Conectar
Medication administration errors are high-risk patient safety issues that could potentially cause harm to patients, thereby delaying recovery and increasing length of hospital stay with additional healthcare costs. Nurses are pivotal to the medication administration process and are considered to be in the position to recognize and prevent these errors. However, the effectiveness of interventions implemented by nurses to reduce medication administration errors in acute hospital settings is less reported.
To identify and quantify the effectiveness of interventions by nurses in reducing medication administration errors in adults' inpatient acute hospital.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted up to 03/24. Six databases were searched. Study methodology quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools, and data extraction was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed to combine effect sizes from the studies, and synthesis without meta-analysis was adopted for studies that were not included in the meta-analysis to aggregate and re-examine results from studies.
Searches identified 878 articles with 26 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Five types of interventions were identified: (1) educational program, (2) workflow smart technologies, (3) protocolised improvement strategy, (4) low resource ward-based interventions, and (5) electronic medication management. The overall results from 14 studies included in meta-analysis showed interventions implemented by nurses are effective in reducing medication administration errors (Z = 2.15 (p = 0.03); odds ratio = 95% CI 0.70 [0.51, 0.97], I 2 = 94%). Sub-group analysis showed workflow smart technologies to be the most effective intervention compared to usual care. Findings demonstrate that nurse-led interventions can significantly reduce medication administration errors compared to usual care. The effectiveness of individual interventions varied, suggesting a bundle approach may be more beneficial. This provides valuable insights for clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of tailored, evidence-based approaches to improving medication safety.
PRISMA guided the review and JBI critical appraisal tools were used for quality appraisal of included studies.
To examine whether manpower and expertise understaffing are distinct, and whether they relate similarly to nursing stressors, burnout, job satisfaction and intentions to turnover.
A cross-sectional survey of hospital nurses nested within units was used.
The sample included 402 nurses. Nurses provided ratings of the study's variables using validated self-report measures. The data were analysed both as multilevel and single-level data.
Manpower and expertise understaffing contributed unique explained variance to all of the examined outcomes. Nurses within the same units experience different understaffing levels. Expertise understaffing emerged as a significantly stronger predictor than manpower understaffing for three of the six of the outcome variables (illegitimate tasks, job satisfaction and turnover intentions).
Manpower and expertise understaffing are distinct, and both are associated with nurse outcomes.
We have adhered to the STROBE guideline for cross-sectional studies.
Considering both manpower and expertise understaffing to maintain proper staffing levels in nursing units is crucial.
A Director of Patient Care Services from the hospital where the study was conducted is a member of the research team. This member contributed to designing and conducting the study as well as interpreting the results.
To explore experiences of LGBT+ individuals in accessing and receiving healthcare in Ireland, and to identify opportunities for more inclusive and equitable healthcare delivery.
A descriptive qualitative study using asynchronous online focus groups.
Asynchronous online focus groups were conducted using the MURAL collaborative platform over a three-week period in 2023. Participants (n = 43) self-selected into one of three focus groups based on gender and sexual identity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate key themes.
Four themes were identified: (1) Culturally aware healthcare professionals; (2) Access and information; (3) Specialist versus universal services; and (4) Mental health support. Participants reported frequent experiences of misgendering, heteronormative assumptions, and provider inexperience. Geographic inequities, unclear referral pathways, and a lack of centralised, inclusive information were also key barriers. While specialist services were valued, participants advocated for a dual approach that integrates LGBT+ competence into all healthcare settings.
Despite legal and social progress, LGBT+ individuals in Ireland continue to encounter significant barriers to equitable healthcare. The findings highlight a need for improved cultural competence, better access to inclusive services, and systemic reform.
Healthcare providers must receive comprehensive training in LGBT+ health to ensure respectful, appropriate, and inclusive care. Enhanced visibility of inclusive providers and improved service pathways are needed to address current inequities, particularly in mental health and gender-affirming care.
This study identifies key gaps in provider competence, service accessibility, and mental health provision. Findings will inform healthcare education, policy development, and service design to improve experiences and outcomes for LGBT+ individuals in both urban and rural contexts.
This study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
No patient or public contribution was involved.
To describe diagnostic categories and comorbidities associated with increased risk of readmission within 28 days among older adults.
Retrospective observational study of all hospital admissions following ED attendance by patients aged ≥ 60 years between July 2020 and June 2023. Index and subsequent 28-day readmission were identified using ED data and hospital discharge records. ED diagnosis, Australian Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (AR-DRG) discharge codes, and ICD-10-AM comorbidities were extracted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations with 28-day readmission. The study and findings have been reported against the STROBE-RECORD guideline.
Of the 28,730 initial patient visits, 7.9% re-presented within 28 days. The most common ED diagnoses at initial and readmission were chest pain (5.4% vs. 4.6%), falls (5.2% vs. 4.1%), dyspnoea (3.5% vs. 3.1%), abdominal pain (3.1% vs. 3.3%) and cerebrovascular accident (1.7% vs. 1.7%). The most frequent AR-DRGs were respiratory infections/inflammations, kidney and urinary signs/symptoms, and other digestive system disorders. Key ICD-10-AM codes associated with a higher likelihood of readmission within 28 days were obstructive/reflux uropathy (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.78–3.96), urinary retention (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.38–2.46), chronic ischaemic heart disease (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10–2.25), delirium (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.71) and disorders of fluid, electrolyte, and acid–base balance (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09–1.54).
Nearly 8% of older adults are readmitted within 28 days. Our described approach offers a potential framework to identify at-risk groups and intervene to reduce avoidable representations and/or admissions.
The results reported here create the opportunity for clinicians to identify areas for improvement in clinical practice, care coordination, and service delivery. Our approach and methodology can be replicated in other health services.
No patient or public contribution.
Dynamic and complex health systems require innovative and adaptive solutions to support patient safety and achieve equitable health outcomes for Indigenous populations. Understanding the ways by which Indigenous (and specifically Māori) nurse practitioners (NPs) practice patient safety is key to enhancing Indigenous health outcomes in predominantly westernized healthcare systems.
To describe Māori NPs perspectives on patient safety when caring for Māori and understand how Māori NPs deliver safe health care.
A group of five Māori NPs worked alongside a Māori nurse researcher to explore their perceptions of patient safety. Together, they held an online hui (focus group) in early 2024. Data were analysed collectively, informed by kaupapa Māori principles, using reflexive thematic analysis.
Māori NP experiences, expressions and understandings of patient safety envelop cultural safety and have many facets that are specific to the needs of Māori populations. The three themes showed: (1) Te hanga a te mahi: the intersection of cultural and clinical expertise; (2) Mātauranga tuku iho: the knowledge from within, where safe practice was strongly informed by traditional knowledge and cultural practice; (3) Te Ao hurihuri: walking in two worlds, where Māori NPs navigated the westernized health system's policies and practices while acting autonomously to advocate for and deliver culturally safe care.
The Māori NP lens on patient safety is vital for promoting culturally responsive and effective health care. By recognizing the unique needs of Māori patients and families and incorporating cultural perspectives into practice, Māori NPs contribute to a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to patient safety that goes beyond westernized principles and practices.
No patient or public contribution.
To clarify the definition and evolution of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) and identify its attributes, antecedents, and consequences in health-related research.
This study follows Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis with a seven-step framework.
Datasets were searched using terms related to PPIE and key categories (i.e., attributes, antecedents, and consequences). Data were sourced from CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science covering publications from inception to October 31, 2024. Document titles, abstracts, and keywords were manually screened to identify relevant studies for full-text review.
A total of 1751 documents were screened, resulting in 38 eligible studies included in the final analysis. PPIE has evolved from a narrow focus on patient inclusion and participation, where patients had minimal influence on research and researchers resisted sharing control of research, to a collaborative model emphasising sustained partnerships, shared contributions, equitable power distribution, and active involvement across research stages. This shift has been driven by research innovation, a growing emphasis on healthcare equity and patient-centred care, technological advances, and stakeholder advocacy (e.g., patients, funders, ethics committees). While PPIE enhances research relevance and impact, barriers, such as resource constraints, power imbalances, patient limited research capabilities and increased researcher workload persist. Facilitators, such as training programmes, standardised guidelines, flexible arrangements and transparent communication can enable meaningful partnerships.
The concept of PPIE is evolving toward greater clarity and consistency in research, positioning patients and the public as active, essential contributors rather than passive participants. Barriers and facilitators were identified to inform its utilisation in research.
This study clarifies the conceptual ambiguities of PPIE, informs theory development, and provides actionable insights. Healthcare and nursing researchers can draw on its findings to utilise PPIE to enhance collaborative and inclusive research practices that align with the needs of patients and the public.
This study adheres to the PRISMA (2020) reporting guidelines for systematic reviews.
One of our co-authors is a patient with lived experience of cancer, who contributed valuable comments and suggestions to enhance this paper.
To provide an in-depth description of an innovative Doctor of Nursing programme which prepares nurses for senior roles in healthcare and related organisations. This programme provides nurse leaders with the knowledge and skills to advance systems through healthcare innovation design, implementation, and evaluation.
A comparison of doctoral nursing programmes, highlighting the unique aspects of the University of Calgary Doctor of Nursing programme.
The University of Calgary Doctor of Nursing programme addresses key gaps that currently exist within nursing education. Few existing programmes directly support the development of nurses as healthcare leaders and innovators. This programme enables nurse leaders to leverage their front-line experience into senior system-level leadership roles. Each core course includes a building block assignment that develops key doctoral skills: framing research questions, appraising literature, selecting methods and data, planning ethically sound projects, and translating evidence into persuasive arguments for policy or system change.
Nurses play a vital role in healthcare around the world. The University of Calgary Doctor of Nursing programme recognises the value of investing in nursing leaders and emboldening them to leverage their frontline leadership experience to advance data-driven change, innovation, and policy development in the complex healthcare systems in which they work and lead.
Currently, there is a dearth of programmes available to prepare nurses for senior leadership roles in healthcare or related organisations, despite significant demand from prospective students and employers alike. The University of Calgary Doctor of Nursing programme meets the workforce demand for a programme focused on nursing leadership, to advance health systems through skill development in systems innovation, appraisal of evidence and implementation science, as well as quality assurance/quality improvement and programme evaluation. This programme focus also better equips students to examine and evaluate systemic inequities and challenges currently facing healthcare systems, practitioners and users.
This study aimed to co-design a model of brilliant care for older people that provides clear, actionable principles to guide how brilliant care for older people can be realised.
As the demand for and international importance of care for older people grows, so too does the negative discourse about care for older people. This ongoing focus on deficiencies can have implications for patients, carers, clinicians, health services, and policymakers, overshadowing opportunities for innovation and positive change.
Experience-based co-design informed this study, grounded in the lived experiences of key stakeholders.
Three scaffolded co-design workshops were facilitated, involving lived experience experts, managers, professionals, clinicians, and an academic (n= 13). The data collected during these workshops were analysed using a qualitative descriptive method and documented according to COREQ guidelines to optimise rigour and transparency.
The participants co-designed a model of brilliant care for older people, comprising principles to promote connection and innovation. To promote connection, the model includes protecting staff member time to deliver meaningful care and demonstrating that everyone matters. To promote innovation, it encourages role flexibility, curiosity, small improvements, and the recognition of brilliant practices.
This article presents a co-designed model of brilliant care for older people, incorporating principles of connection and innovation that can be enacted through simple, resource-efficient practices.
For those who manage and deliver care for older people, the model encompasses simple, accessible, and cost-effective principles to: positively deviate from norms within the sector, offering care to older people; and to deliver brilliant care for older people. Furthermore, given that the model was co-designed with lived experience experts, managers, professionals, and clinicians, its principles are imbued with their experiential insights, which served to bring particular priorities to the fore.
The co-designers, who included lived experience experts, were invited to participate in workshops to co-design a model of brilliant care for older people, during which they discussed and critiqued the findings constructed from the data and co-designed the model.
Despite a growing multidisciplinary interest in the Child and Family Centred Care approach, its meaning remains unclear in extant literature. It is, therefore, crucial to explore, analyse, describe, and clarify the concept of the Child and Family Centred Care approach and its associated terms.
A three-phased principle-based concept analysis approach was used to analyse the concept of Child and Family Centred Care. A systematic search of literature was completed using the CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Peer-reviewed articles on Child and Family Centred Care, published from inception to 2023 were included if they were available in English and discussed children aged zero to 17 years, healthcare providers, and/or caregivers. A systematic screening of articles was undertaken to remove duplicates and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria. A concept quality criteria assessment was performed independently based on a recommended appraisal tool.
Full texts of the retained 23 titles were included in the deductive thematic analysis. Guided by the three-phased principle-based concept analysis approach, data were grouped into epistemological, pragmatic, linguistic, and logical principles. The study revealed various characteristics of the concept of interest to highlight the common terms associated with the concept, primarily being collaboration, participation, communication, and respect/dignity.
This concept analysis provides a theoretical definition of the Child and Family Centred Care approach. The definition emphasises the child as an individual and an active collaborator with healthcare providers and their family. Standardised language improving health outcomes, patient satisfaction, and healthcare systems.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore how critical care nurses access, negotiate and apply knowledge in high-pressure clinical environments, focusing on organisational, cultural and leadership factors influencing evidence-based practice implementation in acute hospital settings.
A focused ethnographic collective case study was conducted across two contrasting critical care units in England.
Methods included non-participant observation (56 sessions), semi-structured interviews (36 participants) and document review. Spradley's Developmental Research Sequence guided data generation and analysis. Data were collected over an eight-month period (February to September 2022).
Five major themes were identified: sources of knowledge and acquisition strategies; institutional and hierarchical influences on knowledge use; role of experiential knowledge and clinical intuition; challenges to evidence-based practice implementation; and strategies for integrating knowledge into practice. Organisational structures, leadership engagement, mentorship and access to updated digital resources were key enablers of evidence-based practice. Barriers included workload pressures, inconsistent guideline dissemination and hierarchical cultures. Adaptive blending of formal evidence, clinical experience and intuition characterised effective knowledge negotiation at the bedside.
Knowledge use in critical care nursing is a dynamic, relational process shaped by leadership, organisational culture and systemic pressures. The availability of evidence alone is insufficient; visible leadership, peer learning, protected educational time and valuing of experiential knowledge are critical to embedding evidence-based practice into routine practice.
Strengthening organisational systems, investing in nurse manager development, expanding simulation-based learning and legitimising experiential knowledge are vital strategies to enhance evidence-based critical care.
This study provides actionable insights for healthcare leaders, educators and policymakers seeking to optimise evidence-based practice adoption in high-acuity clinical environments and improve patient outcomes.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist guided reporting.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination of this research.
Vaccinations are essential to ensure protection for healthcare professionals, patients and communities. However, vaccination hesitancy has been reported among healthcare professionals. Nurses are the main, first and direct point of contact for patients and citizens in most healthcare services, but only a minority of studies investigated vaccination hesitancy and uptake specifically in this population. Thus, this study aimed to explore the determinants and motivations of vaccination hesitancy and uptake among nurses.
Systematic review with a narrative synthesis approach.
We included primary research exploring determinants or motivations of vaccination hesitancy or uptake among nurses. No time or geographical limit was applied. Generalised random-effects linear models with a logit link were used to calculate the pooled estimated proportions for vaccine uptake among nurses.
We explored nine databases (2023).
The initial search identified 3452 records; 42 records were eventually included in this review. Older age, longer professional experience, lack of confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and cost associated with the vaccine were among the most common determinants of vaccine hesitancy. Safety concerns, complacency (e.g., beliefs of not needing the vaccine), and accessibility (e.g., logistics) were among the most common motivations for being vaccine hesitant. Having strong confidence in the vaccine, a high sense of collective responsibility, previous vaccination uptake/positive intentions towards future vaccination, weaker vaccine complacency, and older age were among the most common determinants of vaccine uptake. Willingness to protect themselves and/or others, contribute to the herd immunity, and comply with recommendations were among the most common motivations for vaccine uptake. The pooled prevalence of influenza vaccine uptake among nurses was 44% (95% CI: 35–73).
The findings of this systematic review with meta-analysis could guide the identification of strategies to reduce barriers and further improve facilitators to eventually increase vaccine uptake in nurses.
This study contributes to further understanding nurses' beliefs, barriers, and facilitators towards vaccination. By doing so, these results could guide the identification of strategies to reduce barriers and further improve facilitators to eventually increase vaccine uptake in nurses.
We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, in particular to the PRISMA checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
PROSPERO number: CRD42020212252
The purpose of this study was to describe the strategies older adults use to maintain their balance and prevent themselves from falling in the hospital.
The Expanded Health Belief Model served as the theoretical framework for this qualitative descriptive study.
Audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 (N = 15) older adults (female 53.3%), mean age of 77 (SD 9.9) admitted to a rural community hospital in the United States. Each transcript was analysed independently by two researchers using content analysis before reaching consensus. Sample size was guided by thematic saturation. Trustworthiness was ensured by using the criteria outlined by Lincoln and Guba.
Four main themes emerged: My Balance Problem is My Personal Responsibility, Self-efficacious Common-Sense Balance Management Strategies, Hospital Staff as Contributors or Disruptors of My Balance Management, and My Needs for Balance Management Support. The older adults used extensive mental efforts in planning and executing personal strategies to maintain balance and viewed this as their personal responsibility. Their self-efficacious balance management strategies included observing the environment, assessing furniture and equipment, staying focused, and moving slowly. Assistance from hospital staff members either supported or disrupted the older adults' balance management efforts. The older adults desired to learn more about fall prevention in the hospital. The older adults found physical guidance, demonstration and verbal guidance to be the preferred method of learning.
Rurally hospitalised older adults employ independent, self-efficacious balance management strategies.
Older adults' personal balance management strategies must be recognised by healthcare workers.
Future inpatient fall prevention interventions and policies must focus on exploring hospitalised older adults' optimal and suboptimal balance management behaviours to develop patient-centred fall prevention interventions to decrease inpatient falls among older adults.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
No patient or public contribution.
A call for action has been issued nationwide to prevent suicide among nurses. An increased understanding of contributing and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation in nurses is needed to implement preventive measures. Factors needing exploration include nurses' burnout, mental well-being, physical health, and workplace characteristics.
This study aimed to determine factors associated with suicidal ideation in 501 moderate-to-high-risk nurses, including their mental health, level of burnout, health-related personal beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and workplace characteristics.
A descriptive, cross-sectional correlational study was conducted on baseline survey data that was completed before the nurses were randomized to one of two interventions as part of their participation in a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a combined mental health screening program and cognitive-behavioral skills building intervention versus a screening program alone. Nurses were recruited from across the United States via email. Only nurses identified with moderate-to-high-risk adverse mental health outcomes, including suicidal ideation, were included. The survey used valid and reliable measures to assess burnout, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress, healthy lifestyle behaviors, health-related personal beliefs, resilience, job satisfaction, self-perceived mattering to the workplace, and intent to leave. Bivariate tests were performed.
Burnout, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress were individually correlated with increased odds of suicidal ideation, as were nurses working 12-h shifts and those who reported an intent to leave their jobs. Protective factors against suicidal ideation included resilience, positive health-related personal beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, job satisfaction, and workplace mattering.
There is an urgent need for policies and implementation of evidence-based interventions to address mental health issues in nurses to ultimately prevent suicide. Burnout should be considered as a possible precursor to serious adverse mental health problems and not just an operational retention issue. Leaders need to invest in resources to enhance nurses' mental health, fix system problems that are at the root cause of burnout, routinely recognize employees for their excellent work, and communicate that they matter. Leaders should listen carefully to their nurses, prioritize their ideas for impactful change, and appreciate those who contribute to improving culture and caring practices.
Work-related stressors have been associated with physician suicide. Physician burnout and depression were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, remain unresolved and of national concern. Future pandemics are predicted. This study is the first to characterize professional and pandemic-related stressors in physician suicides during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This study aimed to evaluate whether there was a change in reported job-related stressors after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Physician suicides were identified within the National Violent Death Reporting System dataset (March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021). Free-text law enforcement and medical examiner notes for physician suicides were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Of 307 physician suicides, 70 included professional or pandemic-related stressors associated with death. Themes included pandemic-related dysregulation, financial distress, relationship issues, mental/physical/substance use problems, grief, and discipline.
While loss of employment, physical, mental health, legal, and substance use issues continue to be associated with suicide, grief and pandemic-specific stress were novel findings. Fear of disease, quarantine, and prolonged illness due to contracting COVID warrant psychological support. Psychological support is also indicated for recent discharge, grief management, transition into retirement, and during disciplinary processes. The stress of a pandemic may exacerbate previous risks. Proactive physician suicide prevention measures remain indicated.
Burnout and mental health concerns are prevalent among healthcare workers. Female physicians, nurses, and healthcare staff are at a higher risk of suicide than the general population. Burnout and depression have been known to coexist with suicidal ideation and behaviors.
To identify what is known about the relationship between burnout and depression in the context of suicide among healthcare workers.
Registered scoping review of English language articles indexed to CINAHL, PubMed, and PsychInfo databases with date of publication prior to March 5, 2024.
The review yielded nine eligible studies, all employing observational or descriptive methodologies. Depression was found to be a predictor of suicidal ideation. While burnout was associated with depressive symptoms and found to coexist with suicidal ideation, it was not predictive of ideation. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were key components of burnout linked to depression. No studies were found exploring survivorship factors in healthcare professionals. Suggested prevention strategies that need to be tested include mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral skills training, improved workplace conditions, addressing loneliness, and fostering resilience.
Interventional studies are needed to test strategies addressing burnout, depression, suicidal behaviors, and survivorship of suicide attempts. Depression should be considered and evaluated when healthcare workers exhibit symptoms of burnout. Moreover, the Socio-economic Model of Suicide Prevention (i.e., SESM) can be used to categorize suicide prevention measures in healthcare. Burnout and depression interact to influence mental health outcomes among healthcare professionals, with depression playing a more significant role in predicting suicidal ideation. Despite the demonstrated relationships, critical gaps in knowledge exist in understanding survivorship and in the development and testing of effective interventions. Future interventional multisite research is needed using validated tools to identify best practices in suicide prevention for healthcare professionals.
This study proposes an evaluation of the efficacy of machine learning algorithms in classifying chronic pain based on Italian nursing notes, contributing to the integration of artificial intelligence tools in healthcare within an Italian linguistic context. The research aimed to validate the nursing diagnosis of chronic pain and explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing clinical decision-making in Italian healthcare settings. Three machine learning algorithms—XGBoost, gradient boosting, and BERT—were optimized through a grid search approach to identify the most suitable hyperparameters for each model. Therefore, the performance of the algorithms was evaluated and compared using Cohen's κ coefficient. This statistical measure assesses the level of agreement between the predicted classifications and the actual data labels. Results demonstrated XGBoost's superior performance, whereas BERT showed potential in handling complex Italian language structures despite data volume and domain specificity limitations. The study highlights the importance of algorithm selection in clinical applications and the potential of machine learning in healthcare, specifically addressing the challenges of Italian medical language processing. This work contributes to the growing field of artificial intelligence in nursing, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities of implementing machine learning in Italian clinical practice. Future research could explore integrating multimodal data, combining text analysis with physiological signals and imaging data, to create more comprehensive and accurate chronic pain classification models tailored to the Italian healthcare system.
Background
In sub-Saharan Africa, the risk of obstetric complications remains high throughout the postpartum period.
Objective
We developed and tested a novel, integrated model of group postpartum care titled Focused-Postpartum Care (Focused-PPC) to improve outcomes. In this paper, we report clinical outcomes of participants in the intervention arm and differences in knowledge of postbirth warning signs among those in the intervention and control arms.
Methods
Focused-PPC encompassed recommended clinical assessments, targeted education, and peer support up to 1 year after birth. Focused-PPC was implemented as a parallel randomized controlled trial involving 192 postpartum women across four health centers in Tamale, Ghana, from February 2022 to August 2023. Eligible participants 18 years or older with a live birth were randomly assigned to either the Focused-PPC intervention arm or the control arm at a 1:1 allocation and were not blinded to their allocation. At each health center, 48 participants were allocated to either an intervention or control arm. Focused-PPC groups in the intervention arm consisted of eight participants per group. Participants in the intervention arm received the Focused-PPC integrated group model of care. Participants in the control arm received the standard of postnatal care already administered at each health center.
Results
Baseline analysis included 96 participants from the control arm and 91 participants from the intervention arm. We found that vital signs and clinical outcomes were relatively stable; however, incidences of hypertension substantially decreased among participants in the intervention arm. By 3 months postbirth, most participants in the intervention arm were able to identify all postbirth warning signs and retain this knowledge compared to the control arm. Those in the intervention arm were also knowledgeable of more warning signs at each time point compared to the control arm.
Discussion
An integrated, evidence-based approach to postpartum care, such as Focused-PPC, has potential to increase knowledge and improve clinical outcomes among mothers in Ghana.
To review the current evidence on mixed reality (MR) applications in nursing practice, focusing on efficiency, ergonomics, satisfaction, competency, and team effectiveness.
Mixed methods systematic review of empirical studies evaluating MR interventions in nursing practice.
The systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Studies were included if they assessed nursing outcomes related to MR interventions. Exclusion criteria encompassed reviews, studies focusing solely on virtual reality, and those involving only nursing students. The Cochrane ROBINS-I, RoB 2, and CASP tools assessed the risk of bias and methodological quality.
A comprehensive search of 12 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and others) covered literature published between January 2013 and January 2023.
Eight studies met inclusion criteria, exploring diverse MR implementations, including smart glasses and mobile applications, across various nursing specialisations. MR demonstrated potential benefits in efficiency, such as faster task completion and improved accuracy. Satisfaction outcomes were limited but indicated promise. Ergonomic challenges were identified, including discomfort and technical issues. Studies on competency showed mixed results, with some evidence of improved skill acquisition. Team effectiveness and health equity outcomes were underexplored.
While MR shows potential in enhancing nursing practice, evidence is heterogeneous and clinical relevance remains unclear. Further rigorous comparative studies are necessary to establish its utility and address barriers to adoption.
MR technology may enhance nursing efficiency, competency and satisfaction. Addressing ergonomic and technical challenges could optimise adoption and benefit patient care.
This review adheres to PRISMA guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
PROSPERO registration: #CRD42022324066
FreshRSS