In 2022, the WHO conditionally recommended the use of treatment decision algorithms (TDAs) for treatment decision-making in children
Within the Decide-TB project (PACT ID: PACTR202407866544155, 23 July 2024), we aim to generate an individual-participant dataset (IPD) from prospective TB diagnostic accuracy cohorts (RaPaed-TB, UMOYA and two cohorts from TB-Speed). Using the IPD, we aim to: (1) assess the diagnostic accuracy of published TDAs using a set of consensus case definitions produced by the National Institute of Health as reference standard (confirmed and unconfirmed vs unlikely TB); (2) evaluate the added value of novel tools (including biomarkers and artificial intelligence-interpreted radiology) in the existing TDAs; (3) generate an artificial population, modelling the target population of children eligible for WHO-endorsed TDAs presenting at primary and secondary healthcare levels and assess the diagnostic accuracy of published TDAs and (4) identify clinical predictors of radiological disease severity in children from the study population of children with presumptive TB.
This study will externally validate the first data-driven WHO TDAs in a large, well-characterised and diverse paediatric IPD derived from four large paediatric cohorts of children investigated for TB. The study has received ethical clearance for sharing secondary deidentified data from the ethics committees of the parent studies (RaPaed-TB, UMOYA and TB Speed) and as the aims of this study were part of the parent studies’ protocols, a separate approval was not necessary. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at local, regional and international scientific meetings and conferences. This database will serve as a catalyst for the assessment of the inclusion of novel tools and the generation of an artificial population to simulate the impact of novel diagnostic pathways for TB in children at lower levels of healthcare. TDAs have the potential to close the diagnostic gap in childhood TB. Further finetuning of the currently available algorithms will facilitate this and improve access to care.
The AMBulatoRy blOod preSsure In older Adults (AMBROSIA) study cohort was designed to determine whether ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) is useful for identifying older adults with hypertension taking antihypertensive medication who are at increased risk for falls. The association of home BP monitoring (HBPM) with falls was assessed in an ancillary study (AMBROSIA-HOME).
AMBROSIA was a prospective observational study of adults aged 65 years and older taking antihypertensive medication for hypertension. Participants were recruited from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), an integrated healthcare delivery system, and enrolled from May 2019 to November 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics and geriatric assessments were collected over the course of two consecutive study visits. Participants completed a 24-hour ABPM and 1 week of HBPM. Over the following year, falls were assessed using a monthly falls calendar, and serious fall injuries were assessed from the KPSC electronic health record (EHR).
We enrolled 670 participants; 656 completed 24-hour ABPM and 536 also completed HBPM. The mean (SD) age of the AMBROSIA cohort was 75 (6) years, 16% were over 80 years of age and 56% were female. There were 13% non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, 22% non-Hispanic Black, 18% Hispanic and 44% non-Hispanic White participants. Nearly 72% had mild cognitive impairment, 50% were pre-frail and 4% were frail. Overall, 87% of participants returned all monthly calendars during follow-up.
The AMBROSIA cohort can be updated with longitudinal data from the EHR including antihypertensive medication to explore the relationship of fall risk and white coat effect, defined as the difference between clinic BP and out-of-clinic BP, BP variability over 24 hours and postprandial BP decline with antihypertensive medication intensification during follow-up. Additionally, the cohort can be updated to include outcomes data from the EHR such as cardiovascular events to examine BP phenotypes as potential predictors of cardiovascular events.
The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate the association between health anxiety and self-triage decisions among emergency department non-urgent patients.
Cross-sectional single-centre study
Emergency department in the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Australia
Between 13 December 2022 and 30 August 2023, an exhaustive recruitment strategy was deployed to recruit 400 patients. Eligible participants were patients aged 18 years or above who belonged to the Australasian Triage Scale category four or five (non-urgent), were physically and mentally capable of participating in the study and presented to the emergency department between 6:00 a.m. and 23:00 p.m. during the study period.
The primary outcome was accurately self-triaged decisions, while the secondary outcome was inaccurately self-triaged decisions, including both overtriaged and undertriaged decisions. Self-triage decisions were assessed using six hypothetical medical scenarios.
Regression results revealed that health anxiety was not associated with accurately self-triaged decisions. However, compared with non-urgent patients exhibiting no health anxiety, those in the third and fourth quartiles (the upper two quartiles) of the Whiteley Index-6 were expected to make 0·29 (95% CI 0·09 to 0·50) and 0·25 (95% CI 0·07 to 0·44) more overtriaged decisions (mean=0·42; SD=0·71), respectively. In contrast, negative associations between health anxiety and undertriaged decisions were observed. Subgroup analyses by age showed statistically significant associations between health anxiety and inaccurately self-triaged decisions among the older adult patient group (aged 35–79 years). Moreover, analyses stratified by sex revealed that female and male patients in the fourth quartile of the Whiteley Index-6 were expected to make 0·26 (95% CI 0·02 to 0·49) and 0·27 (95% CI 0·05 to 0·48) more overtriaged decisions, respectively, compared with those with no health anxiety.
Our results suggest no significant association between health anxiety and accurately self-triaged decisions. In contrast, health anxiety was associated with inaccurately self-triaged decisions. This implies that patients with health anxiety overestimate the need for healthcare and therefore could substantially impact the misuse of health services, particularly emergency departments.
Patients undergoing chemotherapy often experience side effects during treatment, including psychological distress and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Interventions during chemotherapy that divert attention from potentially aversive environmental factors have been demonstrated to have a beneficial impact on these symptoms. Virtual reality (VR) offers the potential to visually and audibly disengage from the surrounding environment and can create an alternative sense of presence. This could facilitate the implementation of active guided interventions that may prove more effective than receptive interventions, such as listening to music. The present study examines the feasibility, acceptance and effectiveness of a VR intervention and a music intervention during chemotherapy.
The single-centre three-arm, randomised-controlled trial investigates the efficacy of a VR mindfulness intervention and a music intervention in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either (a) the VR mindfulness intervention, (b) the receptive music intervention or (c) the standard care (control group) in two consecutive chemotherapy sessions. A comprehensive psychological assessment and self-ratings using visual analogue scales will be conducted with situational anxiety as the primary outcome measure. Additionally, secondary measures will be employed to assess cancer-related anxiety, self-efficacy and chemotherapy-related side effects. Furthermore, salivary cortisol, heart rate and blood pressure will be recorded. At the end of the study, an evaluation questionnaire will be completed. It is planned to enrol 82 patients.
The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf (2022-1880). Written informed consent is obtained from the patients prior to participation. The results will be published in international scientific, peer-reviewed journals. Conference presentations are also planned.
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029738).
by Maureen A. Griffin, William T. N. Culp, Amandeep S. Chohan, Eric G. Johnson, Michelle A. Giuffrida, Carrie A. Palm, Robert B. Rebhun, Michael S. Kent
ObjectivesThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of vasodilator administration on CT angiography (CTA) prostatic artery diameter and peak opacification in dogs with prostatic carcinoma prior to prostatic artery embolization (PAE).
Materials and methodsA prospective clinical trial was performed. Ten dogs with naturally occurring prostatic carcinoma and no evidence of cardiovascular disease were enrolled. Each dog underwent multiphase CTA of the prostate before and after IV vasodilator (glyceryl trinitrate [GTN] or clevidipine butyrate [clevidipine]) administration, and cardiovascular parameters were monitored. PAE was performed the following day. Prostatic arterial anatomy was characterized by CTA. Prostatic artery lumen diameter and peak opacification were measured on pre- and post-vasodilator CTA by a blinded radiologist. The percent change of these measurements was calculated and assessed for significance.
ResultsGlyceryl trinitrate and clevidipine were administered in 5 dogs each with subsequent blood pressure reduction documented in all dogs. No significant difference was detected in prostatic artery diameter or peak opacification between pre- vs. post-vasodilator CTA. Good agreement in prostatic arterial branch number, origin, and course was documented between pre- and post-vasodilator CTA images.
Clinical significanceStudy findings do not support the routine use of vasodilator administration during pre-PAE CTA in dogs, though larger sample sizes and protocol alterations may be needed to detect a clinically relevant utility.