Conectar
To explore individual and organisational factors affecting near-miss reporting in healthcare settings.
Systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Five electronic databases from 2013 to 2024 studies published were searched.
A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus and OpenAlex, covering English, full-text literature from 2013 to 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies investigating factors influencing near-miss reporting in healthcare. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. Data were synthesised using the Health Belief Model and the Hospital Patient Safety Culture framework.
A total of 20 studies were included. Key individual barriers to near-miss reporting included a lack of knowledge and negative perceptions. Organisational factors, including hospital safety culture, leadership support, error communication, and non-punitive responses to reporting, significantly impacted reporting behaviours.
Promoting a structured and supportive reporting culture, educational initiatives, and simplified reporting mechanisms can improve near-miss reporting practices.
Improving near-miss reporting practices by addressing identified barriers can lead to safer healthcare environments and better patient outcomes.
This paper addresses a gap in the literature regarding near-miss underreporting. The findings will have an impact on healthcare administrators, healthcare professionals, and ultimately, patients. Implementing strategies such as peer mentoring and constructive feedback, targeted training and simplified reporting systems can encourage consistent near-miss reporting. These efforts will ultimately lead to safer healthcare environments and improved patient outcomes.
The review methodology, including data selection, extraction and synthesis, follows PRISMA standards to ensure clarity, transparency and reproducibility.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This systematic review has been registered with the OSF and is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EJGY2
To explore the factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in hospitals for people with intellectual disability: using a realist lens.
A qualitative study using a realist lens.
Data collection involved one focus group interview and three semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals working in hospital or community settings in September 2023. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and findings were mapped to the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework across the dimension's context, implementation and setting.
Healthcare professionals support the provision of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals as a person-centred approach to caring for people with intellectual disability. While reasonable adjustments are evident in practice, they are mostly individual-level cases with little evidence of strategic system-level implementation. The factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in practice were conceptualised using the CICI framework. Context factors spanned the domains of epidemiological (e.g., ageing population), socio-cultural (e.g., historical healthcare), political (e.g., lack of integrated care pathways) and ethical (e.g., provision of person-centred care). Implementation factors spanned the domains of strategies (e.g., leadership strategies), agents (e.g., liaison and advocacy roles) and outcomes (e.g., individual-level reasonable adjustments). The setting for the complex intervention was the acute hospital. System-level indicators for successful implementation include intellectual disability specific policies/procedures for integrated care pathways, education and awareness training for hospital staff, and leadership strategies such as the development of liaison nursing roles and the appropriate allocation of physical and human resources.
A radical change is needed where implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals are broadened beyond isolated individual-level cases to system-level healthcare. This research highlights the importance of exploring the integrated dimensions of context, implementation and setting in complex interventions such as reasonable adjustments and sets foundation for further implementation research in this area.
Reasonable adjustments at the system-level within acute hospitals would promote person-centred care and help address the inequities and health disparities experienced by people with intellectual disability. This research uses a realist lens to explore the factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in acute hospitals for people with intellectual disability. The factors influencing the implementation of reasonable adjustments in practice were conceptualised using the CICI framework across the dimensions of context (domains epidemiological, socio-cultural, political and ethical), implementation (domains strategies, agents and outcomes) and setting. System-level indicators for successful implementation include intellectual disability specific policies/procedures for integrated care pathways, education and awareness training for hospital staff, and leadership strategies such as the development of liaison nursing roles and the appropriate allocation of physical and human resources. This research highlights the importance of exploring the integrated dimensions of context, implementation and setting of complex interventions such as reasonable adjustments and sets a foundation for further implementation research in this area.
This research adhered to the Equator research reporting guideline: standards for reporting qualitative research.
A parent of a child with intellectual disability was involved in the conduct of this research, specifically in the design, data collection and preparation of the manuscript.
FreshRSS