Conectar
To review current evidence on the implementation and impact of virtual nursing care in long-term aged care.
An integrative rapid literature review.
Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Ageline and Scopus.
The review included studies involving virtual care interventions provided by nurses (or by a multidisciplinary team including nurses) to older people in residential aged care that reported health outcomes or stakeholder experiences. Consistent with PRISMA guidelines, databases were systematically searched in July and August 2024, focusing on literature published since 2014. Studies were screened in Covidence by three team members, with conflicts resolved by additional reviewers. Studies not involving nurses or not set in aged care were excluded.
The search identified 13 studies, which included quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method approaches, conducted in both Australian and international settings, as well as in rural and metropolitan locations. Nurses were often involved as part of an existing virtual care programme, typically located in a hospital setting. The training and credentials of nurses delivering VN varied in terms of specialisation and advanced practice. The model of care in general was ad hoc, though in some cases there were regular, scheduled VN consultations. The time requirements for onsite staff and nurses were not well articulated in any of the studies, and information on the funding models used was also lacking.
There is some evidence that VN interventions in aged care may improve communication, enhance person-centred care and reduce emergency department presentations and hospitalisations.
Rigorous, ongoing evaluation of VN interventions is required to ensure their appropriate application in residential aged care.
To identify illegitimate tasks performed by registered nurses (RNs) in surgical care and explore why they perform them through the lens of gender theory and nursing history.
A qualitative study guided by gender theory, nursing history and the Fundamentals of Care framework.
RNs (n = 48) at three surgical wards attended a lecture on gender theory and a lecture on nursing history, each followed by focus group interviews (n = 12) with 6–8 participants. The analysis included two steps: (A) a content analysis of the interviews to identify illegitimate tasks and (B) a gender analysis using Connell's framework and nursing history.
The RNs describe their work situation in clinical practice as fragmented by illegitimate tasks. The results show how this can be explained as induced by gender theory and nursing history, with the main theme RNs support overall patient care and work climate at the cost of nursing care—a behaviour explained by gender theory and nursing history, presented in four categories: (1) performing administrative tasks and information processing outside the nursing profession, (2) maintaining a pleasant workplace, (3) being constantly available, facilitating and compensating for physicians and (4) backing up nursing assistants.
Contemporary RNs frequently utilise their resources to carry out a wide range of illegitimate tasks. The findings illustrate that RNs remain influenced by their history and still integrate traditionally female-associated tasks and behaviours into the workplace, often without conscious awareness. This knowledge can be used to understand why RNs perform illegitimate tasks without being asked to do so. Primarily, managers and also RNs must consider their complex situation from this perspective to implement systematic organisational changes that ensure patients receive the nursing care they need.
There is a global shortage of registered nurses (RNs). Patients suffer from missed nursing care. RNs describe their work as fragmented, with frequent interruptions and illegitimate tasks they feel expected to prioritise, even if not prompted by routines or requests. RNs are influenced by nursing history, integrating traditionally female-associated tasks and behaviours into the workplace, often subconsciously. When nurse managers and RNs become aware of these problems, it can pave the way for change, which can free up nursing resources and improve patient care. By becoming aware of what constitutes illegitimate tasks and understanding why nurses perform them, organisational changes can be made to fully utilise RNs' competencies. The findings point to a systemic issue that calls for strategic leadership from managers to drive substantive change.
To clarify the concept of disempowerment in adults with chronic illness.
The Walker and Avant approach to concept analysis was used.
A systematic literature search was performed on 14 February 2024, using the following databases: CINHAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global A&I: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection. Studies examining adults' experience of individual disempowerment stemming from chronic illness were included. Definitions and descriptions of the concept in the included studies were extracted and synthesised into defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences.
Forty-five articles were included. Two defining attributes were identified: (1) diminishing opportunities to take control and (2) clients' dissatisfaction with diminishing control. Antecedents were changes in health status related to chronic illness and expectation mismatch within the client, or between clients and their care partners. The consequence of disempowerment was disengagement in the context of disempowerment.
Disempowerment was found as the state of dissatisfaction with diminishing opportunities to control personal lives, which stems from changes in health status and expectation mismatch and leads to disengagement in the context of disempowerment. Contrary to prior studies, where disempowerment was often considered an outcome of an imbalanced relationship between clients and care partners, the present findings showcased disempowerment as a holistic illness experience, involving changes in health status. The understanding of disempowerment as the dissatisfaction with the situation of diminishing opportunities to take control differentiates this concept from the opposite of empowerment, which is conceptualised as clients' ability to make decisions or manage diseases. Findings further highlight the importance of understanding clients' illness experience comprehensively and providing care in a manner that is matched with clients' abilities, expectations and needs. It is suggested that operationalising the concept based on this understanding is necessary in order to understand correlations between disempowerment, its causes and consequences.
Disempowerment has been applied to describe interruptions in their states of being, perceived role performances, and independence in adults with chronic illness from diverse perspectives in the extant literature, such as the opposite of empowerment, action to take away control over personal lives and a state of diminishing ability to tackle problems. Through clarifying the concept, this article will guide the communication, measurement tool development and response in clinical practice.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS