Conectar
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based nursing care. However, the quality of reporting and adherence to methodological standards in Latin American nursing journals remains unclear. This study evaluates the characteristics, reporting quality, and potential risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals.
To assess the reporting compliance and risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals.
Meta-research study.
A comprehensive handsearch of 29 Latin American nursing journals was performed covering publications from 2000 to 2024. Identified RCTs were assessed for adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines and evaluated for risk of bias. Outcomes were classified using the COMET taxonomy. A descriptive analysis was performed.
A total of 6377 references were screened, identifying 34 eligible RCTs, most published after 2018. The median CONSORT compliance was 19 reported items (IQR 16–22). High compliance (> 90%) was observed in abstract reporting items, study objectives, and participant selection criteria. However, critical methodological features such as randomization procedures, blinding, and protocol registration showed low adherence (< 40%). Risk of bias was mostly rated as having “some concerns”, largely due to insufficient reporting. According to the COMET taxonomy, the most frequently reported outcome domains were “Delivery of care” and “Physical functioning”.
Reporting compliance and risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals presents significant gaps, particularly in key methodological domains. These shortcomings hinder transparency, reproducibility, and integration into evidence synthesis. Strengthening editorial policies and enforcing reporting standards could enhance the quality and reliability of published research in Latin American nursing journals.
Nurses confront substantial daily workloads. Coping mechanisms, including resilient behaviours at both individual and team levels, are pivotal in managing these challenges. Factors like work experience can significantly influence individual resilience. Yet, team resilience among nurses remains relatively unexplored.
Our study examined perceptions of both individual and team resilience among Dutch hospital nurses. Furthermore, we investigated the impacts of hospital type, ward type and work experience.
The Employee Resilience Scale was used to evaluate individual resilience and adapted for team contexts to assess team resilience. This study was one of three conducted under a governmental research program aimed at improving patient safety in the Netherlands. A paired t-test and correlation analysis were conducted to compare individual resilience with team resilience. A separate t-test assessed the impact of ward type on perceived individual and team resilience. Finally, post hoc analyses were used to examine the effects of hospital type and work experience.
In total, 344 nurses from 25 different wards of 17 Dutch hospitals completed the survey. In general, nurses indicated to act more resilient on the individual level (mean = 3.77, SD = 0.61) compared to the team level (mean = 3.53, SD = 0.65; t = 7.25, p = 0.00). A correlation was found between perceived individual and team resilience (r = 0.53, p = 0.00). No effects of hospital- and ward type were found on both individual or team resilience. Years of work experience did not affect individual resilience but showed a significant effect on team resilience.
Dutch hospital nurses indicated they often act resilient on both individual and team levels. However, with increasing workloads in healthcare, being able to remain resilient will become increasingly challenging and important. Organisations should therefore support employees to maintain resilience by adapting their work environment to meet more employees' needs.
Investigate the perception of male accessibility to the fields of nursing practice by those studying or teaching nursing in England.
Cross-sectional survey.
Online questionnaire with three closed-scale questions and two open-text questions designed to elicit perceptions on the accessibility of men to the fields of nursing practice. The questionnaire was distributed to the staff and students at 61 nursing schools in England. Inferential and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the closed questions data and inductive content analysis was used to analyse open-text questions data.
Students (n = 52) and staff (n = 51) responded to the survey. Adult (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) and mental health (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) were perceived as the most accessible fields of nursing practice to men, and child (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) the least. Specialised practice areas in acute and emergency (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), education (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), leadership (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), prison services (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and research (Mdn = 7, IQR = 2) were rated the most accessible to men and neonatal care (Mdn = 3, IQR = 3) the least. Societal stereotyping and stigma were seen as barriers to men entering the nursing profession. The perception that nursing is a feminised profession persists and a distrust of men is associated with child nursing. Men were viewed as progressing to leadership roles with greater ease than women.
Societal level stereotyping and stigma are perceived as prevalent in nursing practice areas considered less accessible to men entering the nursing profession.
This study adds insight into the gendered nature of nursing and highlights the barriers to men entering a profession with a workforce crisis.
STROBE cross-sectional studies guidelines. COREQ guidelines for content analysis.
No patient or public contribution.
To understand the social representations of bedside milk expression (BME) among mothers of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Qualitative descriptive study.
The study was conducted from July to August 2024 in two NICUs of a referral maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Nineteen mothers of hospitalised premature newborns participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and subjected to thematic content analysis.
Mothers perceived BME as a meaningful act of protection and bonding, though some were unfamiliar with the practice. Emotional ambivalence was common, shaped by prior breastfeeding experiences and the context of prematurity. Discomfort related to privacy and shared spaces was noted. Support from healthcare professionals was essential to promote understanding and adherence.
Social representations of BME are shaped by emotional, social and institutional experiences. Anchored in prior breastfeeding experiences and cultural meanings of maternal care, the practice is objectified through both gestures of affection and tangible barriers.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive training to support mothers in BME. Structural improvements, privacy and emotional support are essential for fostering maternal autonomy and confidence.
This study highlights the barriers to BME, emphasising the role of healthcare support and the need for better infrastructure, privacy and training to enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding.
The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
None.
This paper highlights the pivotal role of healthcare professional support in overcoming barriers to BME and promoting breastfeeding practices.
Fresh breast milk is considered the gold standard for reducing complications and improving survival in preterm infants. BME is recommended as an effective strategy to ensure the availability of fresh breast milk. Mothers' social representations of this practice remain underexplored within the neonatal intensive care context.
Explores mothers' social representations of BME in NICUs, addressing a significant gap in qualitative research. Reveals how emotional, social and institutional factors shape mothers' perceptions, motivations and challenges related to BME. Highlights the need for targeted professional support, improved infrastructure and privacy to enhance maternal autonomy and adherence to milk expression practices.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive specialised training to provide technical guidance and emotional support, enhancing mothers' confidence and autonomy in BME. Improving infrastructure and ensuring privacy in NICUs are crucial to creating supportive environments that facilitate milk expression and strengthen maternal–infant bonding. Institutional policies should integrate maternal-centred strategies to support breastfeeding continuity and promote humanised neonatal care.
Postpartum psychosis is a psychiatric emergency that occurs following childbirth. Women are often cared for in general psychiatric units or in psychiatric Mother and Baby units. Postpartum psychosis is associated with a significant risk of relapse. There is a need to explore how women perceive care to understand what works well or needs further improvement.
This review aimed to explore women's experiences of care and support for postpartum psychosis.
A systematic review using meta-ethnographic methods was conducted.
Comprehensive searches were conducted between 4 March 2024 and 4 March 2025 on five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science). Backward and forward chain searching was also undertaken.
Critical appraisal was conducted following screening. Reciprocal and refutational translation were used to form the synthesis, and a line of argument was developed. The eMERGe reporting guidelines were used.
Fifteen studies were included within this synthesis. All the studies were conducted in high income countries and included 235 women. Three main themes were developed. ‘Navigating the unknown’ explored women's perceptions of postpartum psychosis as a less well-known condition, and their informational needs. ‘The double-edged sword of care’ found that there were helpful elements of formal mental health care, but that accessing care was sometimes traumatic, stigmatising and conflicting to women's identities. ‘Seeking consolation and recovery’ explored women's need for psychological support and experiences of peer support.
The findings of this review highlighted women's needs in respect to informational support, medication support, psychological support and in-patient care settings. Mother and baby units were strongly preferred by women.
The findings highlighted a need for specialised care for postpartum psychosis.
There were no patient or public contributions.
Prospero (CRD42024515712)
To provide a structured analysis of the acceptability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation to support clinical conversations, decision making and recovery for older adults with aortic stenosis and their carers.
While transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an effective treatment for heart valve disease, its acceptability to patients and caregivers remains unclear. Understanding the acceptability of clinical procedures is key for influencing patient engagement in self-care and guiding the information and support patients and carers need.
A descriptive, qualitative study used deductive content analysis, guided by Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Participants included 18 aortic stenosis patients (mean age 84.2 ± 4.1 years) and 8 carers from three Australian metropolitan hospitals (2018–2020). Semi-structured interviews were conducted 4–6 months post–TAVI and transcribed verbatim. Analysis used Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability across three temporal zones, with deductive coding examining affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy.
Participants described high prospective, concurrent and retrospective acceptability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Perceived prospective acceptability framed the procedure as lifesaving. Peri-operatively, participants found the procedure simple, low-risk and minimally disruptive, ensuring high concurrent acceptability. Post-procedure, patient participants described a slow but gradual return to normal, growing confidence and a reengagement with their valued pastimes. The absence of structured rehabilitation advice led to self-designed recoveries and uncertainty about safe limits.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was perceived as a highly acceptable intervention that helped this group of mostly older adults achieve their personal goals.
Despite the minimally invasive nature of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, optimising recovery and rehabilitation requires a holistic approach that addresses both clinical needs and patient goals.
None in the conceptualisation or design.
To explore how public health nurses at child and family health clinics work to prevent maltreatment and the experiences of public health nurses in the maltreatment prevention efforts.
Child maltreatment is a serious societal issue with major consequences. Preventive efforts are increasing and have broad political support. A key objective of the child and family health clinic services is to prevent, identify, and stop maltreatment, abuse, and neglect. National clinical guidelines outline, in general terms, how such work should be conducted. However, limited research exists on how public health nurses prevent maltreatment and the effectiveness of their methods.
A qualitative and explorative design was used, based on semi-structured interviews with 14 public health nurses conducted as part of the project ‘Public Health Nurses in Child and Family Clinics' Role in Preventing and Detecting Child Maltreatment’ at Oslo Metropolitan University. The interviews were carried out between August and November 2021. We used qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach to analyse the data.
Three main categories were developed: 1. Structure and system: weaving prevention into daily practice; 2. To dare and endure: a negotiation of courage and understanding, and 3. To empower and uphold: the goal of strengthening and supporting parents. The results show the importance of early intervention, barriers to discussing maltreatment with parents, and the importance of building trust and empowering parents.
Preventing maltreatment is a key part of public health nurses' clinical work, focusing on early risk identification and parental guidance. While building trust with families is prioritised, structural, resource, and guideline-related challenges persist.
This study provides knowledge about Norwegian public health nurses clinical work with child maltreatment at the child and family health clinics, which can serve as a valuable foundation for further research as well as for collaborating services.
EQUATOR guidelines were followed, using the COREQ checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
To extract and interpret quantitative data exploring the effectiveness of family health conversations (FHCs) on family functioning, perceived support, health-related quality of life, caregiver burden and family health in families living with critical or chronic health conditions.
Addressing the health of families affected by critical or chronic illnesses requires focused attention. The effective integration of FHCs is hampered by a scarcity of rigorous quantitative studies that provide solid evidence on best practices and outcomes.
A systematic review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
The review is reported according to the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Appropriate studies were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane Databases. Results of the search were imported into the Covidence web-based program. Included were studies with a quantitative research design, delivered to families with critical or chronic health conditions, describing FHCs based on the Calgary Family Assessment Model and/or the Calgary Family Intervention Model, and/or the Illness Beliefs Model, using reliable and validated instruments, published between 2008 and 2023, and written in English.
In total, 24 papers met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen papers used a quasi-experimental design, eight of which included a control group. Two papers used a mixed methods design, and six papers were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A statistically significant effect of FHCs on family functioning was reported in two RCTs and three quasi-experimental papers. We also found that a statistically significant effect of FHCs was reported on perceived support in 9 of 15 papers, quality of life in 4 of 11 papers and caregiver burden in 1 of 3 papers.
The interventions reviewed revealed variability and partial results concerning the effectiveness of FHCs on family functioning. More rigorous research about short-term, intermediate- and long-term effectiveness is needed before conclusions can be drawn.
The study is reported according to the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) (File S1).
No patient or public contribution. Data were gathered from previously published studies.
To explore nursing professionals' perceptions of the intersectional positioning of their profession within healthcare and society, examining how axes of oppression shape healthcare responses and resource management.
A qualitative study framed in critical theory paradigm employing constructivist grounded theory, as outlined by Charmaz.
The study was conducted in Catalonia, Spain, between 2022 and 2023. A total of 26 nursing professionals participated, representing a range of professional roles and settings. Theoretical sampling guided participant recruitment and was saturated after 17 in-depth interviews and 2 thematic focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis, informed by Charmaz's approach, was applied to identify key dimensions and themes. Intersectionality theory was used as a critical analysis framework.
A predominant theme emerged from data identified as ‘intersectional disempowerment of nursing profession’. Four categories shape this positioning: (1) symbolic and historical undervaluation of care, rooted in nursing's feminization and patriarchal norms; (2) patriarchal influence on professional leadership, manifested by men disproportionately occupy leadership roles, reinforcing vertical segregation; (3) intra-professional hierarchies and technocratic influence, forcing prestige disparities within nursing and promoting horizontal segregation; and (4) internalised barriers among nurses regarding professional prestige, authority and recognition which combined undermine nursing's visibility, legitimacy and influence within healthcare.
Nursing cannot be understood as a neutral profession. Its societal positioning is deeply shaped by structural inequities, gendered assumptions and entrenched hierarchies, which collectively undermine its potential for autonomy and recognition.
This study highlights the need to challenge intersectional hierarchies in nursing, promoting equitable recognition, policy reforms and leadership opportunities to enhance nurses' authority, visibility and professional empowerment within healthcare systems. Addressing these challenges requires systemic policy reforms and a critical re-evaluation of societal perceptions. What problem did the study address? Nursing's social image is strongly shaped by biomedical, technocratic and social views. The gap between nursing's public image and identity limits professional growth and recognition. Analysing how power relations intersect in nursing's social position is essential. What were the main findings? Nursing's role is shaped by the intersection of gender, prestige, socioeconomic status and social recognition. Nurses' empowerment must be tied to transforming unjust institutions and systemic structures. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study provides a critical analysis of the intersectional positioning of the nursing profession. The findings have implications at multiple levels: micro, by offering nurses a critical perspective on their professional positionality; meso, by providing healthcare managers with insights into the underlying factors contributing to nursing's undervaluation; and macro, by fostering reflection within the broader healthcare community on the power dynamics shaping interprofessional relationships.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
The manuscript is based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
To investigate what works when using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), for whom, in what contexts, and why in four Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) programmes.
Realist evaluation.
Evaluation of Heart Failure, Parkinson's Disease, Epilepsy and Cataract surgery programmes using data from a scoping review, documentary analysis, questionnaires, quantitative routinely collected data and semi-structured interviews with staff, patients and carers (July 2022–August 2023). Programme theories and logic models were developed, tested and refined.
We conducted 105 interviews (67 patients, 21 carers and 17 staff) and collected data from 230 patients (66 Epilepsy, 140 Heart Failure and 24 Parkinson's Disease) and 14 staff via questionnaires. Clinicians used PROMs data to regularly monitor patients with Heart Failure and Epilepsy, which resulted in better triage and tailoring treatment, prioritisation of access based on the urgency of need, and facilitation of referral to relevant professionals. In Heart Failure, this further resulted in a more efficient provision of care and better use of resources, care closer to home, improved health outcomes (e.g., better symptom management) and service redesign. The same was not observed in Epilepsy, as patients who required mental health treatment had to be referred, but they were not always able to access specialist services. PROMs were discontinued in Cataract surgery services mainly due to the lack of integrated IT systems, which caused an increased workload and staff resistance. In Parkinson's Disease, patients were asked to complete PROMs even though the information was not consistently being used.
Findings challenge the orthodoxy that implementing PROMs is universally good and brings about real improvements in patient outcomes in a VBHC context. PROMs are generally ill-suited for long-term use with patients in routine care without further adaptation. Greater staff and patient involvement are imperative to enhance the acceptability and relevance of the programmes.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures can improve care when embedded in well-supported systems. Implementation must be realistic, involve staff and patients, and be underpinned by clear leadership and robust digital infrastructure. Co-designed patient-facing tools can improve accessibility and engagement.
What problem did the study address? There is limited evidence on how Patient-Reported Outcome Measures function across different routine healthcare contexts. What were the main findings? Patient-Reported Outcome Measures improved care in Heart Failure but not in other services, largely due to contextual barriers. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Findings are relevant for clinicians, service designers, and policymakers seeking to implement meaningful person-centred outcome measurement in long-term conditions.
We adhered to Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards II guidance and to the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public.
The study was developed alongside a wide range of patient and public stakeholders involved in the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Value-Based Healthcare programme, third sector and specific individuals and groups representing the four included services (i.e., St. David's Hospice Care, British Heart Foundation, Digital Communities Wales, Epilepsy Action, Digital Communities Wales, Parkinson's UK Cymru, Race Equality First, Aneurin Bevan Community Health Council, Value- Based Healthcare Patient Reference Group and Wales Council of the Blind). A total of 10 virtual meetings were strategically planned to address gaps, assist in the interpretation of findings, and ensure that outcomes were pertinent and accessible to the specific needs and circumstances of under-represented or vulnerable groups.
To explore the learning processes and prerequisites for nursing students to develop and achieve passing clinical competence, following an initial failing grade in their clinical education.
A constructivist grounded theory study was employed.
Data were collected between January 2022 and June 2024 through individual interviews with seven undergraduate nursing students retaking their clinical education in the final semester at a university in Sweden. In addition, individual interviews were conducted with four teachers in higher education and two focus group discussions, one with four teachers in higher education and another with a clinical teacher and a supervisor. The data analysis was conducted using an iterative process of constant comparison of data in different phases.
The analysis resulted in a theoretical model of person-centred learning which illustrates nursing students' learning processes and the prerequisites for them to develop and achieve clinical competence in clinical education. The model's core learning processes involve tailoring clinical education to students' needs: acknowledging one's own learning needs, receiving supervision which addresses their specific needs and having an educational institution which meets these needs are the three main learning processes that define student development. Students' acknowledgement of their personal learning needs itself entails three learning processes: trusting one's own knowledge, reflecting on and applying the nursing process, and reflecting on one's own learning. For students to progress in the learning process, prerequisites related to supervision and an educational institution meeting the students' needs must be in place.
The study provides evidence for a person-centred model which promotes nursing students' learning and development of clinical competence during clinical practice at the end of their nursing education.
This model can provide support to coordinators and supervisors in nursing education with regard to planning and implementing clinical education.
This grounded theory study provides a theoretical model for nursing students' learning and development of clinical competence during their clinical education in their final year of nursing education. A person-centred learning approach in clinical education can provide learning prerequisites for students to successfully achieve learning objectives and develop safe competences for the profession. The findings of the study can offer valuable support and direction to nursing students, educators, and clinical practice supervisors in the planning and implementation of clinical education.
The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist and the Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory Research Studies (GUREGT).
This study did not include patient or public involvement.
The interaction between dementia and changes in health status accelerates the progression of dementia and health deterioration. Although health indicators exist for older adults, comprehensive ones for dementia are lacking.
To (1) establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia, (2) develop an integrated health assessment toolkit for older adults with dementia, and (3) test the feasibility and applicability of the integrated health assessment toolkit.
This study involved two phases. In the first phase, using the Delphi method, opinions from 10 experts were synthesized to establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia. In the second phase, with a descriptive research approach, an integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, evaluated by 10 daycare case managers for feasibility, and then pilot tested with 50 older adults with dementia across three daycare centers.
The core health indicators for older adults with dementia covered 18 indicators in five domains: (1) cognitive and behavioral impairment, (2) sensory and perceptual impairment, (3) disease and dysfunction, (4) functional fitness deterioration, and (5) social isolation. After two rounds of assessments, experts rated the criteria's importance and clarity at 0.94 and 0.89 on the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA), respectively. In the second phase, the integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, which integrated five observational assessment scales and six physical function measures. The average applicability scores ranged from 7.80 to 9.90 out of 10. In the pilot test, the assessment process proceeded smoothly without any adverse events. However, 10 participants did not comply with wearing the actigraphy device.
The core health indicators and the corresponding health assessment toolkit are feasible to assess the health of older adults with dementia that could provide valuable insights and guide future interventions to enhance their well-being.
Approximately 25% of the Brazilian population suffers from mental disorders, a prevalence exacerbated by systemic and cultural factors such as socioeconomic inequalities, underfunded mental health services, regional disparities, and persistent stigma. These conditions significantly impact hospital care. Nurses, due to their direct contact with these patients, face challenges ranging from managing physical conditions to handling verbal aggression and psychiatric crises. This study aimed to assess the scientific evidence regarding nursing care for hospitalized patients with psychiatric disorders.
A systematic review with a mixed-methods approach was conducted, registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42022359288) and guided by PRISMA standards. Databases, such as MEDLINE, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and BDEnf, were searched using keywords like “Mental disorder,” “Psychiatric health,” “Nursing care,” and “Hospital.” Methodological quality was assessed using JBI and SQUIRE tools. The integration of quantitative and qualitative components occurred through meta-aggregation of qualitative data and frequency-based coding of quantitative themes, allowing thematic convergence across study designs.
Six studies were included. Meta-aggregation revealed frequent terms, such as “Nurse,” “Emergency,” “Screening,” “Patient,” and “Care.” Similarity analysis linked “Nurse” with “perception” and “experience” and “Emergency” with “Screening” and “Mental health,” highlighting the importance of experience and training. Five categories emerged: (1) professional experience (19.05%, showing skill gaps despite experience); (2) caring process (19.05%, stressing efficient screening); (3) barriers and challenges (19.05%, revealing difficulty with comorbidities); (4) training process (19.05%, identifying training deficiencies); and (5) therapeutic interventions (23.81%, discussing restraint use). These percentages refer to the proportional frequency of themes identified across the total number of studies analyzed. For thematic classification, only statistically significant chi-square values (p < 0.05) were considered in the grouping of content.
Nursing care for psychiatric patients in hospitals faces challenges like insufficient training and difficulty managing psychiatric comorbidities. Recommendations include incorporating structured mental health content into nursing curricula and hospital-based continuing education programs. These strategies may guide future healthcare policies in Brazil by improving patient safety, reducing hospital readmissions, and promoting more humane, evidence-based therapeutic interventions.
The findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted education and training to improve nursing care for psychiatric patients in hospital settings.
To evaluate the quality of care from the patients' perspective after receiving either person-centred, nurse-led follow-up or standard care after surgical treatment of intermittent claudication.
Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Patients at two centres for vascular surgery in Stockholm, Sweden were randomised to either a person-centred, nurse-led follow-up programme (intervention group) or a standard follow-up programme with surgeons. During their visits at 4 to 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery, they received the questionnaire Quality from patients' perspective with 28 items. The patients responded to each item from two aspects: (1) how they perceived the quality of received care and (2) subjective importance (how important the care was for them).
A total of 104 of 138 patients at 4–8 weeks and 159 of 193 patients at 1 year after surgery completed the questionnaire. At 4–8 weeks, the intervention group scored significantly higher perceived quality of care regarding five items: receiving useful information about “How I should take care of myself” and “Which nurse were responsible for my care”, “Nurses were respectful towards me”, “Nurses showed commitment/cared about me” and “Easy to get in contact with the clinic through telephone”. At 1 year, the intervention group scored higher regarding two items: “Which nurses were responsible for my care” and “Next of kin treated well”.
Person-centred, nurse-led follow-up as implemented in this study has been shown to lead to a higher perception of quality of care regarding information about self-care, the experience of being respected, and knowing the care provider responsible for their care. Thus, it could contribute towards improved patient satisfaction without compromising the perception of quality of care regarding other factors such as receiving the best medical care or timeliness.
This study addresses how patients with intermittent claudication, who underwent revascularisation, perceive a follow-up care that is person-centred and nurse-led compared to standard care delivered by surgeons. The results indicate that patients find the person-centred and nurse-led follow-up programme satisfactory, with equal or higher quality of care and that follow-up can be delivered by nurses with retained patient safety. Thus, vascular units may consider transitioning follow-up care from surgeons to nurses while maintaining positive patient's perception of quality of care, patient satisfaction and safety.
Reporting of the work was made using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.
No patient or public contribution.
Study Details | Person-centred Follow-up and Health Promotion Programme After Revascularization for Intermittent Claudication | ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03283358
Evidence-based interventions (EBI) can reduce nursing burnout and improve retention and healthcare quality. Nursing school is an ideal time to implement EBI to mitigate burnout and increase resilience in pre-professional populations.
The current study tested whether Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) significantly improved stress, burnout, and wellness in a university-based nursing school.
Using a non-randomized clinical trial design, multilevel modeling for repeated measures tested intervention effects over time in MBSR participants (n = 73) and matched controls (n = 73), as well as potential moderation of intervention effects by modality (online vs. in-person MBSR) and subpopulation (students vs. faculty/staff).
MBSR effectively reduced perceived stress, exhaustion, and total burnout and increased positive affect and frequency of using two key mindfulness skills: observing and nonreactivity. No significant effects of the intervention were observed for disengagement from work, satisfaction with life, negative affect, or the mindfulness skills of describing, acting with awareness, and nonjudgment. Effects were similar across modality and subpopulation.
MBSR increases stress resilience and can be delivered effectively online and in person. Moreover, MBSR appears equally impactful for nursing students and faculty/staff. Implications for integrating EBI into schools of nursing to improve well-being are discussed.
Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is a leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. Hospitals have implemented infant safe sleep programs with varying measures and degrees of success, but few have demonstrated improvements in hospital-based and home safe sleep practices with nurse subject matter experts (SMEs) and community SUID prevention campaigns.
This project evaluated the impact of a state-wide, evidence-based infant safe sleep program for birthing hospitals using nurse SMEs and a community awareness campaign on nurse knowledge, safe sleep environments, and trends in infant sleep-related deaths.
Between 2016 and 2021, a pre- and post-test quality improvement intervention-based design was used to enroll hospitals and train and embed SMEs to educate peers, conduct practice surveillance and audits, and address practice deviations. A website housed comprehensive resources, and a large-scale community-based social and print media campaign on safe sleep practices occurred. Nurse and practice data from 12 hospitals that fully implemented the program were compared pre- and post-implementation. State-wide survey data for key safe sleep indicators reported by parents were compared from our 12 birthing hospitals to other facilities.
Of trained nurses (N = 902), 83.4% reported making substantial or exceptional progress in being proactive in surveillance of safe sleep environments. Pre- and post-implementation environmental audits showed a significantly higher proportion of infants in safe sleep positions post-implementation (94.3%) than pre-implementation (89.6%) (p = 0.001). Statewide survey data from birth parents discharged from our program hospitals significantly outperformed those discharged from other state facilities. Multi-media campaigns resulted in over 1.4 million impressions on our website. Sleep-related deaths for infants born at four program hospitals dropped 16.1% from 31 in 2018 to 26 in 2021.
A safe sleep program improved hospital-based nurses' knowledge and practice and birth parent's knowledge and behaviors, and it was associated with a decrease in infant sleep-related deaths.
To evaluate the impact of a multilevel intervention in a surgical department on the segregation of non-hazardous healthcare waste (plastic and paper) during the perioperative period as well as its effect on the carbon footprint of the healthcare organisation.
A prospective before–after interventional study without a control group was carried out in the operating room of the Universitary Hospital Mútua Terrassa in Catalonia (Spain). A multilevel programme to improve the segregation process during the surgical interventions was implemented in several phases from May 2023 to December 2024. Data collection was conducted in each phase of the study through questionnaires addressed to the professionals along with calculations of the carbon footprint and the volume of waste segregation. The study is framed within the socio-ecological model and employs a collaborative design. The study population included all professionals working in the operating room (n = 320).
A multidisciplinary team was formed with consideration for all stakeholders. The project phases were implemented consecutively. A total of 141 professionals (44.4%) completed the baseline questionnaire. As a result of the project's development, the carbon footprint has been reduced to 79.1 kg CO2 eq/week, representing an 85% reduction in emissions.
The implementation of the recycling project has led to significant reductions in the amount of waste generated and it has been positively evaluated by the professionals.
The benefits of fostering a behavioural change among the professionals, coupled with the implementation of a well-designed segregation and recycling system, lead to significant benefits for the institution in carbon footprint.
Nurses can lead this type of project with a clear impact on both the institution and the environment.
Reduction of the carbon footprint in the operating room increased satisfaction among professionals for contributing to environmental improvement.
The reporting of intervention evaluation studies using nonrandomized designs: the TREND statement Des Jarlais et al. (2004) was used to evaluate the quality of the study.
N/A. Only professionals are involved in this study.
Despite a variety of literature reviews, there is limited understanding of the learning strategies healthcare professionals use to help patients adopt and maintain effective foot care practices.
To explore learning processes and educational strategies for persons with diabetes focusing on foot care and examine how different learning processes influence these strategies.
The scoping review followed the methodological framework established by Arksey and O'Malley and refined by Levac et al. Additionally, the PRISMA-ScR checklist was followed. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic Search Premier databases, using specific search terms related to diabetic foot care and learning strategies. The selection process involved screening 906 articles based on inclusion criteria such as relevance to diabetic foot care, learning processes, and educational strategies, and excluded studies that were not written in English. The data were charted and quantitative and qualitative data were synthesised and thematically analysed to identify key learning strategies.
The analysis identified two main themes: learning insights for comprehensive understanding and self-efficacy, and increased practical knowledge leads to improved footcare. Subthemes included integrative and reflective learning, motivational and collaborative learning, task-oriented and procedural learning, and feedback and reinforcement-based learning.
Effective diabetic foot care education should be multifaceted, incorporating deep learning, practical skills, and motivational elements. Early learning plays a central role in this process. Tailoring educational interventions to personal learning styles and providing continuous support can significantly improve patients' foot care outcomes. A framework for understanding the progressive stages of patient learning and self-management is presented as a starting point. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating educational models that address diverse learning needs, ultimately contributing to better management and prevention of diabetic foot complications.
To explore reasons why patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do (not) engage in fatigue-related care and their care needs.
A qualitative interview study, using a phenomenological methodological approach.
We included 16 fatigued patients with IBD in remission. Data were collected between December 2021 and March 2022, using semi-structured interviews. Template analysis was performed.
We identified six themes regarding reasons why (not) to seek care for fatigue: (1) Cognitions about fatigue and coping with fatigue, (2) perceptions of fatigue-related care and previous care experiences, (3) perceived knowledge and behaviour of healthcare professionals, (4) physical and emotional well-being, (5) social relationships and support, and (6) practical factors. Regarding their care needs, patients reported a need for a holistic and person-centred care approach, with healthcare professionals actively addressing fatigue and offering care. They suggested a range of options for what care to offer, including eliminating physical causes of fatigue, discussing medication options, providing information on fatigue management, lifestyle support, psychological support, peer support and practical support.
Both patient- and healthcare-related factors play a role in why IBD patients do (not) seek fatigue-related care. Our findings emphasise the importance of active screening and discussion of fatigue, using a holistic and person-centred approach to treat fatigue.
This study contributes to the understanding of IBD patients' facilitators and barriers for seeking care for fatigue and their care needs. Moreover, results can inform nurses and physicians about ways to optimise the offer and uptake of fatigue-related care, and the development of interventions that fit patients' needs. Results also provide implications for the treatment of fatigue in other chronic (inflammatory) conditions.
The current results can inform nurses and physicians about ways to optimise the offer and uptake of fatigue-related care, and the development of interventions that fit the needs of patients with IBD. An increase in the uptake of effective and acceptable interventions can improve patients' health and well-being.
Findings were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
No patients, service users or members of the public were involved in this study. The study focused on patients' experiences with fatigue-related care and their needs.
(1) To codesign a health literacy intervention within a specialist healthcare setting to help the parents of children with epilepsy access, comprehend, use and communicate information and (2) to assess the intervention's feasibility by exploring stakeholders' perspectives on its usefulness, ease of use of trial methods and contextual factors impacting its execution.
A codesign participatory approach followed by a feasibility approach inspired by the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access to Health Services (Ophelia) process for health literacy intervention development.
(1) The codesign approach included workshops with (a) multidisciplinary personnel (n = 9) and (b) parents (n = 12), along with (c) an interview with one regional epilepsy specialist nurse (n = 1). The participants discussed parents' health literacy needs on the basis of vignettes and brainstormed service improvements. A three-step intervention was subsequently designed. (2) The intervention's feasibility was assessed via interviews with six parents (n = 6), a focus group interview with study nurses, a short doctors survey and a log of time spent testing the intervention.
(1) The parents of first-time admitted children to a specialist epilepsy hospital were targeted for the intervention. Nurse–parent consultations were central to the intervention, activating parents in codeveloping and executing a tailored education plan. (2) Feasibility: parents (n = 6) experienced consultations and education plans that were beneficial for enhancing their self-efficacy in managing the child's condition. The study nurses (n = 3) acknowledged positive outcomes in streamlining patient education but felt that their training on the intervention methods was insufficient. Both parents and nurses identified limited personnel resources as a significant barrier to executing the intervention.
The codesigned intervention engaged nurses and parents in HL development despite system barriers. The parents experience enhanced self-efficacy in managing their child's condition. However, needs refinements and further feasibility tests are needed before future implementation.
The Consort Statement 2010 extension for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies was used to ensure the methodological quality of the study. A Consort Statement 2010 checklist is provided as an additional file.
The collaboration of parents within the target group, the providers involved and the project's steering committee was crucial in codesigning and evaluating this three-step intervention. Parents and multidisciplinary providers actively contributed through workshops, interviews and in discussion meetings. The study nurses testing the intervention played a key role in defining the documentation process for the codeveloped education plan.
This three-step health literacy intervention can positively impact parents' self-efficacy in managing their child's condition. Enhancing nurses' communication skills is essential for improving parents' health literacy, making it crucial to allocate resources for such training. The intervention content and strategies to meet parents' health literacy needs require refinement, with more provider involvement to better adapt it to the context. Future studies should focus on further feasibility testing by considering a more flexible time frame.
Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/fg9c7/
FreshRSS