adults to improve psychological well-being and cognition.
This review aims to identify (1) the design characteristics of conducting a VR-RT and (2) the effects of VR-RT on the user experience, cognitive outcomes and psychological well-being.
Systematic review.
Eligible studies were sourced across nine electronic databases, trial registries, grey literature and hand-searching of the reference list. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Twenty-two studies were included, and most were appraised as high quality. Most of the VR-RTs were highly immersive and personalised, with participants having the autonomy of control. VR-RT has the potential to improve anxiety and depression, and cognitive outcomes for older adults. Overall, VR-RT was reported to be an enjoyable experience for older adults.
VR-RT is a promising innovation that can improve older adults' psychological well-being and cognition without significant side effects, including cybersickness and with the potential for scalability across various settings. More randomised controlled studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-RT and its features and treatment dosage. These studies could also examine the effectiveness of VR-RT as an intervention to promote independence in activities of daily living and physical rehabilitation.
VR-RT is a promising intervention for older adults in community settings to enhance psychological well-being and cognition. VR's versatility enables personalised experiences within dynamic virtual environments, possibly enhancing engagement and therapeutic outcomes.
This systematic review did not directly involve patient or public contribution to the manuscript.
FreshRSS