The gig economy is a promising arena to reduce unemployment and provide other benefits such as the opportunity to earn supplemental income. Like all other forms of work, the gig space also presents occupational health issues for those working in it. This proposed review is aimed at identifying and describing the common occupational health outcomes reported within this workforce; second, to examine the risk factors that contribute to the development of these health issues; and third, to assess the interventions and support systems currently in place to promote the occupational health of gig workers.
A systematic review will be undertaken according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (2009). A search from 2015 to 2025 will be conducted on four global databases (Web of Science, SCOPUS, Academic Source Complete and Business Source Complete). Only records in English, full text and peer-reviewed journal articles will be included. Book chapters, thesis, reports and systematic reviews will be excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools will be used to assess the methodological rigour of various studies prior to inclusion for the final analysis. The extracted data will be synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach, integrating findings from both quantitative and qualitative studies.
This research is exempt from ethics approval because the work will be carried out on published documents. We will disseminate this protocol in a related peer-reviewed journal.
CRD420250654059.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that impairs the quality of life of affected paediatric patients and their families. Dupilumab, an antagonist of the shared alpha chain subunit of the cytokines interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, has revolutionised the management of moderate-to-severe AD by effectively targeting type 2 inflammation. However, live attenuated vaccines, including live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs), are contraindicated during dupilumab therapy owing to limited safety data. This restriction poses challenges to immunisation strategies, particularly in paediatric populations. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAIV in paediatric patients with AD undergoing dupilumab therapy.
This multicentre, prospective, single-arm, open-label trial will enrol 50 paediatric patients aged 2–18 years with AD undergoing dupilumab treatment. The participants will receive intranasal LAIV, followed by a 25-week observation period after vaccination. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with a four-fold or greater increase in haemagglutination inhibition titres against influenza strains A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B at 4 weeks post vaccination. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of influenza and systemic or local adverse events, such as injection site reactions, fever and other influenza-like symptoms observed within 4 weeks of vaccination. Exploratory endpoints include the evaluation of immunosuppressive markers such as neutrophil counts, lymphocyte subsets and serum immunoglobulin G levels. Safety analyses will assess the frequency of each adverse event, whereas efficacy analyses will focus on immunogenicity and influenza incidence during the 25-week follow-up period. This study aims to provide critical safety and immunogenicity data to guide immunisation strategies in biologically treated paediatric patients with AD.
This study complies with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethics approval from the Institutional Review Board of Chiba University Hospital as a specified clinical trial. Informed consent and assent will be obtained as appropriate based on the participants’ ages. These findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences to inform clinical vaccination strategies for biologically treated populations.
jRCTs031240442.
More than one-third of all diseases in the world are non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and poorer health outcomes are linked to low health literacy (HL), in which nurses have a significant role to play. Various studies have confirmed that there is an association between HL and NCDs. However, less is known about how nurses can intervene in the development of HL in patients with NCDs. This systematic review was carried out to explore, in a comprehensive way, nursing interventions that could promote HL in patients with NCDs.
A systematic review (PROSPERO registration number: CRD370625) was carried out on five databases (PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect and JSTOR). Sequences that provided information for our study topic were retrieved and analysed following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews.
In total, 1915 titles and abstracts were screened, 71 articles were assessed in full-text screening and 25 studies were included in the review. Around 23 different nurse-led intervention strategies were identified, but only 11 major ones were explored in detail. The majority of them prioritised communication (teach-back), self-management programs, counselling and education. In the majority of the trials, a significant positive outcome was discovered. Both nurses and patients needed to devote time and attention to the complex nurse-led HL interventions.
Nurses' HL interventions have shown promise in promoting HL and other health outcomes in people with NCDs, but they need to be tailored to fit specific patients. Nursing programs should include more than just patient teaching strategies.
Nurses' HL efforts hold potential for enhancing HL in NCD patients, provided they are customised to individual needs.