Conectar
To explore the experiences of and reasons for midwives leaving practice.
A qualitative approach applying a social constructivism interpretative framework.
Twenty participants were selected for interviews based on reasons for leaving midwifery practice between October 2022 and April 2023. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes, and results were checked for trustworthiness through a third coder, community engagement and member checking with two participants.
One overarching theme with six subthemes characterised the experience of leaving midwifery practice. All participants reported the overarching theme: Caring for myself and my close community became incompatible with the work of midwifery. Five subthemes reflected negative aspects of midwifery work: value incongruence; racism in midwifery; not feeling respected/valued (+compensation); high workload leading to low quality of care; negative practice climate and psychosocial safety climate. The theme of strong professional commitment and identity weighed into their decision to leave. Negative experiences working in birth centres were prominent across themes.
Participants reported leaving the profession of midwifery when they reached an unsustainable balance between the demands of work life and personal life. The decision to leave midwifery was emotional; participants maintained a strong connection to midwifery. The leaving process supports a theoretical premise for midwifery turnover behaviour. The work life of midwives is a complex composite of challenges that are reflective of identified problems with maternity care in the United States.
Midwives are not leaving practice because they want to leave midwifery but because they are unable to meet non-work-related caring demands. Family-friendly policies, such as flexible schedules and leave policies, could help retain the midwifery workforce.
Based on recommendations from representatives of historically marginalised groups within the midwifery community, we offered participants to be interviewed by a midwife of colour.
To explore the perceptions and experiences of students raising concerns during pre-registration health and/or social care training in England.
Systematic review.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO and Education Research Complete were systematically searched for studies published between September 2015 and August 2024. Grey literature searches were conducted using Google Scholar and ETHOS British Library. Reference lists from included studies were hand searched.
Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for the conduct of systematic review informed conduct and the convergent integrated approach. Mixed methods appraisal tool was used for quality appraisal.
Eleven studies were included. Synthesis of findings generated three themes: (1) conflicting needs of self and others, (2) navigating the professional workspace and, (3) ‘choice to voice’.
Speaking up and raising concerns as a pre-registration student is a complex, multi-faceted and non-linear social phenomenon. Experiences and perceptions are impacted by the novice student position alongside individual, interpersonal and organisational factors. Open cultures within teams and organisations, leadership, support and feedback may enable students overcome barriers to raising concerns.
Raising concerns may reduce avoidable harm. Pre-registration students offer a ‘fresh pair of eyes’; however, they face barriers related to their student position. Synthesis of speaking-up experiences and perceptions of students in English settings can inform the design of learning environments which equip pre-registration students with the knowledge and skills required to cultivate safety behaviours. These skills contribute positively to safety culture and support learning and improvement in complex systems such as health and social care.
The review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines.
The conceptualisation of this project was informed by engagement events with higher education staff, students and Freedom to Speak Up Guardians.
Emergency Departments face increasing pressure due to rising patient demand, complex presentations, and resource constraints, resulting in long waits and extended stays. Nurse-initiated protocols enable nurses to commence investigations and treatments based on clinical guidelines, improving care and efficiency. Despite evidence supporting their effectiveness, few nurse-initiated protocol implementation strategies are grounded in behaviour change theory. This gap may contribute to limited uptake, as many initiatives fail to address the complex factors influencing clinician behaviour.
To develop a behaviour change theory-informed implementation strategy to enhance the uptake of nurse-initiated protocols in the emergency department.
A framework-based intervention design was used.
The Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the implementation strategy. Barriers and enablers identified through prior research in 2023 using surveys and focus groups were mapped to relevant intervention functions. Behaviour change techniques were selected based on their potential to address barriers or strengthen enablers. The APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side effects, and Equity) were applied to optimise feasibility.
Nine barriers and ten enablers to nurse-initiated protocols use were identified and categorised using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) framework and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eight intervention functions were selected and mapped to 24 behaviour change techniques and 23 delivery modes. The key implementation strategies are education, clinical champions, documentation changes, audit and feedback, and leadership engagement. Stakeholders confirmed the feasibility of the selected strategies.
Theory-informed, context-specific strategies are essential for implementing nurse-initiated protocols in emergency departments. This approach enables the design of targeted, feasible interventions that directly respond to identified barriers and enablers. Future research should test context-specific implementation strategies, assess their long-term impact on healthcare outcomes, and evaluate their scalability across diverse healthcare settings.
By targeting the behavioural determinants of clinician practice, this study fills a critical gap in implementation science within emergency nursing. This study identified 24 behaviour change techniques across eight intervention functions to support nurse-initiated protocol uptake. Strategies such as education, clinical champions, and audit provide a practical, replicable framework to overcome barriers, enhance autonomy, and reduce care delays. Findings support sustainable implementation in emergency settings, with future research needed on long-term impact and scalability.
There is no EQUATOR guideline available for this study.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
FreshRSS