Conectar
Investigate the perception of male accessibility to the fields of nursing practice by those studying or teaching nursing in England.
Cross-sectional survey.
Online questionnaire with three closed-scale questions and two open-text questions designed to elicit perceptions on the accessibility of men to the fields of nursing practice. The questionnaire was distributed to the staff and students at 61 nursing schools in England. Inferential and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the closed questions data and inductive content analysis was used to analyse open-text questions data.
Students (n = 52) and staff (n = 51) responded to the survey. Adult (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) and mental health (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) were perceived as the most accessible fields of nursing practice to men, and child (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) the least. Specialised practice areas in acute and emergency (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), education (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), leadership (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), prison services (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and research (Mdn = 7, IQR = 2) were rated the most accessible to men and neonatal care (Mdn = 3, IQR = 3) the least. Societal stereotyping and stigma were seen as barriers to men entering the nursing profession. The perception that nursing is a feminised profession persists and a distrust of men is associated with child nursing. Men were viewed as progressing to leadership roles with greater ease than women.
Societal level stereotyping and stigma are perceived as prevalent in nursing practice areas considered less accessible to men entering the nursing profession.
This study adds insight into the gendered nature of nursing and highlights the barriers to men entering a profession with a workforce crisis.
STROBE cross-sectional studies guidelines. COREQ guidelines for content analysis.
No patient or public contribution.
To examine if trans and gender non-conforming participants perceive greater healthcare inequities in their interactions with healthcare practitioners than cisgender sexual minority participants, and analyse free text responses from transgender and gender non-conforming participants to gain possible insight into causes of inequities.
A cross-sectional study.
An anonymous online survey of over 2800 self-selecting LGBTQI+ participants, 30% of whom identified as trans and gender non-conforming. The research team devised closed and open-ended questions about perceptions of healthcare provision and analysed quantitative responses using SPSS and open-ended data through thematic analysis.
Over half of trans and gender non-conforming participants reported having had occasion to educate healthcare professionals about LGBTQI+ identities and a majority reported that healthcare professionals made incorrect assumptions about their LGBTQI+ identity. Invalidation and pathologisation of participants' trans and gender non-conforming identity and unhelpful therapeutic approaches were some of the negative health experiences cited.
Trans and gender non-conforming populations experience significant barriers to healthcare relative to their cisgender sexual minority peers. Cisnormative thinking in healthcare practice together with a lack of knowledge of trans and gender non-conforming people's experiences leads to substandard care and acts as a barrier to disclosure and help seeking.
Culturally responsive healthcare is critical to ending health inequities experienced by trans and gender non-conforming people.
Problem addressed: Healthcare inequities among trans and gender non-conforming participants.
Main findings: Trans and gender non-conforming participants reported more negative perceptions of their healthcare experiences compared to cisgender sexual minority participants.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Healthcare educators/practitioners.
Strobe.
Members of the LGBTQI+ community were part of the research advisory group and inputted into paper authorship.
Highlights the need for training to increase cultural competency among healthcare providers.
To better develop and understand the practice of rooming-in in adult care, this study aims to explore the perceptions of the three most important stakeholders: nurses, patients, and family members.
A cross sectional survey study in a university medical centre in the Netherlands.
A convenience sample was drawn from nurses, adult patients, and family members across ten general wards. Data of patients and family members were collected through online questionnaires, developed and validated prior to the study. Their responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. For the nurses, data were obtained by analysing responses to an open-ended question from an existing questionnaire, using thematic analysis.
The sample consisted of 364 nurses, 26 patients, and 35 family members. Thematic analysis of the nursing data revealed four themes: (1) reducing the workload of nurses, (2) optimising patient recovery, (3) unclear policy and inadequate facilities, and (4) complexities for nurses. Regarding the perceptions of patients and family members, more than 75% perceived that rooming-in enhanced patients' sense of safety. Additionally, 54.1% of family members indicated that rooming-in improved their understanding of medical information. For most patients (57.7%) and family members (62.9%), the rules and conditions for rooming-in were not clear. Moreover, 65.7% of family members reported experiencing physical burden. Both patients and family members rated rooming-in with a median of 8 out of 10.
According to nurses, patients, and family members, rooming-in may be beneficial in reducing nurses' workload, enhancing patient safety, and improving family understanding of medical information.
Given the ambiguity surrounding rooming-in policies in adult care, clear guidelines and their implementation are essential for ensuring their success.
Rooming-in can positively contribute to adult care by facilitating family involvement.
STROBE statement.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS