Conectar
This scoping review investigates the use of point-of-care infrared thermography devices for assessing various wound types. A comprehensive search across four databases yielded 76 studies published between 2010 and 2024 that met the inclusion criteria. The review highlights thermography applications in burns, surgical wounds, diabetic foot ulcers, pressure injuries, and other lower limb wounds. Key findings indicate its effectiveness in detecting early signs of inflammation and healing delays, facilitating timely interventions. The technology shows promise in accurately predicting wound healing trajectories and assessing treatment outcomes. Recent advancements have made thermographic devices more affordable and user-friendly, expanding their clinical potential. However, challenges persist, including reimbursement, training requirements, and integration with electronic medical records (EMRs), with EMR integration identified as a critical barrier to widespread adoption. While preliminary findings are promising, the current evidence base is constrained by small sample sizes, retrospective study designs, and limited consideration of skin tone variability. Large, prospective studies are essential to validate the clinical utility of thermography in wound care and to inform the development of standardised protocols that support equitable, bias-reduced assessment across diverse populations. Addressing these gaps is critical for advancing research, enhancing clinician training, and improving patient outcomes in wound care. Overall, point-of-care thermography demonstrates significant potential to enhance wound assessment and monitoring, thereby elevating care quality and patient outcomes.
Open incision negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combines delayed closure with negative pressure to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). Its effectiveness in preventing SSI remains unclear, complicating its risk–benefit assessment. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant English studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts using the ASReviewer tool. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eight studies were included in the systematic review and five were pooled in the meta-analysis. Data extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model for SSI occurrence. Eight studies (three RCTs and five cohort studies) with 1655 patients were included. Studies were pooled based on control interventions: primary closure (PC) or delayed primary closure (DPC). Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates favoured NPWT over PC for SSI reduction (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02–0.87). No significant SSI risk difference was found between the NPWT and DPC groups (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06–1.27). Preventive NPWT is associated with a reduced risk of SSI in abdominal surgery compared to PC. Our findings indicate that standardising treatment and reporting protocols could improve future evaluations of NPWT effectiveness.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024401669
Background and aims: Bacteria in wounds can lead to stagnation of wound healing as well as to local or even systemic wound infections up to potentially lethal sepsis. Consequently, the bacterial load should be reduced as part of wound treatment. Therefore, the efficacy of simple mechanical wound debridement should be investigated in terms of reducing bacterial colonisation. Patients and methods: Patients with acute or chronic wounds were assessed for bacterial colonisation with a fluorescence camera before and after mechanical wound debridement with sterile cotton pads. If bacterial colonisation persisted, a second, targeted wound debridement was performed. Results: A total of 151 patients, 68 (45.0%) men and 83 (55.0%) women were included in this study. The male mean age was 71.0 years and the female 65.1 years. By establishing a new analysis method for the image files, we could document that the bacterial colonised areas were distributed 21.9% on the wound surfaces, 60.5% on the wound edges (up to 0.5 cm) and 17.6% on the wound surroundings (up to 1.5 cm). One mechanical debridement achieved a significant reduction of bacterial colonised areas by an average of 29.6% in the wounds, 18.9% in the wound edges and 11.8% in the wound surroundings and was increased by performing it a second time. Conclusions: It has been shown that even a simple mechanical debridement with cotton pads can significantly reduce bacterial colonisation without relevant side effects. In particular, the wound edges were the areas that were often most contaminated with bacteria and should be included in the debridement with special attention. Since bacteria remain in wounds after mechanical debridement, it cannot replace antimicrobial therapy strategies, but offer a complementary strategy to improve wound care. Thus, it could be shown that simple mechanical debridement is effective in reducing bacterial load and should be integrated into a therapeutic approach to wounds whenever appropriate.
This study aimed to develop atorvastatin-loaded emulgel and nano-emulgel dosage forms and investigate their efficiency on surgical wound healing and reducing post-operative pain. This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in a surgical ward of a tertiary care hospital affiliated with university of medical sciences. The eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older who were undergoing laparotomy. The participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three following groups of atorvastatin-loaded emulgel 1% (n = 20), atorvastatin-loaded nano-emulgel 1% (n = 20), and placebo emulgel (n = 20) twice a day for 14 days. The primary outcome was the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation (REEDA) scores to determine the rate of wound healing. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and quality of life were the secondary outcomes of this study. A total of 241 patients assessed for eligibility; of them, 60 patients completed the study and considered for final evaluation. A significant decrease in REEDA score was observed on Days 7 (63%) and 14 (93%) of treatment with atorvastatin nano-emulgel (p-value < 0.001). A significant decrease of 57% and 89% in REEDA score was reported at Days 7 and 14, respectively, in atorvastatin the emulgel group (p-value < 0.001). Reduction in pain VAS in the atorvastatin nano-emulgel was also recorded at Days 7 and 14 of the intervention. The results of the present study suggested that both topical atorvastatin-loaded emulgel and nano-emulgel 1% were effective in acceleration of wound healing and alleviation of pain of laparotomy surgical wounds, without causing intolerable side effects.
FreshRSS