Conectar
To examine factors, including symptom burden profiles and self-care, associated with quality of life among individuals with heart failure and multimorbidity.
A cross-sectional design.
353 adults aged 50 years or older with heart failure and at least one additional chronic condition were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital. Three symptom burden groups were identified (low, moderate, and high) through latent profile analysis of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores. The Heart Failure Self-care Index and EuroQoL-5D-5L measured self-care behaviours and quality of life. This study examined group differences and associations overall and stratified by symptom burden groups via multivariable linear regression.
A higher disease burden and the high symptom burden group compared to the low symptom burden group were associated with lower quality of life. Self-care maintenance was positively associated with a higher quality of life, but not in the high-burden group. Among individual symptoms, pain and depression were associated with lower quality of life. In the high-burden group, older age was positively associated with quality of life. Higher symptom burden groups included a greater proportion of women and middle-aged adults.
Symptom burden and self-care maintenance show significant associations with quality of life in multimorbidity. Symptom burden profiles identified through latent profile analysis may complement conventional approaches by targeting high-risk individuals, such as middle-aged individuals and women with high symptom burden, for follow-up and integrated multimorbidity management.
For healthcare providers, including nurses, these findings underscore the importance of holistic, symptom-based care approaches combined with routine support for self-care maintenance. Adopting a life-course approach, through early identification and management of high-risk individuals, may help promote aging in place with a better quality of life for those with heart failure and multimorbidity.
STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
The rise in smartphone use presents opportunities and challenges in clinical settings. Despite guidelines restricting mobile phone use, nurses frequently rely on them for various purposes. While beneficial, smartphone use poses risks to information security, patient safety, and care quality, prompting the need for monitoring.
This study examined smartphone usage among nursing students and their perspectives on acceptable and unacceptable use during clinical placements.
This cross-sectional study used convenience sampling to recruit undergraduate nursing students from five universities in Australia and New Zealand. Participants completed the Attitude Towards Digital Device Use during Clinical Placement (Adduct) Scale online between September 2021 and August 2022. The survey included closed and open-ended questions. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted using SPSS. Exploratory factor analysis identified attitudinal dimensions, while group comparisons assessed demographic variations. Qualitative responses were thematically analysed. Reporting followed the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).
Among 279 respondents, drawn from an eligible population of 2682 students, the response rate was 10.4%. Age significantly influenced perceptions of unacceptable smartphone use. Younger students (mean age = 25.0, SD = 9.8) were more likely to view such use as acceptable, with those up to 21 years reporting higher scores on the Unacceptable Use sub-scale compared to older peers (p = 0.024). Most respondents found smartphone use beneficial for accessing information and learning, though concerns included distractions and confidentiality breaches. Younger students were at greater risk of non-adherence to guidelines.
Smartphones can enhance learning and efficiency, but clear guidelines and education are needed to balance benefits with risks, particularly for younger students.
This study highlights the need for clear guidelines and structured training to balance educational benefits of smartphone use with the risks of distraction and breaches of patient confidentiality in clinical practice.
No patient or public pontribution.
To identify latent profiles of insomnia, fatigue, recovery, psychological distress and burnout among hospital nurses; examine variations in personal and work-related characteristics across profiles; investigate associations between profiles and outcomes such as patient care quality, nursing work satisfaction and workplace satisfaction; and assess the moderating role of organisational support on these relationships.
A cross-sectional descriptive study.
This study analysed survey data from 2488 hospital nurses using latent profile analysis, multinomial logistic regression and hierarchical multiple linear regression.
Four well-being profiles emerged: low, average, above-average and high well-being. Profiles differed significantly in personal and work-related characteristics. Nurses in the high well-being profile were associated with better patient safety, care quality and satisfaction. Organisational support moderated the negative associations between low well-being profiles and nursing work and workplace satisfaction.
Tailored interventions addressing factors associated with low well-being and enhancing organisational support may be beneficial for improving nurse well-being, delivering high-quality care and supporting nurse retention in sustainable healthcare environments.
Healthcare organisations should prioritise nurse well-being through targeted interventions, adequate staffing, recovery opportunities and stress management resources to support a resilient and sustainable workforce.
The findings revealed the diversity of well-being patterns among hospital nurses and provided insights for identifying subgroups at higher risk of impaired patient safety, reduced care quality and dissatisfaction with nursing work and the workplace. Greater organisational support was associated with weaker negative relationships between poor well-being and nurse outcomes.
STROBE guidelines.
No direct patient or public contribution.
Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring has been used in patient deterioration recognition systems for decades. For patients on supplemental O2, questions related to the effectiveness of this approach have been raised due to elevation of SpO2 from O2 therapy. We examine this issue in the context of a stable inpatient continuous pulse oximetry-based rescue system with the aim of ascertaining if patients receiving supplemental oxygen are at risk of experiencing clinically meaningful delays in deterioration recognition as compared to patients on room air.
Retrospective observational analysis.
Clinical markers of deterioration recognition timeliness and impact were compared for patients receiving various levels of supplemental oxygen and those on room air over 6 years. Chart review was conducted to assess cause and likelihood of preventability and improvement in detection with other monitoring modalities for emergent cases.
Analysis adjusted for patient characteristics, and population level supplemental oxygen use showed no difference between patients on supplemental oxygen vs. room air for transfer rate, emergent transfer rate, or death after rescue or transfer. Analysis excluding population supplemental oxygen modeling showed limited increases in event likelihood, but not for emergent transfers. Chart review of emergent transfers revealed no pattern of delay in recognition of deterioration for patients on supplemental oxygen.
This study found no evidence that pulse oximetry-based continuous monitoring significantly degrades or delays detection of severe deterioration episodes for patients receiving supplemental oxygen. These findings challenge arguments suggesting pulse oximetry is not an appropriate continuous monitoring modality for general care patients receiving oxygen.
This study provides clinical nurses with information about using continuous monitoring when caring for patients who are receiving supplemental oxygen in the general care setting. The study also assesses patient safety of the practice of using pulse oximetry for monitoring in this patient population.
This study addresses concerns related to using continuous pulse oximetry monitoring for deterioration detection when patients are receiving supplemental oxygen. This study found no evidence that pulse oximetry-based continuous monitoring significantly degrades or delays detection of severe deterioration episodes for patients receiving supplemental oxygen. The results can be used by the inpatient nursing community to ensure safe practices are in place for patient care.
This study adheres to the STROBE reporting method.
Patient and/or public contribution was not deemed applicable for the rigorous design and execution of this study.
To explore the experiences of significant others of patients with severe burn injury in the intensive care unit. Specifically, how severe burn injury impacted the significant other and their role within their loved one's life.
This qualitative study employed a Narrative Inquiry approach.
Interviews were undertaken during 2021–2022 with 17 participants who were the significant others of a patient with severe burn injury in the Intensive Care Unit. Recruitment occurred in New South Wales, Australia, from two tertiary hospitals providing care for people with major burns. A narrative inquiry approach was utilised, capturing stories through semi-structured interviews.
Significant others experienced necessary changes in their life in response to the catastrophe. These included advocating, being present and ensuring their loved one's needs were met, while often neglecting themselves. Significant others contemplated their future as a carer to their loved one with severe burn injury, and adjusting their own career, finances and lifestyle, often as a long-term measure. The shifting of their role to carer ultimately transformed and redefined their relationships and lives.
Significant others endure immense trauma when a loved one sustains a severe burn injury. They require support but prioritise the patient by virtue of their critical illness. The life of the significant other is changed as they take on the role of carer and provide support. It is, therefore, imperative that the support needs of significant others are recognised, understood and addressed to ensure their well-being while processing the trauma.
With increased understanding of the significant others' experiences, healthcare providers can adopt a consultative approach, where roles and boundaries can be clearly identified. Through this process, healthcare providers can strengthen rapport and provide targeted support for significant others, as they navigate this traumatic life-altering event.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify: (1) current evidence and gaps of PhD program components influencing PhD students' career outcomes; and (2) methods and tools used to assess the relationships between PhD program components and career outcomes.
PRISMA scoping review.
Search terms included PhD nursing students, PhD education, PhD-prepared nurse, PhD in nursing, nursing faculty, and assistant professor. Studies empirically assessing PhD program components and career outcomes (e.g., desires, attitudes, actual employment) were included. Two researchers conducted screening, data extraction, and inductive content analysis.
PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL in October 2025, without year and geographic location restrictions.
The search yielded 379 studies. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, 13 studies were included. Analysis resulted in 10 factors spanning four categories: program preparation, readiness and satisfaction, impressions of the faculty role, and program support.
Experiences in the PhD program likely influence students' desire to pursue academia. While this review synthesized influential factors, given significant gaps in the literature, there are likely more factors influencing student career desires. A more robust understanding of the factors during the PhD program which influence career outcomes is needed.
This study did not include patient/public involvement in design, conduct, or reporting.
The aim of this study was to understand student perspectives regarding an interprofessional education (IPE) innovation using a single standardised patient (SP) in a large-group setting for a pain management and substance use simulation.
A qualitative descriptive design was used.
Students representing eight health science programs from four universities were invited to participate in a simulation-based IPE program blending asynchronous and synchronous learning. DNP students were one of the largest professions represented (n = 92, 30%) along with students enrolled in Doctor of Pharmacy (n = 111) and Doctor of Medicine (n = 69) programs. Students were invited to complete a post-activity survey asking what parts of the IPE activity were most valued and what could be improved. Student responses were themed using a qualitative descriptive approach with inductive coding and constant comparison.
Of 304 participating students, 155 (51%) responded to one or both open-ended questions. Respondents highly valued interprofessional team diversity. Responses highlighted the importance of: (1) using simulation with student teams to foster active learning, (2) student preparation using relevant curricular resources and (3) grounding interprofessional collaboration activities in student engagement and professional respect.
Findings confirmed that a cost-effective IPE activity using one SP within deliberately planned interprofessional activities can be engaging and meaningful. Students valued team-based collaboration across the disciplines of nursing, pharmacy and medicine.
Educators gathered evidence on the merits of a replicable, cost-effective IPE structure intended to expand team-based simulation learning opportunities. High-priority public health topics such as pain and substance use require multidisciplinary, integrative care to maximise health outcomes. To better prepare nurses and their health science collaborators, novel pedagogy in IPE may optimise student learning experiences.
We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
Health sciences faculty served as facilitators in the IPE sessions. Facilitators were provided 1 h of training and observed student team breakout rooms to ensure that students were engaged and understood the assigned task. They provided feedback to session leaders after the sessions.
To investigate international evidence on home visits and parenting interventions delivered by nurses and midwives and to identify core components, such as intervention content, programme characteristics, contextual factors and implementation elements shared by effective interventions.
Scoping Review.
Nine academic databases and grey literature were searched between June and August 2024 for studies published between 2020 and 2024.
Screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers using covidence. The intervention characteristics were described using the TIDieR framework, and the content was analysed thematically.
Of the 3217 screened studies, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The studies employed various designs, including RCTs, quasi-experimental, cohort, cross-sectional, register-based and single-case experimental studies. Interventions were typically guided by theories of human ecology, attachment and self-efficacy. Most used structured materials and were delivered via face-to-face home visits by trained nurses, starting during pregnancy and continuing for up to 2 years. Visits ranged from weekly to monthly, mainly to family homes. Interventions were often tailored to family needs and cultural contexts. Five core themes emerged: (1) parenting education, (2) maternal and infant health, (3) mental health and psychosocial support, (4) community connections and (5) cultural sensitivity.
Effective interventions should be early, structured and tailored. Integrating parenting education, health, mental well-being and cultural sensitivity improves outcomes and scalable family care practices.
Findings highlight the need for structured training and support for nurses and midwives. Integrating these interventions into routine services, with attention paid to equity and proportionate universalism, can enhance family outcomes.
This review addressed the lack of clarity regarding what makes nurse- or midwife-led interventions effective. It identified key components that support child and family well-being and offers guidance for designing scalable, evidence-based interventions in maternal and child health services.
The EQUATOR guidelines for PRISMA were met.
No patient or public contributions.
Patient mental state deterioration presents significant challenges in acute hospital settings, affecting outcomes, increasing reliance on restrictive interventions, and placing additional strain on healthcare staff. Despite its prevalence, consensus on best practice remains limited. The De-escalation, Intervention, Early Response Team (DIvERT) is a pilot rapid response system introduced to improve early identification, enable timely interventions, reduce crisis incidents, and support ward staff in caring for patients with mental state deterioration.
A realist evaluation approach was used to test, validate, and refine program theories explaining DIvERT's mechanisms. Data collection included a cross-sectional survey, semi-structured interviews, field observations, a medical record audit, and incident report analysis. Analysis was guided by the Context-Mechanism-Outcome framework to explain DIvERT's effective functioning in responding to patient deterioration.
DIvERT facilitated early intervention through multidisciplinary collaboration, though organisational factors such as staffing constraints, workload pressures, and inconsistent assessment practices influenced effectiveness. Key mechanisms included structured escalation pathways, clinical skills, staff training, and interprofessional collaboration. Challenges included limited after-hours availability, reflecting the constraints of a pilot initiative, underreporting of incidents, and hierarchical decision-making. While causation cannot be directly established, trends indicate DIvERT was associated with fewer Code Grey responses, particularly during initial episodes of mental state deterioration.
This realist evaluation highlights the value of structured escalation pathways, multidisciplinary collaboration, organisational support, and tailored training in managing mental state deterioration. Preliminary trends suggest DIvERT may enable more proactive and timely early intervention, whereas traditional reactive hospital emergency response for aggression (Code Grey) was more often linked to repeat incidents. Workforce constraints and inconsistent assessment limited effective functioning, underscoring the need for strengthened training, integration into workflows, and improved after-hours coverage to support scalability and long-term success.
This study demonstrates that a proactive rapid response model (DIvERT) can strengthen the recognition and management of mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings. By formalising escalation pathways, improving interdisciplinary collaboration, and tailoring training to staff needs, the model supports safer and more timely responses to patient deterioration. Embedding such approaches into organisational workflows has implications for patient safety, staff confidence, and system efficiency.
The study addressed the challenge of inconsistent and reactive responses to patient mental state deterioration, which are often reliant on crisis interventions such as Code Grey. DIvERT facilitated early intervention through structured escalation processes, improved interdisciplinary collaboration, and enhanced staff skills. However, organisational barriers such as workforce constraints, after-hours gaps, and inconsistent use of mental state deterioration assessment tools limited its effective functioning. Findings are directly relevant to clinicians in acute hospital settings (particularly nursing and allied health staff), hospital administrators responsible for patient safety and workforce planning, and policymakers overseeing standards for recognising and responding to acute deterioration. The results highlight where investment in training, structured escalation systems, and organisational support can reduce reliance on restrictive interventions and improve both patient and staff safety.
This evaluation adhered to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) II reporting standards for realist evaluations, as outlined in the EQUATOR Network guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of infrared (IR) devices versus the traditional palpation technique for first-attempt success of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in adults.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CINAHL was conducted on 28 May 2024 and included articles in English or French published from 1st January 2000 onwards.
Eligible studies included RCTs comparing IR devices with the traditional palpation method for PIVC insertion in adults. The primary outcome was first-attempt success. Secondary outcomes included overall success, number of attempts, cannulation time and patient pain. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool, and a random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.
Five RCTs were included, involving 690 patients and 704 catheters, including 289 PIVCs in patients with Difficult Intravascular Access (DIVA) criteria. First attempt insertion success was similar when using infrared devices (139/331, 42%) and traditional palpation (143/373, 38%) with Risk Ratio (RR) 1.08 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.70). No significant statistical differences were noted in secondary outcomes: overall insertion success, number of attempts, time to cannulate and patient pain. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity were substantial (primary analysis I 2 = 83%).
Current evidence does not support the systematic use of infrared devices to improve PIVC insertion success, reduce the number of attempts or alleviate patient pain compared with traditional palpation in adults. Further high-quality studies with suitable sample sizes and varied populations are needed to better establish the potential place of infrared devices.
This study highlights the limited benefit of IR devices in routine clinical practice and underscores the need for further research into their use in specialised settings.
No Patient or Public Involvement. This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To analyse the dimensions of the omission of nursing care in emergency departments, including its attributes, antecedents, and consequences, using Walker & Avant's concept analysis method.
Methods: Walker and Avant's eight-step method defined attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the omission of nursing care in emergency departments.
A comprehensive literature review was conducted using CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Health Management Database, and Cochrane Library, covering publications from 2001 to 2024. The search was conducted in August 2024.
Key attributes were delayed, incomplete, or interrupted care, mostly due to insufficient staffing or unpredictable patient volumes. Antecedents included high workloads, inadequate skill mixes, and understaffing. Consequences were increased patient morbidity and mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. A research gap exists in paediatric-specific measurement tools.
Identifying dimensions of omitted nursing care in emergency departments informs interventions to improve patient safety and care quality. Developing paediatric-specific measurement tools is essential.
The findings emphasise the need for improved staffing and resource allocation policies, reducing risks to patients and enhancing nurse satisfaction.
This study addressed the gap in understanding omitted nursing care specifically in emergency departments. Findings highlight systemic issues impacting patient outcomes and nurse well-being. The results will guide organisational improvements and future research globally.
This study adhered to EQUATOR guidelines, following Walker and Avant's method for concept analysis.
This study did not include patient or public involvement.
This study underscores the critical impact of the omission of nursing care (ONC) in emergency departments (EDs) on patient safety, nurse well-being, and healthcare efficiency. ONC contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, and adverse events, highlighting the urgent need for improved staffing models and resource allocation. Training programmes should equip emergency nurses with prioritisation strategies to mitigate care omissions. Policymakers must recognise ONC as a key quality indicator, ensuring adequate workforce support. Additionally, this study identifies a gap in measuring ONC in paediatric EDs, calling for the development of tailored assessment tools and further research on intervention strategies.
The Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version was designed to assess cancer-coping self-efficacy in clinical and research settings where minimising patient burden is essential. However, there is no evidence of its longitudinal validity. Although widely used in cancer research, the lack of evidence for longitudinal invariance significantly undermines its validity in studies spanning multiple time points. Establishing longitudinal invariance enables valid comparisons over time, enhancing our confidence in applying it in longitudinal research.
To examine the factor structure of the measurement and test its longitudinal invariance across four time points in cancer patients experiencing moderate-to-high symptoms during curative cancer treatment.
A longitudinal psychometric evaluation.
This is a secondary data analysis of a randomised controlled trial in patients with moderate-to-high symptoms undergoing cancer treatment (N = 534). We conducted longitudinal invariance tests for the measurement using four time points. Other psychometric tests included confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analyses and correlations.
Our confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor, 12-item structure for the Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version. Items 1 and 6 were found to be moderately correlated. The resulting 12-item measure demonstrated good internal consistency, with convergent and divergent validity supported by correlations with selected instruments. Finally, longitudinal invariance was tested, which revealed strict measurement invariance across four time points (CFI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.045, SRMA = 0.056).
We found that the factor structure of the Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version remained stable over four time points in a sample of patients having moderate to high symptoms under cancer treatment. This supports its accountability for examining the changes in cancer-coping self-efficacy among cancer patients over time in longitudinal studies.
This study confirms that Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version has adequate internal consistency and demonstrated evidence of construct validity. Our conclusion of strict longitudinal invariance supports its credibility for continuous assessment of cancer-coping self-efficacy to evaluate patient outcomes and intervention processes over time in clinical and research settings.
No patient or public contribution.
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the relationship between patient falls, Morse Fall Scale (MFS) items, patient demographics, length of stay and hospital site.
Data were acquired from 72 hospitals in a health system. Logistic regression models were conducted including MFS items, demographics, length of stay, and interaction terms. The final mixed effects logistic regression model included significant patient-level covariates as fixed effects and hospital site as a random effect.
6531 of 978,920 total admissions included a patient fall. Four MFS items (fall history, secondary diagnosis, gait weak/impaired, mental status—overestimates/forgets limitations) and three demographic items (male gender, increased age, longer length of stay) were associated with increased likelihood of falling. Two MFS items (ambulatory aids, intravenous therapy/lock) and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with decreased risk of falling. An interaction effect was present between male gender and mental status. Males who overestimate/forget limitations had 3.16 times higher odds of falling than females oriented to their own ability. The proportion of variance in falls between hospitals was 0.23 and the median odds ratio (MOR) 1.57.
This study uniquely assessed fall risk at the level of the patient and hospital, using data from nearly 1 million admissions at 72 hospitals. Controlling for patient characteristics, results demonstrate variability in fall risk among hospitals. Research informing hospital differences as well as gender and racial/ethnic differences in falls is needed to identify appropriate interventions.
As hospitals increasingly adopt risk-directed fall prevention, assessment tools should be re-evaluated for clinical utility and corresponding prevention practices. The MFS may be enhanced by removing intravenous lock as a risk and screening for additional risks such as medications and medical equipment. Quality improvement efforts must also consider the hospital's environment and processes that may further contribute to fall risk.
Authors adhered to STROBE guidelines for reporting.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Managing patients' mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings is a critical challenge, requiring prompt specialised intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes. Current responses vary widely across health systems. Integrating rapid response systems that incorporate mental health expertise offers a promising approach to reduce risks and adverse outcomes.
To evaluate how a response system manages patient mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings, focusing on the mechanisms driving system effectiveness, for whom it works and under what circumstances, using a realist-informed theory-testing approach with field observation.
We conducted non-participant field observations in one trauma and one surgical unit over 4 months to examine the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes shaping a mental state deterioration response system. Observations captured multidisciplinary interactions, escalation processes and decision-making. Structured field notes were thematically coded using a realist framework to refine program theories and identify key factors influencing timely intervention.
Twenty responses were observed, most in the trauma unit. The system worked best when bedside nurses escalated early signs of deterioration, prompting timely intervention. Multidisciplinary collaboration involving nurse unit managers, liaison psychiatry, doctors and allied health professionals activated mechanisms of integrated assessment and coordinated care, enabling both medical and mental health needs to be addressed. Competing medical acuity demands at times reduced system availability. Teleconferencing supported specialist input when in-person attendance was not possible, ensuring person-centred care.
System functioning depended on early risk communication by bedside nurses and proactive multidisciplinary collaboration. Organisational support and staff training are essential to address operational challenges. Findings provide evidence for strengthening response systems to deliver timely, comprehensive interventions that improve physical and mental health outcomes.
DIvERT (De-escalation, Intervention, Early, Response, Team) is a proactive rapid response model of care piloted to improve the management and outcomes of patients experiencing mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings. The model achieves this through structured escalation pathways, proactive interventions and coordinated multidisciplinary collaboration to integrate medical and mental health care. Strengthening organisational support and staff training further reduces reliance on restrictive practices and promotes safer, person-centred care.
What problem did the study address? Acute hospitals face persistent challenges in responding to patient mental state deterioration alongside medical acuity, with existing rapid response systems often insufficiently integrated with mental health expertise. What were the main findings? Field observations of the DIvERT model demonstrated that proactive integration of mental health expertise, supported by organisational investment in training, clear escalation protocols and multidisciplinary collaboration, enabled earlier intervention and more coordinated responses. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? These findings have implications for acute hospital services, informing system-level improvements to rapid response models that support patient safety, reduce adverse events and improve staff wellbeing.
This study adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines. Specifically, reporting followed the RAMESES II (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards II) reporting standards, which provide criteria for transparent and rigorous reporting of realist evaluation methodology.
No patient or public contribution.
Analyse the concept of expertise among practicing clinical nurses in hospital settings.
The generational loss of expert clinical nurses was exacerbated globally by the novel coronavirus. This ongoing loss combined with the increased complexity of hospitalised patients has prompted an urgent need to understand expertise among clinical nurses who practice in hospital settings.
Walker and Avant's concept analysis method was used. PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and Access Medicine were searched (1982–2025) for research studies and literature reviews published in English that addressed clinical nursing expertise in hospitals.
Expertise is the knowledge and skills that are enculturated from immersion in a domain. Common attributes include obtaining salient information from different sources, interpreting patient situations rapidly and holistically, and performing actions that are individualised, immediate and appear instinctive. Common antecedents include deliberate accumulation of relevant experience and contextual connections within the hospital. Facilitating improved outcomes and facilitating improved outcomes are common consequences.
The attributes, antecedents and consequences of clinical nursing expertise are complementary and cross specialties. Experts' apparently instinctive actions are not intuitive but rather related to relevant past experiences, pattern recognition and skilled know-how. The requirements to develop expertise have evolved with the increased volume of available knowledge.
Expertise requires cultivating relevant experiences through active engagement with patients and creating contextual connections with others regarding hospital systems and processes. Experts should be formally included when developing processes and guidelines. Low-fidelity proxy measures like years of experience should be replaced with psychometrically validated instruments to measure expertise.
This concept analysis addresses the ambiguity of clinical nursing expertise by synthesising over 40 years of literature and provides insights for clinical nurses and researchers regarding the importance of context and the growing complexity of care delivery.
No patient or public involvement.
To explore patients' experiences of participation in surgical wound care and provide an in-depth understanding of their experiences with post-operative wound care during and post-hospitalisation.
A descriptive qualitative study.
Adult participants who had undergone surgery within 30 days were purposively selected from two surgical wards at Gold Coast University Hospital. Seventeen semi-structured phone interviews were conducted using a specifically developed and piloted interview guide. Textual data were analysed using inductive content analysis.
Three main categories were identified. The first category, ‘I didn't expect how distressing post-operative wound care would be; it's tougher than I thought,’ highlights the significant and unexpected physical and emotional challenges participants faced, which initially hindered their engagement. The second category highlights the impact of healthcare professional interactions on patient participation, ‘I want to be involved, but conflicting advice and dismissive behaviour discourage me.’ The third category, ‘With my family's help, wound care got easier as I tried, learned, and recovered,’ illustrates how family support facilitated participants' independence and engagement over time.
The spectrum of patient participation in surgical wound care is dynamic and impacted by environmental, physical and psychological factors. This research deepens understanding of patient participation by highlighting the importance of family support and a temporal perspective in patients' wound care journeys.
Findings showed participants were unprepared for surgical wound care, greatly influenced by healthcare provider communication and family support, and evolved in participation as time passed and their wounds healed. Additionally, participants valued intent just as significantly as their behaviours and regarded even minor involvement as totally participative. These insights can inform strategies to improve patient participation in surgical settings.
SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research).
No patient was involved in this study.
To explore the perceptions of primary care nurses regarding their skills and the challenges they face in managing paediatric obesity.
Qualitative descriptive study.
Data were collected between May 2022 and March 2024 from focus groups with primary care nurses (n = 25) and analysed using thematic analysis.
Four themes emerged from the data. ‘Nurses’ beliefs, skills and tools to manage pediatric obesity’ highlights the skills and limitations nurses encounter in their practice, their views on the causes of this condition, and how they assess families' motivation. The second theme, ‘Nurse-family-child communication’ describes the communication strategies nurses employ when interacting with motivated and unmotivated families. The third theme, ‘The impact of nursing interventions on family behavior’ highlights the limited results behavioural changes observed in families following interventions. The fourth theme, ‘Nurses' reactions to the treatment of pediatric obesity’ reflects the negative feelings nurses experience in managing paediatric obesity.
This study identifies significant challenges for nurses in addressing paediatric obesity, particularly in communication and engagement with unmotivated families, which might stem from a lack of tools. Furthermore, it recognises the emotional responses of nurses when tackling obesity.
This study highlights the needs related to nurses' communication skills. It is recommended to implement training courses focused on this topic.
Adherence to COREQ guidelines was maintained.
There was no patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS